User talk:Poco a poco/2016-04

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Francisco, Lima, Perú, 2015-07-28, DD 71.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:59, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de Nuestra Señora de África, Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 70-72 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:04, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Géiseres del Tatio, San Pedro de Atacama, Chile, 2016-02-01, DD 48-50 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Rftblr 09:43, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Géiseres Sol de Mañana, Bolivia, 2016-02-02, DD 48.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Atamari 07:49, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Giralda, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 82.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:00, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faro Punta Almina, Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 42.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:10, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castillo, Chipiona, España, 2015-12-08, DD 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:09, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faro, Chipiona, España, 2015-12-08, DD 19-21 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:47, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monasterio de San Isidoro del Campo, Santiponce, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 53.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I think this will be OK if you lower the highlights a bit. --Basotxerri 15:22, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
✓ Done Poco a poco 18:13, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Better now. --Basotxerri 19:51, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flamencos andinos (Phoenicoparrus andinus), Laguna Cañapa, Bolivia, 2016-02-03, DD 63.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent quality. -- Rftblr 21:29, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

QIC File:Isla del Pescado, Salar de Uyuni, Bolivia, 2016-02-04, DD 38.JPG

Hallo Poco a poco, I just re-examined your picture. There are still dark blue borders in several places. I made annotations of three, but there are more (e.g. near the left border of the picture). I please you to check the complete border to the sky. You can tell me your opinion on my talk page. I think this is better than a discussion on the QI page. Sincerely --Llez (talk) 15:37, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi Llez, thanks for the notes, I uploaded a new version Poco2 21:27, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Near-duplicate picture of the day

Your proposed Picture of the Day for 2016-05-19 is very similar to that proposed for 2016-04-15.

How about if we choose a different one, perhaps by a different photographer? It looks like you'd going to have the majority of the Pictures of the Day for 2016-06. — hike395 (talk) 19:46, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi hike395, yes, there is a lot of stuff by Poco a poco in the pipeline of POTD, and I believe that some pictures could be somehow similar, but I guess that you don't mean 2016-05-19 and 2016-04-15, as these 2 are by no means similar and they are scheduled with more than one month difference. Anyhow, I can also offer some other pictures like this, this, this, this, this or this one if there is actually such a problem. Poco2 21:39, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Géiseres Sol de Mañana, Bolivia, 2016-02-02, DD 46.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:13, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monasterio de San Jorge, Perast, Bahía de Kotor, Montenegro, 2014-04-19, DD 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:12, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tabuenca, Zaragoza, España, 2016-01-02, DD 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 18:01, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teatro romano de Itálica, Santiponce, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 46.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:03, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Templo del Señor de Luren, Ica, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:17, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Templo y Convento de Regina Coeli, México D.F., México, 2013-10-16, DD 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 23:48, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Pedro, Arcos de la Frontera, Cádiz, España, 2015-12-08, DD 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:39, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Comercio en la plaza del 9 de abril de 1947, Tánger, Marruecos, 2015-12-11, DD 78.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Comercio en la plaza del 9 de abril de 1947, Tánger, Marruecos, 2015-12-11, DD 78.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gasoducto junto a la B-145, Chile, 2016-02-09, DD 33.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 17:06, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Géiseres Sol de Mañana, Bolivia, 2016-02-02, DD 45.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good qualty --Llez 20:23, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de Nuestra Señora de la Palma, Algeciras, Cádiz, España, 2015-12-09, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:10, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aguas termales, Laguna Salada, Bolivia, 2016-02-02, DD 110.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 13:27, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Campamento Aucanquilcha, Chile, 2016-02-10, DD 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:15, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Iglesia de San Miguel, Jerez de la Frontera, España, 2015-12-07, DD 105-107 HDR.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de San Miguel, Jerez de la Frontera, España, 2015-12-07, DD 105-107 HDR.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:07, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anfiteatro de las ruinas romanas de Itálica, Santiponce, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 30.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:20, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basílica catedral, Arequipa, Perú, 2015-08-02, DD 73-75 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:46, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amanecer en isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-25, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 21:21, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Campamento Aucanquilcha, Chile, 2016-02-10, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:22, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flamenco en el Palacio Andaluz, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Given the live performance situation and lights, it is QI. Can you provide the estilo? It looks like Bulerias. --Cccefalon 11:06, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Géiseres Sol de Mañana, Bolivia, 2016-02-02, DD 60.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good rework, thx. Good for me now. --Smial 21:21, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ferrocarril en el salar de Ascotán, Chile, 2016-02-09, DD 48.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 10:48, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flamenco andino (Phoenicoparrus andinus), Laguna Colorada, Bolivia, 2016-02-02, DD 97.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 10:53, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Islas flotantes de los Uros, Lago Titicaca, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:34, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coro, Catedral de Sevilla, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 100-103 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:34, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calle de Arcos de la Frontera, Cádiz, España, 2015-12-08, DD 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I presume, the house on the left is not vertically straigt in real. Good quality --Hubertl 11:13, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anfiteatro de las ruinas romanas de Itálica, Santiponce, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 12-14 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:13, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Templo Yanasen, Ayutthaya, Tailandia, 2013-08-23, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 05:38, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Flamencos andinos (Phoenicoparrus andinus), Laguna Cañapa, Bolivia, 2016-02-03, DD 63.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Flamencos andinos (Phoenicoparrus andinus), Laguna Cañapa, Bolivia, 2016-02-03, DD 63.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laguna Colorada, Bolivia, 2016-02-02, DD 66-70 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --Tsungam 11:47, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laguna Cañapa, Bolivia, 2016-02-03, DD 77.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice --Pudelek 11:56, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Géiseres Sol de Mañana, Bolivia, 2016-02-02, DD 50-54 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 15:51, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flamencos andinos (Phoenicoparrus andinus), Laguna Colorada, Bolivia, 2016-02-02, DD 90.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 18:04, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Anfiteatro de las ruinas romanas de Itálica, Santiponce, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 34-45 PAN HDR.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Anfiteatro de las ruinas romanas de Itálica, Santiponce, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 34-45 PAN HDR.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flamenco andino (Phoenicoparrus andinus), Laguna Hedionda, Bolivia, 2016-02-03, DD 62.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:57, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phoenicoparrus jamesi, Laguna Colorada, Bolivia, 2016-02-02, DD 105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 20:46, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faro del cabo Espartel, Marruecos, 2015-12-11, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:39, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Géiseres Sol de Mañana, Bolivia, 2016-02-02, DD 55.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:57, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Islas flotantes de los Uros, Lago Titicaca, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 42.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:57, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cementerio de la salitrera Rica Aventura, María Elena, Chile, 2016-02-11, DD 127.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:57, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Campamento Aucanquilcha, Chile, 2016-02-10, DD 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:39, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castillo del Desnarigado y faro Punta Almina, Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 38.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 20:06, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anfiteatro de las ruinas romanas de Itálica, Santiponce, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 34-45 PAN HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:27, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de Ceuta, Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:20, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Campamento Aucanquilcha, Chile, 2016-02-10, DD 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:20, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Costa de La Coruña, España, 2015-09-25, DD 14-16 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:27, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Comercio en la plaza del 9 de abril de 1947, Tánger, Marruecos, 2015-12-11, DD 76.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:27, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castillo de Santa Catalina, Cádiz, España, 2015-12-08, DD 51.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. I suggest to clone out the three reflections from flying objects. --Cccefalon 04:21, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
✓ Done Poco a poco 19:05, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa en El Puerto de Santa María, España, 2015-12-08, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 09:21, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anfiteatro de las ruinas romanas de Itálica, Santiponce, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 26-29 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Suggest to crop away ~1/5 on the right, as the area is blurred and to have more symmetrical view of the arena --A.Savin 11:03, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
I agree, ✓ Done, thanks, Poco a poco 19:34, 7 April 2016 (UTC) OK; enough for QI this way --A.Savin 09:17, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cabo Espartel, Marruecos, 2015-12-11, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cúpula del carbón, La Coruña, España, 2015-09-25, DD 72.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:34, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Desierto de Dalí, Bolivia, 2016-02-02, DD 108.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Halavar 10:06, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Desierto de Siloli, Bolivia, 2016-02-03, DD 05-08 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:34, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Giralda, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 131.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:49, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laguna Cañapa, Bolivia, 2016-02-03, DD 64-69 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Super! --Pudelek 11:12, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laguna Blanca, Bolivia, 2016-02-02, DD 35.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:13, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laguna Colorada, Bolivia, 2016-02-02, DD 65.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --Pudelek 11:12, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laguna Hedionda, Bolivia, 2016-02-03, DD 55.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 11:12, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laguna Honda, Bolivia, 2016-02-03, DD 36.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:16, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edificio en el Paseo de las Palmeras 12, Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 64.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:28, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Isla del Pescado, Salar de Uyuni, Bolivia, 2016-02-04, DD 38.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me, the contrasts are much higher in this areas as we know. --Hubertl 17:30, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

