Talk:C. V. Raman

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Chhandama in topic Age of Raman's wife
Good articleC. V. Raman has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 12, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
October 5, 2021Good article nomineeListed
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on February 28, 2014, February 28, 2015, February 28, 2021, February 28, 2022, and February 28, 2023.
Current status: Good article

Untitled

edit

Its very nice to see the biography of C V Raman documented very well. Good Work! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.115.154.189 (talk) 00:02, 1 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Bold textthe article abbout c.v raman is very educational. I hope wikipedia brings some fantastic articles like this one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.92.199.85 (talk) 13:02, 25 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Untitled 2

edit

Shouldn't this article be at C. V. Raman instead of being here? I propose to move this article to C. V. Raman as that is the name by which he is more popularly known. - Aksi_great (talk) 21:22, 23 November 2006 (UTC).Reply

GA nomination

edit

Unfortunately, I have   failed this article's nomination for GA status, as it meets the "quick-fail criteria" (it is currently tagged with {{cleanup}}). Fell free to address this concern and try again in the future. --Agüeybaná 01:51, 12 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Schooling

edit

The article does not give the school, where he studied during his childhood. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.95.113.41 (talk) 12:07, 5 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Other discoveries

edit

He invented a kind of tasty noodles, which are named after him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.72.86.234 (talk) 16:45, 21 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.vigyanprasar.gov.in/scientists/cvraman/raman1.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:11, 23 September 2011. (UTC)

File:Sir CV Raman.JPG Nominated for Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Sir CV Raman.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Sir CV Raman.JPG)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:52, 19 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Award Added

edit

I am the program coordinator of the ACS-National Historic Chemical Landmarks program. I have added Raman's recognition as an International Historic Chemical Landmark to the list of honors and awards. KLindblom (talk) 21:56, 6 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia policy on title Sir

edit

Re recent controversy on whether or not to include the title Sir:

Wikipedia does have a policy on this subject. To quote from the Wikipedia Manual of Style/Biographies at WP:MOSBIO#Honorific titles, The honorific titles Sir, Dame, Lord and Lady are included in the initial reference and infobox heading for the person, but are optional after that. The title is placed in bold in the first use of the name. We included Sir in the initial reference (first line) and infobox heading of this article until yesterday, so I will now restore them as per Wikipedia policy. Dirac66 (talk) 12:42, 12 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Because Wikipedia has a dictatorial policy on this matter, I will avoid going into an edit-war and end my edits here. However, let me make it clear that I do not and will not agree with the 'policy' that Wikipedia seems to have dictated. I am from India and I've studied about CV Raman during my school days and I can say with confidence that no one calls or knows CV Raman as 'Sir'. For us he is just CV Raman, a highly-cherished scientist. Further, several notable individuals, including Stephen Hawking and Paul Dirac declined knighthood for various reasons, including their opposition of this whole concept. That Wikipedia has an official 'policy' encouraging use of these titles only shows that Wikipedia has already taken sides and endorsed this concept. Sigh, the West-dominated world of Wikipedia! Rishabh Singla (talk) 16:49, 12 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Copy of this page

edit

In case anyone who's edited this page is interested, http://indianscience.in/info/index.php/CV_Raman is a copy of this page that does not conform to the attribution requirements of the CC-BY-SA license, and thus violates your rights as creators of original content. Most Wikipedia editors seem to not mind too much (in fact I've heard some hilarious stories about this), but since anyone who's edited this page would be in theory entitled to file suit against the infringing content, I thought you all had a right to know. — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 18:01, 6 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hatnote confusing - what is Venkata?

edit

The newly added hatnote says In this Indian name, the name Chandrasekhara is a patronymic, not a family name, and the person should be referred to by the given name, Raman.

Does this mean that (1) Venkata is the family name, or (2) Venkata is a second given name and there is no family name?, or (3) Venkata has some other meaning? The use of Venkata is not clear (at least to non-Indians) and should be specified.

Part of the problem may be that Template:Indian name only has the given name and the patronymic as parameters. So if necessary, let's start by explaining the use of Venkata here on the talk page; then we can figure out how to put it in the hatnote or where to put it in the article. Dirac66 (talk) 23:16, 30 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Possible vandalism by anilkumaru - changing CV raman to anil upppada

This needs to be reverted — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barath s (talkcontribs) 14:19, 26 February 2015 (UTC) His name is Venkata Raman His father's name is Chandrashekhara — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alderbaraan (talkcontribs) 15:11, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Achievements

edit

Raman did not discover the inelastic scattering of light using a mercury arc lamp. The effect was discovered using the sun as the light source with a system of crossed "monochromatic" optical filters to show that some light was scattered at a different wavelength. Only once the effect had been discovered did he turn to the more convenient mercury lamp, which had the advantage of having a line spectrum, which could be adapted for use as a monochromatic light source. Petergans (talk) 07:03, 28 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Please document this and edit the article accordingly!209.86.76.247 (talk) 21:45, 28 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Opposition to nuclear weaponry?

edit

Didn't he also oppose nuclear weaponry and was awarded the melted stones from the center of the first atomic explosion by the city of hiroshima?

At least that's what a video by "periodic videos" on youtube showed

Givera (talk) 15:50, 17 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:C. V. Raman/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Article has enough information, needs to be touched and restructured. IA (talk) 21:05, 5 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Substituted at 01:10, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on C. V. Raman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:11, 11 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on C. V. Raman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:11, 20 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on C. V. Raman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:44, 9 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Chandrasekhara vs Chandrashekhara

edit

2409:4063:211A:3FE6:59F0:52A:4D2F:7294 changed the name Chandrasekhara to Chandrashekhara, even in the citations! No one seemed to notice to rectify it. Let us note that the name is Chandrasekhara for unanimity. Chhandama (talk) 16:06, 18 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Age of Raman's wife

edit

Under "Personal Life," it says:

"Raman married Lokasundari Ammal (1892–1980) on 6 May 1907. It was a self-arranged marriage and his wife was 13 years old."

1892 to 1907 would make her 15 at the time. Where does the 13 come from? 174.160.111.133 (talk) 21:14, 7 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Good question. The archived version of the cited DNB source just says "While awaiting a posting, aged eighteen, Raman met Lokasundari Ammal (d. 1980). Defying convention he insisted on marrying her," The marriage date can be deduced from Raman's age (18) and birth date (7 Nov 1888) as between 7 Nov 1906 and 7 Nov 1907, but neither his wife's age nor her birth date are given. So perhaps we should delete her age as unsourced. Dirac66 (talk) 01:20, 8 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Edited the info. In fact, there are so many contradictory sources. Most apparently, she was 13 at the time of marriage, contrary to several sources that indicate her birth in 1892. This is not to be taken as unusual in Hindu culture. Raman's brother's wife was only 11 (or so) on marriage. As to the original question, the answer is" "from the most reliable sources." Chhandama (talk) 13:32, 8 June 2023 (UTC)Reply