User talk:MB-one/Archive 25

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geneva International Motor Show 2018, Le Grand-Saconnex (1X7A1221).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:01, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adomi Bridge, Atimpoku (P1090999).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:04, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! National Pensions Regulatory Authority, Tamale (P1100287).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done Thanks for the review --MB-one 13:58, 9 April 2023 (UTC) Thanks. Better now. --Imehling 18:58, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuel station, Tamale (P1100284).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:17, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ODEG Desiro ML, Ribnitz-Damgarten (LRM 20200529 112625).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:17, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Airport, Ayawaso West (P1100131).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The WB is off and the vignetting too obvious --Poco a poco 16:32, 5 April 2023 (UTC)  Done Thank for the review --MB-one 14:38, 9 April 2023 (UTC)  Support Looking better --Poco a poco 16:21, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Überkategorisierungen

Deine neuere Aktion (nature) fällt nicht ganz so massiv aus, hat aber auch zu Überkategorisierungen geführt. Ein Beispiel: File:012 2015 05 06 Winterlinde (Wiki Loves Earth 2015).jpg mit den Kategorien Category:Quality images of trees in Germany und Category:Quality images of nature. --XRay 💬 05:15, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Robin HR100, Mainz (P1090487).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 07:46, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Categories about queens

Hi, MB-one. I saw your change to Category:Photographs of Victoria of the United Kingdom, where you replaced the photographs of monarchs category with photographs of queens. The monarchs category is still needed, though, because not all queens are monarchs. Victoria was a monarch because the was a ruling queen ("queen regnant"), but some queens are queens consort, meaning that they have the title of queen because they are married to a king, but the queen herself is not a monarch. Please be aware of this when making changes related to queens. Thanks! -- Auntof6 (talk) 20:14, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

@Auntof6, you are correct. MB-one (talk) 12:04, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sailing on Lake Constance (1X7A0012).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 16:56, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Changan van, Tamale (P1100344).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 18:29, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ILA 2018, Schönefeld (1X7A5403).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 11:59, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --MB-one (talk) 12:52, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality images of objects

How picture of people, already in proper QI category is an image of object? This category is very general, are you sure all of the results of some scan should be included there? -- Jakubhal 08:54, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

@Jakubhal Sure. Can you give an example, so I can check the scan results? MB-one (talk) 09:41, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Please have a look to all the subcategories of Quality images of objects. --XRay 💬 09:45, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Sure, member of Quality images of Anser answer - now also of "objects" - [1], member of Quality images of people in Kraków, now also "objects" [2]. Just two first examples from my observation list. There is a lot more on my list. -- Jakubhal 09:51, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

@Jakubhal Thanks. That helped a lot. I think, I found the "problem": both Groups of people by country and Groups of animals are indrectly categorized as Objects by setting. While one could argue for ages about this, I will adjust my petscan query accordingly to exclude these categories. MB-one (talk) 10:02, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Ich darf Dich auffordern diese Kategorisierung von Menschen als Objekte sofort zu stoppen. Ich habe nur eine winzige Stichprobe überprüft, und bin entsetzt: [3], [4], [5], [6].
Den generellen Unfug, Kategorien für etwas anzulegen, dass sich per PetScan ganz leicht aktuell anzeigen lässt, lasse ich mal unkommentiert. --Stepro (talk) 14:45, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

@Stepro Shoot the messenger, oder wie? Wie bereits oben erwähnt, habe ich die Kategorienstruktur so nicht angelegt, und stelle sie definitv in Frage. Ich möchte dich daher bitten, deinen Ton hier zu mäßigen. Wenn du konkrete Vorschläge zur Verbesserung hast, bin ich dafür offen. MB-one (talk) 15:45, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Mein konkreter Vorschlag: Hör auf damit! Wenn es denn wenigstens mit Botflag geschähe, so dass dieser völlige Schwachsinn einem nicht die Beo so zumüllen würde, dass sie unbrauchbar wird. Und jetzt kommen immer noch mehr solche bot-erstellten Kategorien, die es nie geben dürfte, da sie eben automatisch erzeugt werden. Was kommt noch? Quality images of sportspeople in Thuringia in May 2022 with yellow dress?

