 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
‹See TfM›
| |||||||||||
At least, the article's author admits a debate on the technology used in the construction of cage cups. This does not happen in roman cameo glasses, where proponents of flashing and cutting the blank, still holding his oppinions, without analyzing the evidence, or trying to do a replica by alternate (and more easy) methods Please see: [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.153.37.246 (talk) 00:37, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Bit removed
editI've removed "and their decoration and their inscriptions more or less refer to the transformation of Ampelos, preserved by the Dionysiaca of Nonnus. The same is true for the Lycurgus cup, as Donald Harden has shown." I can undersatand this in relation to the Lycurgus Cup, but not to the geometrical ones. Johnbod (talk) 17:50, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
- I hope to get to see the Harding "Glass of the Caesars" shortly, which will improve the referencing. Johnbod (talk) 13:55, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
- Blog discussion - some interesting points.