User talk:Wilfredor/Archive 2

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panoramic view of Miranda Park, Caracas.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 00:19, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque Cristal, Caracas.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 18:02, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pastor de Nubes o Formes de Lutin.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. Mattbuck 20:51, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panoramic view of La Asunción, Isla Margarita.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:30, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Don Quijote de La Mancha, Teresa Carreño Teather.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Don Quijote de La Mancha, Teresa Carreño Teather.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Krajobraz_w_Parku_Narodowym_Gorchi-Tereldż_33.JPG

Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list#File:Krajobraz_w_Parku_Narodowym_Gorchi-Tereld.C5.BC_33.JPG - you say  Support but the accompanying text suggests you meant  Oppose. Could you please clarify this? -mattbuck (Talk) 21:49, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks Mattbuck, yes it is opose --The Photographer (talk) 00:26, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miranda en la Carraca by Arturo Michelena.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:53, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Detail in La vara rota 1892 by Arturo Michelena 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:53, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 360° Panoramic view of Santa Rosa de la Eminencia Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I do not particularly fancy 360° panoramas, as their aspect ratio is so unmanageable on screen and lines are curved, but the image quality and light is very good, and I am impressed by the stitch. I also acknowledge that such a pano is one useful way of depicting the entire fort. --Slaunger 09:45, 29 May 2014 (UTC) Excellent review --The Photographer 03:09, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Detail in La Caridad by Arturo Michelena.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit dark, but clear; you can see the individual strokes even in the darker sections.--Peulle 13:38, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Muchas Gracias!

Bonjour Wilfredo !

Thank you very much for the barnstar, I'm very sensitive of, even if I'm not sure I deserve it.

BtW, your file description of the painting is now very good, with the use of the "artwork" template. We will soon have a very nice new FP (nice to learn more about South-America history) ! --Jebulon (talk) 10:21, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

That's my biggest wish --The Photographer (talk) 11:46, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Miranda in VI

OK, Miranda est toujours vivant! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:40, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Miranda en la Carraca by Arturo Michelena.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Miranda en la Carraca by Arturo Michelena.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Miranda en la Carraca.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

No doubt than this one is better. But in this case, as we have already a VI, you should initiate a "Most Valued Review" as explained in the VI guidelines. Try ! (we could help, if needed !)--Jebulon (talk) 16:23, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Pleas help me, and please write me on francaise, SVP --The Photographer (talk) 11:50, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Very good work --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Much better than the existing VI. Yann (talk) 06:46, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Support quote: "Viva Miranda"! Congrats for the successful MVR nomination ! And per Yann.--Jebulon (talk) 11:53, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gunnex (talk) 16:58, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Re-edition of the Photowikimeetup in Wikimania 2014

Hello The Photographer! in the case that you are also visiting this year's Wikimania in London, you may be interested in attending the new edition of the photowikimeetup that took place in Hong Kong last year, and where you listed up. As the preparation is not yet settled, you are more than welcomed to take part in the discussion here. All the best, Poco² 17:42, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Realmente es un honor para mi tu invitacion, lamentablemente no ire a Wikimania por cuestiones monerarias --The Photographer (talk) 18:23, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerta del Teatro Municipal de São Paulo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition --Moroder 17:36, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tian Tan Buddha 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  CommentNeeds better categorization. --Slaunger 13:16, 21 June 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks --The Photographer 13:56, 22 June 2014 (UTC) Good quality. Could benefit from a geocode. --Slaunger 10:24, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charles de Gaulle International Airport in France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Yes, good composition. The airport is copyrighted (no FoP in France), but there is nothing under copyright on this view, IMO. QI.--Jebulon 14:34, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corocoro frito con Arepas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:46, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Fotografia del Halo

Wilfredo, como conversamos, ya subi la fotografia del halo. Saludos --Jaimeluisgg (talk) 11:17, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Featuring the dark sides of society

Hi The Photographer,

In continuation of our discussion regarding your attempts to illustrate the darker sides of society in a way such that the photos can become featured, this is a challenge, but a very interesting challenge. "Pretty" pictures are often the easiest to get featured, but there are notable exceptions. For me the best on Commons for this type of photography is Tomascastelazo from Mexico. If you have not already familiarized yourself with his featured peoples photography have a look at his gallery. He has a very good eye for portraying people in an unfortunate situation in a manner which both preserve the dignity of the portrayed people, while showing clearly, e.g., extreme poverty by using good timing and striking and simple compositions. A significant proportion of the photos in Featured pictures of Mexico are his. This may be the easiest ways to find his people FPs. I think we need much of of this kind of photography on Commons. I am terrible at it myself, too "shy" to "intrude" on other people I do not know in public, so I admire those who master this.

I am happy you got that camera donation from Dcoetzee. You have made many good contributions with that camera.

Do not underestimate your own capability! I think you have demonstrated several times already that you have a good eye for peoples photography, such as File:Boy Face from Venezuela.jpg.

Abrazos (Hope that is not a too intimate "regards". That is how I always finish off, when communicating with a distant relative I have in Colombia :-)), --Slaunger (talk) 20:24, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

@Slaunger: First of all, I wish to apologize for the delay, I was looking for the right way to answer without diverting the focus. Again, I want to join my appreciation for your high-value reviews and reviews of other users. The pictures I've taken of Venezuela have a value beyond the image itself. It is a country full of internal conflicts in Venezuela is currently Head through by great social difficulties, political persecution and if I was not out of the country there would be no way I write this message. The state has controlled everything and security has become an extra length of the Cuban government. The social and economic decline go hand in hand and this is evidenced in the photographic work I have done mainly in Maracaibo. I fled Venezuela for that reason so have many more high quality photos, mainly because seemingly normal photos of Venezuela suffer the stress of war photos with common findings clearly without that wow effect. Where I am now, Sao Paulo, I will be able to enjoy peace of mind for the compositions.

Thank you very much for recommending the work of @Tomascastelazo: is an excellent photographer and @Alvesgaspar: with one of my favorites. Many of them open to feedback, open to novice users guide others like me.

I have watched with concern as the section of FP has become a thirst for the amount of photos, competition for the greatest amount of FP possible, rather than competition for the thirst for knowledge, thirst for improvement, the sed to make art.

As I had mentioned earlier, this situational factor such as insecurity, poverty and limited access to certain photos. In FP is simply transparent because there is no objective rule that can be measured. --The Photographer (talk) 21:51, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

I was searching something to explain you whats happening in Venezuela and I found this --The Photographer (talk) 17:10, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

I am very sorry to hear that you have had to flee from Venezuela. From what you have written previously, and from your photos it appears to me to me that Venezuela is a country with many beautiful places and many resources. It is a pity to learn that these resources are managed so badly, and that life has become untolerable and dangerous for so many. I am glad that you are now safe. I read the article you linked from Washington Post. Thanks, it was very instructive.

Thanks for your kind words about my reviews, I appreciate the feedback.

Regarding FP, I actually do not think it works very different now from how it has always done as long as I remember at least. In my early days at commons back in 2007 I nominated a very non-pretty image for FP, which I found had a lot of value - for me at least. It had been an eye-opener to the irony of my own cultural values when I (and my two kids, then 7 and 9 years old) witnessed the incident leading to the image. It was not promoted, but from the discussion, I came to the conclusion that we needed another "appreciation" program for the value in images and after some time Commons:Valued images was launched. And thinking more about it, I do not think it would have been good editorial judgement if such a photo got promoted to FP status and some day would appear on the main page as POTD, as it could be a shocking experience for some, for instance kids, depending on cultural values.

If you actively look for this kind of material, it is an entirely different matter of course. So I am no longer as frustrated as I once were if truly valuable images, but perhaps not with the pretty wow, gets declined at FPC. The higher purpose is to make the material available, and properly describe it and categorize it, such that re-users looking for a specific not-FP-worthy theme can search for it and find it. Then the immediate appreciation comes in second. Like seeing after some years how images you have uploaded end up being used on wiki-pages, where you had never envisioned them to appear, such as in a quote from Ernest Hemingway.

Now, take care in São Paulo, The Photographer --Slaunger (talk) 19:29, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much for this comment. Right now I will be dedicated to finding a good job in this city. However, the possibilities are endless incredible take photos, so the first thing I do after finding a job is to take some amazing pictures. I have used lately selfishly to wikimedia commons, mainly to back up pictures and secondly, to improve my level using photographic criticism.

In another vein, with the passing of time, I have noticed that the philosophy of Commons to help Wikipedia or other projects, has been lost. They have made a business WMF and chapters is bureaucratic institutions have forgotten that this is not a company, it is an altruistic activity, people feel used when they do these things. --The Photographer (talk) 23:28, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Acrobats in Budapest Street.jpg

Hola compañero. Necesito saber si la imagen corresponde a una calle en Budapest, Hungría, o a la calle Budapest en Venezuela. Un fuerte abrazo, desde Argentina. Allforrous (talk) 11:57, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Perdón, pero no fue mi intención ofender a Venezuela. Por el contrario, junto al Perú son los países mas queridos por mí. Mi pregunta fue para confirmar precisamente el borrado de la Category:Street performers in Venezuela. Gracias por tu ayuda. Allforrous (talk) 12:13, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Panoramic view of Miranda Park, Caracas.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panoramic view of Miranda Park, Caracas.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Kiwix Live CD background

Hi The Photographer,

I am Cristian, and I am trying to build a Kiwix Live CD. I have noticed that you are the creator of the Kiwix logo and I was wondering if you could be interested in helping me with a nice background for the Live CD featuring the logo and/or name of Kiwix. If you want you may also come up with a simple animation for plymouth (the splash screen that is show will loading the operative system, which is based on Ubuntu). This is more complex, but there are some instructions here. Thanks for your time. -- CristianCantoro (talk) 17:22, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Merci beaucoup pour l'occasion, s'il vous plaît, vous pouvez compter sur mon aide, Vous pouvez envoyer le chemin vers le dépôt git?. Merci --The Photographer (talk) 17:48, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Bonsoir, merci pour votre prompte réponse. Le repo git est ceci. -- CristianCantoro (talk) 17:58, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Il ya longtemps que j'ai pensé à un live cd en utilisant les paquets de Linux minimal pour exécuter Kiwix. Avec une distribution Linux exclusivement Kiwix pourrait être utile pour les universités. Je suis ouvert à entendre des idées sur la travail de conception graphique, s'il vous plaît envoyez taille, dans lequel vous devez les dessins. --The Photographer (talk) 18:46, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Salut, voyez ici la version courante du Live CD. Il est vraiment alpha software et plusieurs améliorations sont nécessaires. Les images dont on a besoin maintenant sont:

1. fond d'écran, le directives de Ubuntu sur le sujet proposent une image d'au moins 2560 x 1600 pixels. Voyez ici pour des info supplémentaires
2. fond pour le bootloader GRUB, voyez ici (dans la section "Image creation and setup"), la résolution de base semble être 640x480 ou supérieure.
3. splash screen/plymouth, documentation ici

Si vous avez des autres questions n’hésitez pas à me contacter. --CristianCantoro (talk) 09:52, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Manchas em File:Cemitério da Consolação 232.jpg

Você pode resolver as manchas pretas no lado superior direito da imagem File:Cemitério da Consolação 232.jpg? Veja as notas. ArionEstar (talk) 12:57, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Eu tente de concertar --The Photographer (talk) 19:37, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Centro de Danza Ribera.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:44, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cemitério da Consolação, São Paulo city 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but the left side is leaning in visibly. Can you apply some correction? --Cccefalon 05:07, 1 September 2014 (UTC) Thanks for your review, however, I dont underestand you sorry --The Photographer 13:19, 6 September 2014 (UTC) Please distort bottom left corner to the right until the left side (noted) is vertical. Mattbuck 09:12, 7 September 2014 (UTC) Thanks, though you should really leave a note to say it has been corrected. Mattbuck 17:53, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Michelstadt_Germany_Schloss-Fürstenau-01.jpg

Hi The Photographer, thank your for reviewing my image. However, I feel that I should pass some additional informations concerning your comment about "strong distortion". The image was taken with a tiltshift lense to avoid strong distortions. I am aware, that most people in this forum are not used to see images taken with that kind of lense. Some perspective views are different to what you are used to see here after the usual untilting process. Also, I have to add that Schloss Fürstenau is not rectilinear everywhere. The only proof about verticals can be obtained by windows who cannot get opened if they are skewed. I admit, that there is a small incline on the right side; I can enhance that. But in general, the photo does not have the severe problems, you claim in your annotations. Cheers, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 16:20, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

It really is an almost imperceptible barrel distortion, however, quality is disappearing to the extent that sidewalk edges. It is minimal and adequate for Featured Images and not for QI. Excellent image ! --The Photographer (talk) 01:19, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Qualidade da imagem

Olá Wilfredo, boa noite. O que acha da qualidade da imagem File:Salasaopaulo.jpg? Eu aumentei a resolução, mas não sei se está boa. ArionEstar (talk) 23:50, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

@ArionEstar: Ni de aqui a la China esa foto pode ser QI e muito menos FP. Si você procura a permição eu posso fazer esa misma foto com uma qualidade excelente --The Photographer (talk) 00:20, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Sim, mas é justificável, pois a resolução estava muito baixa inicialmente. O ruído não está tão difundido. Também possui o fator wow e a simetria não está ruim. ArionEstar (talk) 00:47, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

@ArionEstar: A umica forma de que isso poda ser QI e que sea uma foto com muito mais WOW que isso, eu acredito que não e QI, e mia recomendação, não nominarla. Você pode nominar cualquera de mias fotos a QI --The Photographer (talk) 01:04, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

File:¿Perdóon? Furia, yo?... No, yo también soy Virus (2495452738).jpg

Hola The Photographer, I noticed that you tagged this file for missing permission. I don't see though what is unclear about the CC licence found on the Flickr page. Also, I did a search with TinEye that resulted in this image being published with a Creative Commons licence by one and the same author. So I don't see any problem with having it here too. De728631 (talk) 17:42, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

@De728631: I think so the problem is in Flickr --The Photographer (talk) 17:46, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

And why would that be a problem? The file has metadata which is usually evidence that it was uploaded from the original source, i.e. the Flickr user is the photographer. Did you find this photo anywhere else where it is credited to a different author? De728631 (talk) 17:49, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

@De728631: I've removed the template, thanks to your comment. --The Photographer (talk) 17:52, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Thank you, you might also want to inform @Russavia: about that. De728631 (talk) 17:54, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

 Done @De728631: Please, If you see some new irregularities, please do not hesitate to write me --The Photographer (talk) 18:00, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Toto Forever Poster.jpg . Yo soy el propietario del copyright

Estimado The Photographer:

Creo que habla español. If you don't, please let me know and I will send the message in English.

Recientemente ha eliminado tres fotografías de mi cuenta:

File:Toto Forever Poster.jpg

File:Ellen Clifford and Kurt Morningstar in Desire Street (a film by Roberto F. Canuto & Xu Xiaoxi).jpg

File:Mei Mei Poster (a film by Xu Xiaoxi).jpg

La razón, según he leido en el mensaje, es "possible copyright violation". Yo tengo todos los derechos de copyright de las citadas imágenes. Cuando creé mi cuenta, envié el permiso de copyright y un email con differentes sitios en los que he compartido las imágenes junto a la licendia de distribución cediendo derechos de libre distribución. Personalmente he tomado las fotografías y he editado el contenido. Si necesita que reenvie estos documentos a wikimedia commons o cualquier otra información, puedes envirme un mensaje y así lo haré.

Antes de solicitar "undeletion" usando la plantilla de wikimedia, creo que lo correcto es ponerme en contacto con usted. Me gustaría pedirle que elimine el borrado y autorice de nuevo mi trabajo en Wikimedia.

Gracias por su tiempo.

Atentamente.

Almostred

[email protected]

Almostred (talk) 06:03, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

@Almostred: Del mismo modo te agradezco por escribirme, siempre es un placer recibir este tipo de feedback. Te cuento que el mejor mecanismo para solicitar que tus trabajos vuelvan a estar en commons es aquí. Esperamos ver trabajos tuyos de nuevo por aquí, Saludos --The Photographer (talk) 07:40, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Code issues in User:The Photographer/common.js

Hi The Photographer, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited User:The Photographer/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

1. ISSUE: line 12 character 91: Script URL. - Evidence: mw.util.addPortletLink('p-tb', 'javascript:importScript("MediaWiki:VisualFileChange.js");', 'Perform batch task', 't-AjaxQuickDeleteOnDemand');

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 08:32, 20 September 2014 (UTC).

teatro independiente

Hola, Wilfredo, disculpa ante todo que te escriba en castellano, para hacerlo en inglés tendría que utilizar un bot traductor. Verás por la firma que no soy Tolijote. Tolijote se retiró hace tiempo y me encomendó el cuidado de sus trabajos y sus posibles 'descuidos' [1]. No acierto -algo habitual en mí, por otra parte- con la naturaleza del delito del montaje sobre el Teatro Independiente en España. Parte de un archivo ya existente en Commons... ¿Es posible que incurra en la misma torpeza que este otro mío: File:Antiga taquilla de Lluis Domènech i Montaner.jpg, sobre el que ya me dieron las pautas de enmienda? De ser esa la razón, ¿puedo yo intentar arreglarlo, aunque sea de Tolijote? ¿Y caso de que mi torpeza no lo consiga, me podrías ayudar a conseguirlo? Con la esperanza de que pueda contar con esa ayuda, te saluda--Latemplanza (talk) 18:42, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

@Latemplanza: Saludos amigo, te comento que lo ideal es subir un trabajo nuevo obra derivada (en source colocas el link al trabajo original de Tolijote), es lo ideal. --The Photographer (talk) 18:52, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

¡Ay Dios mío¡ eso que tú ves tan fácil yo lo veo negrísimo. Veamos... Si ya has borrado el archivo, cómo lo voy a volver a subir. Veo en las contribuciones de Tolijote que tiene otros dos montajes similares (menos conseguidos, quizá). Te juro que todo esto me supera hasta donde tú no te puedes llegar a imaginar. (ya hasta se me olvida firmar) No si al final iba a tener razón mi madre cuando me dijo: no te metas en Commons, te volverás loco.--Latemplanza (talk) 19:02, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

@Latemplanza: Mi primera recomendación es subir la foto con referencias y colocando el origen de los montajes, es decir, de donde se obtuvieron las fotos para realizar el montaje debido a que todas deben contar con licencias libres. --The Photographer (talk) 19:05, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Lo siento Wilfredo. Tiro la toalla. En los archivos similares que aun no se han borrado figura esta documentación:

Logos de página para entradilla del artículo "Teatro independiente en España" de Wikipedia en español. Autor Tolijote, a partir de los archivos de Commons: File:El Toro Osborne 09 (7007916895).jpg ; File:Toro Osborne Becerreá frente (Lugo).jpg; y File:Toro Osborne.jpg

O sea, esos son los archivos/fotos con los que Tolijote hizo en un Power Point irrecuperable el montaje que luego subió al repositorio. Insisto: tiro la toalla. Creo que voy a dejar este proyecto. No sirvo. Le comentaré a Cookie o a Discasto o a Alan a ver si ellos pueden hacer algo para que la página de WP español no se quede desnuda. --Latemplanza (talk) 19:16, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

@Latemplanza: Te agradezco por escribirme, siempre es un placer recibir este tipo de feedback. Te cuento que el mejor mecanismo para solicitar que los trabajos vuelvan a estar en commons es aquí. Esperamos ver trabajos tuyos de nuevo por aquí, Saludos --The Photographer 19:22, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Wilfredor. You have new messages at Lmbuga#File tagging File:Cartel Galego 3.jpg's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Wilfredor. You have new messages at Lmbuga#File tagging File:Cartel Galego 8.jpg's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

He añadido información

Hola Wilfredo, siguiendo los consejos de otros usuarios, he añadido información o modificado información errónea en todos los archivos de Tolijote. Gracias por sus indicaciones.--Tolijote (talk) 16:22, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Carta de Almostred

Estimado The Photographer:

Recientemente me puse en contacto porque había eliminado tres fotografías de mi cuenta (referencia 21. File:Toto Forever Poster.jpg . Yo soy el propietario del copyright). Ahora ha eliminado otra fotografía:

File:Desire Street (film) Scene with Javier López y Kjord Davis..jpg

En esta ocasión la razón, según he leido en el mensaje, es que no he mandado un mensaje con páginas en las que la he compartido para demostrar que soy el propietario del copyright, algo que no es cierto. Como le comenté en mi mensaje previo, cuando creé mi cuenta, envié el permiso de copyright y un email con differentes sitios en los que comparto las imágenes junto a la licendia de distribución cediendo derechos de libre distribución. Personalmente he tomado las fotografías y he editado el contenido. No se si debo enviar este mensaje de nuevo o que puedo hacer, porque es muy frustrante que cada semana reciba mensajes de este tipo. Supongo que debería haber un centro de registro donde queden todos los mensajes en referencia a mis trabajos. No se si hay algún sitio a donde poder dirigirme para que se solucione definitivamente y que no vuelva a borrar MIS fotografías. Puedo reenviar el mensaje de nuevo, aunque no se si será distinto esta vez.

No entiendo porque es tan sencillo borrar imágenes y tan complicado que se escuche al interesado o que se registren los emails que se mandan sobre determinados temas. Es realmente frustrante. Entiendo que se trate de perseguir a quienes utilizan el trabajo de otros y violan sus derechos... pero no debemos pagar quienes somos inocentes por ellos. Esto se debería evitar. Me gustaría pedirle que elimine el borrado y autorice de nuevo mi trabajo en Wikimedia. Espero que sea posible y no tenga que enviar de nuevo información a una fuente anónima que perderá el email y volver a las mismas.

Gracias de todos modos por su tiempo. Siento descargar con usted mi frustración, pero es quien ha eliminado mi fotografía, aunque supongo que el responsable es el sistema.

Atentamente.

Almostred

Almostred (talk) 03:06, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Saludos @Almostred: . Esto se realiza con el motivo de proteger al proyecto de problemas legales, las imagenes no son realmente eliminadas jamás, son simplemente ocultadas al público a la espera de su autorización, esto se hace para respetar los derechos de autor de cada persona incluyendo el suyo. Imagine que alguien se hace pasar por usted e intenta subir contenido a commons irrespetando su autoría, cómo se sentiría?. Y, no solamente el cómo se sentiría, muchos artístas podrían poner en jaque al proyecto con demandas legales. Una imagen bien documentada con el debido permiso jamás será ocultada. Por favor, usted puede dirigirse a este enlace y colocar básicamente un texto en donde usted afirme que es el autor. No tome este asunto de forma personal, espero ver nuevos trabajos suyos aquí!. Muchas gracias. --The Photographer (talk) 14:29, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

por São Paulo

Oi The Photographer

Estou bem próximo a São Paulo (no ABC), e normalmente passo na cidade para treinar corrida e passear. Sim gostaria muito de combinarmos um passeio para fotografar, faço a sugestão do Parque Ibirapuera, podemos combinar do meio para o final da tarde para pegar melhor iluminação, as terças normalmente faço os treinos de corrida lá. Mas é apenas uma sugestão, se tiver algum tema (local) já planejado é só avisar que eu me planejo e combinamos.

Lauro Sirgado^contribs 15:32, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

@Lauro Sirgado: Este fim de semana eu tenho planejado para ir para outro lugar onde eu moro, além disso, a previsão do tempo não é bom. Você acha que se o fizermos na próxima semana?, Eu também convidou outros. --The Photographer (talk) 14:32, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

@The Photographer: Ok, ótimo, me avise o dia, horário e local com um pouco de antecedência para eu me programar. -- Lauro Sirgado^contribs 18:42, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Futbol Deluxe

Hi User:The Photographer, the source is in CC By, why the delete of the images?. Can you explain please? I'm tired of fighting for the no elimination of pictures. These images were consulted for deletion in the past. Why you delete them again? And even the owner of the copyright knew about this [2]. Best Regards. (I think that I'm not gonna use Commons any more) --JoRgE-1987 (talk) 19:41, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

@JoRgE-1987: Do not take this personally, this activity is done to protect the project from future lawsuits. A well documented photograph will never be erased, this permission can be applied in a simple way. I hope to soon see your work again, for the moment, please, I beg you to make your claim writing to the following link. Thanks --The Photographer (talk) 14:20, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi User:The Photographer, I take this personally because there is no reason to delete the images, and you are not explaining me why the delete of them. How can I learn anything if nobody tells me what is wrong? I'm not going to claim anything, since this images should not have been deleted, at least from I undertand. Best regards, --JoRgE-1987 (talk) 19:37, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

@JoRgE-1987: Saludos Jorgito, te cuento que las imagenes fueron retiradas debido a violación a derechos de autor, es decir, las fotos fueron tuyas, sin embargo les tiraste fotos a trabajos de otras personas. Te invito a leer esto y pasate por aquí también. Y, no te preocupes, yo también cometí el mismo error. Abrazos --The Photographer (talk) 19:46, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Hola User:The Photographer , ¿el diminutivo es para hacerlo mas simpático o para que me ponga aún peor? Seguis sin explicarme que derechos de autos violaban las Imagenes. El Owner del Copyright del Software compartió las imágenes con CC By, que esta permitido en Commons. ¿Que Derechos de autor violé? No recuerdo que decian los cuadros de información, pero tengo el leve recuerdo de haber puesto bien el Autor, la fuente y la licencia. ¿A que te referís con "las fotos fueron tuyas, sin embargo les tiraste fotos a trabajos de otras personas"? ¿Yo puse que YO era el Autor en las imágenes? --JoRgE-1987 (talk) 20:54, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

@JoRgE-1987: Saludos Jorge, si consideras que eres el autor de estos trabajos, por favor, usa canal siguiente dando clic aqui, de esa forma tus fotos serán restauradas debido a que ninguna foto es realmente eliminada, solamente ocultada al público. El diminutivo era para hacer la comunicación más acertada y familiar. Te pido usar ese mecanismo, espero ver más trabajos tuyos aquí. Por favor, no te desanimes, estas cosas las hacemos para proteger al proyecto y a los mismos usuarios, yo soy un simple colaborador como tu. Un abrazo --The Photographer (talk) 21:01, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Hola User:The Photographer , no voy a pedir que se restauren las imágenes porque no se deberían haber eliminado desde un principio. Como dije antes, no voy a colaborar mas en Commons salvo que sea estrictamente necesario. Me parece erroneo el sistema de "Eliminar todo por las dudas". ¿Estas leyendo mis preguntas? Veo que me seguís contestando constantemente lo mismo, pero no me respondes ninguna pregunta que te he hecho. Te pido por favor que contestes mis preguntas. --JoRgE-1987 (talk) 21:06, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Hola Wilfredo. Si no te importa, voy a reponer las imágenes que borraste. Jorge te está explicando las cosillas de buena forma y parece que lo estás tratando como a un subidor de imágenes más. Las imágenes están todas en regla si te fijas la fuente y la licencia de las mismas. Jorge nunca dijo que él era el autor ni nada por el estilo. Saludos Alhen .::··¨ 23:07, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

@Alhen: @JoRgE-1987: , No tengo absoluta preferencia por ningun usuario, simplemente le he mostrado el camino indicado que se le da a todos. Darle un trato especial a un usuario es equivocado y es la razón por la que está siendo dificil la captación de nuevos usuarios en los proyectos de Wikimedia. Por otro lado, espero comprendas que estoy manejando grandes volumenes de violaciones a derechos de autor, así pues, es algo que suele suceder. Alhen, gracias por tu ayuda, gracias por apoyarme en este caso. En cuanto a @JoRgE-1987: , espero seguir viendo trabajos tuyos de nuevo por aquí, disculpa por llamarte Jorgito, lo hice por cariño, tengo varios amigos llamados Jorge y suele llamarse así cuando somos compañeros. No dejen de escribirme, P.D. Yo coloco la plantilla de borrado a muchas imagenes a diario, sin embargo, nunca coloco la de borrado rapido a menos que sea necesario. En este caso, he cometido evidentemente un error en nominarla a borrado, sin embargo, mi página de discusión, no es el canal adecuado para resolver estos problemas pues, @Alhen: , como veras, no puedo ni borrar ni restaurar imagenes --The Photographer (talk) 23:39, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

w:es:Wikiproyecto:Wikimedia en langues régionales de España

I invite to participate. And create table for wikipedia of Hispanoamérica.--Kaiyr (talk) 12:13, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Copyright

Bonjour, Si tu n'as pas une preuve qu'une image est une violation de copyright, il est préférable de créer une demande de suppression plutôt qu'une suppression immédiate. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:30, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Merci beaucoup ami, c'est une meilleure pratique --The Photographer (talk) 16:15, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altino Arantes Building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments NIce but a small tilt and a small stictching error, otherwise QI.--ArildV 21:04, 29 September 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks --The Photographer 09:12, 1 October 2014 (UTC) Support--ArildV 08:20, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corpus Cristi in Santa Ifijenia Church of São Paulo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 10:14, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rainbow in Se Catedral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very pretty. --Mattbuck 10:14, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

To clone out dust spots in File:Pátio do Colégio in São Paulo.jpg

Olá Wilfredo. Aqui um pedido de remoção (meu) dos pontos de poeira (dust spots) indicados nas notas da imagem File:Pátio do Colégio in São Paulo.jpg. ArionEstar (talk) 16:47, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Oi @ArionEstar: , eu concertaré isso no transcurso da semana, mais essa imagem não pode ser destacada, tenhe problema de iluminação, ruido e composição. Obrigado --The Photographer (talk) 22:52, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Oi @ArionEstar: , muito obrigado por sua nota na imagem, o problema esta concertado agora, eu também concerto o ruido (noise) no cielo. Por favor, si você acredita que qualquer outra foto, não solamente as mias, precisam ser concertadas, por favor, fale comigo eu ajudarei a você. Eu recomendo que você nomine y vote em QI imagens, logo de entender melhor ou processo ali, nominar também no FP. Beleza, Obrigado, boa noite Arion --The Photographer (talk) 01:53, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Code issues in User:The Photographer/common.js

Hi The Photographer, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited User:The Photographer/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

1. ISSUE: line 2 character 91: Script URL. - Evidence: mw.util.addPortletLink('p-tb', 'javascript:importScript("MediaWiki:VisualFileChange.js");', 'Perform batch task', 't-AjaxQuickDeleteOnDemand');
2. ISSUE: line 14 character 91: Script URL. - Evidence: mw.util.addPortletLink('p-tb', 'javascript:importScript("MediaWiki:VisualFileChange.js");', 'Perform batch task', 't-AjaxQuickDeleteOnDemand');

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 20:14, 7 October 2014 (UTC).

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Theatro Municipal de São Paulo, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope ("Facade" added to the scope. I hope it's OK.). --JLPC (talk) 13:02, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Merci monsieur. --The Photographer (talk) 13:34, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:22, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Catedral da Sé (Interior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 13:03, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:24, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

??

Olá The Photographer, que encontros? E eu não tenho muito o que discutir, pois ali é uma questão muito simples: a Béria errou de página, não assumiu o erro, e ainda está promovendo algo que foi mal feito, e já acabou. Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 22:51, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

"Imagine he's very busy and can't respond to every picayune thing?

• "Imagine he's very busy and can't respond to every picayune thing?"

Regarding your above comment:

An update: User:Jimbo Wales did indeed respond to a licensing request, see: Yes. I hereby license the above-referenced talk (Wikimania 2014) under CC-BY-SA-3.0.

Perhaps you could revisit your position at Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Annoying_User,_Good_Content.JPG ?

Thank you for your time,

-- Cirt (talk) 14:52, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

@Cirt: Ok Thanks --The Photographer (talk) 14:57, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

So are you going to change your position there??? -- Cirt (talk) 17:26, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Of course yes, but I am reviewing with WLM UK, in this moment, please, let me finish and I will edit that. --The Photographer (talk) 17:29, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Okay no problems, thank you! -- Cirt (talk) 21:18, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Fishermen on Pier Juan Griego.jpg

Sorry for asking but I really don’t understand why you withdrew your nomination only 3 hours before the voting period ended. At 8 support and 4 oppose votings, it would have been featured (assuming that no more oppose had been added)! By my review, I intended in no way to make you act this way. Always remember, an "oppose" never means "this pic is bad" but rather "while this pic is certainly good, it is from my personal point of view just not good enough to be among the very best ones". --Kreuzschnabel 19:35, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

@Kreuzschnabel: Thanks for write me, please do not take the matter personally. I value the reviews, yours was very good, additionally, I wanted to nominate another picture. thank you very much :) --The Photographer (talk) 02:40, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

login at Commons Archive

hallo The Photographer, I've tryed to log in but it says "To help protect against automated account creation, please select just the cat photos in the box below: " I don't see any cat photos to select on my browser firefox. Can you help me. Regards --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:48, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

@Moroder: Please, write to [email protected], @Dcoetzee: , for the moment, I could upload the file for you, shareme with google drive The [email protected] --The Photographer (talk) 00:12, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I sent you the file by gigamail. It should be possible for you now to download it. Thanks --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 10:51, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Cantero poster

Hello, you deleted a poster of the "Cantero" exhibiton for the Humus Gallery.

