User talk:Tiefkuehlfan

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Tiefkuehlfan!

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  /−


Hello, Tiefkuehlfan!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 15:06, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tiefkühlschublade.JPEG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

darkweasel94 14:43, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Entfernung von "unidentified locations"

[edit]

Hallo, siehe bitte File talk:A street of Wien (8080615899).jpg und File talk:Wien (5979264724).jpg (ich bin mir nicht sicher, ob Echo funktioniert hat). darkweasel94 14:51, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. regarding these two successive edits, I'd like to point out that the cake is not frozen, so the category you added is inappropriate. Further, you removed Category:Frozen (2013 film), which is the theme of the cake. I haven't reverted your changes yet because I wanted to verify with you the purpose of the changes. Could you elaborate about these changes please? Mindmatrix 18:36, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fotos von Gefrorenem

[edit]

Hallo Tiefkuehlfan, nach den Fotos scheinst du ja aus dem Waldviertel zu sein :-) - aber eine Frage zu den anderen Fotos: Was für eine Motivation ist das, Tiefkühlkost zu fotografieren? - ich finde es nicht schlecht, aber man findet das halt selten :-) --gruß aus dem Wienerwald K@rl (talk) 12:23, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Es war nur so eine Frage, da es ja nicht alltäglich ist :-) --gruß K@rl (talk) 09:38, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Street categories

[edit]

Hi Tiefkuehlfan!

As regards this your edit, I would like to point out that when a local name is used as a street name in the official adress system, we categorize such a place also as a street even though it is not a "street" in strictu sense. (Only squares have a separate categorization structure.) I. e. some parks, gardens, paths, staircases, islands, secluded places or even small quarters can be categorized as "streets". Try to check RÚIAN or mapy.cz if you are not sure. Thank you. --ŠJů (talk) 13:05, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Look at https://www.flickr.com/photos/96401256@N02/10244727473/

File:Iglo Austria Mohnnudeln.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 17:58, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Golf Resort Karlštejn

[edit]

Hi,

how do you know, that the picture presented to right is in GRK?--Juandev (talk) 21:28, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And the fact that sand mine is next to it is a good reason to place it into its category? Why?--Juandev (talk) 20:00, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Categories on Commons

[edit]

I dont have to damage your enthusiasm to Wikimedia Commons, but after your answers I would say you dont know, how our categorisation tree works. In the case of places we categorise pictures to the category of place, if they were taken on the place or they are depicting such place. Thats why pictures of sand quarry cant be in the category of golf resort. Even the quarry is next to it, it is not in it.

So thank you very much for the work you did about it. In the case of the category of sand mine "Pískovna u Golf Resort Karlštejn" is probably not an official name of this sand mine (pískovna stands in Czech for sand mine). In this case I would propose to use English nomenclature and it could by something like Category:Sand mine (municipality). Unfortunately this mine lands in 3 land areas at the same time. I will ask Mr. ŠJú, how to do it.--Juandev (talk) 22:36, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Look at https://www.flickr.com/photos/96401256@N02/8890370885/

File:Würstel.JPEG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 20:35, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Look at https://www.flickr.com/photos/96401256@N02/10244712643/

File:Iglo Austria Champignons.JPEG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 19:51, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Look at https://www.flickr.com/photos/96401256@N02/10756257134/

File:Iglo Austria Gemüse.JPEG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 19:51, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Look at https://www.flickr.com/photos/96401256@N02/10739302455/

File:Iglo Austria Germknödel.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 19:51, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

[edit]

Thanks for categorizing images from Józef Burszta Digital Archives! I appreciate that very much.