Und zum Adressaten: Ich kann mich nur an den wenden, der die Bearbeitungen durchführt, die Hintergründe kenne ich nicht, und sie interessieren mich auch nicht. Ich bin inzwischen maximal von diesem Unfug genervt. Du führst die Edits durch, also bist Du auch für diese verantwortlich. So einfach ist das. Und glaube mir: Ich reiße mich mit meinem Ton gerade sehr zusammen. Stepro (talk) 16:28, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis mit dem Botflag. Ich prüfe mal, warum das von Quickcategories nicht gesetzt wird. Bzgl. der vergebenen Kategorien scheint allerdings ein Missverständnis vorzuliegen. Die sind keineswegs durch Bots erstellt. Auch ich habe in diesem Zusammenhang keine spezifischeren Kategorien erstellt, als schon vorhanden. Quality images of sportspeople in Thuringia in May 2022 with yellow dress wird also vermutlich Phantasie bleiben. Für die Edits übernehme ich natürlich die Verantwortung. Wenn einzelne Edits tatsächlich objektiv fehlerhaft sind, bin ich für jeden Hinweis dankbar und werde sie korrigieren. Abgesehen von dem fehlenden Botflag, würde mich tatsächlich interessieren, wieso dich diese Edits nerven. Sie machen schließlich nichts kaputt (zumindest nicht, solange es vorher "heile" war) und erleichtern die Suche nach guten Bildern. Mich stört mangelnde Kategorisierung viel eher, weil sie die effektive Nutzung (grade unserer besten Bilder) erschwert. MB-one (talk) 16:54, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

@Stepro habe mich bezüglich der Edit-Markierungen schlau gemacht: QuickCategories setzt das Tag #OAuth CID: 1277. Damit kannst du diese Edits aus der Beobachtungsliste filtern. MB-one (talk) 17:11, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Ich sehe einfach keinen Sinn darin, PetScan-Ergebnisse in Kategorien zu speichern. Das hat meines Erachtens nichts mit "mangelnder Kategorisierung" zu tun, sondern mit der falschen Auswahl der Werkzeuge. Wenn ich es mir mit PetScan anzeigen lassen kann, ist eine Kategorie überflüssig. Wichtig sind Kategorien, die sich nicht automatisch ermitteln lassen. Stepro (talk) 14:44, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Eine Anmerkung. Du hast eine Kategorietiefe von 7 für deine Suche gewählt - und einen sehr allgemeinen Begriff. Das ist schon recht sportlich, zumal Zuordnungen mit jedem Level schwammiger werden. Eine so große Aktion kann man eigentlich nur durchführen, indem man mit einer überschaubaren Anzahl beginnt und Fehler analysiert. Nach zwei, drei Runden hat man zumindest große Problemstellen entdeckt. Die Personen wären so zumindest aufgefallen. Die große Anzahl in Category:Quality images of objects muss unbedingt wieder reduziert werden. Die Kategorie ist so nicht brauchbar. Länderspezifische Kategorien sind vorhanden, spezielle Unterkategorien auch. Bitte bring das in Ordnung, bevor die weitere Aktionen startest. Danke! --XRay 💬 05:12, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Eine geringere Kategorietiefe würde mehr Fehler durch Überkategorisierung verursachen, nicht weniger. Theoretisch würde unbegrenzte Kategorietiefe die besten Ergebnisse bringen. Leider sind die Queries dann nicht mehr ausführbar. 7 hat sich als guter Kompromiss herauskristallisiert, so dass Fehler durch Überkategorisierung weitestgehend vermieden werden können. So lange einzelne Fehler systematisch auftauchen, lassen sich diese zum Glück auch leicht korrigieren (siehe Personen). Ja, per COM:CAT sollen alle Dateien nach Möglichkeit in die spezifischste existierende Kategorie. Genau das ist aber auch das Ziel der Aktion. Dies ist jedoch der erste Schritt, der die weiteren Schritte erst ermöglicht. Wenn dich die allgemeine Kategorie in einer bestimmten Datei stört, spricht natürlich nichts dagegen, sie in eine passendere Unterkategorie zu verschieben. MB-one (talk) 06:59, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Das Verschieben in die Unterkategorien hatte ich bereits vor Monaten gemacht. Nun sind da aber mehr als 10.000 Dateien und bei vielen nicht ersichtlich, warum sie überhaupt in "Quality images of objects" gelandet sind. Aus diesem Pool möchte ich nichts verschieben. Und ich denke (=Annahme, aber auch Erfahrungen aus eigenen Kategorisierungen), dass 7 Kategorien definitiv zu viel sind. Hast du denn vorher mal ausgewertet, was für Dateien damit überhaupt gefunden werden? Wenn die Tiefe noch größer würde, triffst du zwar auf Dateien, die nicht in "Quality images of objects" zu finden sind, die aber von der Thematik auch weit davon entfernt sind. Diverse Analysen hatte ich auch schon mal gemacht, bei 3 bis 5 Ebenen war Schluss, da die Zugehörigkeit zur eigentlichen Ebene (hier "Objects") kaum noch zu finden war. Schau dir einfach mal an, welche Kategorien in "Objects by setting" zu finden sind. Versuch mal nachzuvollziehen, woher der Bezug bei den Bildern kommt. Manchmal findet man ihn, manchmal ist er aber auch gänzlich unsichtbar. Ich möchte dich doch bitten, Category:Quality images of objects dringend aufzuräumen, bevor du weitere Aktionen startest. Ich helfe immer gerne, aber diesen Zustand halte ich für inakzeptabel. Da möchte ich nicht ansetzen. Wenn ich von den meiner Meinung nach nicht korrekt eingeordneten Bilder welche zum Beispiel in Category:Quality images of objects in Germany verschieben würde - nur weil es Bilder aus Deutschland sind, werden die Bilder nur weiter versteckt. Meiner Meinung nach muss erst aufgeräumt werden. --XRay 💬 10:53, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Nur mal ein Vergleich: Die Suche nach incategory:"Quality images of objects" insource:/Category:Objects/ findet nur 417 Bilder. 417 von mehr als 11.000. Das ist eine recht ungünstige Quote. --XRay 💬 10:56, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Mir scheint, dass wir ein unterschiedliches Verständnis des Kategoriensystems haben. Das die Unterkategorie "weit entfernt" von der Hauptkategorie ist, heißt nicht, dass die Definition der Hauptkategorie nicht mehr relevant für die Datei ist.

