User talk:Santasa99
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
You've uploaded a derivative work | We're sorry, but File:Starship Enterprise.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Photographs of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this photo must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a derivative work, please explain why on the image description page.
|
--KTo288 (talk) 20:14, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 06:14, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Neretva kod jablanice.jpg is uncategorized since 19 March 2009.
- Image:Zaštičeni revir Neretva.jpg is uncategorized since 19 March 2009.
- Image:Neretva upstream of town of Konjic.jpg is uncategorized since 19 March 2009.
- Image:Water of the Neretva river.jpg is uncategorized since 19 March 2009.
- Image:Zaštičeni revir Neretva - Djevica.jpg is uncategorized since 19 March 2009.
- Image:Kanjon Neretve Ocrkavlje.jpg is uncategorized since 19 March 2009.
- Image:Najbolja slika Stari.jpg is uncategorized since 19 March 2009.
- Image:Neretva 4.jpg is uncategorized since 19 March 2009.
- Image:Neretva at Glavatičevo.jpg is uncategorized since 19 March 2009.
- Image:Neretva žičani mostovi.jpg is uncategorized since 19 March 2009.
- Image:Zaštičeni revir Neretva - Kanjon Ljuta.jpg is uncategorized since 19 March 2009.
- Image:! ! ! čudo ! - kanjon Neretve nizvodno od Uloga.jpg is uncategorized since 30 March 2009.
File source is not properly indicated: File:Neretva_kod_jablanice.jpg
[edit]File source is not properly indicated: File:Neretva_upstream_of_town_of_Konjic.jpg
[edit]File source is not properly indicated: File:Viseči_most_Ostrožac.jpg
[edit]File source is not properly indicated: File:Neretva_žica.jpg
[edit]File source is not properly indicated: File:Stara_ćuprija_Konjic.jpg
[edit]File source is not properly indicated: File:Neretva_kod_jablanice.jpg
[edit]File source is not properly indicated: File:Neretva_upstream_of_town_of_Konjic.jpg
[edit]File source is not properly indicated: File:Neretva_žica.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Neretva_žica.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Neretva_žica.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Martin H. (talk) 20:31, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
In answer to your question on my talkpage: Yes, it is ok to make mistakes and to have them corrected. But it is not ok to upload a photograh someone else made and later change the authorship to yourself (own work). Are you the photographer? I dont think so. The photo was taken from another website and it is not free as required on Commons. Everything on Commons must be free for every purpose including commercial use by the copyright holders explicite written permission. --Martin H. (talk) 20:48, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks for having this clearified. Thanks for fixing the image descriptions now.
- I saw http://www.bih-x.com/vijesti/grafika/neretva.jpg which you uploaded to File:Neretva 4.jpg - first in a very small thumbnail size. Also the image on the website have more EXIF data than your upload. How comes? P.s.: the image was first on that website http://www.bih-x.com/vijesti/arhiva/06-11-01-01.htm, not first on Commons. --Martin H. (talk) 21:27, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
- I also found http://www.riverpeople.com.ba/p7hg_img_1/fullsize/Neretva_fs.jpg, you uploaded it as File:Kanjon Neretve Ocrkavlje.jpg. Its nr. 75 of 77 at http://www.riverpeople.com.ba/gallery.html. --Martin H. (talk) 21:34, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
- Your absolutely right, they also took the image from somewhere else. I found the original source:
- Photo by Sulejman Badzak, UCODEP, all with camera EXIF. This answers the question "Various NGO sites" - as UCODEP is a NGO. Our policy requires that you provide a permission from the copyright holder and forward it to OTRS. My personal opinon is, that you are not the copyright holder as you maintain your own panoramio account without mentioning the source and without any EXIF/camera data. --Martin H. (talk) 22:36, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
- Furthermore i should have checked w:en:User talk:Santasa99 first. Also the history of the Neretva article gives strong evidence that you simply continiue your behaviour on Wikipedia here on Commons. This was NOT your first upload as en.wikipedia clearly shows, so you know how to provide source and author. Maybe you did not know that images must be free to use by the copyright holder written permission. --Martin H. (talk) 22:49, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
- Page blanking is not the sollution. I want to separate the correct images from the wrong images - here and on Wikipedia. So please help with correcting the information. Given the upload information I think everything you uploaded here is not free. --Martin H. (talk) 23:07, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Images can and will be deleted, however I still appreciate a clear statement what is from you and what not. Here (gallery) and on Wikipedia (gallery). Accounts cant get deleted. You can blank your talkpage after the situation is clearified. --Martin H. (talk) 23:30, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
- A free license once given is irrevocable, so a call for take down would be invalid if you are the copyright holder. However, I gave some evidence that you might be not the copyright holder, therefore deleted acting precautionary. I ask you to follow the licensing policy in future, only free content is allowed on Wikimedia projects. --Martin H. (talk) 23:55, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Hodidjed.PNG
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Hodidjed.PNG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Hodidjed.PNG]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Smooth_O (talk) 16:12, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Lg dwld.gif
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Lg dwld.gif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
JuTa 17:02, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
File:Emblem-FKS-238x314px.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Smooth O (talk) 08:32, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
File:FKSarajevo1996-2000(vector).png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Smooth O (talk) 08:32, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
File:FKSarajevo1992-96(vector).png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Smooth O (talk) 08:32, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
File:FKSarajevo1964-1992(vector).png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Smooth O (talk) 08:32, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted content
[edit]
File:FKSarajevo1996-2000(vector).png
- use in any work, regardless of content
- creation of derivative works
- commercial use
- free distribution
See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.And also:
- File:FKSarajevo1992-96(vector).png
- File:FKSarajevo1964-1992(vector).png
- File:FKSarajevo1946-1964(vector).png
Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 14:33, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!
[edit]You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.
Dear Santasa99,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.
In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.
Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!
[edit]Dear Santasa99,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.
In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.
Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:05, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Enjoy Sarajevo 1992-93.jpg
[edit]
Túrelio (talk) 08:15, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Smooth O (talk) 17:25, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Зеница 20200408 113026 (cropped).jpg was recently deleted
[edit]File:Зеница 20200408 113026 (cropped).jpg was recently deleted by Well-Informed Optimist for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.
- Reason for deletion: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Зеница 20200408 113026.jpg
It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 17:13, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Smooth O (talk) 11:38, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Reminder
[edit]Hi Santasa99. I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than using the automatic Nominate for deletion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests), please remember to follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:12, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
- "Sidebar" is the key word here - I was completely lost when i tried to delete that cat. It would not occur to me in a million years to look for tools on the sidebar. It's a wikipedia habit to look top bar for del. So, apologies for the inconvenience, and thanks for the reminder. Happy holidays.--Santasa99 (talk) 01:51, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Bosansko Primorje - small piece of Vego's large map of medieval Bosnia.png
[edit]Copyright status: File:Bosansko Primorje - small piece of Vego's large map of medieval Bosnia.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Bosansko Primorje - small piece of Vego's large map of medieval Bosnia.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 23:05, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Bosona has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
SevenSpheres (talk) 17:34, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!
[edit]Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 05:17, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Banate of Bosnia flag of Stjepan II Kotromanic (rotated).svg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Banate of Bosnia flag of Stjepan II Kotromanic (rotated).svg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |