User talk:Pierre André Leclercq/Archive 6

Happy holidays! 2018! ;)

			* Happy Holidays 2018, Pierre André Leclercq! *
			Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:50, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Your signature

Your signature has a space between the "User" and ":Pierre André Leclercq". This makes it broken and the tool used to count votes fails. For example, see this diff. Could you fix it please? -- Colin (talk) 17:56, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Sorry I wasn't clear. I had already fixed the voting pages. I was asking you to fix your signature (in Preferences) -- Colin (talk) 18:37, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi Colin, I think I repaired the broken link. The result tables now display correctly. With my all apologies. Best regards. --Pierre André ^(talk) 18:40, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Pierre, please look at the wikitext of your signature. "User :Pierre André Leclercq". There is a space in it before the ":". The link seems to still work but it breaks the Photo Challenge voting tool. Can you have a look at your preferences and try to find the space. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 20:23, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi Colin, OK! I deleted the space that remained before ":". I hope that my error repaired, no longer affects "Photo Challenge voting tool". Thank you, best regards. --Pierre André ^(talk) 21:22, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Low resolution ?

Bonjour Pierre-André,
Je ne comprends pas pourquoi tu as mis ces 4 images dans Category:Low-resolution images from Wiki Loves Earth 2018 in France ?
Le produit de leurs dimensions (1920 × 1080) donne 2073600 qui est supérieur au 2000000 requis.
Est-ce que j'ai raté quelque chose ? Pmau (talk) 10:08, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Bonjour Pmau

Mea culpa! C'est une erreur de ma part que je m'empresse de corriger. Je me suis arrêté à leur taille de - 1Mo sans avoir penser faire le calcul du produit de leurs dimensions (1920 × 1080). Cordialement --Pierre André ^(talk) 10:25, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Ok, Merci. Pmau (talk) 10:27, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscou Park Kultury-Koltsevaya.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:57, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Souzdal Église Saint-Nicolas (Glotovo).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 21:25, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pavlosk Monument Ermina.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:03, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Icons of Saint Pantaleon in the cathedral of the Dormition, Yaroslavl, Russia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment should be used in the article Olivier LPB (talk) 09:39, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

 Done Thank you for your advice.--Pierre André ^(talk) 10:06, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:32, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Antonio da Firenze Madonna and Child with Saints. Ermitage Saint-Pétersbourg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Problem of crushing the image. The dimensions are known it is easy to correct. There is a problem of rebuilding (see the note on the image), the clipping is not finished. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:20, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Done correction the crushing of image, and fixing clipping on the left; Thank you for your advise. --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:52, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:11, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:33, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nicolas-le-Thaumaturge Cathedral Saint-Basile-the-Blessed. Moscow.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Problem of crushing the image. The dimensions are good for this image Russian icon of 'St. Nicholas of Velikoretsk', 17th century.JPG , easy to correct. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:35, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Done corrections dimensions for the image. Thank you for your advice.--Pierre André ^(talk) 07:52, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Support now perfect --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:12, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:33, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

VI

Bonjour, Je vote volontiers si les images ont au moins une utilisation, ceci est purement personnel ce n'est pas une règle de VI. Les tableaux par convention ne sont pas présenté avec un cadre sauf si celui ci à un intérêt historique (çà peu arriver), ton dernier tableau a une zone de reflet qui masque une partie de l'oeuvre. Ce n'est pas possible de l'améliorer. Il faut souvent prendre deux images que l'on assemble pour avoir un tableau sans reflet, fait quelques essais on y arrive. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Bonjour, Archaeodontosaurus Merci pour ces informations. En ce qui concerne mon dernier versement "Murillo, Rest on the Flight into Egypte", j'ai tenté de corriger la zone de reflet, en reprenant une portion d' images sans reflet. Cordialement. --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:15, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kingston sohal tower (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Slightly tilted CW, but easy to correct. --Palauenc05 09:59, 24 June 2018 (UTC)  Done Correction of inclination -1 °, thank you for your advice.--Pierre André Leclercq 14:40, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canadian Horseshoe Falls (en 2017) (7).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, quite sharp for a waterfall photo --Michielverbeek 09:49, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kingston Ontario Canada Island -Queen (5).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:06, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Doors of Saint Isaac's Cathedral Saint Petersburg, Russia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope The best perspective in the scope, so I support this nomination. Voltmetro 08:40, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thousand Islands.- Zavikon Island.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me, Tournasol7 17:59, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Flight into Egypt by Bartolomé Esteban Murillo. Musée de l'Ermitage, Saint Petersburg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support The frame brings nothing and could have been removed. But it's the best picture we have of the painting. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catherine Park, Saint-Pétersbourg, Russie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:35, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscou Prospekt Mira-Koltsevaya (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 16:44, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niagara Falls Rainbow Bridge en2017 (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Simisa 09:44, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kingston Ontario Canada Bateau Mouche.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The hand holding the smartphone should be cropped --Tsungam 12:28, 26 June 2018 (UTC)  Done I've cropped the hand holding the smartphone.--Pierre André Leclercq 16:29, 26 June 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tsungam 06:12, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ottawa Peace Tower (l'horloge).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:35, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parc marin du Saguenay–Saint-Laurent (11).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:29, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Petersbourg Musée littéraire Anna Akhmatova bis (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:00, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Moscou Statue de Pierre le Grand.JPG

File:Moscou Statue de Pierre le Grand.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

- [Tycho] ^talk 21:37, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quebec-city Corridor du Littoral (5).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:05, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angkor Wat.- Battle of Devas and Asuras (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:41, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ile de Bréhat (Enez Vriad) Buildings (4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. May be a little bit too dark. --XRay 10:54, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canadian Horseshoe Falls (en 2017) (8).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 23:11, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ottawa Byward Market Hall (12).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Catchy for its size --Daniel Case 02:48, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iaroslavl le Pont du trans-sibérien sur la Volga (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharpness should be better, dust spot top right. And please have a look to COM:OVERCAT. --XRay 19:27, 3 July 2018 (UTC) Thank you for your advice,  Done Better sharpness, and removing dust spot top right. Deleting redundant categories.--Pierre André Leclercq 20:03, 4 July 2018 (UTC)  Support IMO OK now. Thank you. --XRay 15:37, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Louvre-Lens Autel.- Sacrifice compitalice (cap855).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. IMO the white line at the bottom should be removed or black like the background. --XRay 12:18, 6 July 2018 (UTC)  Done Thank you for your advice.--Pierre André Leclercq 12:33, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Painting of Saint Anthony of Padua in France Saint Maurice church, Lille.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment the painting alone would be preferable. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

 Done a better crop, thank you for your advice .--Pierre André ^(talk) 09:35, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

• this is much better, but we need to update the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Done updating the scope. --Pierre André ^(talk) 12:47, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Support OK now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:42, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:40, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Charles de Borome Saint Maurice church, Lille.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment There is a deformation of the canvas (barelization) the frame does not mean anything. Pay attention to the proportions: the table seems stretched in height, it is easy to correct because the dimensions are known and given in the Palissy base. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

 Done correction deformation of the canvas (barelization) and the proportions, best regards --Pierre André ^(talk) 09:18, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

•  Support it's better. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:40, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Butchers' House Besse-et-Saint-Anastaise, Puy-de-Dôme (France).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:29, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:04, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quebec-City Corridor du Littoral (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Probably the best of this bunch --Daniel Case 17:13, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quebec-city Corridor du Littoral (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Like the last one, a decent job in the situation --Daniel Case 17:13, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quebec-city Corridor du Littoral (4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Decent job given the circumstances --Daniel Case 17:13, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

VI candidate muddle

Hi Pierre, I corrected the name of an entry of yours in the VI candidates list. The entry I removed is corrupt, it points to the wrong image for its name. You can see the problem if you look at the "File usage on commons section" of this image - it appears in two different candidate files. I hope you understand and agree with my actions. :) -- DeFacto (talk). 17:36, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi DeFacto, You're right, it's allright. Thank you for your action.--Pierre André ^(talk) 20:50, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Painting of Saint Joseph Saint Maurice church, Lille.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment I proposed this file inadvertently, it is not Own work, is it allowed.--Pierre André ^(talk) 09:45, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
• No problem --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 03:53, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ta Reach Angkor Wat Temple. Cambodia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and Useful. It would be nice if this was used on a project. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:51, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:13, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Problème en VI

Ton Cabe de San Francisco est bloqué en VI, veux-tu que je ferme manuellement cette promotion?--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Bonjour Archaeodontosaurus je ne sais pas à quoi cela est du. Effectivement, il vaut mieux que tu fermes cette cette promotion. Bonne journée. Cordialement--Pierre André ^(talk) 07:59, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Les causes restent mystérieuses, voilà c'est réparé. Bonne journée. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:16, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kudurru Detail of Babylon Cassita Louvre-Lens museum..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in Scope. It is useful. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:23, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:45, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hathoric capitals Louvre-Lens museum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope Voltmetro 17:39, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 14:01, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bust of Saint Maurice Lille.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question This photo is really good but why do you decide to use this scope? In my opinion, a helmet is the less important and conspicuous thing in this photo, and you should nominate this image with scope like used in "Bust of Saint Peter". Voltmetro 10:53, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment  Done scope "Statues of Saint Maurice in France". thank you for your advice.--Pierre André ^(talk) 11:14, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Voltmetro 11:49, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 10:21, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bust of Saint Peter. Saint Maurice church, Lille.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Very good and quality photo. Useful. Voltmetro 10:48, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 10:21, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wracks Oven, Porspoder in France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:06, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Virgin Hodegetria (Rostov Kremlin), (Russie) Eastern view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Nice photo. It would be good to put its orientation in the scope. It would also be nice if this was used in a project. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:27, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

 Comment Not used in an other project.-  Done orientation in the scope, best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 20:37, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

•  Support Other photos don't appear to be of this view and it is useful. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 23:48, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:06, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ile de Bréhat (Enez Vriad) Buildings (13).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp and nice colours, but composition could be improved. Just enough for QI. --MB-one 14:40, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villeneuve d'Ascq Asnapio Age de Bronze Eté2018 (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:16, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Inuksuit in Quebec Saint-Félicien Zoo..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 05:59, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 14:05, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ile de Bréhat Croix de Maudez.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 14:14, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ile de Bréhat (Enez Vriad) Buildings (7).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments On the left the photo is on the dark side. But good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:52, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Camp of Boulogne-sur-Mer North view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:32, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 03:40, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Louvre-Lens Fragment du palais de Darius1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Not perfect but has the detail it needs to have --Daniel Case 17:12, 13 July 2018 (UTC) Thanks --Pierre André Leclercq 09:17, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pania Of The Reef Statue North view, Napier (N.Z.).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Problem of color fringing and sailing on the upper part of the image, which can be corrected. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

 Done corection of color fringing and sailing on the upper part of the image, and better crop, thank you for your advice.--Pierre André ^(talk) 16:27, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:09, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nielles-les-Blequin la chapelle Notre-Dame du Mont (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but it might have been sharper --Michielverbeek 12:42, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beaune.- les vignobles de la côte de Beaune (26).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But your user category should be hidden. Please have a look to {{User category}}. --XRay 10:37, 21 July 2018 (UTC)  Done thank you for that clarification. After redesigning all my categories I had omitted this rule..--Pierre André Leclercq 15:20, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hemeroplanes triptolemus MHNT CUT 2010 0 162 Nuevo Xcán Quintana Roo Mexico male ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Pierre André Leclercq 21:04, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holy water dispenser in Church of the Immaculate Conception Wimereux..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:04, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:50, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vougeot WLM2016 Château du Clos de Vougeot (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:05, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuits Saint Georges, Clos de Vougeot Domaine Anne Gros (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:41, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clos de Vougeot Chateau de la Tour (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tsungam 06:13, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Coat of arms of Fontenay abbey Marmagne, Côte-d'Or.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:14, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stone carving: "Hunt of St Hubert" basilica Sainte-Marie-Madeleine. Vézelay.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:47, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 13:40, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beaune.- les vignobles de la côte de Beaune (25).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Main object too shadowed, an English description would also help --Michielverbeek 09:56, 23 July 2018 (UTC)  Done Clearing the shadow area of the main object thank you for your advice.--Pierre André Leclercq 12:37, 23 July 2018 (UTC) It's looking better, quality is now just high enough for Q1 a weak  Support --Michielverbeek 06:43, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vaudringhem sur le GR 121B (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments *   Weak support The cross should have stood freely in the air--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:48, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chaillé les Marais. Église Sainte-Marie-Madeleine (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:16, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jard sur Mer, Le moulin de la Conchette (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 15:12, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jard sur Mer.- la plage (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could have been sharper. (Tripod?). But good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:54, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dinan le Vieux pont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:51, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dinan le Vieux pont sur la Rance (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:51, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beaune.- les vignobles de la côte de Beaune (28).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:56, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beaune.- les vignobles de la côte de Beaune (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:56, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuits-Saint-Georges WLM2016 Château d'Entre-Deux-Monts (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Generally good, though at the limit to over-sharpening. What makes me sure that this will not be a quality image is the disturbing flare artifact around the chimney at the left. --Johannes Robalotoff 20:20, 22 July 2018 (UTC) Thank you four advice.  Done a correction of the disturbing flare artifact around the chimney at the left.--Pierre André Leclercq 21:19, 22 July 2018 (UTC)  Comment I'm a bit surprised. The new version has significantly different, better geometry (upright walls, horizontal roof). The house is darker against the sky. (Perhaps not as good as before.) But the greenish round area at the chimney with reduced contrast is still there. (Probably difficult to correct.) --Johannes Robalotoff 20:24, 23 July 2018 (UTC)  Comment Indeed the greenish round area at the fireplace with a reduced contrast is difficult to correct. The photo was taken in the direction of the SE, so in light against day around 11 o'clock in the morning. I've uploat a new version, tring a correction of artefact in the left corner of the chemney Thank you for your opinion.--Pierre André Leclercq 15:56, 24 July 2018 (UTC)  Comment Now your correction was very successful on the main roof at the right and directly below the chimney. Why did you not apply the same to the small roof to the left and farther below of the chimney? Same effect, same solution? --Johannes Robalotoff 19:45, 24 July 2018 (UTC) Thaks for your advice.  Done I've removed the greenish round area at the small roof to the left and farther below of the chimney.--Pierre André Leclercq 09:31, 25 July 2018 (UTC)  Weak support OK, finally the effect is sufficiently mitigated. --Johannes Robalotoff 20:34, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nielles-les-Blequin la mairie (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:56, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapelle Sainte-Catherine de Dinan Facade from the north of the former Dominican Convent..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:50, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:46, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Châteauneuf WLM2016 le château (Côte-d'Or) (3).jpg

Bonjour, J'ai essayé d'améliorer un peu l'image. Reverte si ça ne va pas. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 13:50, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Bonjour Yann  Thank you. C'est sympathique de votre part, l'amélioration est parfaite; Cordialement.--Pierre André ^(talk) 15:46, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hornaing la centrale thermique en2018 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1, but IMO it would be more beautiful to crop bottom and/or top --Michielverbeek 15:40, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beaune.- les vignobles de la côte de Beaune (21).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not sure about this one, you seem to focus on the vineyards (see cats) but they are not sharp, the signs are sharp. Btw, there are also a couple of dust spots in the left top corner --Poco a poco 11:14, 21 July 2018 (UTC)  Done removed the couple of dust spots in the left top corner, thanks for your advice.--Pierre André Leclercq 15:49, 21 July 2018 (UTC) It still misses categories about signs --Poco a poco 21:31, 23 July 2018 (UTC)  Done add categories about signs- Thank you. -Pierre André Leclercq 19:29, 24 July 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:18, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beaune.- les vignobles de la côte de Beaune (32).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Here I rather see a gate --Poco a poco 11:15, 21 July 2018 (UTC)  Done thank you for that clarification.--Pierre André Leclercq 15:27, 21 July 2018 (UTC) What I was trying to say is that you need to add description/categories about gates --Poco a poco 21:31, 23 July 2018 (UTC)  Done add description/categories about gates.Thank you.-Pierre André Leclercq 19:29, 24 July 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:18, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Reliefs in Gutmanis Cave East view, Sigulda (Latvia).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:01, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:19, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sculptures of Euripides in Louvre-Lens Museum (2018).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good and no alternative. Yann (talk) 12:34, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:36, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nielles-les-Blequin la chapelle Notre-Dame du Mont (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 19:34, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior of the Château de Châteauneuf (Côte-d'Or), seen from W.- Côte-d'Or.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The light is dull here, compared to File:Chateau de Chateauneuf DSC 0357.JPG and File:Chateauneuf vue chateau.JPG. The later is the best, but perspective correction was excessive. Also too much grass in foreground. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:18, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your advice, I downloaded a new version taking into account your remarks. Regards,--Pierre André ^(talk) 08:57, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Support (I made some changes to the image.) Yann (talk) 17:38, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Thank you. it's better. Regards --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:32, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Malo Ships at berth in 2017 (25).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 14:07, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Malo les remparts de la cité (25).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:30, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Malo Ships at berth in 2017 (29).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 13:07, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beaune.- les vignobles de la côte de Beaune (29).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 13:15, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chambord Eté2016 exposition de Calèches au château (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Atamari 14:23, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chambord Eté2016 exposition de Calèches au château (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 14:17, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Notre-Dame de la Grand'Porte Seen from East, ramparts of the city of Saint-Malo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Not yet used but useful as I think -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 13:32, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chambord Eté2016 exposition de Calèches au château (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Peulle 11:52, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Souzdal.-Horse-drawn carriages (1).JPG

If the file File:Souzdal.-Horse-drawn carriages (1).JPG could be used in a project then it would be alright for a VI I feel. Generally if a file is in use then it can be promoted easier then those that are not in use. The scope may need a bit of refinement once it is in use but that should be it. I can't tell you what I think a better scope would be right now because I don't know where it would be best used but if it was used at all it then the scope could be figured it out from there. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 10:33, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi Sixflashphoto, Thank you for this information. I keep the scope thus modified, wishing that it will be understood from there. Best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 10:46, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Guittiere l'Ile Aux Huitres (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. A little bit too dark, but acceptable. --XRay 16:12, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! L'Île d'Olonne (5).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK for me. --Basotxerri 19:58, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! L'Île d'Olonne (7).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:37, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jard sur Mer.- la plage (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Apeallingly minimalist --Daniel Case 06:21, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Memorial of the Legion of Honor Seen from South, Wimereux.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:45, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Vincent Circuit pédestre de La Ragnette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:30, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Vincent sur Jard,Plage Clemenceau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 15:31, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Vincent sur Jard, Plage de la Ragnette (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 15:31, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hornaing, city limit en 2018.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:43, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pump in the village of Chaillé-les-Marais, Vendée.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:46, 3 August 2018

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:56, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

(UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La cathédrale Saint-Pierre de Maillezais (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please remove the spots in the sky. --Ermell 19:53, 2 August 2018 (UTC)  Done remove the spots in the sky, thanks for your advice.--Pierre André Leclercq 08:30, 3 August 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:40, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Malo Ships at berth in 2017 (11).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:12, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Malo la Tour Bidouane.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 23:27, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Malo Le Fort-National (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! L'Île d'Olonne (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Zabriskies Point panoramique2016.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zabriskies Point panoramique2016.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puy du Fou.- La Cité Médiévale (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carlos yo 15:49, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le sentier du Blanc Nez .- Eté2016 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK for me. --Basotxerri 07:52, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

May I use your phoyograph of a Strowger switch?

May I please use this image in a book that I am putting together on http://roger-wood.com

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strowger_switch#/media/File:Télégraphie,_Systeme_Strowger.jpg

I will make sure the link is included and the image is attributed to Pierre Andre Leclercq.

best regards Roger — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 174.215.10.11 (talk) 07:48, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi, Roger, I am happy to know that this image will be useful in the book you are collecting on your site http://roger-wood.com. I am indeed, the author of this photo taken in the museum of telecommuications of Marcq-en-Baroeul. Best regard. --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:16, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohenschwangau village (Baviara) (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:26, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le sentier du Blanc Nez .- Eté2016 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments You focused on the signs but I guess that's OK. --Peulle 20:11, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Hohenschwangau (Baviara 2016) (9).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:57, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel of Our Lady of the Coast Penvins, France (view N)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:10, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Shooting RAW

Bonjour Pierre André, I've seen that you struggled quite a lot when improving your image. If you take photographing seriously and I think so as your camera isn't precisely a point-and-shoot camera, I can only recommend you that you shoot RAW and prepare your images in a descent program (well GIMP isn't bad but something like Lightroom is much easier). When I started here, I didn't care about the preparation/post processing but after some tips of the people at QIC, I got better and better. Best regards, --Basotxerri (talk) 18:32, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

• Hi, Basotxerri, indeed I am trying to improve my images to present them in QIC. I'm really passionate about digital photography, and I have a Sony Cybershoot and a second Sony NEX-F3 that allows the RAW format. I rarely use this format that I can unpack with the RawTherapee 5.4 software installed on my PC. I will follow your advice in the future with the hope of improving my QIC. Thank you for this information. Best regards, --Pierre André ^(talk) 21:06, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Due to a mishap it was possible for a while to upload .mp4 files. You have uploaded one or more .mp4 files in that period. Please go to Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MP4 files to see all files that are affected. If the video(s) are entirely your own work or properly licensed you can re-upload them with video2commons.

Yours sincerely, Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 01:43, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laos Plateau des Bolovens Ban Lao Ngam (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The picture is actually cut too tight at the top. But otherwise okay for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:34, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laos Plateau des Bolovens Ban Lao Ngam (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This one needs additional categories, the subject of the image is not a village --Poco a poco 08:36, 18 August 2018 (UTC)  DoneI created a category "Weaving in Ban Lao Ngam" Should I change the title. Thank you? Regards.--Pierre André Leclercq 09:50, 18 August 2018 (UTC)  Support Better now, regarding renaming I leave to you, not required IMO --Poco a poco 14:52, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laos Plateau des Bolovens Ban Lao Ngam (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JoachimKohlerBremen 10:09, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laos Plateau des Bolovens Ban Lao Ngam (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:36, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laos Plateau des Bolovens Ban Lao Ngam (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 22:54, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wurztburg Festung Marienberg.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is a tilt in ccw direction --Poco a poco 18:57, 14 August 2018 (UTC)br/>I uploaded a new version of the photo with the corrections needed, thank you for your advice.--Pierre André Leclercq 08:32, 15 August 2018 (UTC) Why did you upsized it? now it isn't sharp (tilt is fine now) --Poco a poco 18:09, 16 August 2018 (UTC)  DoneI upsized by mistake, so I've corrected the inclination from the original image, regards.--Pierre André Leclercq 19:03, 16 August 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:50, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tonle Sap Biosphere Reserve (28).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 01:12, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Linderhof (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs a slight rotation --Trougnouf 22:24, 18 August 2018 (UTC)  Done rotation of the image of 1°5 . Thank you for your advice.--Pierre André Leclercq 15:38, 20 August 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 16:05, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Hohenschwangau (Baviara 2016) (10).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:51, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nieuwkerke Eglise Onze-Lieve-Vrouwkerk (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Peulle 21:52, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

WLM 2018 : Catégorisation de la série sur le château de Valbelle d'Astroscape

Bonsoir Pierre-André,

En vérifiant les photos de wiki loves monuments, j'ai vu que tu avais déplacé les photos du château de Valbelle prises par @Astroscape: (comme celle ci ) dans la catégorie Category:Images from Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in France − early. Ces photos (fort réussies au demeurant) ont été envoyées le 2 septembre et rentrent donc bien dans le concours donc, si tu n'y vois pas d'objections, je vais les retirer de cette catégorie.

Cordialement, Jvillafruela (talk) 18:49, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

@Jvillafruela: Bonsoir, en fait ayant fait un test sur une dizaine de photos j'avais quelques doutes. J'ai donc posé la question via ma page de discussion aux organisateurs. Il s'agit d'une confusion, de ma part, entre la date d'importation et la date de la prise de vue. Tu as donc bien fait, de procéder à la correction, avant moi. Merci cordialement, --Pierre André ^(talk) 21:27, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

WLM not early

Salut, pourquoi tu as changé la categorie ici, ici et ici pour Category:Images from Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in France − early? Ils ont téléchargé aujourd'hui, donc pas trop tot... Cordialement, Tournasol7 (talk) 19:52, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

@Tournasol7: Bonsoir, en fait ayant fait un test sur une dizaine de photos j'avais quelques doutes. J'ai donc posé la question, via ma page de discussion aux organisateurs. Il s'agit d'une confusion, de ma part, entre la date d'importation et la date de la prise de vue. J'ai procédé aux corrections en les validant dans la catégorie Images from Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in France. Merci pour ton message cordialement, --Pierre André ^(talk) 21:36, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Ok, merci pour ta reponse. Bonne soiree! Tournasol7 (talk) 22:56, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris lePalais de la Cité (la Conciergerie) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 13:50, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris le Louvre au Pont-Royal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Мирослав Видрак 06:00, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

WLM Obviously ineligible

Bonjour,

Je vois que tu viens de déplacer ce matin certaines photos dans Category:Obviously ineligible submissions for Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in France, notamment des photos de Chambord et Cheverny. Pourtant ces photos me semble parfaitement admissibles, quel est le problème ?

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 08:33, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Bonjour, sauf erreur, il semble que la taille de ces photos, n'a pas le minimum requis. Leur format est inférieur à 1600x1200 selon l'article 5.3 du règlement. Cordialement, Pierre André

Ah oui, bien sûr, c'est moi qui suis fatigué ;) Merci de ta vigilance. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 09:03, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Bonsoir, ces photos du Château de Chaumont sur Loire et de Notre-Dame me semblent admissibles non ? Jvillafruela (talk) 18:21, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Bonsoir, @Jvillafruela: , sauf erreur de ma part, ces photos ne répondent pas aux points du règlement à vérifier:

• présence obligatoire du modèle Mérimée avec un identifiant valide ... (les modèles avec un identifiant erronée sont automatiquement placé dans Category:Mérimée with incorrect ID)
• présence, facultative, d'une catégorie, dans l'idéal la plus précise possible, soit la catégorie sur le monument lui-même - voire même une sous-catégorie sur un élément du monument - soit au minimum la commune où se trouve le monument

Pour info, à titre pédagogique, j'ai à plusieurs reprises corrigé de nombreux fichiers en y rajoutant les descriptions, l'identifiant de la base Mérimée, la géolocalisation et j'ai précisé, pour certains d'entre eux, la catégorie de la ville dans laquelle ils avaient été pris, qui n'était pas donnée.

A mon sens point trop n'en faut, surtout quand le photographe persiste à téléverser des fichiers mal libellés. CF l'historique de ce fichier que j'ai validé après y avoir apporté de nombreux ajouts. Cordialement, --Pierre André ^(talk) 20:58, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Bonsoir Pierre André, je corrige également(quand c'est possible) les fichiers incomplets. Pour l'exemple que tu donnes je ne pense pas qu' Iris Chérot ait fait preuve de mauvaise volonté car c'est une nouvelle contributrice et elle a envoyé ses 5 photos en une seule fois. Je me permets donc de repêcher sa photo tout en attirant son attention sur les règles à suivre. Bonne soirée Jvillafruela (talk) 18:53, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Bonjour @Jvillafruela: effectivement tu as bien fait de repêcher Iris Chérot, nouvelle contributrice. En aucun cas j'ai voulu "casser" son moral, mais l'inciter à corriger ses oublis, tout en sachant que j' aurais revu les fichiers concernés. Bonne journée, cordialement.--Pierre André ^(talk) 08:48, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Bonjour Pierre André Leclercq, je ne comprends pas pourquoi la photographie File:Manège journées du patrimoine 70011.jpg est versée dans cette catégorie inéligible ? Merci pour l'attention que tu prête à ce concours. Garitan (talk) 13:48, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Bonjour @Garitan: je l'ai versée dans cette catégorie, parce que tout comme cette image l'accent porte trop sur les personnes et l'exposition qui se tient dans l'édifice. Ceci dit je ne suis pas le seul vérificateur, ta photo peut être repêchée par un autre contrôleur, et l'un des membres du jury (dont je ne fais pas partie), qui en ultime recours décidera. Attention également, de bien veiller au droit l'image, des personnes qui figurent sur les images transmises. Bonne continuation dans ce concours 2018, bien cordialement à toi. --Pierre André ^(talk) 14:03, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Merci Pierre André Leclercq, je n'avais pas du tout compris que ce classement était un acte personnel du vérificateur et qu'il ne présageait en rien du classement du concours et amènerait d'autres vérifications. Pour ce qui est de l'équilibre entre la, ou les parties classées et le contexte, les participants...n'est pas cité dans les règles du concours. A Garitan (talk) 14:20, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments ti aspetta, con centinaia di nuovi comuni fotografabili

Concorso Wiki Loves Monuments Italia 2018 (English version)

Gentile Pierre André Leclercq, ti ringraziamo ancora una volta per la tua passata partecipazione a Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM). Il più grande concorso fotografico del mondo si svolge anche questo settembre per documentare e promuovere il patrimonio culturale italiano, con una licenza copyright libera.

Quest'anno è doppiamente facile partecipare: gli oggetti fotografabili coprono quasi 1000 comuni in più, grazie all'adesione di centinaia di nuovi enti fra cui Roma, e alla possibilità di fotografare circa 2000 alberi monumentali. Controlla le liste di monumenti fotografabili! Carica tutte le foto che hai e magari organizza una visita presso i monumenti che ancora non hanno una foto.

Quest'oggi il Parlamento europeo ha respinto la proposta di estendere la libertà di panorama. E allora scattiamo e pubblichiamo tutte le foto che possiamo, almeno per questi monumenti per cui ci è legalmente consentito!

Grazie, Nemo 16:09, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Gentile @Nemo: , devo andare in Italia (Milano) per alcuni giorni prima della chiusura della competizione. Pertanto userò la lista dei monumenti mancanti, che scaricherò volentieri. Cordiali saluti.--Pierre André ^(talk) 16:43, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Aire-sur-la-Lys le bailliage bis2018 (2).jpg

Copyright status: File:Aire-sur-la-Lys le bailliage bis2018 (2).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Aire-sur-la-Lys le bailliage bis2018 (2).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:44, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi @Magog the Ogre:  Thank you. thank you for your comment, I specified the license forgotten. Regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 13:17, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi

Hallo Pierre, as an paddler on lake Chiemsee i can identify some locations there. I corrected description on your picture. Grüße vom Chiemsee --DaxBichler (talk) 13:44, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Hallo @DaxBichler:  Thank you. for correcting the description on my photos of Chiemsee, as well as their geolocation. Sincerely from Northern France.--Pierre André ^(talk) 14:13, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Khusugtun au théâtre national de Mongolie

D'abord un grand merci pour tous les superbes développements d'articles sur les instruments de musique chinois et mongols. Les sources ne sont pas toujours faciles à trouver. D'autre part, j'ai vu quelques photos qui viennent du Théâtre national de Mongolie à Oulan-Bator. Et il me semble y reconnaître certains musiciens de Khusugtun, dont le joueur de mokhin khuur sur une photo, et des versions spécifiques des costumes mongols qu'ils utilisent de temps en temps. Je crois que le groupe n'a pas des membres fixes, mais n'en suis pas certain. J'ai donc ajouté ici, Category:Khusugtun. Est-ce que vous avez encore le programme du soir où vous les avez-vu ? Afin de vérifier qu'il s'agit bien de ce groupe ? Le chanteur est peut être un invité, pour participer à ce groupe. À priori, ils travaillent comme enseignant dans un établissement supérieur de musique, donc on doit souvent les retrouver dans ce théâtre pour les démonstrations du savoir faire national. Merci d'avance pour toute confirmation, et en tout cas merci pour tout. Popolon (talk) 23:35, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Bonjour Popolon je vous remercie également pour votre aide précieuse apportée dans la rédaction de mes articles. En ce qui concerne les photos prises lors de la soirée spectacle du 07 septembre 2011 à l'Opéra d' Oulan-Bator, je n'ai pas souvenance d'avoir eu de programme. Il s'agissait d'un voyage en trans-mongolien, organisé par "Nouvelles-Frontières, en vue de relier Irkoutsk à Pékin. Je ne suis resté, en fait que trois jours en Mongolie et la jeune et charmante guide locale qui pilotait notre groupe se nommait UUREE. Si mes souvenirs sont bons, (je ne peux le confirmer) ce fut le groupe "Tumen Ekh Ensemble" qui assura le spectacle, que j'ai particulièrement apprécié. Encore merci pour votre soutien. Bien cordialement--Pierre André ^(talk) 16:04, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Merci pour ces informations. Il est possible qu'un musicien soit dans les 2 ensembles alors. Je vais corriger. Vos modification m'ont fait découvrir certains détails de sujets qui me passionnent. Je ne suis personnellement allé qu'en Mongolie-Intérieure pour le moment, mais plusieurs fois. J'aimerais bien y retourner, et aller à Oulan-Bator en train depuis Pékin et aussi voir pousser jusqu'à Touva et la Bouriatie, mais ça sera pour des prochains voyages, je l'espère.Popolon (talk) 16:14, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

 Thank you. Popolon La traversée du désert de Gobi, à bord du trans-mongolien, offre des paysages superbes surtout au lever du soleil. A Oulan Bator, la visite du Monastère bouddhiste de Gandan est certes incontournable, mais passer ne serait-ce qu'une nuit dans le Parc national Hustaï et une autre dans celui de Terelj donnent la possibilité de faire des safari-photos uniques Encore merci pour votre sympathique aide, je vous souhaite de réaliser de belles découvertes dans la république de Bouriatie. Bien cordialement, --Pierre André ^(talk) 17:35, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2019! ;-)

			* Happy Holidays 2019, Pierre André Leclercq! *
			Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:59, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

@George Chernilevsky: Merci pour vos bons vœux. je vous souhaite un Joyeux Noël et une bonne et heureuse année 2019. --Pierre André (talk) 21:49, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2019! ;)

			* Happy Holidays 2019, Pierre André Leclercq! *
			Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- Llez (talk) 12:27, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Joyeux Noël

Merci beaucoup! Joyeux Noël pour toi aussi! Tournasol7 (talk) 09:49, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Et de ma part également, merci ! -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:43, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and a happy 2019! ;-)

			* Happy Christmas time and all the best for 2019, Pierre André Leclercq! *
			Merry Christmas and a happy New Year! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Joyeux Noël et bonne année! Frohe Weihnachten und ein frohes Neues Jahr! Wesołych Świąt i Szczęśliwego Nowego Roku! Счастливого Рождества и c Новым годом! Щасливого Різдва i З Новим роком! ... :) -- Poco2 13:41, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and a happy 2019! ;-)

			* Merry Christmas and all the best for 2019, Pierre André Leclercq! *
			Merry Christmas and a happy New Year! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Joyeux Noël et bonne année! Frohe Weihnachten und ein frohes Neues Jahr! Wesołych Świąt i Szczęśliwego Nowego Roku! Счастливого Рождества и c Новым годом! Щасливого Різдва i З Новим роком! ... :) Ermell (talk) 15:50, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your best wishes.

Also from Friesland in the Netherlands I wish you happy holidays and a happy and healthy 2019. Kind regards from.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:21, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Merry Christmas...

and a Happy New Year And a healthy 2019!
With greetings from the Netherlands.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:36, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Arrivée de Sacha

Merci pour tes vœux. C'est le plus beau Noel de ma vie : depuis cette nuits je suis grand-père pour la première fois. Tous mes vœux pour toi et ta famille..--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:45, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus: Félicitations, bienvenue au club des papys, joyeux Noël.--Pierre André ^(talk) 09:35, 25 December 2018 (UTC)