User talk:Ron whisky
Speedy|Unused and empty
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
--SieBot 13:56, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Harry Potter i Zakon Feniksa (polish poster).JPG has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
Saligron 14:54, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Loga czasopism
[edit]Witaj. Fotografie/skany logotypów czasopism stanowią przykłady fair use, niedozwolonego na Commons. Na dodatek sfotografowanie/zeskanowanie fragmentu czasopisma nie daje Ci automatycznie praw autorskich do zastrzeżonego logo i przypisywania sobie takich praw przez opatrywanie takiej grafiki licencją wskazującą, że jesteś jej autorem - nie zaprojektowałeś przecież logo "Faktu" czy "Życia na gorąco". Nie ładuj, proszę, więcej takich grafik. Pozdrawiam, Maire (talk) 19:16, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
You've uploaded a derivative work | We're sorry, but Image:Resident Evil- Apocalypse by Ron.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Photographs of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this photo must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a derivative work, please explain why on the image description page.
|
Kanonkas(talk) 18:34, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
You've uploaded a derivative work | We're sorry, but Image:DVD U Pana Boga w ogródku by Ron.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Photographs of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this photo must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a derivative work, please explain why on the image description page.
|
Kanonkas(talk) 18:35, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
You've uploaded a derivative work | We're sorry, but Image:DVD The Bourne Ultimatum by Ron.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Photographs of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this photo must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a derivative work, please explain why on the image description page.
|
Kanonkas(talk) 18:35, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
You've uploaded a derivative work | We're sorry, but Image:DVD 8 Mile by Ron.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Photographs of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this photo must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a derivative work, please explain why on the image description page.
|
Kanonkas(talk) 18:36, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
You've uploaded a derivative work | We're sorry, but Image:DVD Stara Baśń by Ron.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Photographs of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this photo must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a derivative work, please explain why on the image description page.
|
Kanonkas(talk) 18:36, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Marcia Gay Harden by Ron.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
—Angr 17:19, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Magda Umer by Ron.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
—Angr 17:19, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
File deletion warning | File:Heroes_Logo.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
MBisanz talk 20:23, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | File:Winona Ryder.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. For images, you may find Commons:Image casebook useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
- Hi Ron whisky! Cool photo of Winona Ryder...unfortunately, we can't keep it. :\ Keep in mind when choosing photos on flickr to upload to Commons that not all flickr users understand copyright law so often have copyvios in their photostreams and have an invalid license applied to the images they have uploaded there. Use a critical eye when choosing photos on flickr - if a flickr user has a professional photo of Queen Elizabeth next to a red carpet photo of a celebrity next to a snapshot photo of seals at a zoo, it's pretty likely they didn't take the pro shots. This Winona Ryder photo will be deleted as it is an obvious copyright violation. If you have questions, feel free to leave a note on my talk page. Cheers! -Brynn (talk!) 17:19, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Natalie Portman.JPG has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. For images, you may find Commons:Image casebook useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
- Same issue with this one. :\ Brynn (talk!) 17:22, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
hi...it's your new best friend here ;)
