Talk:Aracá uakari

Primates Low‑importance

	Primates portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Primates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Primates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PrimatesWikipedia:WikiProject PrimatesTemplate:WikiProject PrimatesPrimate
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brazil Low‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This scientific name is unpublished

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

It is not a service to anyone to divulge unublished scientific names. --Wloveral (talk) 04:08, 3 May 2008 (UTC)<br /Reply

Hello, I agree, the article was based on popular science magazines and rumors. An article in the Int J of Primatol has just come up though (June). It might be interesting to add it as a reference to the page, if it is to remain. According to this article, there are now four species within the Cacajao genus: C. calvus, C. melanocephalus, C. hosomi and C. ayresi. - A Taxonomic Reassessment of Cacajao melanocephalus Humboldt (1811), with the Description of Two New Species--Espantalho (talk) 22:20, 19 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

ayresi oder ayresii

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello. The correct scientific name should be ayresi and not ayresii because Boubli uses this form in his paper abstract - I have the full paper and it clearly says ayresi. No idea why the english and every other Wikipedia uses the wrong version. Regards --80.108.59.151 (talk) 20:50, 30 November 2008 (UTC) de:Benutzer:BradypusReply

The correct scientific name is C. ayresi. I do not know why it is in Wikipedia as C. ayresii. Nowhere in the description is the name C. ayresii mentioned, however, give that the article was started before the official description was published, it probably resulted from that. I will fix as much of this as I can. Killidude (talk) 11:49, 1 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add topic