American Needle, Inc. v. National Football League, 560 U.S. 183 (2010), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the ability of teams in the National Football League to conspire for purposes of a violation of §1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act.
| American Needle v. NFL | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued January 13, 2010 Decided May 24, 2010 | |
| Full case name | American Needle, Inc., Petitioner v. National Football League, et al. |
| Docket no. | 08-661 |
| Citations | 560 U.S. 183 (more) 130 S. Ct. 2201; 176 L. Ed. 2d 947; 94 U.S.P.Q.2d 1673 |
| Case history | |
| Prior | 538 F.3d 736, 88 U.S.P.Q.2d 1358 (7th Cir. 2008) |
| Holding | |
| The National Football League's licensing of intellectual property in this case constitutes concerted action that is not categorically beyond Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act's coverage. The judgment of the Seventh Circuit is reversed. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Stevens, joined by unanimous |
| Laws applied | |
| Sherman Antitrust Act | |
Background
editThe alleged conspiracy involved the formation of the National Football League Properties (NFLP), an entity responsible for licensing NFL intellectual property (IP) and formed in 1963. Before that date the NFL teams marketed their IP rights individually. Proceeds from NFLP activity were evenly distributed among the teams.[1]
Between 1963 and 2000, the NFLP granted nonexclusive licenses to various suppliers permitting the manufacture and resale of apparel bearing team insignias. The petitioner in this case, American Needle, Inc., was one of those license holders. In December 2000, the teams voted to authorize the NFLP to begin granting exclusive licenses. The NFLP granted a 10-year exclusive license to Reebok to manufacture and sell trademarked headwear bearing team insignia of all 32 teams. At that point, the NFLP did not renew American Needle's nonexclusive license.
Opinion of the Court
editIn a unanimous decision, the Court held that NFL teams are distinct economic actors with separate economic interests that are capable of conspiring under §1 of the Sherman Act.[2]
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ "In American Needle v. NFL, Supreme Court Holds That NFL Joint Venture". Pillsbury Law. Retrieved March 23, 2023.
- ^ Grady, Mark F. Cases and Materials on Antitrust. UCLA Academic Publishing, Los Angeles, CA. 2011, p. 346-48
Further reading
edit- He, Yifei American Needle Upon Remand, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2520044
External links
edit- Text of American Needle, Inc. v. National Football League, 560 U.S. 183 (2010) is available from: Google Scholar Justia Oyez (oral argument audio) Supreme Court (slip opinion) (archived)
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |