User talk:Nolanus
.gif){kind=link}
2.gif){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
Welcome
[edit]
 First steps tutorialOur first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.  Getting helpMore information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
 Goodies, tips and tricks
 Made a mistake?
| |
| (P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) | ||
Yann 03:02, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
|
První kroky Články První kroky a Často kladené dotazy Vám velmi pomohou. Naleznete zde návod, jak si nastavit prostředí (například jazyk), jak nahrávat obrázky a také naši licenční politiku. Přispívat zde může každý bez zvláštních technických znalostí. Buďte odvážní při editaci a předpokládejte dobrou vůli ostatních přispěvatelů. Je to wiki – vše je jednoduché. Potřebuji pomocVíce informací je možno nalézt na Portále Commons. Můžete klást otázky na stránce Help desk, Pod lípou nebo na IRC kanále #wikimedia-commons. Můžete také kontaktovat správce na jejich diskusních stránkách. Pokud máte specifický dotaz ohledně autorských práv, ptejte se na stránce Commons:Licensing questions. |
Tipy a triky
Udělali jste chybu?
| |
| (P.S. Chcete nám poskytnout zpětnou vazbu na tuto zprávu?) | ||
Yann 03:02, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Hungarian Wikipedia welcome
[edit]Hi Nolanus,
I read your message about our welcome message. I went to sign up for an account at Hungarian Wikipedia to see what they do. When you said you "see a welcome site automatically", do you mean the link to hu:Wikipédia:Az első lépések?
cheers, pfctdayelise (说什么?) 04:20, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
- No, this is not this. I found out now, that you must click to /tick off/ to "elszó megjegyzése a használatok között" and after you will see the message /or better page, it is not a message really/. It seemed, that it is not possible to make a link from /to/ it. But I saw it on other Wikipedias too, bud hungarian is the only I remember on it. --Nolanus 04:34, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
- Ye, it is! Thank you, I want to propose it on cs.wiki too, this information will help me maybe. --Nolanus 04:50, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
- Good thinking! :) I updated ours too: MediaWiki:Welcomecreation. pfctdayelise (说什么?) 05:05, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, I found out, that will have it too cs:MediaWiki:Welcomecreation :) --Nolanus 05:13, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
- (I changed your welcome message to czech! :)) --pfctdayelise (说什么?) 05:16, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, I found out, that will have it too cs:MediaWiki:Welcomecreation :) --Nolanus 05:13, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks Elise! I wil use both of them, 1. I want to lern better english, 2. it confuse me, when I go here to my user page /I think, I may back on cs.wiki :)/.
- I have one more idea: what about to add the important links to confirmation mail? --Nolanus 18:14, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Hi Nolanus, yes you are right: category names are normally plural nouns in English. We have a bot which can automatically "move"/"rename" categories, you can see it here: User:Orgullobot/commands/documentation. I added this request.
- About the confirmation mail -- why do you think it is important? At the moment we don't even require that users have an email address set at all. cheers, pfctdayelise (说什么?) 13:25, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- About the confirmation mail - I ment a new idea to our last talk - it could be usefull to send improtant information and links with the confirmation mail. Yes, many users havent set an email adress, but it colud help to them, who do. /sorry for my english/ --Nolanus 15:12, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Ah, great idea!!!! Very very good thinking. I will update that a bit soon. :) --pfctdayelise (说什么?) 03:18, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, I hope it wil makes the things better. / I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms/ --Nolanus 02:13, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
POTY 2006 voting
[edit]I know they are all beautiful, but we are allowed only the maximum of 5 votes... Alvesgaspar 20:32, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Okey, I wil change it, but now, I have to go, tomorrow maybe. --Nolanus 20:35, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Your additions of weblinks and interwiki links to image pages
[edit]Hello Nolanus,
your question "Why not": I have removed those links because they are wrong. The wikipedia articles you are linking to are the articles of the respective towns or villages, and if an article/gallery page about that village exists here on Commons, that is the place where those wikilinks should be put (for an example see the page about Stuttgart), but not on the page of any image that shows something related to that town.
I see no real need to add any weblinks to town websites per se here on Commons, I think that should be done in the respective Wikipedia articles. But if one would add those links, that should also be in the article/gallery page for that town. So: please remove those links again. Regards --Rosenzweig 17:18, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- I think, the interwiki there is usefull it makes the surfing easier, if you see no real need, OK /and I add the interwiki not always but for example in images which are improtant for me/, but say me, why it is harmfull?
- And you should show me a rule of commons, voting or something which forbid it, in other case, the talk and you opinion makes no sense. --Nolanus ✉ (C | E) 18:54, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- Don't be an ass, Nolanus. This is just not common practice and there is very little use having interwiki links all over the place in the image namespace. The interwikis in the image namespace should lead to duplicates in other wikis. The interwikis in the main namespace should lead to Wikipedia articles. Siebrand 12:46, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- Please don´t try to discourage others by arguments like "Don't be an ass". It would be better for you to not to discuss if you don´t have better arguments. In fact, there is very little use having interwiki links all over the place in all namespaces /I think no more than 10 %. And it is cleare why, it is not worth the time; but I don´t understand why should the interwiki be bad, it can be usefull in some cases /and for some people/. There are no reason to delete the interwiki. --Nolanus ✉ (C | E) 00:59, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Hello,
I want to talk with you about the same problem. As Rosenzweig explained it, an interwikilink normally connects Articles in different Wikipedias or gallery pages with Wikipedias. An image description page is the wrong place because an image is not the article, whereas a gallery page corresponds with an article.
It is better to create informative description pages (as I do it). You can still add them to your own pages, but please don't change descriptions pages of images by other users.
Regards, --MdE 16:32, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
OK. --Nolanus ✉ (C | E) 14:29, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:House_in_nerudova_and_snemovni_street2.jpg
[edit]
|
Thanks for uploading Image:House_in_nerudova_and_snemovni_street2.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS ([email protected]).
Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Siebrand 08:33, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Heraldry of Karviná
[edit]Sorry. You are right. I made a mistake because the name of the category is not usual (coats of arms of ....), but the category is absolutely satisfying. I deleted category to be classified from your coat of arms. Bye. Massimop 20:58, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Meta
[edit]I would like to use the name "N" on meta but you registered it. Could you please log in as "N" there and consent to being usurped here: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meta:Requests_for_help_from_a_sysop_or_bureaucrat#Username_change ? I would appreciate it. -Nard 02:25, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Revert
[edit]Please before reverting edits check that they are valid. this was a good detail added to description, not a vandalism.--Jollyroger 10:59, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- Excuse me this day there were a lot of vandalism. --Nolanus ✉ (C | E) 23:30, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Image:Glass tesseract animation.gif
[edit]Can you read one of these languages?
This text is in the page Category:Mathematics. It tooks me a lot of time to remove images from this cluttered category, and you have put again this picture in this category. So, thank you for trying to find a better category. --Juiced lemon 22:07, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- I pat it in Category:Animations of geometry now. But you would do better to put it in a subcategory and no simply take it away. It is better when a image is in the category above than in none cat. --Nolanus ✉ (C | E) 22:39, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- I put away this image from Category:Mathematics, because I thought it was not useful to illustrate any article about mathematics. --Juiced lemon 22:50, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
{{Welcomeip}} vs. {{Anon}}
[edit]Hi. Why did you feel the need to apply {{Anon}} to User talk:90.229.135.239 in this edit when I had already applied {{Welcomeip}}? Thanks! — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 04:52, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- The answer is very simple: because I didnt know that this template exists. And I didnt know it because it is as good as impossible to find this template when it isnt in a good category and when her name cant be guessed. I think it is better when the name of template is the same how in en.wiki then it is better to find /and when the text is simirally it good too, I think/. Naturally you can change my template or rename your to anon, I think both templates have their advantages. Sorry for my english. --Nolanus ✉ (C | E) 21:05, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
- So, you didn't read User talk:90.229.135.239, you just slapped "{{subst:Anon}} --~~~~" on the end? Please avoid doing that in the future. Also, please be aware that, even ex post facto, we like to put welcome templates at the top of user talk pages, both here and on English Wikipedia. I have now edited both templates, the first to include it in Category:Welcome templates. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 00:17, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- I wil be sure capable to avoid things like this if you create a tempkate properly, with all categories that should be there:). The creating of the cat. was a large work for me with my english, I didnt never do it if it were possible to find thos cat.
- I think, renaming to the same name like on en.wiki would be usefull. --Nolanus ✉ (C | E) 14:14, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Page and category for Briana Banks?
[edit]I noticed you made a page and category for Briana Banks - who only has one image. Is that common practice here? --AnonEMouse 00:48, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
- It now has three images. :) — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 17:17, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
I didnt made it, I only requested for restoring. I think it is usefull to have a category and page even if it has has only one image if it is probable that we wil have more images in future. --Nolanus ✉ (C | E) 21:34, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- About the other 2 images - uh-oh. See this discussion. [[1]]. These are apparently those again. Are you quite sure these images are OK? --AnonEMouse 17:46, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- I dont know, I didnt load it. Me, I am not sure of course. --Nolanus ✉ (C | E) 18:07, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- Jeff G. uploaded them, I repeated the question on his page. Frankly I hope the answer is "yes", because there are 170 Kamui99 images on Flickr that I'd be thrilled to use most of. However in the past suspicions have been brought up that they aren't actually Kamui's images. --AnonEMouse 18:48, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, I had forgotten about Kamui. We'll see if he responds here or on the images' pages on Flickr. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 19:23, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
- He hasn't responded yet, so I've just sent him FlickrMail. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 12:20, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- He still hasn't responded. :( — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 23:22, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, one of the image was a good example for laughter and humour, I liked it and I used it on cs.wiki. --Nolanus ✉ (C | E) 21:12, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
You are the person; about /Sasha Grey/
[edit]I can see your recomendation about the use of the Prewiev command.Thank you very much for your recomendation.So...you are the person in the famous conflict about the Sasha Grey's photos.You most be carefull.The woman is in the ATACC POSITION.....JA JA. So if shi can to find other photos that shi like,you should leave it calm.For my and other people(I suppost)are very interesting to take direct comnication with a particular person like that.Please(in your possibilities)if you cant,don't let that shi go.Thank you aggain. User talk 200.0.24.58] /19:19, 9 September 2007 UTC [Special:Contributions/200.0.24.58|200.0.24.58 (Talk) /
- My english isnt good and I think yours too, so I am not sure if I understand what do you mean.
- About Sasha Grey: user:Madjabuds has removed the images, but I didnt know that it is Sasha Grey, I thought that it is vandalism. I stopped to revert it but I hope that Sasha Grey wil free other images. --Nolanus ✉ (C | E) 21:37, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
You have reason,my English is terrible but you have understood. The problem with the famous Hideous two photos(that I like)has finished. However the photos are in the Sasha Greys (category).If you can, remove these photos here.So I hope that she can find other photos too.Thank you for your answer. (talk) 14:29, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- I sent you another message /what language do you speak?/. About cat: Sasha Grey didnt protest against tha imagea in the cat, only in her article; simple expressed the politics of commons in the category should be all photos relating the subject /collection of the images/, in the page the better images and it can be a brief explication about the image and subject; the link form Wikipedia articles about Sasha Grey is only tho article in commons, this means that only very few man can see the cat. Let us wait if he protest against it. I have to say that I am not a man who has right alone to decide things like this, if anyone other sees the this he has right to revert it again, this is why it would good if Sasha Grey release other photos. --Nolanus ✉ (C | E) 16:05, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Hello Nolanus: I speak Spanish but don't worried.I have to try to comunicate in this form.About Shasha Grey:I didn't know this politic of common.For my is enough.My unic and real point of view was:I liked this girl.My intention was in any form to try to comunicate with her, but I think that, this is impossible because I think that her unic and real precupation is to do more biggest her Porno - article with the maximun cuality possible.(No comunication with a person in particular).That most be normal in a person like that.So I'm not interesed really on Porn Articles.I'm musician and I hope that in the future I can write real articles about art in general.So thank you very much for your time and atention. PD:If you want, you can see that in her article(Sasha Greys)she name's herself catholic.So...WHAT IS THAT?
200.0.24.58 23:28, 10 September 2007 (UTC)(talk)
- Write me a E-mail please /see my user page or through wiki/. --Nolanus ✉ (C | E) 01:11, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Sorry,I can't send you a messaje because the messaje that I write to you is returned to my home.I don't know what hapen.Please if you can, give me another E- mail address that I can to write you.If you prefer, put this direccion on my talk page.So if you want to write me, my direccion is in my talk page.Thank you.
200.0.24.58 12:12, 11 September 2007 (UTC)(talk)
Sorry again.I was not registred.I underestand now how it works this.So if that is possible for you write me to see if my answer arrives you. I'm now the user Vicond Vicond(C | E) 17:56, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Don't worry Nolanus.I received my own message again.Thank you and Good-bye. Vicond 16:58, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Question
[edit]Hi, can you tell me why you reverted me on Sasha Grey? Videmus Omnia 00:59, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- I can, but I tell you, you are no Videmus Omnia. See [2]. ]. This link was in my edit summary!--Nolanus ✉ (C | E) 14:49, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- In other words, you are removing the images because someone who claims to be the person in them thinks they are not flattering? That's kind of a low standard, isn't it? They're not explicit, they're not humiliating, they're not offensive, they're just not as sharp as they could be. She isn't giving us better ones to replace them, she just wants us to get rid of perfectly fine free photographs of her. --AnonEMouse 16:41, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, this is what I don't understand. We have the images, they are of this person, all I did was to organize them into the gallery. And why did you delete the gallery description? Videmus Omnia 17:31, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- In other words, you are removing the images because someone who claims to be the person in them thinks they are not flattering? That's kind of a low standard, isn't it? They're not explicit, they're not humiliating, they're not offensive, they're just not as sharp as they could be. She isn't giving us better ones to replace them, she just wants us to get rid of perfectly fine free photographs of her. --AnonEMouse 16:41, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- I think, it would be good to show some respect to a person when she doesnt like her images, nevermind if she is a pornstar; the images are in the cat, it is enough I think. If you want to make a ultimatum "give us other images or we will use this ones", make it, it would be a good solution. --Nolanus ✉ (C | E) 19:11, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- The en Wikipedia links to the gallery, not the category. I'm not sure what difference it makes to remove the images from the gallery. Videmus Omnia 04:18, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
- I think, it would be good to show some respect to a person when she doesnt like her images, nevermind if she is a pornstar; the images are in the cat, it is enough I think. If you want to make a ultimatum "give us other images or we will use this ones", make it, it would be a good solution. --Nolanus ✉ (C | E) 19:11, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- It is my point; it is important to have the imagesd inthe cat. but it we mustnt have it in the gallery. --Nolanus ✉ (C | E) 02:14, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
| Image deletion warning | Image:Jablunkov-coat of arms.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 16:49, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Briana Banks categorizing
[edit]Just think about it - when you categorize category same as a page that it contains, your categorizing it twice (its in cat and in subcat tooo. Like you copied your file in deepest folder on your HDD to every parent directory. Wouldn't it be stupid?). There are rules about that, it's redundant, bad practice, and cluttering the cats. Regards, --Maggot666PL 22:25, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Give me the link to this rule, please. --Nolanus ✉ (C | E) 23:08, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
In the "vertical" dimension, Wikipedia has traditionally been more frugal, placing articles only in the most specific categories they reasonably fit in. Thus, if there is a Category:American film actors, John Wayne would go there and not in Category:Film actors or Category:American actors.
- Source: WP:CAT - How to categorize an article --Maggot666PL 00:45, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
I cant see there no proof that article and category cant be in the same cat. --Nolanus ✉ (C | E) 03:20, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- Think again - category for particular person is created to gather media together, to make parent cat less crowded. If you categorize page in the cat and in the same categories as it, your doing just the opposite. What's the point? --Maggot666PL 16:58, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- No, category and article are not the same thing. For the reader can it be usefull to go more quickly to the article fort the parent cat. And think about that articles a categories are sorting separately. --Nolanus ✉ (C | E) 18:45, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- No, they do not. Apart from being listed as categories, pages are sorted alphabetically in the same way as categories (non-Windows way), so there is no problem with that. And categorizing it that way DOUBLES the amount of records in cat. Which is ridicoulus, maybe not always (there are crucial differences in some situations, but this one is typical example of easily avoidable redundancy). --Maggot666PL 19:13, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 14:48, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- I changed it but my model for this edit was: Template:Information, Example usage it should be changed than. --Nolanus ✉ (C | E) 14:58, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
By the way, back N
[edit]You can have the "N" name back :P -Nard the Bard 02:00, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
- Why? You dont like it anymore? I dont need it necessary but it would be useful for me to have it on all wikis. --Nolanus ✉ (C | E) 16:19, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- I wasn't able to unify it across all wikis so I changed to a more unique name.. I should be able to give you a few of them I created and maybe a few moe that got re-created after I re-named. You'd have to ask for usurpation on the rest. -Nard the Bard 16:33, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Thanx. Where should I ask for usurpation? --Nolanus ✉ (C | E) 20:11, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
- There is no "N" account currently on Commons, although you'll have to ask an administrator to make the account for you since it is too close to another name. As a courtesy please link through from User:N to my page with a notice like "Note, comments before September 2008 signed by "N" actually belong to Nard the Bard" -Nard the Bard 20:45, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
- I will do it, but I think, for you would be good to ask a bot to change the signatures N to Nard the Bard.