[edit]I'm going to go through your uploads to see if there are other copyvios that you might have uploaded just by mistake. It would be really awesome if you would help me, now that you know how to figure out which flickr images are probably copyvios and which are not. Wanna do that with me? If you do, just go through your uploads and tag the copyvios so they can be speedy deleted. If not, leave me a note and I'll just go through them on my own and delete, however, I won't spam your talk page with a ton of copyvio template thingies, as they will all say pretty much the same thing. Also, when we get this cleaned up, let's archive your talk page so you can start with a clean slate. Cheers! Brynn (talk!) 17:48, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, Image:Portret Królowej Jadwigi w ZSP 6 Piotrków Tryb by Ron.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Brak autora obrazu - jako autor zdjecia nie masz prawa go rozpowszechniać, chyba że prawa autorskie do obrazu wygasły. A.J. (talk) 09:24, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Królowa Jadwiga
[edit]Dzwoniłem właśnie do sekretariatu szkoły :) Obraz stworzono współcześnie, na 500-lecie Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego i tam też wisi oryginał. Niestety (Nie chcę, żeby wyszło, że życzę komuś rychłej śmierci ;)A.J. (talk) 09:45, 11 February 2009 (UTC) autor/autorka potretu prawdopodobnie jeszcze żyje, a nawet jakby odeszła do lepszego świata tuż po namalowaniu, to do wygaśnięcia praw autorskich jeszcze daleko. Jeśli wciąż chodzisz do szóstki, to byłoby miło, gdybyś sie pofatygował do sekretariatu i wyjaśnił zamieszanie; starałem się Cię wytłumaczyć, że zapewne działałeś w intencji podniesienia prestiżu szkoły. Zdjęcie naturalnie skasuję. Pozdrawiam! A.J. (talk) 09:38, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
- Nie, nie wydaje mi się; tylko nie kojarzyła nikogo o nazwisku "Ron Whisky" ;) A jak mnie coś napadnie, to czasem wydzwaniam po różnych miejscach; szczególnie ciekawe są telefony do muzeów, żeby powiedzieli jak obraz wygląda (np. File:Stattler-Machabeusze.jpg okazało się lustrzaną kopią). A.J. (talk) 09:50, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Królowa wróciła :) Autor obrazu zmarł w 1924 roku, prawa autorskie do niego już wygasły. A.J. (talk) 12:32, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Lepszy rydz niż nic; może jak ktoś kiedyż załaduje doskonałą reprodukcję z oryginału, to ta pójdzie do kosza, ale nie wcześniej. A.J. (talk) 14:53, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Critically evaluate Flickr licenses | India at the Oscars 2009 has been marked as a copyright violation. You may have preserved the information shown on Flickr correctly when transferring the image here, but the Flickr uploader is not the copyright holder of this image. Either the image was created by someone else, or it is a derivative of someone else's work. As stated in Commons:Licensing, only the copyright holder may issue a license, so the one shown on Flickr is invalid.
Always remember to critically evaluate Flickr licenses. Photostreams with professional-looking photographs, album covers, posters, and images in a wide range of styles or quality taken by many different cameras often indicate that the Flickr uploader either does not understand or does not care about copyright matters.
|
--Martin H. (talk) 12:13, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks! -- Nick Moreau (talk) 17:53, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 06:35, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Ryan Kwanten.jpg is uncategorized since 16 April 2009.
Witaj!
Czemu utworzyłeś kategorię zawierającą 1 (słownie: jedno) zdjęcie? To czyni przeglądanie mniej wygodnym. Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 06:24, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Towarzyszu! Obudź się. Zaczynamy. --Starscream (talk) 06:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Piękny,choć deszczowy, czerwcowy poranek. A po drugie: Czemu utworzyłeś kategorię zawierającą 1 (słownie: jedno) zdjęcie? To czyni przeglądanie mniej wygodnym. To jeszcze nic. Czasem spotykam kategorie zawierającą jedną podkategorię, w niej nic, oprócz następnej podkategorii i tak dalej i tak dalej, aż dokopuję się do zdjęcia. A ślicznie byłoby w jednej z nadrzędnych. Jeśli kategoria nie zawiera więcej niż kilkanaście zdjęć, przyjemnie przegląda się gdy podkategorii nie ma. Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 06:51, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- A, rozumiem. Dodałem te interlinki do zdjęcia. Proszę, nie pogniewaj się jeśli będę usuwał kategorie jednozdjęciowe. Może znajdziemy jeszcze jedną fotkę Alicji na wolnej licencji? Ale dopiero gdy powrócę z dzisiejszych targów. Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 07:10, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Witaj!
