User talk:Mgl.branco

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
English: Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Mgl.branco!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | /−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|correct name}}
  • For more information read the full deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot (talk) 14:18, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No fair use

[edit]

Hello.

The old logos of KDE are probably free and might be under the LGPL, like the new ones. A proof is needed though.

On the other hand, “I'm allowed to upload this files as there's no commercial intention and are uploaded to use to write about KDE project” (i.e. a fair use claim) is not valid for Commons, because Commons is not an encyclopedia, and it only accepts free images. Please see Commons:Fair use for details on why fair use is not allowed. Also, tagging them with {{GFDL}} was simply wrong, because you did not know if they were under GFDL.

Thanks.

--AVRS (talk) 18:45, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry for the inconvenient. As I understand from here ( http://www.kde.org/stuff/clipart.php ) the LGPL license is applicable to both the new logos and the old logos. And from here: http://techbase.kde.org/index.php?title=Policies/Licensing_Policy , point 7, I understand that logos are and must have always been GPL/LGPL/BSD/X11/MIT licensed. If a formal confirmations is necessary ask and I'd directly contact with the project or KDE e.v.

Mgl.branco (talk)

Actually, trademark fair use is usually OK (I guess I have misunderstood your intent there). As long as the logos' copyright is under the LGPL, no copyright fair use is needed.
Both statements about LGPL in http://www.kde.org/stuff/clipart.php appear to be in the section about the current official logos, which gave me small doubts about the licensing of the older logos.
--AVRS (talk) 17:16, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:ShowFoto kde4.png

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  /−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:ShowFoto kde4.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:ShowFoto kde4.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Pruneautalk 11:31, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cateogory:Requián has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tangopaso (talk) 18:27, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Betanzos Museo das Mariñas 1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−

. HombreDHojalata.talk 15:52, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ola HombreDHojalata, cal era o problema coa imaxe? pola autoría do cadro? Como está exposto nun museo público non me decatara de que tivese problema ningún. Uns saúdos!! Mgl.branco (talk) 09:09, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ola. Que estea exposto en museo público non implica que autor (neste caso Alfredo Erias Martínez) perda os seus dereitos de autoría. Un saúdo. --. HombreDHojalata.talk 09:12, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image corruption detected in File:PN Fragas do Eume 28.jpg

[edit]

Deutsch | English | /−


Information icon
Hello Mgl.branco, it appears that the version of File:PN Fragas do Eume 28.jpg which you uploaded 2020-02-23T17:25:39Z is broken or corrupt. Please review the image and attempt to correct this issue by uploading a new version of the file. TheSandBot will re-review this image again in 7 days. If it is still corrupt at that time, then the file may be nominated for deletion. This is most likely to happen when a substantial portion of the image is corrupt. Thank you,

TheSandBot (talk) 17:31, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image corruption detected in File:PN Fragas do Eume 81.jpg

[edit]

Deutsch | English | /−


Information icon
Hello Mgl.branco, it appears that the version of File:PN Fragas do Eume 81.jpg which you uploaded 2020-02-23T21:38:22Z is broken or corrupt. Please review the image and attempt to correct this issue by uploading a new version of the file. TheSandBot will re-review this image again in 7 days. If it is still corrupt at that time, then the file may be nominated for deletion. This is most likely to happen when a substantial portion of the image is corrupt. Thank you,

TheSandBot (talk) 22:08, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Capela da Pobra

[edit]

Hola. Según la posición de la cámara las fotos corresponden a la Capilla de San Roque, no a la de la Capela da Pobra, que estaría cerca de la anterior y no sale en las fotos.--Aitorembe (talk) 18:35, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hola. He checkeado PXOM de Mesía que me comentas, y se llama.. Capela de San Roque, situado en a Pobra, tercera foto de su arquitectura religiosa, clave de identificación AR-03. Un saludo.--Aitorembe (talk) 15:51, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ponte Vea

[edit]

Ola, Miguel! Como vai?

Como Category:Pontevea bridge xa está incluída en Category:Sistema Fluvial Ulla-Deza, non fai falta incluír esta última nas imaxes que xa están categorizadas coa primeira. É como se ás imaxes de Category:Padrón lle pos Category:Province of A Coruña; non fai falta por redundante, pola estrutura en árbore xerárquica das categorías.

Un saúdo! --Estevoaei (talk) 16:24, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Estevoaei Deime conta tarde; é que e primeiras pensei que fora un erro de se estaba ou non no espazo protexido. Pero vaia, grazas, vexo que está ben así :) Mgl.branco (talk) 18:37, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]