User talk:Primaler
cat sort
[edit]Hi Primaler. Regarding your edits like this [1], the parent category has never bothered with the last name sort (for numerous reasons). As the parent category contains over 4500 of these artist categories, unless you plan to add the sort to them all, I think these edits will only introduce confusion and inconsistency (for me, I do look at Category:Google Art Project works by artist quite often, and expect to see it in simple alphabetical order after the "Google Art Project works by " part).
Hope you don't mind the feedback. Boo-Boo Baroo (talk) 20:54, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Please see User talk:Dcoetzee#Bot updates––Oursana (talk) 01:09, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
File:Jacop Epstein Rockdrill study.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Fæ (talk) 09:53, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
After Holbein the Elder or the Younger?
[edit]Hello, Primaler! Since you seem to be interested in Holbein, I thought you might be able to help me out of this dilemma: I‘ve been doing a little purging of disambiguation categories, and there’s just one left in Hans Holbein. Can you tell which Holbein’s works it was taken from? All I feel confident to identify without evidence (the Wellcome source is no help, as it doesn’t distinguish the two, but I found some of the other originals) are the English courtiers by HH Jr. Anyway, I‘d be grateful if you could take a look, whenever you have a chance.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 04:24, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- @Odysseus1479 Hi! Actually, in the full bibliographic record, Wellcome Library says it's after the younger HH, so I moved it there. The source indeed does not readily come to mind, but that's no surprise, as Holloway's drawings/engravings can be both after a minor detail and rather loosely based on the original; see Judas Iscariot and The Last Supper.
- Primaler (talk) 07:18, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks; I hadn‘t noticed those bibliographic-record links before—will check there first in future.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 07:36, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello!
Thank you for uploading File:Holbeinstitch.gif to the Wikimedia Commons. I noticed that when you uploaded from another Wikimedia project, you left out some important information, or copied it incorrectly. In the future, please consider using CommonsHelper, a tool which automates the process of moving files over. Thank you,
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:00, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Category:Papyri_in_the_Altes_Museum_(Berlin) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Marcus Manilius (talk) 12:15, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Category:Papyri_in_the_Neues_Museum_(Berlin) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Marcus Manilius (talk) 12:18, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
gold glass in Turin
[edit]Hi, I need to check my archive, but unfortunately I won't be home before next week... so please ask me again if I forget to answer!. Thank you. --Sailko (talk) 06:51, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
- Hi, I thought I sent you an email much time ago... maybe you could not receive. So, anyway, the museum capture says for the left one: "Arte tardoromana, medaglione III secolo d.c. Il medaglione proviene dalla raccolta del marchese Tapparelli d'Azeglio. Il ritrattro, modellato a pennello a chiaroscuro, potrebbe raffigurare l'imperatrice Marcia Otacilia Severa, moglie di Filippo l'Arabo (244-249 dc.). Vetro oro graffito, tempera. Legato D'Azeglio, 1890 94/VD". For the right one it just says "Arte tardormana (?). Medaglione con figura maschile. II-III secolo d.c. (?). Vetro a oro graffito, tempera. Acquisizione non specificata". Does it help? --Sailko (talk) 10:40, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Sailko: Thanks! Primaler (talk) 18:12, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
File tagging File:Kaburis-p360-photo.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Kaburis-p360-photo.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Kaburis-p360-photo.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Jcb (talk) 11:57, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Ⅎ?
[edit]Cannot find a "Ⅎ" here. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 20:21, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
Empty cat
[edit]Hi. Category:Google Art Project works in İstanbul Museum of Modern Art that you have edited in the past is empty. Do you think it will still be useful or shall I ask for it to be deleted? Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 18:13, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Palosirkka (talk) 19:40, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
John Dudley, Duke of Northumberland
[edit]Hi, I noticed you uploaded “An unidentified man” by Holbein in 2015 and placed it in the media for John Dudley, 1st Duke of Northumberland. Do you have a source that says it could be John Dudley? 2600:4040:2D27:1900:61AE:AE94:6BA9:1F07 07:28, 31 March 2023 (UTC)