Talk:Central Vermont Railway

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Trains Mid‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article lacks references.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

United States: Vermont Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Vermont portal This article is supported by WikiProject Vermont (assessed as High-importance).
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled

The CV is listed on both Template:US class 1 and Template:US class 2. Which is correct? slambo 12:28, Nov 19, 2004 (UTC)

Not sure yet, but it's certainly possible that BOTH have been true at different times. In cases like that, what do we do? I lean towards listing in just class 1 in that case. —Morven 19:56, Nov 19, 2004 (UTC)

Well, the nature of Class 1 means that at some point those railroads were Class 2. Likewise with Class 2 vs. 3. I would agree that the railroad should be listed on the highest class rating that it has qualified for. slambo 20:50, Nov 19, 2004 (UTC)

Related railroads

Logo

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Central Vermont Railway had a logo symilar to that of the Canadian National Railway ( , but using CV Peter Horn 03:05, 19 February 2008 (UTC)) Can anybody find it to include it in the article? Peter Horn 03:02, 19 February 2008 (UTC) Yes, the most recent logo used should be used and should fall under fair use.173.110.59.190 (talk) 01:50, 23 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

70 year gap

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There's very detailed info from the 19th Century but nothing from the 1920s until CN sold the line in 1995. There should be something atleast about dieselization, the GT Corporation or shipping conections. 173.110.59.190 (talk) 01:50, 23 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Talk:Central Vermont Railway

Contents

Untitled

Related railroads

Logo

70 year gap

Inline Citations????