QI File:2012-07-17 - Bayerischer Landtag - Plenarsaal - 6915.jpg

Was ist den deiner Meinung nach falsch an der Perspektive? Der Raum ist tatsächlich rundlich, siehe: Seite des Landtages. cu --ST 08:02, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Steschke, damit meinte ich, dass die vertikale Linien auf beiden Seiten nicht vertikal sind, sie sind eher stützenden Linien nach ihnen. VG Poco2 19:11, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
Jetzt besser? --ST 21:15, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
In der Tat Steschke, promoviert! Poco2 19:54, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Ah, jetzt also Dr. Steschke :-) --Ralf Roleček 19:57, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Buf, dann bin ich auch über 8000 Doktor :) ...Ich rede auf der QI Sprache, was wäre denn sonst der beste Begriff auf Deutsch? Poco2 20:05, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Ich würd sagen "befördert". --Ralf Roleček 20:15, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
:-) --ST 20:25, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Cementerio, Tulcán, Ecuador, 2015-07-21, DD 60.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cementerio, Tulcán, Ecuador, 2015-07-21, DD 60.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia la Catedral, San Antonio de Ibarra, Ecuador, 2015-07-21, DD 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:20, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Vicente Mártir, Sigüenza, España, 2015-12-28, DD 141.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:15, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laguna Cañapa, Bolivia, 2016-02-03, DD 75.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. And a place with wow potential. However, a crop with less sky (suggest a 16:9 ratio) would be better --A.Savin 20:02, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Ücretsiz Kürdistan (talk) 03:42, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Géiseres Sol de Mañana, Bolivia, 2016-02-02, DD 56.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Hight quality and very nice--Lmbuga 19:24, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Clear FP IMO (Si lo deseas, la propongo yo: Sugiéreme el texto de la propuesta), la foto es increíble--Lmbuga 19:35, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faro Punta Almina, Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:02, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ermita del Rocío, El Rocío, Huelva, España, 2015-12-07, DD 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Very good quality, hight quality picture. For my taste the area of sky is too big, but that's not important to QI because it's very very good picture--Lmbuga 19:32, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
I agree, ✓ cropped Poco a poco 21:43, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cementerio de la salitrera Rica Aventura, María Elena, Chile, 2016-02-11, DD 130.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality! --Lmbuga 19:27, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paisaje en Punta Pitt, isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-24, DD 33.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:29, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palacio Postal, México D.F., México, 2013-10-16, DD 48.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:29, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parroquia de San Fernando, Ciudad de México, México, 2015-07-20, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:25, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palacio de Villavicencio, Alcázar, Jerez de la Frontera, España, 2015-12-07, DD 61.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:29, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 April 2016 (UTC)


Shells

Hallo Poco a poco, da Sie deutsch verstehen, schreibe ich auf deutsch, das ist am einfachsten. Wie sie vielleicht wissen, sammle ich Schale von Mollusken, um sie zu fotografieren. Ich kaufe zwar ab und zu Schalen (ist oft relativ teuer), aber viele sind selbst gesammelt. Zudem frage ich auch Freunde, ob sie mir aus dem Urlaub Schalen mitbringen können. Dank dieser Hilfe von Feunden bekomme ich immer wieder interessantes Material. Daher die Frage an Sie (wenn ich Ihre Bilder betrachte, sieht es so aus, dass Sie immer wieder inteessante Gegenden besuchen): Wenn sie auf ihren Reisen auf (leere) Schalen stoßen, ist es möglich, welche zu sammeln um mir zuzusenden (bitte mit Angabe des Fundortes)? Natürlich nur, wenn dies dort auch legal ist, in manchen Ländern ist das Sammeln bzw. Mitnehmen von Schalen nicht gestattet. Ich habe Interesse an allem, egal, ob von Land, aus dem Süßwasser oder aus dem Meer. Viele Grüße aus Deutschland.
Herbert Zell --Llez (talk) 17:50, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi Llez, ach, bitte, nicht so formal! :) Ja, klar, ich denke an dich und nehme was mit, wenn es mir auffällt. Servus aus München! Poco2 21:27, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
OK, war mir nicht sicher. Dann bleibt es beim Du. Vielen Dank und Grüße aus Karlsruhe --Llez (talk) 11:45, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Another FP nom?

I think this is another fantastic photo! Although there's one exception: a small area of darker blue in the sky below the left end of a cloud toward the left side; I don't know what that is and if it's an artifact of photography and not something that was there, it should be fixed. Anyway, do you feel like this is a photo you'd like nominated?

All the best,

Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:51, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi Ikan, yes, indeed, and the place has a kind of legend. It is called the Salvador Dalí Desert because Salvador Dalí created paintings which look very similar to the place, but without having been there or having heard about it. I've reworked the curves a bit and the sharpening/denoising and have removed what you called "a small area of darker blue" it was nothing else but a dust spot, a problem I rarely have now with my Canon 5DS R but that I had permanently with my stolen 5D Mark II. Thank you once more and regards, Poco2 12:27, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Thank you. I will nominate the photo.
All the best,
Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:28, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
By the way, I'm sorry your camera was stolen! Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:16, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Los Menhires, Parque de La Torre, La Coruña, España, 2015-09-25, DD 03-05 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:19, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lápida cerca de San Pedro de Atacama, Chile, 2016-02-01, DD 147.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:35, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Líneas de Nazca, Nazca, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 59.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments verdammt, ich will mich auch da rumtreiben, wo du bist! --Ralf Roletschek 19:35, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
:) Poco a poco 19:41, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Machu Picchu, Perú, 2015-07-30, DD 65.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:18, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Salar de Uyuni, Bolivia, 2016-02-04, DD 10-12 HDR.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Salar de Uyuni, Bolivia, 2016-02-04, DD 10-12 HDR.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:06, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Templo de A-Má, Macao, 2013-08-08, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:20, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ta Keo, Angkor, Camboya, 2013-08-16, DD 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:20, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre de agua, Gniezno, Polonia, 2014-12-26, DD 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 17:45, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Templo Wat Arun, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:20, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lobos marinos (Zalophus californianus wollebaeki), Punta Pitt, isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-24, DD 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I would have cropped even tighter but good quality for me. --Ermell 21:24, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lagartija de lava de San Cristóbal (Microlophus bivittatus), Punta Pitt, isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-24, DD 45.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 20:49, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laguna Blanca, Bolivia, 2016-02-02, DD 20-24 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It's tilted --Pudelek 11:56, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
✓ New version Poco a poco 19:13, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Is still tilted in my opinion --Pudelek 11:14, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Can you please add a note, this is a panorama and it is definitely not oeverall tilted Poco a poco 18:13, 10 April 2016 (UTC)  Comment What a great motif! Maybe the right part tilts slightly down. More I´m wondering about a thin, horizontal white streak in the sky. I hope this is not a problem of my monitor. --Milseburg 22:20, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
✓ New version Poco a poco 21:14, 14 April 2016 (UTC)  Support QI for me now. --Milseburg 11:40, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flamencos andinos (Phoenicoparrus andinus), Laguna Hedionda, Bolivia, 2016-02-03, DD 60.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:44, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flamenco andino (Phoenicoparrus andinus), Laguna Colorada, Bolivia, 2016-02-02, DD 99.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent! --Ermell 12:44, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Desierto de Siloli, Bolivia, 2016-02-03, DD 09-14 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:44, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Desierto de Dalí, Bolivia, 2016-02-02, DD 107.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:44, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escuela, Ollagüe, Chile, 2016-02-09, DD 76.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:46, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Isla del Pescado, Salar de Uyuni, Bolivia, 2016-02-04, DD 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Looking at the thumbnail, at first I thought it was a cemetery with crosses ;) --A.Savin 14:36, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guardia Real, Plaza de Armas, Lima, Perú, 2015-07-28, DD 66.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:48, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kasbah, Tánger, Marruecos, 2015-12-11, DD 26.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:11, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Pedro, Lima, Perú, 2015-07-28, DD 96.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 20:29, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ta Phrom, Angkor, Camboya, 2013-08-16, DD 48.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:32, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flamenco en el Palacio Andaluz, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:34, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Islas flotantes de los Uros, Lago Titicaca, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 41.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ElBute 17:30, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Observatorio espacial ALMA, Atacama, Chile, 2016-02-06, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:20, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oficina de turismo, Plaza Mayor, Medinaceli, Soria, España, 2015-12-28, DD 70-72 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:26, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ollagüe, Chile, 2016-02-09, DD 75.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:02, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paisaje en las cercanías de Ica, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:02, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palacio de Aldealseñor, Soria, España, 2016-01-03, DD 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:02, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paisaje en Cerro Brujo, isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-24, DD 114.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Ferrocarril en el salar de Ascotán, Chile, 2016-02-09, DD 46.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ferrocarril en el salar de Ascotán, Chile, 2016-02-09, DD 46.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Almacenamiento de RAWs

Saludos Poco, recientemente he perdido una cantidad enorme de archivos RAW. Quería que me recomendaras algún lugar en donde almacenarlos, y saber cómo haces tu. Muchas gracias de antemano --The Photographer (talk) 13:11, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Hola The Photographer, hasta hace poco no tenía realmente una solución convincente, ahora sí. Tengo un sistema de NAS con capacidad para 4 discos duros, si bien ahora mismo solo tengo 2, cada uno de 5 teras y que hacen un backup entre sí de forma automática. De esta forma no perdería datos si se estropea un disco duro. Además de eso tengo otra copia en un disco duro externo (tb de 5 teras) en el trastero para no perder los RAWs en el caso de que me roben el NAS. Saludos, --Poco2 22:32, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
No creo que tenga suficiente dinero para crear redundancia, sin embargo, he tomado el consejo. Quizás compre un HD que usaré junto con mi caja que ya tengo preparada. Hablando de otra cosa, te dejo este tutorial por si te interesan las panoramicas 360 --The Photographer (talk) 15:12, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Desierto de Siloli, Bolivia, 2016-02-03, DD 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 17:34, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de Cádiz, España, 2015-12-08, DD 69-71 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 17:35, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de la Asunción, Ariza, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-29, DD 103.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:33, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mina de Chuquicamata, Calama, Chile, 2016-02-01, DD 115.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:33, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

WLF-Template

Hallo Diego, dieses Template in dieser Form halte ich - als Information für Nachuser - für ziemlichen Unsinn. Es sollten meiner Meinung nach nur Templates enthalten sein, welche einen Bezug zu einem anderen, öffentlichen Verzeichnis haben. Als Referenz und Quelle.

