User talk:Sinigh

Archives 1

Recent deletion requests

Hi Sinigh, thanks for the excellent categorisation work you've been doing. I just wanted to let you know, though, that in your recent DRs you take far too narrow a view of COM:PS, particularly "realistically useful for an educational purpose", which we interpret broadly. General stock images are well in scope, as they can easily be used to accompany educational blogs and the like, and variety of choice for re-users is a good thing. Remember that Commons is hosting for the whole world, not just for Wikimedia. To be specific, not one of these arguments takes an image out of scope: "of little use", "long-term unused [on Wikimedia]", "uncategorized", "stock-photo style", "not a meaningful contribution", "details are in scope but not the whole image" (can be cropped), "image probably won't be used", "partly out of frame and/or out of focus" (for many of the images you've tagged, that's mostly an artistic choice). MichaelMaggs (talk) 11:01, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your feedback, MichaelMaggs! To anyone else who might be reading this, this is where I responded: Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with "rawpixel.com 2017". Sinigh (talk) 13:17, 13 July 2024 (UTC)