User talk:Sfu/4

Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mur chiński 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. --Jovianeye 05:34, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Kod stron z plikami ilustracji

Od dwu dni nie mogę załadować stron z ilustracjami z commons. Po wywaołaniu strony przeglądarka przeładowuje kilkukrotnie i w końcu zgłasza błąd strony. Mój system operacyjny Windows XP, przeglądarka IE8. Na projektach narodowych strony z ilustracjami ładują się poprawnie, jednak bez możliwości przejścia do opisu na commons, z opisanego wyżej powodu. Na drugim komputerze - z Windows 7 i IE8 - wszystko działa poprawnie. Podejrzewam, że ktoś musiał coś pokręcić w skrypcie. Nie wiem, jak zgłosić ten problem techniczny i dlatego chciałbym wykorzystać Twoje możliwości administracyjne. Podobne problemy miał Kintetsubuffalo, o czym pisał na Graphic Lab/Photography workshop.

Pozdrawiam PawełMM (talk) 08:14, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Dziękuję za informacje, już jest dobrze. Pozdrawiam. PawełMM (talk) 18:51, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mur chiński 2010 5.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good. -- IdLoveOne 06:58, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Khajuraho Vishwanath temple 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good lighting and the angle makes the scaffolding easier on the eye. Cayambe 13:22, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ajanta caves panorama 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Impressive panorama. It's a shame though that the top if the hills are cut off. QI nonetheless for me. --Coyau 13:46, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Varanasi Munshi Ghat3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Amazing scenery. Meets criteria, imo.--MrPanyGoff 18:07, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Varanasi 2010 Munshi Ghat2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Meets criteria, imo.--MrPanyGoff 18:11, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Varanasi 2010 ghats1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Meets criteria, imo.--MrPanyGoff 18:11, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Varanasi 2010 Ahilyabai Ghat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good colors and perspective. -- Daniel Case 04:25, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Varanasi 2010 Chousatti Ghat.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Meets criteria imo.--MrPanyGoff 14:47, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Varanasi 2010 ghats2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Meets criteria imo.--MrPanyGoff 14:47, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:鸡西文化广场.jpg

Please take care about rest of user uploads. Thank you. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fatehpur Sikiri Salim Chishti Tomb 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good quality --Carschten 16:50, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fatehput Sikiri Buland Darwaza gate 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments fajne zdjęcie, fajna jakość --Pudelek 14:30, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Przeniesienie

Witam

mógłbyś przenieść plik File:Peroutkova street in Brno.JPG pod nazwę Starobrněnská street in Brno? jest jakiś szablon, który mógłbym zostawić na zdjęciu, jeśli bym chciał, aby jakiś admin go przeniósł? zawsze o tym zapominam. pozdrawiam --Pudelek (talk) 11:50, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fatehpur Sikir Jami Masjid gate 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. --Jovianeye 16:06, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Varanasi 2010 ghats3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 09:44, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dęblin kościół Piusa V.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:54, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warszawa Karowa 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 07:54, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Khajuraho Dulhadeo 2010.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Khajuraho Dulhadeo 2010.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 12:59, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maciejowice pomnik 1974.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jovianeye 05:16, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Varanasi Munshi Ghat3.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Varanasi Munshi Ghat3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Khajuraho Parshvanath temple 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Jebulon 08:50, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur cows eating trash.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Varanasi cow on ghat stairs.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Suspicious coulour in thumbnail, but looks right. Very good. --Ikar.us 22:22, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yungang road to grottoes.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Ikar.us 23:14, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Varanasi 2010 ghats4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very impressive and good enough for me. --Ikar.us 11:40, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stefanów kapliczka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:49, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dach gmachu głównego politechniki 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Great composition, the glass roof is of excellent quality, just the surrounding walls are very noisy. Can you do something about this? If so, I'd even support it for FP. -- H005 10:17, 30 July 2011 (UTC) I uploaded version with some denoising done. --Sfu 11:49, 30 July 2011 (UTC) OK, luminance noise is very low now, but there's still a lot of colour noise (usually easier to get rid of than luminance noise) - and you added a black line in the lower right corner. :-) -- H005 12:03, 30 July 2011 (UTC) Wasn't easier fr me, but done. --Sfu 14:57, 30 July 2011 (UTC)  Support Great work! -- H005 16:29, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Wola Gułowska-trumna.jpg

We wanted to let you know that we've used one of your pictures in a project of ours: http://litpics.tumblr.com/post/8355758397/lit-whosoever-shall-offend-by-f-marion-crawford

We created a computer program to generate random pairings of sentences from public domain texts and public domain / creative commons images. Some of the pictures we've selected come from the Wikipedia Commons. All the pictures we select ourselves, but the pairings and the text are random. Of these pairings that are generated, we only post the most interesting combinations.

We welcome any feedback about our site.

Thanks for sharing your pictures,
Samantha and Patrick

blog: http://litpics.tumblr.com/
email: [email protected]
twitter: http://twitter.com/litpics

Litpics (talk) 21:35, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Teatr Wielki w Warszawie

Witam Pana (mam nadzieję, że w ten sposób zwracam się do pana Marcina Białka), piszę w sprawie zdjęcia Teatru Wielkiego w Warszawie. Przygotowuję książkę o perspektywie i chętnie bym to zdjęcie wykorzystał (zarówno w wersji prosto- jak i krzywoliniowej), oczywiście z odnotowaniem pana autorstwa. W związku z tym chciałbym jeszcze zapytać o parę szczegółów na temat jego zrobienia. Podaję mój adres mailowy (chyba wolę się w ten sposób kontaktować, bo w sumie nie dokładnie rozumiem, jak tutaj te strony dyskusji w Wikipedii funkcjonują): [email protected] Będę wdzięczny za kontakt. Pozdrawiam, Krzysztof

Coffin and coffins

Hi Sfu,

I think you mistake with the captions of your nominations in QIC page.

above the caption President Ryszard Kaczorowski's coffin I see TWO coffins on the photo.

above the caption President Lech Kaczyński's and Maria Kaczyńska's coffins I see only ONE coffin on the photo.

In my opinion, you have to invert the captions...

Impressive pictures, by the way, with a high emotional and encyclopedic values.

Posdrawiam, --Jebulon (talk) 14:19, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pomnik Jana III Sobieskiego w Warszawie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A very little perspective distortion (not important IMO), good quality--Lmbuga 11:55, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trumny Pary Prezydenckiej w Sali Kolumnowej Pałacu Prezydenckiego.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'm sorry it is not the good caption, please invert.--Jebulon 13:33, 1 October 2011 (UTC) Done--Jebulon 23:27, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warszawa kościół ewangelicki 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Jebulon 15:18, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pałac Kultury i Nauki 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and nice view --Taxiarchos228 08:32, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pomnik Jana III Sobieskiego.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments To me good quality, it can be QI if perspective correction (the iron fence)--Lmbuga 11:51, 1 October 2011 (UTC)  Done with Gimp (in order not to loose exif, as it's not my pic. --Sfu 08:47, 2 October 2011 (UTC) Much better--Lmbuga 16:53, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Horch 830 BL z 1938 roku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 21:47, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Most Świętokrzyski 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 13:54, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pomnik Kilińskiego 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 19:57, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pałac Krasińskich 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good --Pudelek 13:49, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trumna Ryszarda Kaczorowskiego 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'm sorry it is not the good caption, please invert.--Jebulon 13:33, 1 October 2011 (UTC) Did you mean this? --Sfu 13:37, 1 October 2011 (UTC)  Done --Sfu 16:51, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

chromatic aberration ?

Hello Sfu.

Would you please help me by annotating the CA you see on this picture ?