incategory:"Quality images of objects" insource:/Category:Objects/ sucht hingegen auch nicht nach Unterkategorien von Objects sondern nach Dateien in Kategorien die den String "Object" im Namen tragen. Da ist es wenig überraschend, dass das Suchergebnis anders ausfällt.

Mein Ziel ist es auch nicht, diese Dateien als nächstes nach Quality images of objects by country zu sortieren, sondern primär in die passenden Sachunterkategorien (Quality images of vehicles Quality images of buildings, Quality images of food, etc.) zu verschieben. Ich gehe davon aus, dass das deine Zustimmung findet. MB-one (talk) 12:02, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Meine Zustimmung ist sicherlich unbedeutend. Fehler machen wir alle und da kann ich auch auf den Holzweg sein. Die Sachkategorien hätte ich auch als erstes Ziel, aber die länderspezifischen kann man zusätzlich setzen. Für die Sachkategorien knüpfe ich an meinen Suchvorschlag an. incategory:"Quality images of objects" insource:/Category:(Food|[^\|\[\]] as food)/ ist dann hilfreich, um Kandidaten für Quality images of food zu finden. So war zumindest vor Monaten mein Ansatz. 100% erreicht man nicht, aber nah dran. --XRay 💬 15:00, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Object is very common. I don't know why flowers are objects: File:Ballonblume -- 2021 -- 8789.jpg. In Quality images of objects are now lot's of images without any reason. The subcategories are not considered, country specific categories too. The category Quality images of objects is now completely confusing. More than 10.000 images. Please fix the category urgently. --XRay 💬 15:25, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

@XRay

The images aren't there without a reason. All of these images are QIs that are already categorized as showing some sort of Objects by setting. The plan is, to make the categorization more specific, where possible. You are welcome to help me in identifying systematical errors in the catgorization. I will do my best to fix them. Thanks MB-one (talk) 15:57, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Please finish your categorization first. Put all the images to the specific subcategories and country categories. --XRay 💬 16:12, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --MB-one (talk) 12:54, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Objets ?