What do I need to do to put it back online ?

Thank you

Buisson1 (talk) 11:12, 4 November 2014 (UTC)�

Category:Featured pictures of Brazil by User:The Photographer

Criada a Category:Featured pictures of Brazil by User:The Photographer. ArionEstar (talk) 18:54, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Obrigado @ArionEstar: , por favor, lembrese de mostrarme lugares para tomar fotos interesantes na ciudade de São Paulo --The Photographer (talk) 19:04, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Acompanhando as suas fotos, percebe-se que você ainda não tirou fotos do Museu de Arte de São Paulo (ou simplesmente MASP). ArionEstar (talk) 19:09, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Eu preciso de uma permision para fazer isso, mais o problema e que isso precisa de soporte da WMF o um Capitulo --The Photographer (talk) 19:14, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Camuflaje

Hola Wilfredo, Nunca he intentado camuflajes tan sofisticados como los que tu mencionas, y la verdad no conozco a ningún otro fotógrafo que los use. En mi experiencia, los sentidos de los lobos son tan increíblemente agudos, que no va a funcionar. Yo he estado en situaciones en las que, incluso dentro de un hide, perfectamente camuflado, y totalmente inmóvil y silencioso, a 300 metros de un lobo, el lobo sabia, de alguna manera, que había algo raro... y se fue al poco rato. EN el caso de esta foto el lobo sabia perfectamente que estábamos allí pero el hambre era mas fuerte... De verdad, no creo que haya alternativas a usar lentes largas. Para otros muchos animales, como ciervos, pájaros... si. Felinos como los linces no les importa nada que haya gente hablando y fumando a 100 metros. Pero los lobos imposible. Llevamos demasiados siglos matándolos... --Arturo de Frias Marques (talk) 19:38, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Saludos Arturo, antes que nada, me gustaría agradecerte por tomarte la molestia de responderme. Con respecto al tema de la fotografía de lobos, el lobo iberico ha sido mi principal pasión, sin embargo, he buscado diversos mecanismos para fotografiarlo de forma cercana, con un camuflaje principalmente de olor. He sido muy seguidor de fotografía de animales en su ambiente salvaje, sin embargo, el problema del lente indicado ha sido un impedimento, asi que en este punto solamente observo detenidamente los animales e intento retener lo más que puedo su imagen nitida en mi recuerdo. Debido al lente y camara con pocas capacidades, he perdido grandes oportunidades. Durante varios años, siempre, al llegar del trabajo, me internaba en la selva, me recostaba de un gran arbol y simplemente esperaba, a la media hora se empezaban a escuchar a los animales recobrar su vida normal, con un poco de suerte recuerdo haber fotografiado un ave extremadamente difícil de encontrar, también he estado cerca de grandes animales como el felino negro o pantera, sin embargo, de noche y sin una dslr es sencillamente imposible. El tipo de vegetación en Brasil es densa, esta situación impidió que grandes animales pudieran tener éxito, debido al poco espacio para la movilidad. También me he encontrado en mis expediciones con aves que no vuelan como el caso de File:Thrush_unknown.JPG que lo encontré robandome la poca comida que me quedaba a 4700 msnm en los Andes de Venezuela. Son muchas historias que me gustaría compartir, es bueno conocer a otros fotografos interesados en temas comunes. --The Photographer (talk) 22:44, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Detail of Mulher do chale verde by Cyprien Eugene Boulet.jpg

Bonjour,

Je pense que tu devrais tenter une nomination comme FP. Il faudrait compléter la description et créer Creator:Cyprien Eugène Boulet. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 12:47, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

 Done It has not been easy to find information of this author , thanks @Yann: --The Photographer (talk) 13:31, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Esto es para hombre

Saludos amigo, espero que te encuentres bien. Tengo tiempo que no subo imágenes debido a que no he podido salir como antes por tiempo y cuestiones de mucha inseguridad actualmente. El titulo del mensaje se refiere a esto . Tanto esfuerzo por una llanta...jajaja. Pareces que no comes mucho y eso que alla se consigues de todo si estas aquí te mueres.

Espero que algún día nos volvamos a ver. Saludos....

@Rjcastillo: Jajaja, coño eso fue hace 4 años, y si estaba exagerando para la foto. Lo que da risa es que alguien consiguió agregarla al artículo llave de cruz en Holandes, da mucha risa la vaina. Hablando de otra cosa, he estado al tanto de los problemas en Maracaibo y de como en tan corto tiempo la situación a empeorado mucho. Commons es un territorio para relajarse y pasar el tiempo, eso es lo que hacía en Venezuela para poder escaparme un poco de la rutina. --The Photographer (talk) 10:39, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Hola

I was surprised and pleased that you thanked me for archiving part of my user page?!. How do you do to send those messages, I'd really like to use that tool too. Buenas tardes --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:53, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

@Moroder: I love watching how talk pages are clean by users, very gratifying to note that another user uses this tool --The Photographer (talk) 18:01, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Opina este planteamiento

