Talk:2014 Fort Hood shootings
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2014 Fort Hood shootings article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
yo
editYo, I heard there is more than 1 shooter.--150.216.62.225 (talk) 23:38, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Request for semi-protection
editA lot of vandals are beginning to attack the page (seemingly from 4chan) --Zrowny (talk) 00:13, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
shooter identification
editThe [Hinterland Gazetter] used as a source for the name of assailant is a blog -- we should wait until a mainstream news source reports the name. NE Ent 00:27, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Move request made
editI have created a disamb page for Fort Hood Shooting and have made a move request over at Talk:Fort Hood shooting#Requested Move. I feel the two articles should be dated to differ the two events. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 00:43, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- This seems premature to me - I can see little evidence that this latest shooting will meet Wikipedia notability guidelines, and I accordingly expect the article to be deleted. AndyTheGrump (talk) 00:48, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- Well Obama spoke out against the shootings, and they are on a military base, this was not just some domestic violence shooting. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 00:51, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- I agree, that it's unlikely that a shooting at a military base with multiple casualities will stand much chance of being deleted. Its not your every day occurrence.--70.49.72.34 (talk) 03:32, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- Well Obama spoke out against the shootings, and they are on a military base, this was not just some domestic violence shooting. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 00:51, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- At the time I made my post, it was unclear that there had been any casualties beyond the gunman. With four dead, notability guidelines will have been met, I would assume. AndyTheGrump (talk) 03:51, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Better Image
editA more detailed map instead of the one used by the last shooting - TwoFace — Preceding unsigned comment added by TwoFace728 (talk • contribs) 08:06, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Fair use candidate from Commons: File:Ivan Lopez Fort Hood 2014.jpeg
editThe file File:Ivan Lopez Fort Hood 2014.jpeg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at File:Ivan Lopez Fort Hood 2014.jpeg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. If no action is taken, it will be deleted after 7 days. Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 09:05, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Fair use candidate from Commons: File:Ivan Lopez Fort Hood 2014.jpeg
editThe file File:Ivan Lopez Fort Hood 2014.jpeg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at File:Ivan Lopez Fort Hood 2014.jpeg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. If no action is taken, it will be deleted after 7 days. Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 09:25, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 2014 Fort Hood shooting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140405033918/http://www.kvue.com/news/Fort-Hood-confirms-incident-on-post-253638631.html to http://www.kvue.com/news/Fort-Hood-confirms-incident-on-post-253638631.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150126012304/http://www.kwtx.com/home/headlines/Report--No-Single-Factor-Led-To-Fort-Hood-Shooting-Rampage-289597121.html to http://www.kwtx.com/home/headlines/Report--No-Single-Factor-Led-To-Fort-Hood-Shooting-Rampage-289597121.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:38, 20 June 2017 (UTC)