Dieses Template ist ohne Bezug, nicht mehr als bunt und erfüllt denselben Zweck den eine Kategorie auch erfüllt. Wenn, dann sollte der Bezug über ein spezifisches Bild über das Kategoriensystem gemacht werden - mit eben dem jeweiligen verborgenen Parameter (Qxxxxxx). Wenn jemand von außerhalb, der so ein Bild haben möchte, draufklickt, was bekommt er? Nullinformation. Das sind alles interne Organisationssachen, das hat mit der Bildbeschreibung wenig zu tun.

Und genau so etwas soll die Beschreibungsseite nicht sein. Ein Spielplatz für Wikidata. Wenn ich ein Bild dieser Art bekomme um es zu bewerten, werfe ich das Template raus. Sorry für meine Harschheit, aber Experimente sollten vor ihrem Einsatz allgemein diskutiert werden bevor man sie einsetzt. Mit Hinblick auf den Zweck jeweils, wo es eingesetzt werden soll. --Hubertl 13:05, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

So nebenbei halte ich es auch für problematisch, dass es keinen Länderparameter gibt. Was ist, wenn andere Länder auch draufkommen, dass sie ein Festivalbild-Projekt machen wollen? Das scheint mir etwas kurz gedacht. Und ich sehe das jetzt vorerst mal aus Usersicht, weniger aus Datenbankentwickersicht. Abgesehen davon, dieses Projekt ist toll! Sehr beeindruckend! --Hubertl 13:10, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Hallo Hubertl, bitte, entschuldige mich für die verspätete Antwort und kam heute Nacht aus dem WikiCon in Berlin zurück. Ich melde mich morgen dazu. Poco2 22:58, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Die Chapter Convention, wie ich annehme. Ich hoffe mit guten Ergebnissen. Ich habe übrigens keine Eile, dafür bin ich schon zu alt. Mich interessiert ja hauptsächlich dieser Pseudo-Aktivismus von Wikidata, noch mehr allerdings dieses WLF. Obwohl ich ja jemand bin, der keine Person fotografieren möchte. Ich kenne aber Einige, die das sicher für eine gute Idee halten. --Hubertl 23:06, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Hallo Hubertl, das war meine erste WikiCon, und laut einigen Teilnehmer war es besser als vergangene Jahre, von daher kann man schon sagen, dass es gut lief. Ich hatte dennoch keine Moment Ruhe (entweder war ich in der Konferenz oder habe ich mich mit Kollegen unterhalten oder habe ich fotografiert) und der Alltag hat mich halt heute eingeholt.
Bzgl. der Vorlage habe ich was angepasst, um den Link Richtung Wikidata etwas unauffälliger zu gestalten. Wieso brauchen wir das Ding weiterhin überhaupt? Na ja, Volksfeste in Spanien haben, im Gegensatz zu den Monumenten zum Beispiel, keinen Code. Damit hatten wir 3 Möglichkeiten, entweder geben wir keine Ids an (eine Referenz brauchen wir aber), oder machen eine fiktive Ids-Liste dafür (wertlos) oder nutzen halt einen internen Id. Hast du einen anderen Vorschlag? Ich habe auch eine zweite Sprachversion angelegt (die Spanische!), es wurde einfach vergessen.
Wikifolk ist eine Initiative, um die unterschiedlichen Volksfeste Spaniens zu dokumentieren. So was haben wir einfach neben Monumenten und Natur vermisst. Die Webseite gibt es aber leider nur auf Spanisch: http://wikilov.es Poco2 20:47, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capilla ortodoxa, campo de concentración de Dachau, Alemania, 2016-03-05, DD 27.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:45, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faro del cabo de Trafalgar, Zahora, Cádiz, España, 2015-12-09, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:21, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de Santo Domingo, Lima, Perú, 2015-07-28, DD 58.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Air I really white, but good quality.--Famberhorst 15:40, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Isla del Pescado, Salar de Uyuni, Bolivia, 2016-02-04, DD 43.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 20:54, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paisaje cerca de Ica, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 36.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:21, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Géiseres Sol de Mañana, Bolivia, 2016-02-02, DD 56.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Géiseres Sol de Mañana, Bolivia, 2016-02-02, DD 56.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:06, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Photo of memorial in desert

Hi, Poco. I find this photo moving and would support a FP nomination. If you'd like, I'd be willing to nominate it.