Où voyez vous ici des objets File:Un sans-abri dans un duvet dans le centre-ville de Lausanne (Suisse).jpg et File:Dampremy - Soumonces 2014 - 03.jpg ? Ce sont des sujets, des personnes.

Merci de bien vouloir revoir vos critères d'ajout de la catégorie.

Cordialement. H₂O^(talk) 15:27, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

@Jmh2o

Thank you for noticing. The image was already categorized as depicting an object (in this case the sleeping bag). I manually added the Quality images of people as well. MB-one (talk) 15:52, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Merci. --H₂O^(talk) 16:05, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --MB-one (talk) 12:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Vandalism warning

---

 

You have vandalized the content of Wikimedia Commons. Please stop. If you continue making inappropriate edits you may be blocked from editing Commons. You may test freely in the sandbox.

A.Savin 16:55, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --MB-one (talk) 12:52, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! North Ridge, Korle-Klottey (P1090876).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The photo is OK, although the file name could be more descriptive. --Peulle 11:38, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --MB-one (talk) 12:52, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Kategorisierung präziser

Hallo MB-one, du hattest bei File:Rüsselsheim 2021-11 Foto 1.jpg die sehr allgemeinen Kategorien Ruins und Towers ergänzt. Bitte mache da speziellere, z.B. regionale Kategorien draus, sonst hat man in den Hauptkategorien wahnsinn viele Dateien. -- Gerd Fahrenhorst (talk) 12:49, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Mache ich gerne bei Gelegenheit. MB-one (talk) 12:50, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --MB-one (talk) 12:52, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 771 065, Heringsdorf (P1090764).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. A part of the foreground could be cropped IMO. --Ermell 07:51, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Land Cruiser, West Gonja (P1100488).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 09:07, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burma Camp, La-Dade-Kotopon (P1100238).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp, but the colours seem off - could be fixed with a white balance correction? --Mike Peel 17:04, 7 April 2023 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review --MB-one 14:28, 9 April 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality, maybe could do with a bit further WB tweak, but good enough. --Mike Peel 08:34, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Unvollständige Kategorisierungen

Hallo! Irgendwie habe ich das Gefühl, dass du eine ganz schön lange To-Do-Liste hast. Category:Quality images of Germany angefangen, aber nicht weiter verteilt, Category:Quality images of objects angefangen, aber nicht weiter verteilt. Und wie schreibst du hier auf deiner Diskussionsseite bei einem anderen Kommentar einer unvollständigen Änderung: "bei Gelegenheit". Darf ich hoffen, dass diese Gelegenheit bald kommt? --XRay 💬 04:41, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Hallo XRay,

zur Beantwortung deiner Frage weise ich darauf hin, dass Wikimedia Commons a) ein Wiki und b) ein Freiwilligenprojekt ist. Wie ich bereits weiter oben erwähnte, kannst Du mich gerne auf Fehler hinweisen. Dann versuche ich das schnellstmöglich zu korrigieren.

Viele Grüße MB-one (talk) 07:02, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

War ja nur 'ne Frage. Bei Fehlern melde ich mich gerne. Wenn ich mit Rat und Tat zur Seite stehen kann, gerne. --XRay 💬 07:47, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --MB-one (talk) 07:03, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2023 - Deutschland

Hallo MB-one,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 31. Mai 2023 findet zum elften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth statt. Dabei können unter anderem Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

• Sieger WLE 2022 – Landschaft
• 
  Hohes Ufer zwischen Ahrenshoop und Wustrow, Fischland
• 
  Biotop Nördliche Lothdorfer Wiese
• 
  Aisch bei Willersdorf im FFH Aischgrund

• Sieger WLE 2022 – Detail
• 
  Gemeine Goldwespe im NSG Wittenberge Rühstädter Elbniederung
• 
  Libellen-Schmetterlingshaft im Naturschutzgebiet Badberg (Kaiserstuhl)
• 
  Blüte eines Schmalblättrigen Weidenröschens im Naturpark Taunus

Der Wettbewerb ist zweigeteilt, das heißt wir unterscheiden zwischen den beiden Wettbewerbskategorien Landschaft und Detail/Makro. Zu Landschaft zählen auch geschützte Einzelbäume. In der Wettbewerbskategorie Detail/Makro werden Pflanzen, Tiere und Pilze bewertet.

Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Findlinge, Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Auch im vergangenen Jahr sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen – zum Beispiel in Sachsen die Liste der Naturdenkmale in Wurzen.

Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du bei WLE 2023 – Deutschland und unter dieser Anleitung.

Damit der Upload für dich einfacher ist, haben wir in diesem Jahr die einzelnen Hochladeseiten für die Bundesländer abgeschafft, alle Fotos werden über dasselbe Formular hochgeladen. Außerdem haben wir das Layout unserer WLE-Seiten geändert.

Damit es ab 1. Mai mit dem Upload schnell geht:

Upload your photos for WLE 

Außerdem laden wir dich ein, vom 1. Mai bis 30. Juni 2023 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Damit bewertest du die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelst so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Juli tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2023 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist bald hier freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Vorjury-Tool 

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung. Falls du im nächsten Jahr keine Einladung für Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland haben möchtest, trag dich bitte hier ein. Wir würden das natürlich schade finden, da wir uns auf deine Fotos freuen.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb 2023 wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 15:25, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2023 - Deutschland

Hallo MB-one,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 31. Mai 2023 findet zum elften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth statt. Dabei können unter anderem Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

• Sieger WLE 2022 – Landschaft
• 
  Hohes Ufer zwischen Ahrenshoop und Wustrow, Fischland
• 
  Biotop Nördliche Lothdorfer Wiese
• 
  Aisch bei Willersdorf im FFH Aischgrund

• Sieger WLE 2022 – Detail
• 
  Gemeine Goldwespe im NSG Wittenberge Rühstädter Elbniederung
• 
  Libellen-Schmetterlingshaft im Naturschutzgebiet Badberg (Kaiserstuhl)
• 
  Blüte eines Schmalblättrigen Weidenröschens im Naturpark Taunus

Der Wettbewerb ist zweigeteilt, das heißt wir unterscheiden zwischen den beiden Wettbewerbskategorien Landschaft und Detail/Makro. Zu Landschaft zählen auch geschützte Einzelbäume. In der Wettbewerbskategorie Detail/Makro werden Pflanzen, Tiere und Pilze bewertet.

Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Findlinge, Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Auch im vergangenen Jahr sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen – zum Beispiel in Sachsen die Liste der Naturdenkmale in Wurzen.

Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du bei WLE 2023 – Deutschland und unter dieser Anleitung.

Damit der Upload für dich einfacher ist, haben wir in diesem Jahr die einzelnen Hochladeseiten für die Bundesländer abgeschafft, alle Fotos werden über dasselbe Formular hochgeladen. Außerdem haben wir das Layout unserer WLE-Seiten geändert.

Damit es ab 1. Mai mit dem Upload schnell geht:

Upload your photos for WLE 

Außerdem laden wir dich ein, vom 1. Mai bis 30. Juni 2023 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Damit bewertest du die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelst so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Juli tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2023 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist bald hier freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Vorjury-Tool 

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung. Falls du im nächsten Jahr keine Einladung für Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland haben möchtest, trag dich bitte hier ein. Wir würden das natürlich schade finden, da wir uns auf deine Fotos freuen.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb 2023 wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 17:32, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Park, Schlemmin (P1090180).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 19:04, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Accra Mall, Ayawaso West (P1100127).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 20:02, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buergerfest des Bundespraesidenten, Berlin (P1090890).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 19:04, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veritas Scorpion, Techno-Classica 2018, Essen (IMG 9302).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 19:04, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frank-e, Frankfurt am Main (LRM 20210417 155159).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Question Could you please specify the type? --Augustgeyler 17:57, 12 April 2023 (UTC) added the brand name (NIU) to filedescription and categories --MB-one 07:51, 17 April 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 17:07, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porsche, GIMS 2018, Le Grand-Saconnex (1X7A1475).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Alexander-93 13:07, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jamestown, Accra (P1100265).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:16, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lada (LRM 20200514 092427).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 07:23, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vistajet, EBACE 2019, Le Grand-Saconnex (EB190484).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Question The noise is too strong, could you fix it? Actually, it is strange for a good camera at ISO 250 and 1/40 s. --LexKurochkin 04:06, 19 April 2023 (UTC)  Done Noise was increased due to increased exposure in post. Tried to correct it as much as possible. --MB-one 19:48, 19 April 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Vasmar1 05:37, 20 April 2023 (UTC)  Support Good now. Thank you! --LexKurochkin 08:29, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Category:Quality images - vector

Hi, MB-one. I noticed that in this edit you added an image to Category:Quality images - vector. Although that category is tagged with {{Catcat}}, there are actually over 300 files in it right now.

