User talk:Ryj
--Ryj (talk) 11:46, 25 July 2011 (UTC)Hi.
To put an image in a a category (for example: Algarve) you should add the following text to the image page:
[[Category:Algarve]]
Thanks for sharing your images with the Commons.
--OsvaldoGago 08:18, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Polyamidjacke.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
-- Bryan (talk to me) 14:24, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, but that's not enough. An image must be free for anyone, for any purpose: unlimited redistribution, commercial use, any modification and derivate work must be allowed. Please note that images from Google or some random website are not free! -- Bryan (talk to me) 14:57, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello!
Thank you for providing images to the Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.
To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.
You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.
The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on the Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!
Thank you. 85.179.110.81 20:22, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:46, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Wirkmaschine Baujahr 1856.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Wirkmaschine Baujahr 1856.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Motopark 18:40, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello, you have overwritten this image with another content, I've reverted it, please upload it with another file name. Thanks. --GeorgHH • talk 13:19, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
File:Siebdruck 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Achates (talk) 11:01, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 06:15, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Schermaschine 2.jpg was uncategorized on 10 October 2009.
- Image:Fixiermaschine 1.jpg was uncategorized on 12 October 2009.
- Image:Dekatiermaschine 3.jpg was uncategorized on 13 October 2009.
- Image:Galvanik-Versuchsanlage 1.jpg was uncategorized on 18 October 2009.
- Image:Leiterplatte 1.jpg was uncategorized on 18 October 2009.
- Image:Effektgarn 1.jpg was uncategorized on 15 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:32, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Cops.jpg was uncategorized on 19 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 20:56, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Jigger 2.jpg was uncategorized on 25 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 19:13, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Foulard 2.jpg was uncategorized on 26 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 21:20, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
If you have a question concerning this process, answer below, or in case of a deletion request, on the deletion-discussion page. Do not ask on my discussion page. With best regards RE rillke questions? 09:46, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Hallo Ryj, es sieht so aus, als ob Du einige Fotos von Abbildungen aus einem Buch gemacht hast. Dafür ist aber die Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers des Buches nötig. Wenn dem nicht so ist, kannst Du dich auf der Antragsseite auch gern auf deutsch äußern. Danke. -- RE rillke questions? 09:51, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Tja, etliche Bilder sind wahrscheinlich rechtlich problematisch, allerdings nicht alle. Ich muss es sortieren und melde mich dazu in den nächsten Tagen. Schade, dass du es nicht schon früher reklamiert hast, so ist es ohne Einwände fast fünf Jahre gelaufen. Grüße --Ryj (talk) 18:48, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Um Bilder nach Commons zu transferieren, gibt es inzwischen gute Tools: de:Wikipedia:WikiProjekt Commons-Transfer. Ich hoffe das hilft Dir. -- RE rillke questions? 20:47, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Hallo Rillke, ich habe die etwa 130 von dir zum Löschen vorgeschlagenen Bilder in 6 Gruppen aufgeteilt:
- 53 davon habe ich vom Bildschirm (ziemlich dilettantisch) abfotografiert. Die meisten davon sind dort nur vorübergehend erschienen, ich wüsste nicht, bei wem ich um Erlaubnis fragen sollte oder nach welchem Paragraphen es bei COMMONS geregelt ist.
- Von 24 Bildern aus aktuellen Fachbüchern habe ich Teile (keine ganzen Kopien) aufgenommen und mit eigener Beschreibung oder Ergänzung weiter gegeben. – Diese Gruppe könnte kritisch sein, ist es aber ausdrücklich verboten?
- 20 Bilder stammen aus über 30 Jahre alten Fachbüchern, die damaligen staatlichen Buchverlage in Leipzig oder in Prag gibt es natürlich nicht mehr. Müsste ich irgendwelche juristischen Nachfolger suchen, um bei den einen Antrag stellen zu dürfen?
- 12 Bilder wurden ganz regulär vom COMMONS-Public domain übernommen, der Urheber ist aufgeführt.