- But I dont know, should i ask for usurpation of N here or in en.wiki? --Nolanus ✉ (C | E) 20:53, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Amalthea (moon).gif
[edit].gif){kind=link}
|
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Amalthea (moon).gif. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS ([email protected]).
Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Giorgiomonteforti (talk) 10:19, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
- Done. --Nolanus ✉ (C | E) 12:26, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Amalthea (moon)2.gif
[edit]2.gif){kind=link}
|
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Amalthea (moon)2.gif. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS ([email protected]).
Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Giorgiomonteforti (talk) 10:19, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
2.gif){kind=link}
- Done. --Nolanus ✉ (C | E) 12:26, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
|
File:Amalthea (moon).gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
.gif){kind=link}
--Uwe W. (talk) 18:38, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
Copyright status: File:Motyl-temelin-mensi.jpeg
[edit]
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Motyl-temelin-mensi.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
ChNPP (talk) 18:43, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Temelin-zastavka-mensi.jpeg
[edit]
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Temelin-zastavka-mensi.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
ChNPP (talk) 18:43, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Temelin-ostnace-mensi.jpeg
[edit]
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Temelin-ostnace-mensi.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
ChNPP (talk) 18:43, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Temelin-horizont-mensi.jpeg
[edit]
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Temelin-horizont-mensi.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
ChNPP (talk) 18:43, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
|
|
File:ETE en.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
hilarmont \\ talk, talk, talk 23:10, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
[edit]Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to [email protected].
Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:05, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- ↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
- ↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
[edit](Sorry to write in Engilsh)
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.
About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or [email protected]. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:56, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:MTplakat43137882 10214748128875088 1132256003174170624 n.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:MTplakat43137882 10214748128875088 1132256003174170624 n.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Ronhjones (Talk) 23:43, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
- Hi, it wil be no problem, I have the personal permission. --Nolanus ✉ (C | E) 23:48, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:MTplakatcropped2.png
[edit]
|
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:MTplakatcropped2.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:MTplakatcropped2.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Secondarywaltz (talk) 00:44, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:MtejmlovaDcropped.jpg
[edit]
|
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:MtejmlovaDcropped.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:MtejmlovaDcropped.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Secondarywaltz (talk) 00:45, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:Mtejmlova.png
[edit]
|
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Mtejmlova.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Mtejmlova.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Secondarywaltz (talk) 00:45, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:Michaelatejmlova.jpg
[edit]
|
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Michaelatejmlova.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Michaelatejmlova.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Secondarywaltz (talk) 00:46, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:Oleksandr Irvanets by Tetiana Davidenko1.JPG
[edit]
|
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Oleksandr Irvanets by Tetiana Davidenko1.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Oleksandr Irvanets by Tetiana Davidenko1.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Secondarywaltz (talk) 02:54, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
Přihlaste své fotky do Czech Wiki Photo 2020!
[edit]
Milí fotografové a editoři projektů Wikimedia,
každý rok společně nahrajete na Commons tisíce svobodných fotografií. Chceme vám všem poděkovat a také vás ocenit. Vyberte ty nejlepší z vašich fotek a přihlaste je do 30. 10. 2020 do soutěže Czech Wiki Photo 2020! Soutěž je otevřená i úplným nováčkům. Autoři tří nejlepších fotek si odnesou vouchery do Foto Škoda a speciální wiki-odznaky. Přihlášené fotky bude hodnotit i Honza Rybář, držitel Czech Press Photo.
Baví vás focení pro Commons i mimo soutěže? Staňte se fotografem Wikimedie, půjčujeme fototechniku a proplácíme cesty - více na Fotíme Česko.
Těšíme se na vaše snímky!
Za spolek Wikimedia Česká republika
Jakub Holzer
[email protected] -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:06, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 | Category:Videos of Trapogan temminckii is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
In addition, I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request, as linked above and below: not including year, month, or day; not creating the subpage; and not transcluding. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than the automatic Nominate for deletion or Nominate category for discussion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests and COM:CFD#Starting requests), you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually policy or the "By hand" portion of COM:CFD#Starting requests, normally collapsed), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people. Warning: such edits are not tolerated and have led to account blocks, as "We cannot work here with people who are not willing to follow our procedures, in particular for deletion requests." — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 18:02, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
| Category:Videos of Trapogan terminckii is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 18:06, 28 June 2024 (UTC)