Yarl 15:11, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Şelimbăr, Sibiu

[edit]

Danke fürs Anlegen der Kategorie:Şelimbăr. Das "Ş" ist aber ein türkischer Buchstabe, der rumänische ist "Ș". Microsoft hat viele Jahre nur den türkischen unterstützt, aber seit 2007 gibt es Rumänisch auch unter Windoof, und vor einigen Jahren hat die rumänische Wikipädie umgestellt, daraufhin auch die für Esperanto, dann die deutsche und die englische. Siehe ro:Wikipedia:Diacriticele vechi și noi. Servus, -- Aisano (talk) 22:35, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cerna

[edit]

Servus, Tiefkuehlfan,

beim Kategorisieren im Umfeld von Category:Cerna River, Caraș-Severin County‎ ist es jetzt dazu gekommen, dass diese Kategorie und die Kategorie Cerna gegenseitig Mitglied voneinander sind. Außerdem gehört Cerna jetzt zu Category:Mehedinți County, obwohl der Fluss im Kreis Caraș-Severin liegt.

Das Problem ist wohl, dass man nicht genau weiß, wofür Cerna eigentlich steht. Sie wurde im Januar 2014 in Category:Villages in Croatia angelegt, dann aber auf Category:Mountains in Romania umgewidmet, und jetzt steht sie für einen Fluss. Es gibt vermutlich viele geografische Objekte, die Cerna heißen; zum Beispiel Category:Cerna River, Vâlcea County und Category:Cerna River, Hunedoara County.

Wenn man Category:Cerna nicht als Oberkategorie für alle solchen Objekte nehmen will (das bringt wohl nicht besonders viel), wäre ich dafür, die Kategorie gar nicht zu verwenden oder zu löschen. Sie ist zu unklar.

Grüße, -- Aisano (talk) 17:43, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

LAs

[edit]

Moin! Bitte VOR dem LA stellen nachschauen wie alt die Kategorie ist. Alte Kategorien werden behalten (als redirect) damit externe Einbindungen nicht zerstoert werden. Danke! LG--Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 16:33, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An unfree Flickr license has been found on File:Burg Liechtenstein.jpg

[edit]

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  /−


A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Burg Liechtenstein.jpg, has been reviewed by an administrator or reviewer and found available on Flickr under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. Unless the Flickr user changes the license to one that Wikimedia Commons accepts, the file will be speedily deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. Once the license on Flickr is changed, you may replace the {{Unfree Flickr file}} tag with {{Flickrreview}} so that an administrator or reviewer can review the image again.

Ww2censor (talk) 14:28, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are use sure of your recent categorization on this? I'm close to 100% certain that it is Biserica Belvedere, not Sf. Gheorge - Plevna. See Biserica Belvedere on the church's own web page: http://www.bisericabelvedere.ro/istoric/, both still photos and video. It is absolutely identical to this image. Sf. Gheorghe Plevnei, while similar in its treatment, is architecturally quite different: see its web page, http://www.sfgheorgheplevna.ro/. Not as tall, and totally lacks that upper gallery over the portico. - Jmabel ! talk 19:10, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, for identifying Romanian Orthodox churches in Bucharest, many of which resemble each other, the page Romanian Orthodox churches in Bucharest that I put together can be very useful. - Jmabel ! talk 19:13, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Monastery_Vavedenje_Senjak_Belgrade has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Zoupan (talk) 17:16, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Monastery_Tresije has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Zoupan (talk) 17:22, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Feuerwehrhäuser

[edit]

Hallo Tiefkühlfan, du hast bei Fotos, wie diesem File:Sulz-Feuerwehrhaus 8426.JPG die Kats für das Feuerwehrhaus entfernt. Ich habe bewusst, diese Kats auf die einzelnen Fotos und nicht auf die Kategorie gegeben, denn was mache ich mit Fotos über die Feuerwehrfahrzeuge, die auch noch kommen, die haben bei den Feuerwehrhäusern nicht direkt was zu tun. Ähnlich der Category:Freiwillige Feuerwehr Weissenbach (Hinterbrühl) -- gruß und guten Rutsch K@rl (talk) 17:16, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Bilingual categories has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Achim (talk) 20:08, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Einser-Kanal

[edit]

Hallo Tiefkuehlfan, du hast schon recht, dass die Fotos den Einserkanal zeigen. Allerdings ist ja eh die ganze Kat der Brücke von Andau in der Überkat Einserkanal. Somit ist das redundant und daher nicht notwendig. gruß K@rl (talk) 21:57, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

[edit]
WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

[edit]
WMF Surveys, 01:21, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

[edit]
WMF Surveys, 00:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

360-tram

[edit]

Hallo Tiefkuehlfan, erstens danke für die vielen Nachkategorisierungen, viele sind da dabei, an die ich dabei gar nicht denke - eine Kleinigkeit: du hast den 360er in eine neu Cat Former tram tracks in Vienna - mit dem hab ich ein kleines Problem, denn diese Linie oder Strecke liegt bzw. lag mehrheitlich auf niederösterreichischen Gebiet, wenn auch von den Wiener Linien oder Wiener Verkehrsbetrieben, wie sie damals hießen, betrieben wurden. Deshalb wurde sie ja auch hauptsächlich aufgelassen ;-) --K@rl (talk) 21:53, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo @Karl Gruber: Die Linie 360 war eine der wenigen bundesländerübergreifenden Linien der Wiener Verkehrsbetriebe, habe Kategorien in NÖ ergänzt. MFG. Tiefkuehlfan (talk) 12:50, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Meines Wissens die einzige. --K@rl (talk) 22:06, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Aber nicht wirklich. Abgesehen vom 317er nach Groß-Enzersdorf und dem 72er nach Schwechat ist auch Stammersdorf erst seit 1938 Teil von Wien, und die (heute noch vorhandene) Straßenbahnstrecke dorthin gab es schon davor. Tokfo (talk) 22:32, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Okay wusste ich nihct, allerdings ist zu berücksichtigen das Schwechat bis 1954 bei Wien war und bis 1922 alles eins war. Aber ich lerne gerne dazu, drum schrieb ich ja meines Wissens. --K@rl (talk) 08:43, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Category:Vaznesenjska_crkva has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Mieczysław Podolski (talk) 13:20, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:12, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 20:01, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Djerjap - Foto des Kraftwerks am Eisernen Tor

[edit]

Hallo Tiefkuehlfan,

wir würden gerne dein Foto des Kraftwerks am Eisernen Tor für eine neue Ausstellung im Donauschwäbischen Zentralmuseum nutzen. Gibt es dieses Fotos noch in einer besseren Auflösung als der in Wikimedia Commons? Falls ja, könnten wir das Bild in dieser Auflösung nutzen?

Vielen Dank und beste Grüße Kathinka Engels — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kathinka M. Engels (talk • contribs) 14:29, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Vojak (mountain)

[edit]

Hi Tiefkuehlfan. I have reverted your editing [1] because Vojak is the peak of the Učka mountain. The Vojak itself is not a mountain, don't be confused by the mark in parentheses (mountain). Greeting --Vhorvat (talk) 02:34, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:2452 Mannersdorf am Leithagebirge, Arbach Brücke 2022-10-15.jpg

[edit]

Hallo Tiefkuehlfan. Wie kommst du darauf dass File:2452 Mannersdorf am Leithagebirge, Arbach Brücke 2022-10-15.jpg ein denkmalgeschütztes Objekt zeitgt? Und mehr als die Brücke zeigt es auch nicht. Auf https://www.bda.gv.at/dam/jcr:d9745190-ce0a-46d5-8228-4dbd0458e063/_Niederösterreich_DML_2022.pdf gelistet ist es ebenso nicht. Habe ich etwas übersehen? mfG --Hangman'sDeath (talk) 07:08, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As there exists another Glan in Rhineland-Palatinate of similar importance, the tributaries-category of the Carinthian Glan should be disambiguated so it won't usurp further the common river name. The Category:Glan should be made a disambiguation page and so on.

See in de-wp

for the lengths and the drainage bassins of both rivers. --Silvicola (talk) 06:43, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]