I don't understand what the "vector" part of this category is about, but do you think this category needs to be tagged with {{Catcat}}? Could it possibly be tagged with {{Categorise}} instead? I occasionally look at files that are in categories that are supposed to contain only other categories, and this vector categories often shows up as having files.

Thanks. -- Auntof6 (talk) 18:18, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

@Auntof6 Thanks for noticing.

I agree that Quality images - vector is not strictly a metacat. So {{Categorise}} would be more appropriate.

Nevertheless, I moved all files according to their SVG validity status. MB-one (talk) 09:24, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Well, it wasn't a metacat before. {{CatCat}} is different from {{MetaCat}}. With the addition of the unchecked category, though, I think it's OK to leave {{CatCat}}, so I won't change it for now. Thanks for your reply and action. -- Auntof6 (talk) 09:42, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel de Rome, Berlin (P1080140).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:04, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oxford Street, Korle-Klottey (P1090851).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:10, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Motor Show 2018, Paris (1Y7A1989).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 15:32, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hockenheimring, Hockenheim (P1100587).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:06, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reiherstraße, Anita Ehlers, WPAhoi, Hamburg (P1080324).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not the best composition but good quality -- Spurzem 08:17, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HLB, Bischofsheim (LRM 20200815 140209-hdr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:06, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gurli, Nacka ( 1090800).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:15, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Train station, Haldensleben (P1100706).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:06, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Techno-Classica 2018, Essen (IMG 9299).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 18:33, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! IAA 2017, Frankfurt (1Y7A3104).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:21, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at 18 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Street, Oguz (P1090484).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 07:09, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roller, Tema (P1090915).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 06:26, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karvansaray, Sheki (P1090468).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Alexander-93 16:05, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! House, Gbanyemini (P1100304).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:14, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Door, Cape Town (P1050562).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:56, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

USER/IP

User: USER/IP (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
Reason for reporting: REASON. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:26, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --MB-one (talk) 12:31, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

COM:AN/U

---

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#3RR edit-warring breach by MB-one at Category:Locomotives by Whyte classification. Edit warring.

Tryvix1509 (talk) 13:49, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DR, Heringsdorf (P1090763).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:36, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dassault Falcon 2000, EBACE 2018, Le Grand-Saconnex (BL7C0628).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:41, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oxford Street, Korle-Klottey (P1090853).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:04, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Silver C123 front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 16:00, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nature reserve Richtenberger See, Richtenberg (P1090440).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I would much prefer a smaller aperture, f8-f11 (same as the vineyard picture), the field is not at all in focus, but the path is and it's the subject so good enough. --Trougnouf 21:41, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Botanical Gardens, Akwapim South (P1090823).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done Thanks for the review. --MB-one 20:59, 6 May 2023 (UTC) Good quality. --Imehling 13:49, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MAN TGA, Tema (P1090914).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 17:07, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW 1602 Elektro, IAA 2021, Munich (IAA10375).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 07:44, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VW Atlas (LRM 20210914 100653).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 07:44, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Classic Days 2019, Berlin (CDB90102).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:50, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz, GIMS 2019, Le Grand-Saconnex (GIMS0712).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:16, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hisense, IFA 2018, Berlin (P1070179).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:16, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! No parking, Ayawaso East (P1090891).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 16:56, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Border, Susteren (P1090755).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 18:48, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirstenbosch National Botanical Garden, Cape Town (P1060068).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:51, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schmid-Kaserne, Rendsburg (P1100587).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 05:55, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfaffenthal, Luxembourg (IMG 20210918 134156 1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There are burned out parts at the white buildings in the middle. Sharpness is also quite low. Is this fixable? --Augustgeyler 21:22, 30 April 2023 (UTC)  Done improved exposure and detail. Thanks for the review. --MB-one 19:24, 7 May 2023 (UTC)  Support You did improve it a lot.  Thank you. Sharpness and detail are still borderline. Shadows and highlights are much better now. I only think it became a little  Oversaturated, so I suggest balancing this a litte bit. --Augustgeyler 17:33, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Frankfurter Grüngürtel

Du hast den Frankfurter Grüngürtel aus dem Landschaftsschutzgebiet Grüngürtel und Grünzüge in der Stadt Frankfurt am Main herausgeschoben und einen Querverweis hinzugefügt. Dadurch sind jetzt sehr viele im LSG liegende Flächen nicht mehr entsprechend kategorisiert. Warum hast du das denn verschoben? Meines Wissens nach liegt der Frankfurter Grüngürtel vollständig im LSG. Oder habe ich da einen Park übersehen, der zwar zum Grüngürtel, aber nicht zum LSG gehört? GPSLeo (talk) 10:50, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

@GPSLeo,

die öffentlich verfügbaren Angaben, ob das eine Gebiet vollständig innerhalb des anderen liegt, sind widersprüchlich. Einerseits steht auf der Webseite des LSG: "Das großflächige Landschaftsschutzgebiet 'GrünGürtel (sic!) und Grünzüge der Stadt Frankfurt am Main' umfasst den gesamten GrünGürtel und seine umgebenden Grünzüge". Andererseits wird z. B. der Bereich um den "Deutsche Bank Park", sowie der Boehle-Park in der offiziellen Freizeitkarte als Teil des Grüngürtels ausgewiesen, sind jedoch laut der Karte des BfN, nicht Teil des LSG.

Ich tendiere dazu den Karten zu glauben, zumal auch andere Angaben der städtischen Webseite zum Schutzgebiet fehlerhaft sind. MB-one (talk) 14:18, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Wobei die Freizeitkarte nicht Teil des Landschaftsplans und kein offizielles Dokument im eigentlichen Sinne ist. Ich würde die beiden Flächen eher nicht dem Grüngürtel zuordnen. Unabhängig davon halte ich die jetzige Form nicht für optimal. Bei der jetzigen Form sollten die im LSG liegenden Flächen und zusätzlich in die LSG Kategorie kopiert werden. Ich würde sie aber eher komplett dahin verschieben und das LSG als Unterkategorie in die Frankfurter Grüngürtel Kategorie einordnen, da sowieso alle "Grünzüge" aktuell unter "Grüngürtel" einsortiert sind. GPSLeo (talk) 16:32, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Umgekehrt macht noch weniger Sinn, da große Gebiete, die definitiv nicht Teil des Grüngürtels sind (z. B. der Grüneburgpark, Niederräder Ufer, die landwirtschaftlich genutzten Flächen um Zeilsheim und Sindlingen sowie entlang der A5), zum LSG gehören. MB-one (talk) 21:08, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bunkier, Gdansk (LRM 20201004 110211 shot 2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:58, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arcteryx Aerios, OutDoor 2018, Friedrichshafen (1X7A0377).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:19, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ant highway, Shai Hills, Shai-Osudoku (P1100055).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 08:59, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Categorization problem

Be careful you reclassify categories in paleontology when they are actual animals, can you correct? THANKS. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:32, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus Can you give an example, so I can investigate? MB-one (talk) 14:12, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus I believe, I found the problem. Skeleton specimens is currently a subcategory of Fossils. May I assume that this is incorrect then? Thanks for your help. MB-one (talk) 14:18, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MSC Preziosa, WPAhoi, Kaiser-Wilhelm-Hafen, Hamburg (P1080381).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:47, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! North Ridge, Korle-Klottey (P1090865).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 17:41, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nissan Champ Bakkie, Cape Town (P1050773).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 12:31, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! D-ELWK, Mainz (P1090651).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too dark. Can you brighten it, especially the plane? -- Spurzem 11:35, 5 May 2023 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review. --MB-one 19:46, 7 May 2023 (UTC)  Support OK for me. --Milseburg 13:15, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DB Premium Lounge, Berlin (LRM 20210709 164739).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:22, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Let L-410, Red Clay, Jana (P1100313).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Alexander-93 12:41, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Held MAN Lion's Intercity LE (LRM 20230502 075042-SR).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Alexander-93 12:41, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church, Rendsburg (P1100584).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Too much uninteresting road in the foreground, but ok, I guess --Poco a poco 17:24, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! North Ridge, Korle-Klottey (P1090882).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:25, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nissan Patrol, Ribnitz-Damgarten (P1070877).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit too much of foreground and a little bit underexposed but still QI to me --Poco a poco 15:25, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Candela, Interboot 2020, Friedrichshafen (IB200007).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is an individual blocking the view of the boat, I wonder if this might affect the QI status? Would also be better if the TV screen was in focus. --多多123 15:35, 19 May 2023 (UTC) The people are part of the composition, because it's a presentation. The TV is intentionall out of focus to avoid copyright conflicts. --MB-one 09:30, 22 May 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --多多123 13:44, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mont Blanc, Istanbul (P1100184).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:17, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! EBACE 2023, Le Grand-Saconnex (EB237569).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Radomianin 12:21, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rekon, Port of Hamburg, Hamburg (P1080308).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GRDN711 09:31, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for uploading those beautiful photos as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2023 in Ghana. We would like to link up with you and also encourage you to upload more. If you are currently based in Ghana, let us know so that you can join some of our photo walks. Thank you.

Bright Ayisi Lead -Wiki Loves Earth in Ghana Kwameghana(Bright Kwame Ayisi) (talk) 22:18, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

@Kwameghana(Bright Kwame Ayisi) Thank you for the warm words. I still have a few photos from my trip in February left on my hard drive. Unfortunately, I'm not currently in Ghana, but I'd love to come back maybe next year. MB-one (talk) 06:39, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MAN truck, Atimpoku (P1100011).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 00:46, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! EBACE 2023, Le Grand-Saconnex (EB237526).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Shougissime 19:58, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Innotrans 2018, Berlin ( 1070473).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:22, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FRA 7, Maxdorf (P1100559).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mathieu Kappler 12:40, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! EBACE 2023, Le Grand-Saconnex (EB237525).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The shadow in the foreground is unnecessary and disturbing, can you please crop a bunch of it? --Poco a poco 09:08, 30 May 2023 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review --MB-one 12:26, 30 May 2023 (UTC) Good quality --Shougissime 21:17, 30 May 2023 (UTC)  Support Much better, QI --Poco a poco 20:18, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shai Hills, Shai-Osudoku (P1100078).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --BigDom 17:30, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! EBACE 2023, Le Grand-Saconnex (EB237519).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 18:10, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Treasure Island, Ada East (P1090929).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vasmar1 13:47, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Accra Tema railway, Ayawaso West (P1090898).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Buddy Bear at Newark Airport.jpg

File:Buddy Bear at Newark Airport.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:37, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mole National Park, West Gonja (P1100478).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:27, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arriva Flirt, Susteren (P1090739).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 20:43, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harbour, Wieck a. Darß (P1100808).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 20:41, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mole National Park, West Gonja (P1100445).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:02, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shai Hills, Shai-Osudoku (P1100074).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --NoNickFinder 09:05, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! EBACE 2023, Le Grand-Saconnex (EB237516).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:49, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porsche, IAA 2017, Frankfurt (1Y7A2264).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you please crop the white areas in the bottom left and brighten it a bit up? --Poco a poco 08:45, 3 June 2023 (UTC)  Done thanks for the review --MB-one 07:55, 4 June 2023 (UTC)  Support Much better --Poco a poco 16:35, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hydra Harbour 2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Right side leaning in, a bit of sharpening would help, too --Poco a poco 09:08, 30 May 2023 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review --MB-one 22:20, 3 June 2023 (UTC)  Support QI now --Poco a poco 16:37, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wikimania 2019, Stockholm (P1090622).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 15:32, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speicher, Stralsunder Strasse 12, Ribnitz-Damgarten (20150404-DSC04769).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:24, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! EBACE 2019, Le Grand-Saconnex (EB190622).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:24, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toyota Highlander, Korle-Klottey (P1090889).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:01, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pete Bunce, AERO 2018, Friedrichshafen (1X7A4572).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good useful image. --Peulle 08:24, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aurus Senat, GIMS 2019, Le Grand-Saconnex (GIMS1175).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 08:32, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geneva International Motor Show 2018, Le Grand-Saconnex (1X7A1580).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 08:33, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruts, Oghuz (P1090535).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 07:12, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 June 2023 (UTC)