All the best,

Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:45, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi Ikan, crazy scene, isn't it? I had never seen something like that before. There are tones of those memorials in South America, but this one is pretty unique. Actually, I talked yesterday about it with people from Chile and they told me that they haven't seen something like it anywhere else. So, yes! please, nominate it and let's see what happens Poco2 22:54, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
I will. I'll probably get to this later tonight, or it might possibly take a few days. Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:58, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castillo de San Marcos, El Puerto de Santa María, España, 2015-12-08, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:32, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gaviota patiamarilla (Larus michahellis), Cádiz, España, 2015-12-08, DD 50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:16, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laguna Hedionda, Bolivia, 2016-02-03, DD 50.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 08:59, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Islas flotantes de los Uros, Lago Titicaca, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 24.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:16, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cementerio judío, Tánger, Marruecos, 2015-12-11, DD 36-38 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:16, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Lucas, Toconao, Chile, 2016-02-06, DD 33.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Hardly any straight lines but good quality for me. --Ermell 08:07, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Francisco, Quito, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 152.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Appears slihgtly too dark to me but good quality. --Ermell 08:13, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faro, Chipiona, España, 2015-12-08, DD 11-13 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good composition and a good perspective. Sky is well done --Michielverbeek 09:09, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Giralda, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 92.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Bold perspective, but beautiful to me.--Famberhorst 15:52, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia y convento de Santa Catalina, Cusco, Perú, 2015-07-31, DD 72.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 12:23, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Nomination request

Please nominate this photo. I will probably nominate photos by a couple of other people next time, but what an amazing sight this is!

All the best,

Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:14, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi Ikan, thanks for your message, I will! Cheers, Poco2 20:03, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Ikan: ✓ Done Poco2 20:21, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

FP

Hello DD. What do you think about this picture? Thanks! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:14, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Arion: pretty cool, indeed! Poco2 20:24, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laguna Cañapa, Bolivia, 2016-02-03, DD 78.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:53, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laguna Blanca, Bolivia, 2016-02-02, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 09:58, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Campamento Aucanquilcha, Chile, 2016-02-10, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:54, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laguna Honda, Bolivia, 2016-02-03, DD 34.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, I think. --Peulle 14:55, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Entrega de Premios Wiki Loves, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-05, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:58, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garza azulada (Ardea herodias), isla Santa Cruz, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-26, DD 88.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Lmbuga 17:43, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fuente de la Canal, Medinaceli, Soria, España, 2015-12-28, DD 109.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:11, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Isla de Tarifa, Cádiz, España, 2015-12-09, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 17:39, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardín Botánico Jerry E. Clegg, Lafayette, Indiana, Estados Unidos, 2012-10-15, DD 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:11, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Milana, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 64.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:11, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de Santo Domingo, Lima, Perú, 2015-07-28, DD 60.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Minor CA on top of the building. Very easy to fix and almost not noticeable. Good quality. --ElBute 07:09, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Indeed, it was hard to see, ✓ fixed now Poco a poco 17:38, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ferrocarril en el salar de Carcote, Chile, 2016-02-09, DD 70.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ferrocarril en el salar de Ascotán, Chile, 2016-02-09, DD 45.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:41, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Desierto de Siloli, Bolivia, 2016-02-03, DD 22-29 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality. --Peulle 22:02, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cementerio de la salitrera Rica Aventura, María Elena, Chile, 2016-02-11, DD 132.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 02:08, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escolta presidencial, Plaza de Armas, Lima, Perú, 2015-07-28, DD 26.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 22:02, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alborge, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-23, DD 46.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:35, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Esteban de Litera, Huesca, España, 2015-12-23, DD 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:59, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torrehermosa, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-28, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:59, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flamenco en el Palacio Andaluz, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:26, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 April 2016 (UTC)