Przy takim opisie, pójdzie bez sdu. Co ważniejsze: Zdjęcie zostało wykonane aparatem profesjonalnym! Bardzo profesjonalnym. Kto takiego używa, musi na nim zarabiać. Nie pamiętam ile kosztuje, ale za takie pieniądze można kupić niekiepski samochód, czasem nowy. Dobre stanowisko do takich zdjęć, na pewno też kosztuje. Podkreśl to najbliższemu administratorowi. Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 05:33, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
Witaj!
Zgadzam się z Tobą, że te pliki są bardzo podejrzane. Na czerwonym dywanie jest zbyt profesjonalny. A drugi to po prostu wycinek z filmu. Ale ja nie jestem administratorem Commons. W tytule załączam link, w którym admini są posegregowani według mowy. Dla siedemnastu, ojczystym jest język Jana Kochanowskiego. Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 10:50, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Zdjecia
[edit]To zaloz deletion request. Tak na "chyba" nie moge usunac zdjecia. Herr Kriss (talk) 17:32, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- COM:DR. Tam sa instrukcje. Herr Kriss (talk) 18:02, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Flickr
[edit]Jesli zdjecie zostalo dobrze wstawione, tzn. z szablonem o flickr, a potem zostalo przegladniete przez admina, lub zaufanego uzytkownika, to takie zdjecie zostaje. Jesli nie ma szablonu, a przez co nie zostalo przegladniete, to trzeba usunac. A o czyms konkretnym mowa? Herr Kriss (talk) 22:12, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- Byly przejrzane, wiec wszystko jest OK. Herr Kriss (talk) 15:16, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:The Twilight Saga- New Moon Exhibit.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.
|
--Túrelio (talk) 10:53, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
File:The_Twilight_Saga-_New_Moon_Exhibit.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Eusebius (talk) 10:53, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Flickr images
[edit]When you upload flickr images (whether cropped or uncropped) like this one of Ronald D Moore, please upload the highest resolution photo available from flickr. Look at the flickr source here for instance: [1] , then click on "all sizes" and save the maximum resolution 2048 X 1536 original size version. Not the lower resolution version! This is the image you should upload on Commons.
Its not easy for flickr reviewers to reupload the highest original size image as I did here:
Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:41, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
File:Anna Paquin 1 (2009).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Anna Paquin 2 (2009).jpg, File:Anna Paquin 2.jpg, File:Stephen Moyer 2.jpg, File:Stephen Moyer 1.jpg and File:Rutina Wesley 1.jpg. --MGA73 (talk) 23:44, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
File:Greg Hernandez at 2009 Academy Awards.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Pieter Kuiper (talk) 08:51, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
File:EmmyAwardsHeadquarters.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Tm (talk) 19:01, 5 August 2009 (UTC) Just lefting the message that i received as second uploader Tm (talk) 19:01, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Academy Awards - 2009 OFS Oscars.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.
|
--Dereckson (talk) 18:23, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Categories
[edit]I see that in files like File:Pop Conference 2009 - Liminal Grooves panel.jpg and File:Andy Zax, Jason King, & Mark Villegas.jpg you are removing the general categories and replacing them with categories for individuals. This only makes sense if you then fill in the supercategories for those individuals. Otherwise, it becomes impossible to search down the hierarchy and find the images. - Jmabel ! talk 02:37, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
File:Deborah_Ann_Woll_2009_CCI.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
High Contrast (talk) 18:21, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
File:Tadeusz Lampka, producer of 'M jak Miłość' and few actors of this TV series at III Meeting of Fans of the TV series 'M jak miłość' in Gdynia 2009.jpg
[edit]Witaj!
Aktorzy są po lewej stronie producenta :-) Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 13:10, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Your flickr uploads
[edit]Hello!
A hint for uploading flickr images: you can use this tool, so uploading images from flickr is much easier and faster! Have fun with the tool! --High Contrast (talk) 17:52, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi, you requested the above image for deletion, but did not give a reason. Can you please comment on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Heroes截图1.jpg why you want it deleted. Thanks. -- Deadstar (msg) 08:39, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi, you requested the above image for deletion, but did not give a reason. Can you please comment on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Azkaban.jpg why you want it deleted. Thanks. -- -- Deadstar (msg) 08:51, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
File:Magdalena Schejbal and Wojciech Mecwaldowski at opening of the XXXIV Polish Film Festival in Gdynia 2009.jpg
[edit]Witaj!
