User talk:Vamps
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- 19:37, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments!
[edit]WLM super uploader | |
Thanks for uploading already more than 100 photos to Wiki Loves Monuments! Keep going, like this mill at Kinderdijk :) -- Effeietsanders (talk) 08:47, 5 September 2011 (UTC) |
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Keila-Joa mõisa peahoone, 1831-33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Keila-Joa mõisa köök, 1801.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tallinn, Jaan Koorti monument.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tallinna Meremeeste Kodu, 1926.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished
[edit]Dear Vamps,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. |
- Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 01:24, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
File:Tallinn, Jaan Koorti monument.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Túrelio (talk) 22:08, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Naissaare kitsarööpmeline raudtee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Kultuurimälestised Vikipeediasse 2012
[edit]Fotovõistlus Kultuurimälestised Vikipeediasse toimub ka sel aastal. Pilte saab lisada septembrikuu lõpuni. Oled oodatud osalema! --WikedKentaur (talk) 17:25, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Niitvälja raba Keila-Paldiski raudtee ääres.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FoP Latvia
[edit]Hello, I'd really appreciate it very much if you create ONE deletion request page for the FoP in Latvia (as I did here) instead of creating one for each picture, since the argument is the same for them all and I don't need the same message 100 times in my page. Thanks and regards, --Poco a poco (talk) 08:42, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
- Hello, after you took care that all my pictures of Vanšu tilts are gone, I'd like to ask you why were there exclusively only picture of my authorship, whereas in the project there are many others and even a category for the bridge. The FoP does not apply there?. I agree that we have to attach to our policies but it is the first time that I see that they are author-centered instead of subject-centered. Maybe there is a reason for that. Regards, Poco a poco (talk) 07:42, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, Poco a poco (talk) 10:27, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
Paisley Abbey
[edit]What are your thoughts, FP wise, on File:Paisley Abbey from the south east.jpg? -- Colin (talk) 08:41, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Please see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Umgebindehaus in Dittersbach, Böhmische Schweiz, Tschechien.JPG. You wrote: "perspective distortion, strong NR, oversharpened". I answered: "Thank you, Vamps, I made a better update. Please check it. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 01:41, 16 November 2013 (UTC)". Please have a look to this image. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 19:01, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Igaks juhuks mainin, et esitasin 2 sinu fotot eeskujulike piltide kandidaatideks. Kruusamägi (talk) 11:10, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mukri raba 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
File:Tallinna kunstihoone, 1934.a., 1961.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
82.131.126.74 15:10, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Tallinn, tuletõrjehoone Raua 2, 1938-1939.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
82.131.126.74 15:14, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The Photographer
[edit]Please excuse me spamming you. As a regular on Feature Picture Candidatess you will recognise User:The Photographer, who has 86 Featured Pictures. His contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. He has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and lives in a poor country where photographic equipment is expensive. The Photographer has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.
Please see the discussion about the Crowd-funding campaign on User talk:The Photographer#Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign and visit the Generosity Crowd-funding Campaign page to consider donating. Even a modest donation will make a difference if many people contribute. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 21:11, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
File:Tallinn, uus Raadiomaja Gonsiori 21, 1972 (2).jpg was recently deleted
[edit]File:Tallinn, uus Raadiomaja Gonsiori 21, 1972 (2).jpg was recently deleted by Missvain for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.
- Reason for deletion: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tallinn, uus Raadiomaja Gonsiori 21, 1972 (2).jpg
It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 16:46, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
File:Põllküla raudteepeatus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:23, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Tallinn, elamu Väike-Karja 1 - Sauna 1, 1924.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Taivo (talk) 18:28, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
File:Tallinn, Pikk 4, 6, 8, 16. saj.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |