User talk:Tetris L

English: Welcome to the Commons, Tetris L!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot 12:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Heinrich Zoelly mit Unterschrift.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by John Bot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. -- John Bot_{(My Operator|My Contribs)} 13:40, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

TUSC token 1970912e361cb72f4a2c6ee55d9371dc

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

TUSC token 7a8511154a26718c53097e79cff7b759

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

About the deletion of File:Access Shaft at Hill Road, West Island Line 1.jpg

Why does nobody notify me about the deletion request of this photo? I'm the original uploader.

Also, FYI, these can be deleted as well, according to the reason:

• File:MTR WIL (2).JPG
• File:MTR WIL (4).JPG
• File:MTR KET (2).JPG

--Minghong (talk) 04:08, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Erm, and what exactly do I have to do with this? Really, I don't remember, fill me in, please. --Tetris L (talk) 08:02, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, my mistake. I thought you are the one who deleted my photo. --Minghong (talk) 08:21, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! E126-Prototyp-12-02-2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Stiking too. --Saffron Blaze 18:38, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Bahrain_WTC_day.JPG

File:Bahrain_WTC_day.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 12:26, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Category:Grube_Fortuna_(Wetzlar)

Grube Fortuna (Wetzlar) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Emha (talk) 09:59, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Category:Ride with the Hespertalbahn

I reactivated this category and reverted your image moves from this category. There is a big difference between the Hespertalbahn itself and images taken during a ride with the Hespertalbahn as shown in this category you shouldn't ignore! -- Ies (talk) 20:53, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes, there is a difference, but the category still doesn't fit into the established schemes. A similar category "Ride with ..." does not exist on Commons for any other railway, road or vehicle. Images are primarily categorized by what they show. Sometimes they are also categorized by the locatiopn or objekt from which they were taken. In the latter case the category is usually named "View from ..." (see Category:Views by viewpoint and Category:Views from vehicles). Hence, if the category is reactivated, it should be renamed Category:Views from the Hespertalbahn, and it should only contain images not showing the Hespertalbahn itself (which belong directly into Category: Hespertalbahn or Category: Rolling stock of Hespertalbahn) but only the surrounding landscape, especially the Baldeneysee and the Hardenbergufer. --Tetris L (talk) 09:04, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Let's continue the discussion at Category talk:Ride with the Hespertalbahn#Move. --Tetris L (talk) 09:12, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Meerbusch_-_Lank_-_Alte_Schule_(4).jpg

File:Meerbusch_-_Lank_-_Alte_Schule_(4).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nerd9669 (talk) 08:35, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Re: Graphs, charts, schemas and diagrams

Hi! I noticed that you removed Category:Energy statistics from Category:Energy schemas and diagrams (and subcategories accordingly), stating that "Charts and graphs are not schemas or diagrams". I see where you're coming from, but I have to say that (unfortunatly) the definition of these terms is not quite as clear as you (and me too) would like them to be. If you read the relevant articles in Wikipedia (which should be the main reference, not some Google search), you see that the terms are pretty wide, collective terms, often used like synonyms. The term diagram includes various charts, graphs, schemas, plans, technical drawings and even maps. Consequently, the terms are largely mixed up all over Wikipedia and Commons. To make life easier, I put schemas and diagrams together in one category in the energy tree, because there is no clear difference anyway. Maybe I should have named the category Category:Energy schemas, diagrams, charts, graphs, plans and all the rest. --Tetris L (talk) 19:51, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

If you want to include statistics under schemas and diagrams, I believe that is incorrect. But I don't want to spend a lot of time arguing about it.

Just please do not remove obvious statistical charts and graphs from statistics categories. Many people will not look for statistical charts, graphs, and tables in schemas and diagrams categories.

So statistics categories need to also be direct subcategories of their topics. For example; Category:Energy statistics should be directly under Category:Energy. If you also want to put Category:Energy statistics under Category:Energy schemas and diagrams that is OK by me if you insist. But leave Category:Energy statistics directly under Category:Energy too. --Timeshifter (talk) 18:34, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

I didn't remove any content from any statistical category. Quite the opposite, I added a lot to them during my recent clean-ups.

Well, I believe that it's not expected too much from somebody who is looking for a statistical diagram (charts and graphs are diagrams) to understand that he will find it in the diagram category. Off course everybody wants his favorite object or topic as high up in the category tree as possible. But I feel that this clutters the main categories. In a flat category that is packed it is much harder to find something than in one that is well structured with subcategories in multiple levels. It's a matter of taste. --Tetris L (talk) 18:48, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear Tetris L, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 01:13, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Mass broken edits

You've just moved a lot of files from Category:North Sea to undefined:Coasts of the North Sea (example). Please repair the damage done and fix your scripts before continuing. BR, tsca (talk) 09:08, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Must have been a temporary hick-up of Cat-a-lot, which is not my script but an official Gadget. I'm not a script coder, just a plain user, so I wouldn't mess with the script to fix or break it. However, everything seems to be okay again now. Did you fix all of those errors? If yes, thank you! --Tetris L (talk) 21:33, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

File:PearlRiverTower Jan.jpg

You removed categories about renewable energy on this file, without comments, have you got a reason for that ? This skycrapper use wind turbines and solar panel to be energy positive. 82.225.234.108 14:30, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

The file was already in multiple sub-categories of Category:Renewable energy: Category:Renewable energy in China and Category:Solar energy in China and Category:Solar architecture. Please read Commons:Categories#Over-categorization, it explains why I removed the category. Actually, I should have removed even more. --Tetris L (talk) 21:34, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Photo Gruhl

As the photographer is unknown nobody can be sure that he died before 1943. So the photo is not public domain. Best regards 88.77.135.126 17:36, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Categories for your kind information

Hi, some categories have been tagged as {categorize}, p.e. that edit has been fixed, best regards Roland zh (talk) 19:11, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Horse Gin in Use

Sorry this went to the wrong user. Please delete.

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze

Hallo Tetris L,

in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.

Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.

In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)

Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen

Hallo Tetris L,

nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.

Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.

Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.

Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.

( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)

User:Tetris L/Template:Mill

User:Tetris L/Template:Mill has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 11:56, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Category:Mills_in_Guttau

Category:Mills_in_Guttau has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

j.budissin ^/- 20:05, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

File:NYMT in Concert with Matt Lucas & Friends - cropped.jpg

File:NYMT in Concert with Matt Lucas & Friends - cropped.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Diannaa (talk) 17:23, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

User:Tetris L

User:Tetris L has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

119.160.98.199 19:38, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to [email protected].

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or [email protected]. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Category:Sugar_mills

Sugar mills has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Themightyquill (talk) 11:42, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Category:Making fire

Making fire has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

El Grafo (talk) 09:15, 31 July 2023 (UTC)