- 9 Bilder kommen aus Skripten von 1978, auf deren Deckblatt der Herausgeber (Arbeitgeberkreis Gesamttextil) eine Vervielfältigung zu Ausbildungs- und ähnlichen Zwecken ausdrücklich gestattet. Soll ich bei jeder Aufnahme den Herausgeber mit den ganzen Formalien angeben?
- Weitere 9 Aufnahmen habe ich zu Hause gemacht, welche Beweise muss ich dafür bringen? Oder schickt COMMONS einen Revisor zur Kontrolle, ob die fotografierte Gardine tatsächlich bei uns in der Toilette hängt? (Im Ernst, ich könnte ruhig auch noch zehn „geklaute“ Fotos textiler Gegenstände dieser Kategorie zuordnen, das Urheberrecht wird hier nicht einfach durchzusetzen sein). Hast du eine Lösung parat?
Ja, bei 2 Aufnahmen habe ich nicht zugefügt, dass sie zur Serie gehören, die ich vor 4 Jahren im Stadtmuseum Nordhorn mit Permission on shooting of exhibits gemacht habe. Und eine übernommene Zeichnung ist 200 Jahre alt.
Wie du siehst, ergeben sich hier einige Fragen. Vielleicht hast du ganz einfache Antworten und Lösungen, es wäre ganz nett, wenn du sie mir bald mitteilen könntest. Bis dann macht´s gut.--Ryj (talk) 13:31, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Hallo Ryj,
- Einfach etwas abzufotografieren macht Dich nicht zum Urheber. Wenn der Urheber noch nicht 70 Jahre tot ist, müssen wir sie löschen.
- Bildzitate sind OK, aber nicht auf commons. Daher müssen auch diese gelöscht werden, sollten wir keine COM:OTRS-Berechtigung bekommen.
- Wie es mit staatseigenen Betrieben der DDR und dem Urheberrecht aussieht weiß ich nicht.
- Die 12 Bilder entweder aus der Liste streichen oder aufführen.
- Wie es mit staatseigenen Betrieben der DDR und dem Urheberrecht aussieht weiß ich nicht. Unsere Bilder auf Commons sollen auch zur Kommerziellen Nutzung dienen können.
- Die 9 Aufnahmen von zu Hause bitte auch aus der Liste streichen oder aufführen.
Vielen Dank für die viele Mühe -- RE rillke questions? 13:52, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Hallo Rillke, kannst du bitte noch einmal erklären:
- Wie ist es mit dem Abfotografieren?. Ich habe auf Commons einige Landschafeten, Gegenstände usw., die auch einfach abfotogarafiert sind. Die müssten doch ebenso gelöscht werden, oder in dem Fall bin ich der Urheber, oder wo ist der Unterschied zu Webseiten?
- Du weißt zwar nicht wie es mit dem Urheberrecht aus der DDR läuft, aber du weißt, dass man die Aufnahmen löschen muß? Uns was hat es mit der kommerziellen Nutzung zu tun?
- Wie ist es nun mit den Skripten vom Arbeitgeberkreis?
Ich bedanke mich im voraus für baldige Antworten. --Ryj (talk) 16:45, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Hallo Ryj,
- Landschaften und Alltagsgegenstände fallen nicht unter das Urheberrecht. Einfach mal §1 und §2 unseres vergleichsweise leicht verständlichen Urheberrechtsgesetzes durchlesen.
- "eine Vervielfältigung zu Ausbildungs- und ähnlichen Zwecken ausdrücklich gestattet" das schließt keine kommerzielle Nutzung ein.
- Ich denke die Bilder aus den Werken der DDR werden gelöscht werden müssen, da diese seit ca. 1965 das gleiche Urheberrecht hatte, wie die BRD. Damit ist eine Privatperson Inhaber des Urheberrechts von Fotos und wenn der noch nicht vor 70 Jahren gestorben ist, bedarf es dessen Zustimmung. (soweit ich jetzt weiß, aber ich habe nachgefragt.)
Grüße -- RE rillke questions? 17:10, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
OK, Rillke, es ist so weit klar, aber eine Frage habe ich doch noch:
Ist jedes Foto im Internet eine Veröffentlichung im Sinne des Urheberrechts (Beispiel: http://cgi.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?VISuperSize&item=170627548802). Sonst möchte ich natürlich auch noch wissen, wie es mit dem geistigen Eigentum der ehemaligen Staatsbetriebe steht. Danke, bis dann --Ryj (talk) 07:57, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
- Mit dem Link gibt es scheinbar Probleme? Ich sehe da nur so einen AjaxLoader File:Ajax-loader.gif
- Ob diese einfachen Animationen die nötige Schöpfungshöhe erreichen ist fraglich.
- s. Commons:Forum#Urheberrecht bei staatlichen Unternehmen der DDR
- -- RE rillke questions? 08:19, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
Entschuldigung, hier ein anderes Beispiel für Internetfotos: http://cgi.ebay.de/zimt-braun-Pannesamt-SAMT-Dekostoff-Meterware-Stoff-TOP-/380289871900?pt=DE_Haus_Garten_Hobby_Basteln_Stoffe&hash=item588b0af01c --Ryj (talk) 09:26, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
- § 2 Punkt 5. Lichtbildwerke einschließlich der Werke, die ähnlich wie Lichtbildwerke geschaffen werden;
- Ja, Fotos (Lichtbildwerke) (außer denen, die nur einen 2-d-Gegenstand zeigen), genießen Urheberrecht. Der zweidimensionale Gegenstand kann aber auch dem Urheberrecht unterliegen. -- RE rillke questions? 10:15, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
Hallo Rillke, ich möchte mich abschließend für deine Bemühung bedanken. Die letzten beiden Antworten bringen mich zwar nicht weiter, aber sonst habe ich von dir einiges gelernt. Tschüß --Ryj (talk) 13:52, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
- Ich habe mich auch gefreut. Von manchen Nutzern wird man einfach ignoriert, andere denken sich Lügengeschichten aus, manche stellen sich absichtlich blöd und wieder andere reagieren mit Vandalismus. Da bist Du anders. Danke!
- Wenn noch Fragen bestehen, wende Dich an mich. Alles weiß ich aber auch nicht.
- Im Forum kannst Du auch nachfragen.
- Was meine 2. Antwort angeht: Lies Dir, wenn Du Zeit hast mal in Ruhe Commons:Bearbeitungen durch. Besonders der Fall mit dem Gemälde und dem Bilderrahmen sind da interessant.
- Viel Spaß beim Hochladen noch. Ich hoffe die Möglichkeiten dafür verbessern sich auch noch.
- Mit freundlichen Grüßen -- RE rillke questions? 14:49, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Netzknüpfmaschine.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Netzknüpfmaschine.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
RE rillke questions? 17:43, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
Jacquard hat sie gebaut. Aber wer hat da gezeichnet? -- RE rillke questions? 17:45, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
Wahrscheinlich hat die Zeichnung der liebe Herr Jacquard selbst gemacht. Mehr als offensichtlich ist nur, dass sie älter als 70 Jahre alt ist. Ich suche im Moment vergeblich nach dem uralten Buch, in dem sie irgendwann vor 150 Jahren veröffentlich wurde. --Ryj (talk) 08:54, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
- Hallo Rillke, jetzt habe ich das Buch gefunden. Es geht um Netze und Netzwerke: Archäologie einer Kulturtechnik, 1740-1840 von Sebastian Giessmann. Das Werk ist zwar nicht sehr alt, aber unter der Zeichnung dort steht (auf Seite 78), dass es ein Stich von 1824 ist. (Autor unbekannt).
Ich möchte dich noch etwas anderes fragen: Vor 25 Jahren habe ich verschiedene Fachberichte und Anweisungen für Kunden geschrieben, die ich beraten habe. Die dazugehörigen Texte, meine eigenen Zeichnungen, Diagramme und Bilder aus Prospekten wurden intern in unserer Firma vervielfältigt. Es existieren heute weder mein Arbeitgeber noch zum großen Teil die Auftraggeber. Wie steht es mit den Autorenrechten? Ich bitte um eine Antwort nur wenn du einmal Zeit und Lust hast, lebenswichtig ist das Thema nicht. Bis dann --Ryj (talk) 11:46, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
- So weit ich weiß, geht das Urheberrecht nur bei Computerprogrammen auf den Arbeitgeber über. Es sei denn, es wurde im Arbeitsvertrag ausdrücklich übertragen (exklusives Nutzungsrecht). Evtl. finde ich auch noch einmal Zeit nachzulesen. -- RE rillke questions? 17:15, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
Hallo Rilke, noch etwas: Unter den gelöschten Bildern war auch File:Doppelraschel 2.jpg. Wie ich erst später festgestellt habe, war die Löschung nicht gerecht, weil das Bild vorschriftsmäßig von der Quelldatei http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Doppelraschelmaschine.jpg aus der deutschen WIKI nach Commons übernommen worden war. Ich habe jetzt vesucht, das Bild (unter einer anderen Bezeichnung) nach Commons neu zu transferieren, es wurde aber wiederholt mit dem Hinweis abgelehnt, dass die Datei schon einmal gelöscht wurde. Kannst du da bitte ein “Machtwort sprechen”? Danke --Ryj (talk) 09:16, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- Ich habe File:Doppelraschel 3.jpg wiederhergestellt, die nötigen Informationen nachgetragen und die volle Auflösung hochgeladen. -- RE rillke questions? 09:50, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
Dank und schöne Grüße --Ryj (talk) 10:30, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
File:Struktur PBO 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 19:17, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Deletion is OK--Ryj (talk) 14:38, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
File:Strukturformel PIPD 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 19:31, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Deletion is OK--Ryj (talk) 14:38, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:19, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 08:21, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Was ist den bei dem Bild passiert? Es führt dich als Autor, aber das Original von der deutschen Wikipedia hat Stahlkocher als Urheber des Bilds. -- Cecil (talk) 19:33, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
- Ich habe die Datei auf Commons kopiert, weil ich sie für die tschechische WIKI verwenden wollte. So habe ich es schon in mehreren Fällen ohne Probleme gemacht. Gibt es einen besseren Weg, oder ist es sogar verboten? Grüße --Ryj (talk) 10:03, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Henkel 5.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Henkel 5.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Denniss (talk) 17:53, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Henkel 5.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Henkel 5.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 14:06, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Henkel 5.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Henkel 5.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 12:45, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
Permission to Use an Image
[edit]Dear Ryj
I have seen the vector image of ring spinning that you have uploaded to Wikipedia which I would like to include in a textile text book which I have written and am requesting your permission to use it. As much as the commons licence implies the image can be used my publisher wants written permission from the owner of an image.
I look forward to hearing from you
regards Bev Ashford
Lieber RYJ
Ich habe die Vektor-Bild der Ringspinn , dass Sie Wikipedia Welche Ich möchte in einer Textil Text Buch, das ich geschrieben habe, und bin Anfordern Ihre Erlaubnis , es zu benutzen sind hochgeladen haben gesehen . So viel wie die Commons-Lizenz impliziert das Bild genutzt werden kann mein Verleger will vom Eigentümer eines Bildes schriftlichen Genehmigung.
Ich freue mich von Ihnen zu hören
Grüße
ich verstehe nicht ganz, warum Ihr Verleger eine Genehmigung von mir verlangt. Ich bin zwar der Autor einiger Aufnahmen, aber alle Rechte zur weltweiten Verwendung habe ich unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Wikimedia Commons abgegeben. Seitdem bin ich kein Eigentümer des Bildes und als Genehmigung zu seiner Übernahme gilt eine Kopie oder ein Zitat der Lizenzbedingungen, die unter jedem Foto auf Wikimedia Commons stehen.
