Talk:Bowled
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editBowled by a wide - how is this supposed to occur?Captain Pedant 13:15, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- I have no idea. The only conceivable scenario would be if he chased after a double bouncer or high lob after it had been called wide and deflected it onto his stumps; but surely any ball a batsman hits cannot be considered wide by definition! Citation needed indeed. DublinDilettante (talk) 01:09, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
It can't happen. A Wide is a ball too far away from the stumps to play at, so how can he be bowled? If he plays it on its no wide, and a waist high full toss is a no-ball. And therefore not out anyway. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.153.65.64 (talk) 07:26, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
- Removed. Law 25.8 says a batsman can only be out hit wicket, stumped, run out, handled the ball or obstructing the field on a wide. —Raven42 (talk) 19:45, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
- Bowled second behind caught as commonest way of being out? I haven't got any stats but I'd have thought it was lbw.Haldraper (talk) 09:33, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bowled. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121125070200/http://www.lords.org/laws-and-spirit/laws-of-cricket/laws/law-30-bowled,56,AR.html to http://www.lords.org/laws-and-spirit/laws-of-cricket/laws/law-30-bowled,56,AR.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:19, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Jkckvk
editNhvkj 2405:205:1483:9499:0:0:1458:80A5 (talk) 15:20, 1 October 2022 (UTC)