User talk:Massalim

English: Welcome to the Commons, Massalim!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot 15:44, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Спасибо за вычитку ;)

Сколько не вычитывай, всё равно что-нибудь да останется на долю будущих читателей. Для справки: а) можно переключиться на русский интерфейс; б) для общения русскоговорящих/пишущих есть Commons:Форум (чахлый, но есть). Удачи! --Kaganer 22:03, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

File:Pokrovsky Monastery (Kiev) Pokrov Church.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:55, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Category names

Hi, category names should be in English, but of course we have some tolerance as many names just don't exist in English. The names however must use the (extended) Roman characterset as most people have major problems displaying Cyrillic, Arabic, Hebrew, Chinese, Japanese, Aramese, ... charactersets, let alone reading it. Keep up the good work. --Foroa (talk) 14:12, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Unfortunately I have not time to restore what you destroyed in two minutes. In my opinion categories in non-English should be redirected into English but not deleted. If you do something do it in a perfect manner. Massalim (talk) 14:23, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

File:Saint_Brieuc.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Saint_Brieuc.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 10:08, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Alexis_Toth_icon.jpg

File:Alexis_Toth_icon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 12:05, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Муссем (фольклорный фестиваль) в Тан-Тане (Марокко).jpg

Hi Massalim, I just wanted to say again that File:Муссем (фольклорный фестиваль) в Тан-Тане (Марокко).jpg is an amazing photo. In the description I have noted that they are Sahrawi people. Could you possibly confirm that if possible? Also, I have nominated the image for featured photo status at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Муссем (фольклорный фестиваль) в Тан-Тане (Марокко).jpg. I look forward to seeing more photos from this most interesting festival. Cheers, russavia (talk) 05:36, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Yes, they are. Thank you for nomination, but I don't find this photo here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Featured_picture_candidates. И. Максим (talk) 12:06, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Someone erroneously removed the nomination from the list, I have now added it back. You, of course, are welcome to vote for it as well :) russavia (talk) 13:28, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

I don't know how to vote for yourself :) И. Максим (talk) 13:50, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Is there any chance of possibly getting the photo in a higher resolution, as per one of the comments in the nomination discussion? Also, the photo is a great example of fr:Fantasia (Maghreb). :) russavia (talk) 15:43, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

It's not a problem. In fact I don't see any connection with nomination and printing-quality resolution... Why 2000px is a problem for commenters? И. Максим (talk) 20:19, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi Maxim, 2000px isn't so much a problem, but they like to see photos in as large a resolution as possible. Thanks for providing this in a higher resolution, another editor has uploaded it from Flickr. I think this photo will also do well in COM:POTY in the next invocation. Cheers, russavia (talk) 18:26, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. И. Максим (talk) 22:41, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

• Well, I doubled resolution on Flickr. Russavia, could you please do all necessary on Commons? И. Максим (talk) 20:31, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Fantasia in Morocco.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Problem: The image does not match the scope. Easy to fix --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:07, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

• Why do you think it doesn't match the scope? Of course it does. russavia (talk) 17:52, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
• If I click on the scope I do not see the image. The correct scope, will be Fantasia in Morocco.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
• Fixed by adding in upper category. И. Максим (talk) 11:57, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
• No it is not like that. The image is now over-categorized. The scope must be: Fantasia in Morocco. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:29, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
• Done. И. Максим (talk) 12:43, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:07, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:01, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

This is for you. russavia (talk) 12:54, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Thank you И. Максим (talk) 21:35, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Featured photo promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Муссем (фольклорный фестиваль) в Тан-Тане (Марокко).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Муссем (фольклорный фестиваль) в Тан-Тане (Марокко).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:50, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Купол Спасо-Преображенского собора Валаамского монастыря.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 17:52, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bogolyubskaya Africa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 12:11, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Тайная Вечеря. Роспись храма на Валааме.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Слишком явный цветовой шум, как мне кажется --A.Savin 17:52, 12 September 2013 (UTC) OK for me, though would be better if composition were central. @Mattbuck 18:59, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Александро-Свирский скит Валаамского монастыря.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough for QI imo. --Dirtsc 15:52, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metropolitan Laurus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good! --Ralf Roletschek 23:28, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

QIC

My sincere apologies for declining your nominations due to thinking you weren't a Commoner. A suggestion: Instead of linking to your Flickr in the "Author" field, could you just use your (linked) Commons username? You could put the Flickr link elsewhere if desired. This will make it easier for reviewers to see that you are a Commoner. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:32, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

In fact it was not me who downloaded and promoted these photos. But thank you for your advice. И. Максим (talk) 23:19, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calvaire à Saint Silouane.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Commons:Picture of the Year/2013/R1/v/Муссем (фольклорный фестиваль) в Тан-Тане (Марокко).jpg

Hi Massalim, just a quick note to let you know that POTY voting has now begun and your Fantasia photo is to be found at Commons:Picture of the Year/2013/R1/v/Муссем (фольклорный фестиваль) в Тан-Тане (Марокко).jpg. Good luck. Cheers, russavia (talk) 07:18, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Massalim⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Massalim,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Вікі любить Землю, 1–31 травня / Wiki Loves Earth, May 1–31, 2014

Вітаємо!

З 1 по 31 травня 2014 буде проходити конкурс «Вікі любить Землю», метою якого є фотографування пам'яток природи. Цього року конкурс став міжнародним. Зі списками пам'яток природи України можна ознайомитися тут. Приєднуйтеся!

Більше інформації про конкурс читати тут. – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить Землю» (in english) 20:54, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:Bogolyubskaya Africa.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bogolyubskaya Africa.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Tom-L (talk) 10:33, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:Kobrin Mikhail 1.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Kobrin Mikhail 1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Sealle (talk) 05:30, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Kobrin Mikhail 3.jpg

File:Kobrin Mikhail 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sealle (talk) 18:48, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Kobrin Mikhail 1.jpg

File:Kobrin Mikhail 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sealle (talk) 18:52, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fleurs sur la côte Atlantique marocaine (14161612988).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:16, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Playa de las cuevas, Asilah (14161726789).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 10:38, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monte Cinto vs Calacuccia et Lozzi (5746094163).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:25, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port d'Assilah (14161945927).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me now --Poco a poco 17:43, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ourika sightseeing (8162699524).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Might be a little too much saturation for some, but I'll take it --Daniel Case 16:25, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Vladimir Skete (Valaam Monastery) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Chromatic aberrations and dust spots. Some chromatic noise in the shadows. All fixable. --Cccefalon 21:19, 2 November 2015 (UTC) I beleive I corrected it. --Massalim 00:53, 3 November 2015 (UTC) For me a QI now --Haneburger 07:31, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Терракт в Ницце

Передали, что задавили русского священнослужителя. --Pauk (talk) 01:26, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Нет, никто из священнослужителей там не пострадал. Погибли друзья настоятеля Николаевского собора. И. Максим (talk) 08:42, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Category:June_2006_in_Solovki

Category:June_2006_in_Solovki has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Ricky81682 (talk) 08:40, 8 December 2022 (UTC)