Talk:Advanced Encryption Standard
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Advanced Encryption Standard article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Archives: 1 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 1000 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
Citation Needed for Optimization of Cipher
editWhere did the information in this section come from? 129.74.154.239 (talk)
Poorly referenced assertion that ChaCha is better.
editIn this diff, someone added the following content:
- Where the CPU hardware does not support AES acceleration, ChaCha is an alternative cipher with better performance and without sacrificing security.
AES-128 broken to a complexity of 2^96
editjoin the effort it's open! The main programmer who is doing this work, is limited to a 4 core Xeon 1275 with 3 active cores. We need people with fast boxes and a will to look at the code and improve it.
Supported by the following refs:
- "So you want to use an alternative cipher…". A Few Thoughts on Cryptographic Engineering. 9 October 2012. (Blog, unreliable source)
- Bernstein, Daniel. "Why switch from AES to a new stream cipher?". cr.yp.to. Retrieved 17 February 2021. (The website of the maker of ChaCha is not going to be neutral w.r.t ChaCha)
This violates WP:UNDUE, especially since the references supporting this assertion are rather dubious. Blogs are not reliable sources, as per WP:BLOGS. The website of the designer of ChaCha is not a neutral nor reliable source, as per WP:NPOV and WP:SPS. Samboy (talk) 21:20, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Neither of those references supports the claim in any way. —Naddy (talk) 10:24, 9 May 2024 (UTC)