Ich hoffe, dass es Ihr Verleger verstehen wird (unfortunately just in German, my English is not good enough) und wünsche Ihnen viel Erfolg --Ryj (talk) 15:51, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi Ryj The ring spinning image does say it is your work - did you take the image? if so you can say yes to me using it. thank you Bev's Book (talk) 19:08, 14 October 2015 (UTC) Bev's Book Hallo RYJ Das Bild Ringspinn nicht sagen, dass es Ihre Arbeit ist - hast du das Bild zu nehmen ? wenn ja, können Sie ja zu mir sagen Sie es. danke Bev's Book (talk) 19:08, 14 October 2015 (UTC)Bev's Book
- Hallo Bev,
ja, Maschinen, die auf WIKIMEDIA COMMONS unter den Namen File:Ringspinnen.JPG, File:Ring 1.jpg, File:RSM 5.jpg, File:RSM 5.jpg erscheinen, habe ich selbst fotografiert und Sie dürfen die Aufnahmen selbstverständlich verwenden. --Ryj (talk) 10:20, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Máte také obrazy osnovní pletení - mohu užitnou to taky? Díky Bev's Book (talk) 14:57, 15 December 2015 (UTC)Bev's Book You also have images of warp knitting - can I a use this too? thanks Bev's Book (talk) 14:57, 15 December 2015 (UTC)Bev's Book Lieber Bev,
File tagging File:Wovenit 11.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Wovenit 11.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Wovenit 11.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Wdwd (talk) 20:49, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Permission for Weaving Image
[edit]Hi Ryj
Omlouvám se, že tě zase mají potíže, ale jste autorem nahrávání obrazu https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c7/Kette_und_Schuß.jpg
to je diagram tkaní. pokud ano, opět mohu požádat o povolení k jeho používání . Pokud nejste vlastníkem máte tak jako tak kontaktovat Kette a Schub Díky Bev's Book (talk) 21:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Bev's Book Translation: Sorry to trouble you again but are you the author of the upload image of https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c7/Kette_und_Schuß.jpg
this is a diagram of weaving. if so again may I ask permission to use it. If you are not the owner do you have anyway to contact Kette and Schub thanks Bev's Book (talk) 21:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Bev's Book
Přihlaste své fotky do Czech Wiki Photo 2020!
[edit]Milí fotografové a editoři projektů Wikimedia,
každý rok společně nahrajete na Commons tisíce svobodných fotografií. Chceme vám všem poděkovat a také vás ocenit. Vyberte ty nejlepší z vašich fotek a přihlaste je do 30. 10. 2020 do soutěže Czech Wiki Photo 2020! Soutěž je otevřená i úplným nováčkům. Autoři tří nejlepších fotek si odnesou vouchery do Foto Škoda a speciální wiki-odznaky. Přihlášené fotky bude hodnotit i Honza Rybář, držitel Czech Press Photo.
Baví vás focení pro Commons i mimo soutěže? Staňte se fotografem Wikimedie, půjčujeme fototechniku a proplácíme cesty - více na Fotíme Česko.
Těšíme se na vaše snímky!
Za spolek Wikimedia Česká republika
Jakub Holzer
[email protected] -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:06, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Rudé právo 1.png
[edit]Copyright status: File:Rudé právo 1.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Rudé právo 1.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Ahmadtalk 01:43, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
File:Barton 2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Krdbot 20:04, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Kemka 3.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Kemka 3.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Kemka 3.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:05, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Kemka 3.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Kemka 3.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Kemka 3.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 13:05, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Kemka 3.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Kemka 3.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Kemka 3.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 14:05, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Rudé právo 1.png
[edit]Copyright status: File:Rudé právo 1.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Rudé právo 1.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:05, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Reeling 01.png
[edit]Copyright status: File:Reeling 01.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Reeling 01.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 13:05, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Silk 03.png
[edit]Copyright status: File:Silk 03.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Silk 03.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 09:05, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Guipure 02.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Guipure 02.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Guipure 02.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:05, 20 December 2022 (UTC)