User talk:Rohini

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:Rohinil)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Rohini!

-- 18:47, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
For the lovely photographs, and multilingual descriptions ... Cheerio, -- Rsrikanth05 (talk) 14:56, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
-- Thank you, Srikanth! Rohini (talk) 18:25, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yuvar welcome! : ) --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 12:18, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Goa images

[edit]

Fantastic job with the images. Keep them coming. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:29, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion nominations

[edit]

Hi, 'uploader request' is only a valid reason for deletion within a week after upload. Jcb (talk) 15:39, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jcb: Two of the images "Plastic moulding machine" and "Injection moulding machine" are of bad quality and not usable for informational or encyclopaedic purposes. They cannot be improved via editing and are not in use in any Wiki project. I have also not found the opportunity to shoot a better image of both objects. -- Rohini (talk) 17:09, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, (talk) 17:54, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
hello Ramiiiiiiiii 08:20, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
File:Amateur porn and consent (redux).pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FredWalsh (talk) 08:53, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flyer, Barrier-free access for the disabled.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FredWalsh (talk) 13:46, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Non-consensual pornography in India-NCII.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FredWalsh (talk) 01:25, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:The WhatsApp Economy.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 13:48, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@DMacks: I have fixed the issues with the file as discussed on the discussion page for deletion. Please remove the deletion notice. Thanks. -- Rohini (talk) 07:36, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Non-consensual intimate imagery in India.pdf

[edit]
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  /−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Non-consensual intimate imagery in India.pdf, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JuTa 13:22, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@JuTa: There are no images in the file you have referred to, let alone an "image within an image". The file contains only text. The file is not a derivative work; it is my own original work. Rohini (talk) 13:57, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:Fishing boat, coastal village in Tamil Nadu 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rohini (talk) 14:53, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]