I want to improve the file, but I don't know where...

Thank you for your review, anyway.--Jebulon (talk) 14:48, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cmentarz ewangelicki na Woli - grób Feliksa Gebethnera.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments excellent playing with the light and I'm surprised about this great DOF (uncommon at 36mm and f/5,6...) --Carschten 20:06, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cmentarz ewangelicki na Woli - grób rodziny Laske 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I really don't have to comment that --Carschten 20:06, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warszawa kościół na Chłodnej 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality image --Jakubhal 19:53, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Rozdzielanie grafik

Cześć, zauważyłem że wiesz jak rozdzielić nadpisane pliki, więc zgłaszam takie coś. W razie czego mogę podesłać tego więcej. Yarl ✉ 20:05, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Kolejne: File:Ruiny pałacu Opalińskich w Radlinie.jpg. Yarl ✉ 15:44, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Supraśl, cerkiew Zwiastowania NMP.jpg. Yarl ✉ 15:40, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Teatr Juliusza Słowackiego - Kraków.jpg. Yarl ✉ 16:56, 15 October 2011

File:BOGUSZYCE.jpg 77.187.187.252 16:59, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

File:PiotrPaweł.jpg Yarl ✉ 22:04, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Kamienica czynszowa Łódź.jpg Yarl ✉ 12:29, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Kamienica Jaracza 42 Łódź.jpg Yarl ✉ 12:55, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Dwór alkierzowy w Kotlinie.jpg 77.187.187.252 17:09, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Klasztor oo redemptorystów w Tuchowie.jpg 77.13.10.20 07:14, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Zamek Grodziec.jpg 77.13.10.20 14:30, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Pałac w Cerekwicy.jpg 77.13.10.20 19:50, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Podcienia kościoła p. w. św. Marcina w Jarocinie.jpg 77.13.10.20 21:23, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Polkowice - Kościół parafialny św. Michała Archanioła.jpg 217.247.158.138 12:47, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Cmentarz rzymsko-katolicki 1.jpg Yarl ✉ 10:20, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Kaplica cmentarna "Emaus" ,1848.jpg77.13.6.194 11:34, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Zajazd (obecnie dom mieszkalny) z lat 1820-1830.jpg 77.13.6.194 21:37, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Cmentarz rzymsko-katolicki 1.jpg 77.13.6.194 07:44, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Środek katedry.jpg 80.171.153.248 12:41, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Domy robotnicze K.W. Scheiblera.jpg

File:Zespół d. domów robotniczych K.W. Scheiblera.jpg Yarl ✉ 13:04, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Miasto Świeradów-Zdrój.jpg 80.171.49.123 13:55, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Kleczanow - cmentarzysko ciałopalne z VIII-X w.jpg 80.171.49.123 14:18, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Pałac Wilcza.jpg 80.171.49.123 16:26, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Kolumna Zygmunta a3.jpg Yarl ✉ 21:14, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Kościół par. p.w. św. Jakuba w Tarchominie.jpg 80.171.90.172 06:42, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Dzwonnica przed kościołem par. św. Jakuba na Tarchominie, 2 poł. XVIII.jpg 80.171.90.172 06:47, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Kościół p.w. Narodzenia NMP, 1684-88, XX.jpg 80.171.90.172 07:28, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Ćmielów - ruiny zamku Szydłowieckich z XVIw..jpg 80.171.90.148 11:15, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Zespół pałacowy w Wolborzu.jpg 80.171.17.139 06:49, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Międzygórz - ruiny XIV-wiecznego zamku.jpg 80.171.17.139 08:13, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Zespół dworski Młodziejowice .jpg 80.171.103.65

File:Kościół ewangelicki, obecnie rzymsko-katolicki pw. NMP Królowej Korony Polskiej z końca XIX w..jpg

File:Kościół parafialny św. Michała Archanioła we Wrocławiu.jpg 80.171.87.79 14:24, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Plebania ewangelicka, 1871-72.jpg

File:Grudziadz Cytadela.jpg

File:Stary cmentarz żydowski.jpg

File:Kamienica mieszczańska.jpg 80.171.87.31 14:21, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Żuraw gdański.jpg 80.171.50.99 15:18, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Sułów.jpg 80.171.172.119 20:08, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Kościół ewangielicki w Ujściu.jpg 80.171.102.4 11:58, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Dworek w Paulinach.jpg 80.171.103.54 11:07, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Widok na kościół od strony parkingu.JPG 80.171.103.54 11:30, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Radziki Duże.jpg 80.171.89.184 07:25, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Basztaattykowaikrakowska.jpg 80.171.89.184 11:08, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Biłgoraj - kościół św. Marii Magdaleny.jpg 80.171.147.75 15:02, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warszawa Pałac Prezydencki 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 12:54, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plac Politechniki 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 12:54, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warszawa kościół pokarmelicki 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 12:54, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Cyclotron

Sfu,

Fantastic pictures of your cyclotron. Please post more information on the building of your device, as many students here in Colorado would like to learn more!

Regards, Doug University of Colorado

Błędna kategoria

Witaj. Co zrobić z tym fantem [1] ? To co stworzył "IP" należy do kategorii S-F. Współcześnie istniały jedynie "Komandoria Polska obediencji maltańskiej" i "Delegatura Polska obediencji paryskiej". Od 2011 w Polsce istnieje jedynie "Wielki Przeorat Zakonu Rycerzy św. Łazarza". Pod nazwą wprowadzoną przez "IP" jako byt z nazwy ten zakon w Polsce "pozaborczej" nigdy nie funkcjonował. Przypisywanie przynależności do niego (pod tą błędną nazwą) osób żyjących współcześnie jest wielkim błędem i "chcąc-niechcąc" szerzeniem fałszywych informacji. 80.171.87.31 19:57, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

W art. w wiki napisane jest: "Obecnie po zjednoczeniu obu obediencji w 2011 roku Zakon na ziemiach Polski jest reprezentowany przez Wielki Przeorat (tzw. zjednoczone obediencje maltańska i paryska) oraz Komandorią Polską funkcjonującą w składzie Wielkiego Przeoratu Czech (tzw. obediencja orleańska)." Czy jest to nieprawda? Jaka powinna być właściwa nazwa tej kategorii? Mam jednak wrażenie, że grupuje zdjęcia przedstawiające tą samą organizację. Jeśli zaproponujesz lepsza nazwę, to mogę to zmienić. Nie czuję się jednak dość kompetentny aby sam tę nazwę zmieniać. --sfu (talk) 21:25, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Witaj. Określiłem to niezbyt precyzyjnie. Chodzi o to że jest to Komandoria Polski a nie Galicji i Lodomerii. Grzegorz Badziąg jest przecież cytat z wikipedii: "Kapelan Generalny i Inkwizytor Jurysdykcji Polskiej Zakonu Rycerzy św. Łazarza z Jerozolimy, oraz Stowarzyszenia Świętego Łazarza". Moja propozycja to "The Commandery of the Knights of Saint Lazarus of Poland by Friars Minor church in Krosno". Nie mam zielonego pojęcia co ten user zamierzał osiągnąć wprowadzając do historycznego i nieistniejącego bytu (od 1918) fotografie osób żyjących współcześnie. Hasło na wikipedii - jak najbardziej ale jako kategoria na commons wypełniona współczesnymi fotografiami jest błędem. 80.171.171.157 17:11, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Dałem to botowi do zrobienie. Ma jakieś problemy, ale w końcu mam nadzieję to zrobi. Pośpiechu chyba nie ma. --sfu (talk) 15:38, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Kategoryzacja

Witaj raz jeszcze. Chodzi mi o podstawy tworzenia takich kategorii jak "Category:Greek Catholic churches in Lwów Voivodeship" i przypisywanie jej fotografii współczesnych. Obawiam się że może to doprowadzić do lawinowego powstawania kategorii nieakceptujących współczesnych granic i burzących z trudem uzyskany tzw. consensus na poszczególnych wikipediach. Tylko patrzeć jak następni założą kategorie "churches in Provinz Posen", "churches in East Prussia", "Churches in West Prussia", "Churches in Inflanty", "Churches in Galicia (Central Europa)" i wszystko wypełnione oczywiście fotografiami współczesnymi. Oczywiście po kościołach, mosty, szkoły i wszystko jak leci ... aż do chaosu totalnego. Jak wygląda taki przypadek od strony regulaminowej ? Rozumię że można utworzyć taką galerię i odpowiednio ją opisać historycznie... ale kategoria bytu historycznego do którego przypisuje się media współczesne "jak leci" jest dla mnie absolutnie ściemniająca. pozdr. i z góry dzięki za odpowiedź 80.171.171.157 17:38, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Absolutnie jest przeciw istnieniu takich tworów. Kiedyś nawet aktywnie uczestniczyłem w przeczyszczaniu tzw. polskich krain historycznych ze wszelkich współczesnych zdjęć. Przyczym napotkałem tutaj na opór, szczególnie Ślązaków. Uważam, że jest jeszcze co najmniej jeden argument przeciwko takim historycznym kategoryzowaniem współczesnych zdjęć i jest to czas jaki zajmuje to użytkownikow. Po prostu mam i tak na duży nieporządek w obecnej kategoryzacji, więc wprowadzanie kolejnych, do którym może trafić wszystko co na danym terenie zostało sfotografowane może tylko zwiększyć zamieszanie. Jeśli chodzi o regulamin to nie wydaje mi się, żeby było to gdzieś określone. Wszystko musi przejść przez jakąś dyskusję. Moim zdaniem takie kategorie powinny zawierać jedynie mapy, herby, zdjecia wojewodów czy innych lokalnych urzędników, być może współczesne zdjęcia dawnych urzędów. Żeby to zachować, trzeba to moim zdaniem na początku każdej kategorii napisać. Tak zrobiłem w Category:Regions of Poland. Póki co z grubsza działa, poza Śląskiem, choć wydaje mi się, że opis ten trzeba rozszerzyć na kolejne kategorie. Podobny opis moim zdaniem można dać w innych kategoriach regionów historycznych w celu ustrzeżenia się przed tworzeniem bytów podobnego typu. --sfu (talk) 15:37, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Dzięki za odpowiedź. W sumie wszystko było dla mnie jasne ... ale zawsze lepiej otrzymać potwierdzenie. Dobrze że nie tylko ja tak myślę pozdr. 80.171.50.99 15:20, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warszawa MEL 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:16, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warszawa Cepelek 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:16, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Kategorie wprowadzające chaos

Witam. Bardzo proszę o zwrócenie administratorskiej uwagi na zmiany których dokonałem w ciągu ostatnich 30 minut. W wątku wyżej "Kategoryzacja" podałem przykład bezsensownej i wprowadzającej w błąd "Category:Greek Catholic churches in Lwów Voivodeship". Teraz ten sam user posuwa się dalej wprowadzając nowe katagorie dla NIELEGALNYCH i NARZUCONYCH bytów nazistowskich (Warthegau) O ile samo istnienie takiej kategorii (wypełnionej WYŁĄCZNIE historycznymi mapami i dokumentami) jest OK to przypisywanie jej do subkategorii "Niemcy w 1940" lub "Niemcy podczas II wojny światowej" jest już niezłym skandalem i SUPER MANIPULACJĄ Takie NIELEGALNE byty można kategoryzować tylko pod kraj który znalazł się pod okupacją a nie powielać tezy wiadomych kręgów ekstremalnych jakoby w latach 1933-1945 w ówczesnych Niemczech wszystko było OK a idąc dalej tym samym tropem również w okupowanej Polsce w latach 1939-1945. Commons to nie wikipedia - tam można opisywać prawie wszystko. Logicznie rzecz biorąc to commons powinna się trzymać obowiązującego porządku prawnego. Aż strach że na takie rzeczy trzeba zwracać uwagę. pozdr 80.171.89.190 09:25, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Witam. Kategoria "Trepcza Quarry" została dopisana do kategorii "Sanok during World War II". Żadna z fotografii nie jest historyczna wszystkie są współczesne. To kolejny byt który nic nie wnosi i przyczynia się do szerzenia zamętu. 80.171.72.152

Uprzejmie proszę o skierowanie administratorskiej uwagi na to (http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Polish_areas_annexed_by_Nazi_Germany&action=history) 80.171.72.152 17:46, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

proszę o zwrócenie uwagi na usera, który chyba poza tym że nie ma pomysłów co ze sobą zrobić łazi za innymi 80.171.72.152 18:46, 3 December 2011 (UTC

Zgłosiłem sprawę także do userów "Masur" i "JarekBot" proszę zwrócić uwagę na próbę zmanipulowania mojej wypowiedzi poprzez sfingowany podpis z moim IP 80.171.72.152 18:09, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Kategorie dotyczące granic

Witaj raz jeszcze. Rzecz dotyczy: "File:Bundesarchiv Bild 102-09887, Neuhöfen, Deutsch-polnische Grenze.jpg" Parokrotnie zrewertowałem edycje "IP87...." z adnotacją że jest to coś historycznego. Niestety ten user upiera się bez podania kontrargumentów dalej na "category:Border crossings of Poland", "category:Border crossings of Germany" i "category:East Prussia". Również moją uwagę o wprowadzenie do członu "historical" potraktował jako wandalizm. 80.171.89.190 09:40, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

I jeszcze to "File:Znak graniczny przemalowany.JPG". Jest to zdjęcie WSPÓŁCZESNE dotyczy obiektu HISTORYCZNEGO na OBOWIĄZUJĄCEJ od 1945 granicy polsko-czechosłowackiej a od 1993 polsko-czeskiej. Dwie godziny po mojej edycji z 13 kwietnia user "ŠJů" przywrócił kategorię "Boundary stones in Germany" (podkreślam in Germany). Odnoszę wrażenie że wbrew wszelkim regułom wg usera "ŠJů" wszystko co przed 1945 było niemieckie a zostało sfotografowane po 1945 należy wg jego "widzimisię" kategoryzować pod Niemcy. pozdr 80.171.89.190 10:02, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warszawa cmentarz ewangelicki na Woli grób Ireny Grosman 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Foot is a bit out of focus, but good general quality. --Coyau 02:27, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kościół na Witolinie 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --kallerna 18:40, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur Jantar Mantar plate 2011.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 17:15, 16 January 2012 (UTC)  Comment Some more explanation of what we see is appreciated for QI. --NorbertNagel 19:06, 16 January 2012 (UTC) This particular one I don't know and I don't think it's complete. Basicaly all devices where used for either observing shadows (sun or moon) or stars through something thus knowing time, date etc. --Sfu 20:33, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jantar1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 17:15, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur Jantar Mantar clock 2011.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 17:15, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

File:H-lesnoi-14-3958.jpg

You say, good quality considering resolution. I cannot get the idea. What's wrong about the resolution?--PereslavlFoto (talk) 16:44, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dworek Grochowski front 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please keep the EXIF data. --Yann 07:58, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dworek Grochowski 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Katarighe 20:36, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woman - gate Jaipur 2011.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 08:17, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jantar Mantar in Jaipur 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 16:31, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jai Prakash Yantra Jaipur 2011.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Uhm, what is it? The description just says "device". Mattbuck 04:08, 18 January 2012 (UTC) Device is called "Jai Prakash" as in a file name. Idea here is similar to that device (full hemisphere, observing the shadow of sun from the pinhole). Here the observer where entering the canals made in the hemisphere and observing the star though the pinhole. This type of device was in a pair of two. In the other one there where canals in places where you have white stone here. So two devices where complementary. --Sfu 10:36, 18 January 2012 (UTC) Er... ok. Mattbuck 23:48, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peacock gate 2011.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think a crop would be better. See annotation. Yann 08:17, 24 January 2012 (UTC) Right. Done. --Sfu 09:59, 25 January 2012 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Yann 17:17, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur Jantar Mantar Narivalaya Yantra 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 20:01, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Chiesa di san Giorgio Martire - Gorizia (1).jpg

Thank you very much! --T137(talk) 11:14, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London St James Park 2011.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good (i love the 2 flying birds!).--ArildV 22:43, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paryż kościół inwalidów.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Question Why no EXIF data? --NorbertNagel 18:46, 30 January 2012 (UTC) It's a stich. --Sfu 20:18, 30 January 2012 (UTC) Good quality. --Mbdortmund 18:49, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaipur Jantar Mantar panorama 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The left half of photo is darkish. --Aleks G 00:24, 26 January 2012 (UTC) I think, so the photo will look better ;) (the file is updated) --Aleks G 22:05, 26 January 2012 (UTC) OK then. Mattbuck 06:18, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Jaipur Jantar Mantar panorama 2011.jpg

Always please, good luck. --Aleks G 22:45, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Horse Guards 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment It seems to me that the photo so will look better ;) (the file is updated) --Aleks G 23:07, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Pałac Kultury i Nauki 2011.jpg

Gdyby jeszcze lekko przyciąć z dołu, żeby nie było widać tej poręczy po lewej... Przykuta → [edit] 13:11, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Węzeł Marsa 2012 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Should the license plate be blurred? --Till.niermann 19:46, 6 March 2012 (UTC) I've mixed the numbers. Sfu 20:32, 6 March 2012 (UTC)Dark parts are a bit... dark, denoising "borderline", but good picture, QI.--Jebulon 14:50, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Węzeł Marsa 2012 5.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality image for me. --Art-top 05:54, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Bolesławiec Map.jpg

Witam. Przypuszczam, że nie jest to praca własna tylko scan wydawnictwa kartograficznego lub zrzut planu ze strony internetowej. pozdr. 77.187.2.70 12:41, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Distortion corrected in Vienna

Hi Sfu,

The distortion behind the fountain of the Vienna State Opera is now corrected.

You were right.

Thanks for review and comment.--Jebulon (talk) 22:09, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

New version uploaded. Thanks for review.--Jebulon (talk) 22:01, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ An image you created has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you created was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jabłonowski Palace, Warsaw.

review

 Support all criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:54, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 17:47, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

--MrPanyGoff 06:00, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ An image you created has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you created was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Adinath Temple, Khajuraho (exterior).

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:48, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 10:45, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

--MrPanyGoff 06:26, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ An image you created has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you created was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Devi Jagadambi Temple, Khajuraho Group of Monuments.

review

•  Support Best for the scope. Yann (talk) 12:51, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Khajuraho India, Devi Jagadambi Temple - Full View.jpg:  0
2. Khajuraho Devi Jagadambi Temple 2010.jpg:  1 
=>
File:Khajuraho India, Devi Jagadambi Temple - Full View.jpg: Declined.
File:Khajuraho Devi Jagadambi Temple 2010.jpg: Promoted.

--MrPanyGoff 18:58, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

--MrPanyGoff 08:02, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

prośba o zmianę nazw plików

Witam.Mam Prośbę o zmiane nazw pilików ponieważ popełniłem literówki a cieżko mi jest sobie samemu poradzić z tym problemem ponieważ jestem jeszcze zielony. moje pliki do poprawy to: Jerzy Styczynski 1 http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jerzy_Styczyński_1.jpg Festiwal Ryśka 1 http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Festiwal_Ryśka_1.jpg Martyna Jakubowicz 1 http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Martyna_Jakubowicz_1.jpg Proszę o usunięcie tych 1.

Za poprawę nazw plików z góry dziękuję. Pluton76

Nie mogę przenieść tych plików pod proponowane nazwy ponieważ isntieją już pliki o takich nazwach. W przypadku dwóch pierwszych plików ponieważ sam tego nie zauważyłem za wczasu zmieniłem nazwy zamiast 1 dodają rok w którym zdjecie zostalo wykonane. Jesli chodzi o zdjęcie 3. to go nie ruszam, bo nie tutaj również istnieje czyjeś zdjęcie o nazwie File:Martyna Jakubowicz.jpg, a _1 w sumie niczemu nie przeszkadza. --sfu (talk) 16:19, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Dzięki za odpowiedz. Zawsze trochę więcej wiedzy w mojej głowie. :)--Piotr Frydecki (talk) 10:08, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tuchowicz kościół 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good photo. --Florstein 07:44, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wodynie kościół 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:02, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Latowicz kościół 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:02, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rieju RR 2006.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:30, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Ясновельможная Польша плакат РСФСР 1920.jpg

Dzień dobry. Wycofałem już dwa razy błędną kategorię. Niestety zostało to już dwukrotnie zrevertowane. Plik należy do kategorii "polityka", "propaganda reolucyjna", propaganda antypolska" ale przecież nie "Polska w sztuce" ... a jeżeli już to tylko w jakiejs podkategorii dot. propagandy i naciąganej satyry. Chciałem równocześnie zauważyć że revertujący nie odważyli się przypisać tego pliku do "Francji w sztuce". Prosiłbym o zwrócenie na to uwagi i ewentualnie na podjęcie interwencji. 77.187.26.183 10:14, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Category:Personifications of Poland

W tej kategorii jako 3 i 4 plik znajdują się plakat niemieckich nazistowskich władz okupacyjnych w Polsce i propagandowy plakat niemiecki z okresu plebiscytu na G. Śląsku - żaden z nich nie jest ani personifikacją ani też symbolem Polski tylko propagandystycznym narzędziem twórcy plakatu. Pliki 6,7,8,9 są znaczkami pocztowymi Generalnej Gubernii - wymowa ideologiczna tych znaczków to "Goralenvolk - Germanie" i blonwłosi Polacy to potomkowie "Germanów". Przypisujący te pliki do owej kategorii (jako użytkownik zalogowany wielonickowiec z pacynkami i IP) wielokrotnie sprawił już sporo kłopotów na wiki.pl, wiki.en i wiki.de stosując własne "prawdy" oparte na "źródłach" pseudonaukowych. Zwróciłem mu kilka razy uwagę, niestety spotkałem się z agresją i obrazą. Bardzo proszę o zwrócenie uwagi na przytoczone przeze mnie przykłady. 77.187.26.183 10:37, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Category:Polish areas annexed by Soviet Union

Dotyczy tego samego użytkownika co wyżej. [2], [3] i [4] dokonał kolejnego revertu wg własnej wizji historii. Obszary te po ataku na ZSRR nigdy nie zostały zaanektowane przez III Rzeszę, zawsze miały status obszarów zajętych (po niemiecku Besetzte Gebiete). Użytkownik nie widzi różnicy pomiędzy "okupacją a aneksją", "Besetzung a Annexion", "Military occupation a Annexation" i świadomie wprowadza sfoją wersję historii opartą na fałszu. Obawiam się, że niestety jest to czubek przysłowiowej góry lodowej i pod swoimi wieloma nickami "zasiał" na commonsie więcej takich "kwiatków". 77.187.26.183 11:16, 6 June 2012 (UTC)