Hola The Photographer, verifica este comentario por mi, y que se puede hacer al respecto. Category talk:Cueva del Guácharo National Park ¿Será que de tendrá que re-categorizar todas esa foto involucradas?--TheDarkFear (talk) 23:17, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

What do you think

Of my photo? Victorgrigas (talk) 06:55, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi @Victorgrigas: , I still remember the interview you did to me, as I would turn back time and make it better. First of all, thanks for taking me into account to review your photograph which is excellent, very good composition. However, I think that does not meet the requirements to be featured. I have some suspicions about if you used a tripod or not, jpg compress level. The picture has focus problems, chromatic aberration and noise at the bottom. I am sorry, this is only my humble personal opinion. You could try it again, you have an excellent camera, everything else can be learned. You could try before Commons:Quality images candidates --The Photographer (talk) 08:34, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge-translations

Hello The Photographer,
I just saw your thanks for my category edits in Venezuelan architecture and checked why I thought I knew that name - you're also active on Commons:Photo challenge, aren't you? As I noticed your babel boxes, I wanted to ask if you'd be interested in translating the commons challenges into Spanish? At the moment we translate the challenge themes and descriptions as well as the watchlist notice to Afrikaans, German, French, Hungarian, Russian, Swedish and Ukrainian (languages, where we have one or several users that can reliably help at the end of a month), but Spanish is a widely used language not included so far. I'm also asking Discasto, who translated the Photo challenge-main page, but it's normally better if there's more than one person involved - especially as we often try to do the translations in the last few days of the month (we haven't any December themes so far ;->).
Best wishes, Anna reg (talk) 10:36, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

@Anna reg: I would be very happy to help u, just show me the way. --The Photographer (talk) 10:47, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Great! As we don't have the December themes so far, only the general description that doesn't change from month to month (except for the dates) can be translated at the moment - you can find it here (Photo challenge rules). We are using the Langswitch-Template for the translations, which means that you have to use es= and then write your translation. The months are translated automatically via another template (that's the strange thing with the {{{{{#ifexist:{{{1}}}|{{#time: F|1 {{{1}}} 2014|af}}|{{{1}}}}} {{{2}}}}}}). I'll contact you again as soon as we have the themes and descriptions (normally about one sentence) and give you the links. Thanks, Anna reg (talk) 11:00, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Working process @Anna reg: --The Photographer (talk) 11:07, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

@Anna reg:  Done --The Photographer (talk) 11:53, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! I copied your translation into Template:Photo challenge rules restricted as well, which differs only by missing the (but may have been taken earlier). --Anna reg (talk) 14:13, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello The Photographer,
the themes are chosen - we have Bad weather and Household items in use for December. Though there could still be small changes in the challenge descriptions (I'm not sure if they are understandable & clear enough - if you have any ideas, feel free to help!), most of it should remain as it is. Beside the titles and descriptions on the challenge pages, the watchlist notices are prepared in HelenOnline's sandbox.
Best wishes, --Anna reg (talk) 11:16, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

As nobody answered my questions, there won't be any changes. But if you think the whole paragraph for bad weather too long, feel free to shorten it (e.g. to ...featuring Bad weather in all its ugly glory (or simply uglyness) - no sunlight, lightning or rainbows allowed!).

The watchlist messages will be posted at MediaWiki talk:WatchlistNotice as soon as the voting pages are ready - so probably in two or three days. --Anna reg (talk) 16:33, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

No problem @Anna reg: , I was uploading images and creating categories. Please only pasteme the links what you want translate and I will do that. See you soon :) --The Photographer (talk) 18:12, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Okay, here are the links in a clear list ;->

1. watchlist messages
2. Bad weather (may be shortened to e.g. ...featuring Bad weather in all its ugly glory - overcast skies are obligatory, no sunlight, lightning or rainbows allowed!)
3. Household items in use

Thanks, --Anna reg (talk) 22:21, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Last warning for the watchlist message ;->: the messages are now posted on MediaWiki_talk:WatchlistNotice#New_watchlist_message_2, so if you'd still like to translate it, please do so soon and edit it there. If not, please tell me if I should ask you again for the January translations or if you'd prefer if I did not.

Best wishes, --Anna reg (talk) 10:17, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

@Anna reg: I would make the following months, however, you must write me to ask me :p --The Photographer (talk) 10:32, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Pedido para entrar no Commons:Meet our photographers/People

Olá Wilfredo! Eu sugiro que você entre no Commons:Meet our photographers/People, que é uma lista dos fotógrafos do Commons e já que você também é um fotógrafo daqui. ArionEstar (talk) 12:54, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Oi @ArionEstar: Você pode me adicionar, considero auto-promoção fazer isso sozinho. Obrigado moso --The Photographer (talk) 12:58, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Categorization

For this picture see how you must see for example this File. Copy the infobox and replace the data (author, year, name of the painting, etc.). And for categories looking for another picture of this author for example.Regards. --LivioAndronico talk 11:00, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Feliz Cumpleaños

Saludos, Feliz cumpleaños amigo....Espero que la estes paasando muy bien....Como están las cosas ?? en que estas trabajando ?? --Rjcastillo (talk) 15:50, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Epale mijo @Rjcastillo: , muchas gracias hermano!!. comos tai?, Aquí las cosas estan muy bien y si la estoy pasando requete bien, solamente con el hecho de no escuchar más Vallenato y Regeton. Si estoy trabajando en una clínica, también me inscribi en algunas cosas de la bolsa de valores para jugar con eso. He seguido subiendo fotos, aunque ahorita el clima anda muy nublado. Creo que este sábado saldré a tomar otras fotos. Y voz como estai? --The Photographer (talk) 16:00, 4 December 2014 (UTC)