Proszę, nie twórz kategorii zawierających tylko jeden plik. Przeglądanie miniatur jest wtedy bardzo niewygodne. Chociaż właśnie pomyślałem, że można zrobić kopię tego zdjęcia i wykadrować tak, aby zawierała tylko Wojciecha Mecwaldowskiego. Ale ja w mam na razie dużo zajęć w prawdziwym świecie. Dlatego, proponuję Ci... Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 18:15, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Witaj!
Wcześniej dodałem do tego category:Ziębice, bo tam się urodziła. Zły pomysł? Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 13:19, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
- Fakt :-) --Starscream (talk) 13:24, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
Witaj!
Dlaczego nie powinno zawierać kategorii female blond hair? Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 20:15, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
- Jakby nie patrzeć, masz rację. Ale w przypadku takich lasek jak Arciuch, Kożuchowska... Niektóre słyną m.in. z tego. --Starscream (talk) 21:03, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
File:Camilla_Belle_2009.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
High Contrast (talk) 00:05, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Obviously a bad flickr user. --Martin H. (talk) 23:16, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
file:Filmmaking of 'Black Thursday' on crossway of ulica Świętojańska and Aleja Józefa Piłsudskiego in Gdynia - 057.jpg
[edit]Witaj!
Często edytujesz zdjęcia aktorek. Czy rozpoznajesz tą miłą panią, którą spotkałem na planie "Czarnego czwartku"? Nosiła identyfikator z: "aktor". Zatem, gra istotną postać. Ale nie znalazłem na liście obsady. Jestem pewny, że widywałem ją w mediach. Mam pamięć absolutną do twarzy. Ale nie do nazwisk. Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 18:55, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
- Dziękuję. Ręczę głową, że nie jest statystką. Statyści nie mieli plakietek "aktor". Miałem zdjęcia z tym identyfikatorem, ale nieudane. Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 07:19, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Mary Bell
[edit]Witaj!
Chcę Cię prosić o przywrócenie odpowiednich kategorii na pl:Mary Flora Bell. Najlepsza rzecz jaką tam dałem. I nikt o niej nie czyta, bo jest tylko rok urodzenia. A niewiele dziewczynek jest tak fascynujących. Dziewięć dni było na stronie głównej... Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 18:59, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
File:Filmmaking of 'Black Thursday' on crossway of ulica Świętojańska and Aleja Józefa Piłsudskiego in Gdynia - 111.jpg
[edit]Dziękuję za naprawienie Mary Bell.
Jak już wspominałem, mam pamięć absolutną do twarzy. Ale do nazwisk nic a nic. Lubisz edytować zdjęcia aktorów, więc pomyślałem... Reżyserem "Czarnego czwartku" jest Antoni Krauze. To nie on. Ale ten pan miał plakietkę z napisem: "reżyser". I nawet częściej dyrygował niż Krauze. Na mur beton, wiele razy widziałem go w mediach. I było napisane na ekranie: "Reżyser". Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 17:21, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
- Dobrze na Ciebie liczyć. Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 17:15, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Zamówienie na obrazki
[edit]Witaj!
Wkrótce w Warszawie zburzą sklep, w którym nakręcono słynną scenę "Co mi zrobisz jak mnie złapiesz". Gdzie chwytali ludzi za głowy, robili zdjęcia i umieszczali na tablicy "nie obsługujemy". Legenda. Naturalnie, w środku zmienił się bardzo od 1978. Na zewnątrz, nie wiem jak. Część pięknej karty historii polskiej kinematografii zmienią w proch.
Proszę Cię o dodanie odpowiedniego ogłoszenia na zamówieniach w polskiej wiki. Oraz, że czas działa na niekorzyść. To zdjęcie aż krzyczałoby, aby dodać do hasła o filmie. Samo w sobie, cenne.
Link ze szczegółami, podam Ci imejlem. Jeśli się zgodzisz. Osoby trzecie, mogłyby to uznać za spam. Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 17:38, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
Alicja Bachleda-Curuś
[edit]Świetne zdjęcia. Teraz kategoria ma rację bytu. Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 16:49, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Żółte ramki w praktyce
[edit]Witaj!
Przy okazji, przypomniałeś mi, że niektóre zdjęcia wymagają interwencji bota, w kwestii opisu. W tym jest za krótki.
Aby uzyskać taką ramkę, klikasz u dołu zdjęcia Dodaj notatkę. Ustalasz myszką pole jakie ma zajmować. Gdy zwolnisz guzik, pojawi się okno, w którym dodajesz opis detalu. Jeśli kształt nie jest taki jak chciałeś, nie można go zmienić. Tylko anuluj lub usuń.
To bardzo przydatne, gdy interesujący człowiek, stanowi mały procent pola. Oto świetne przykłady:
- [2] Po wojnie, chyba dziesięciu mężczyzn przysięgało, że byli tym chłopcem.
- [3] To samo warto zrobić z "Bitwą pod Grunwaldem" [4]. Lata temu pamiętałem nazwisko tego, który dźgnął mistrza. I trudno odróżnić króla od świty.
Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 14:56, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Pamięć absolutna
[edit]Witaj!
Mam pamięć absolutną do twarzy. Ale pozbawiony jestem umiejętności zapamiętywania nazwisk. Jestem pewny, że pani obok Olgi Bołądź, także jest aktorką. Czy ją rozpoznajesz? Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 20:29, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Actors and Actresses from England
[edit]Please can you explain why you are removing these categories? They are not parent categories of Category:Actors from the United Kingdom by decade or Category:Actresses from the United Kingdom by decade, therefore there is no reason to remove them. I thnk you should revert all your removals of these categories. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 17:46, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
- I also would like an explanation and also call for an immediate halt to this. Please see my comments at User Talk:Foroa#Category:Actresses from England. Anatiomaros (talk) 00:54, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
Witaj!
Jestem rozczarowany. Dziś przeczytałem ten artykuł i nic a nic zdjęć. Plotkarskie strony często dostarczają fotografie z kręcenia w plenerze i nikogo nie kusi by coś cyknąć dla Wikipedii? Proszę, dodaj do zamówień obrazków, aby mieszkańcy Piotrkowa, Lublina, Zielonki etc. obserwowali swoje okolice. Bo, naprawdę, szkoda... Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 04:10, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
File:Rutina Wesley 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
▫ JohnnyMrNinja (talk / en) 01:20, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
File:Stephen Moyer 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
▫ JohnnyMrNinja (talk / en) 01:20, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
File:Stephen Moyer 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
▫ JohnnyMrNinja (talk / en) 01:21, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
File:Zachary Levi 2009.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
▫ JohnnyMrNinja (talk / en) 01:22, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
File:Yvonne Strahovski 2009.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
▫ JohnnyMrNinja (talk / en) 01:22, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
File:Anna Paquin 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
▫ JohnnyMrNinja (talk / en) 01:22, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
-- Gazebo (talk) 08:28, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
-- Gazebo (talk) 08:33, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:45, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Konstancja Bednarzewska.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 20:10, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
File:Nora Arnezeder 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
79.179.237.219 18:34, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
File:Nora Arnezeder 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Galmesika (talk) 18:37, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
File:Nora Arnezeder 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Maylisp33 (talk) 14:17, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Nora Arnezeder 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Maylisp33 (talk) 14:21, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Nora Arnezeder.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Maylisp33 (talk) 14:22, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Nora Arnezeder 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Can10v (talk) 13:46, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
File:Nora Arnezeder.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |