User talk:Llez/Archives/2018 (1)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Diodora spreta, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Puperita pupa (Zebra Nerite), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Usefull --Ercé (talk) 07:41, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:49, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zebrina detrita 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:20, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Solatia cf. piscatoria 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:31, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zebrina detrita (Detritus Ena), shell, striped form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful and quite good. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:58, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:29, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Forcella del Pana.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Forcella del Pana.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Umbonium thomasi 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 00:12, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Umbonium thomasi, shell, reddish form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:05, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:48, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Problem in VI

I checked on three different screens I have no reading problems. Do you have problems for these two files too? My screens are calibrated every month. Thank you for your opinion. Labit - Bouddha Amida - Japon fin de la période Edo - 59 498.jpg and Labit - Coupelle Longquan (époque Qing) D. 78 2 6.jpg --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:00, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Umbonium thomasi 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:01, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Umbonium thomasi, shell, brownish form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:44, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clithon diadema (Crown Nerite), shell, banded form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:23, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clithon diadema (Crown Nerite), shell, spotted form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:13, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Phasianella variegata (Variegated Pheasant), shell, unicoloured form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Phasianella variegata (Variegated Pheasant), shell, spotted form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - Useful, but why is there a big halo around the shell in the upper center and lower right? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:37, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Done Sorry, was a masking error --Llez (talk) 14:47, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
• Thanks.  Support. What's a masking error? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:15, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Seiser Alm 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Seiser Alm 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:06, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chilostoma cingulatum nicatis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:01, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chilostoma cingulatum ssp. nicatis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:43, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nerita planospira (Flat-spired Nerite), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, and a beautiful shell. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:44, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Fusiturris similis 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fusiturris similis 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nerita planospira 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:36, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nerita peloronta 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 17:39, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nerita peloronta (Bleeding Tooth Nerite), shell, smooth form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:52, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nerita antiquata (Ancient Nerite), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:46, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nerita antiquata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 21:41, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chilostoma cingulatum preslii 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Atamari 20:08, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chilostoma cingulatum ssp. preslii, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:24, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euchelus asper 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:09, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Euchelus asper, shell, brown form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - Superb and a very likely FP if nominated, IMO, but apparently not the only variety of this species' shell; see File:Euchelus asper 002.jpg and File:Euchelus asper 001.jpg. Does the scope need to be refined? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:43, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support All possible views are given. The scope is correct. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

•  Comment - It's clearly best in scope, but if there are two varieties of this shell, I would expect Llez to eventually obtain a shell of the other variety and photograph it, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:26, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

•  Info @Ikan: The two shells you mention are juvenile shells, not adult; there is some variety, but most of the shells are brown, see here. I dont know, where i can get a pale form at the moment; in addition, I don't know the price, when I buy it. The photos are from my private collection (not a museum), and I don't have enough money to buy any interesting shell. I try to show variability, when I have the material, but I can't document the varability of every species. Nevertheless, I promise, if I get a pale form, I will publish it.
  

BTW, I'm glad about every shell worldwide which is send to me by a wikimedian ;-) --Llez (talk) 18:14, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

PS: I added "brown form" to the scope --Llez (talk) 07:11, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Wonderful, and of course I  Support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:04, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:23, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vittina variegata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:21, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vittina variegata, shell, striped form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Euphorbia lamarckii

I moved some images you had named "Euphorbia lamarckii ..." to Category:Unidentified Euphorbia, at least for now.

• According to the World Checklist of Selected Plant Families here and Wild Flowers of the Canary Islands (2001), E. lamarckii = E. broussonetti = E. obtusifolia does not occur in Fuerteventura.
• The description of this species in Wild Flowers of the Canary Islands and other sources says that it has small floral bracts. The plants in your photos have quite large floral bracts. They are also more compact and shorter than expected – although this can vary by habitat.

How did you identify the plants in your photographs? Peter coxhead (talk) 15:45, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vittina variegata, shell, spotted form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:22, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Rifugio Friedrich August - Sleigh.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rifugio Friedrich August - Sleigh.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vittina variegata 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:18, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Candidula rugosiuscula, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:18, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Left or Right

• 
  Left
• 
  Right

Hi, do you remember a discussion at Commons:Valued image candidates/Triton conch (Charonia tritonis).jpg? Would you like to talk to clarify? --AntanO 02:05, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Ping me if you want to discuss about this. --AntanO 02:50, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

As already discussed, a shell is right-handed, if you look a the aperture and it is at the right, and left handed, if is at the left. Please look here, where is said: "The easy way to identify the 'handedness' of a shell is to hold the shell, with the top pointing up, and turned so that you are looking into the entrance hole. If the entrance hole is on the right, the shell is right-handed, if it is on the left, the shell is left-handed." and also in Wikipedia (the upper right picture). A detailed description you find here, where is also clearly said: "A sinistral shell is a shell of a gastropod which is 'left-handed'. The shell is coiled in an anti-clockwise direction, so that when viewed from the front (ventral view) with the spire uppermost, the opening or 'aperture' appears on the left."
So please correct the description in your pictures.
Greetings --Llez (talk) 06:06, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

I cannot consider the source from blog as it consider unreliable source unless prove. Read article en:Dakshinavarti Shankh. It says when it is held with the spout (siphonal canal) pointed up, this conch's spiral twists rightwards (dakshinavarti). Indian continent countries such as India and Sri Lanka have long history about conch and right spiral conchs are especial. For an example, see en:Travancore that featured right spiral conch. --AntanO 09:52, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Pleae note: In the article you mentioned (en:Dakshinavarti Shankh), there is said (referring to the very rare reverse-turning spiral = left handed): "when it is held with the spout (siphonal canal) pointed up, this conch's spiral twists rightwards (dakshinavarti) rather than very much more common form, which twists leftwards (vamavarti).". It is correct, if the SIPHONAL CANAL is pointed up, the aperture is on the right on a left-handed shell. Do you know what SIPHONAL CANAL means? In your pictures the siphonal canal is pointed down (not pointed up!), the spire is pointed up. Turn you photo to 180°, so that the siphonal canal is on the top (as said by en:Dakshinavarti Shankh!), then the aperture is at the left, so it is right-handed according to en:Dakshinavarti Shankh! --Llez (talk) 11:20, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Eg: If first image (black background) turn to 180°, aperture would on the left. So, it is not twists rightwards (dakshinavarti). --AntanO 15:11, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

I think, it is useless to continue the discussion. Keep your opinion about the coiling of the shell and go on ignoring all scientists around the world, the malacozological literature, all Wikipedia articles and also the book "Compendium of landshels" by Tucker abbott, of one of the greatest malacozoologists of the world --Llez (talk) 16:10, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Angaria aculeata 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Angaria aculeata 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Batillaria zonalis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:31, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Batillaria zonalis, shell, dark form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:29, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Batillaria zonalis 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 23:44, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Batillaria zonalis, shell, banded form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clypeomorus inflata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 18:56, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clypeomorus inflata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cochlostoma septemspirale, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Usefull --Ercé (talk) 06:21, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:27, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clypeomorus purpurastoma, shell, brown form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:43, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:16, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Puez - Sella - Marmolada.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Puez - Sella - Marmolada.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clypeomorus purpurastoma 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:09, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clypeomorus purpurastoma, shell, spotted form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 18:12, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clypeomorus purpurastoma 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:16, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vittina waigiensis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:37, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Pisaniinae

Hello Llze,
I saw your modification of Pisaniinae. Which source do you follow ?
As I stated on Category:Pisaniinae, this subfamily is placed in familia Buccinidae par Wikispecies & The Paleobiology Database & WoRMS.
You must know that I fight for 13 years for the sourcing of wikicommons.
It would be wonderful if you could provide the source in the page when you do such change.
Best regards Liné1 (talk) 14:42, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

I didn't make a review of all Pisaniidae on Commons (I have not the time). I only corrected my own shell pictures according to the actual status of WoRMS, as I realized that some genera are now belonging to the family Pisaniidae, which is (according to WoRMS) now a valid familiy and no more a subfamily of the Buccinidae. Also in Wikipedia the family Pisaniidae is accepted. The familia Buccinidae on Commons is not actual, WoRMS was there updated the last time July 6, 2016! --Llez (talk) 17:19, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

OK, understoud, what you wanted was a redirect Pisaniinae=>Pisaniidae not a change of parent.

I fear that it is a bit early to follow this change in WoRMS.

Buccinidae in WoRMS seems intransition state

Cheers Liné1 (talk) 10:06, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passo Sella - Città dei Sassi - 13a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:07, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vittina waigiensis 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 18:31, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vittina waigiensis 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Armenak Margarian 19:54, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vittina waigiensis 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:45, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eobania vermiculata 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:53, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eobania vermiculata (Chocolate-band Snail), shell, white form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good --Ercé (talk) 17:27, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:17, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Thylacodes colubrinus 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Thylacodes colubrinus 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vittina waigiensis 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:59, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vittina waigiensis 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:40, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vittina waigiensis 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:00, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Opeas pyrgula, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:54, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 19:09, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vittina waigiensis 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:48, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vittina waigiensis - Variability.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 16:33, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vittina waigiensis, shell variability.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:DHU-Logo Claim RGB rot.jpg

Copyright status: File:DHU-Logo Claim RGB rot.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:DHU-Logo Claim RGB rot.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:36, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics)

In other languages (translate this)

Please use SVG Thank you for uploading some images! Did you know that Wikimedia Commons recommends the SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics) format for certain types of images? Scalable Vector Graphics are designed to look appropriate at any scale, and SVG images are easier to modify and translate, helping Wikimedia to distribute knowledge to all of the world. A lot of modern programs support SVG export. If you encountered problems or have questions, don't hesitate to ask me, a member of the Graphic Lab, or the Graphics village pump. Uploading images in SVG format isn't mandatory, but it would help. (To avoid any misunderstandings, please don't just put raster images into an SVG container as embedded raster.) Thanks, and happy editing!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:20, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tonna perdix (Partridge Tun), shell, spotted form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:27, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:17, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Rifugio Friedrich August - Gable.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rifugio Friedrich August - Gable.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tonna perdix 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:32, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ena montana 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 19:34, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ena montana (Mountain Ena), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope Very nice. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 19:05, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:22, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Vittina waigiensis - Variability.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vittina waigiensis - Variability.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neripteron violaceum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:11, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Neripteron violaceum (Violet Nerite), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nerita histrio 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:58, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nerita histrio (Scaled Nerite), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 19:18, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vittina cumingiana 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 17:57, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vittina cumingiana, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Euchondrus septemdentatus, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:21, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Neritina turrita (Turreted Nerite), shell, broad banded form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, beautiful shell. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:23, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:04, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neritina turrita 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:39, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neritina turrita 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:51, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Neritina turrita (Turreted Nerite), shell, narrow banded form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 21:12, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Succinea putris 001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 23:45, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Succinea putris, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in Scope, Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 23:28, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:18, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Caecum regulare, fossil shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Swainsonia fissurata (Reticulate Mitre), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:13, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:19, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Swainsonia fissurata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good as usual. -- Ikan Kekek 19:51, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Meioceras nitidum, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Peulle (talk) 22:50, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dacelo novaeguineae - head.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:54, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Radix auricularia auricularia 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:36, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Radix auricularia auricularia (Big-ear Radix), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:09, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ich bin ein Elefant - Anna Dorothea Klug.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:31, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Caecum pulchellum, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Peulle (talk) 22:41, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:21, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dacelo novaeguineae - head.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dacelo novaeguineae - head.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bubo scandiacus - Karlsruhe Zoo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Would be better if you can recover blown head feathers Charlesjsharp 16:45, 28 March 2018 (UTC)  Done --Llez 18:50, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karlsruhe - View from the Lauterberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:58, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macropus parma - Karlsruhe Zoo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:43, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Caecum condylum, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Peulle (talk) 00:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:44, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pan troglodytes - Karlsruhe Zoo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice boy and good quality -- Spurzem 17:56, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scutalus bicolor ssp. polymorphus, shell, coloured form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Caecum cycloferum, fossil shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:28, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eurypyga helias (Sunbittern), on nest.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment 'on nest' would be better than 'breeding'. Charles (talk) 13:38, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
 Done OK, changed to "on nest" --Llez (talk) 20:21, 1 April 2018 (UTC)  Support Thanks, useful. Charles (talk) 09:36, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:50, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Passo Sella - Città dei Sassi - Sella - Marmolada.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Passo Sella - Città dei Sassi - Sella - Marmolada.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vicugna pacos - Karlsruhe Zoo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:31, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Caecum subannulatum, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support best in scope Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:23, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:31, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Struthio camelus - male - Rülzheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:31, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parastrophia cornucopiae, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:46, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Struthio camelus - female - Rülzheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:25, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scutalus bicolor polymorphus 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:06, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scutalus bicolor ssp. polymorphus, shell, white form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:36, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Struthio camelus - male - Rülzheim.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Struthio camelus - male - Rülzheim.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierordtbad - chimney.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:50, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Struthio camelus - juvenile - Rülzheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:07, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Caecum cinctum, fossil shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:16, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ostrich sculpture - Rülzheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:14, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Caecum trachea ssp. obsoleta, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scutalus bicolor polymorphus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 12:19, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Struthio camelus - male - Rülzheim 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:50, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bostryx cf. lesueureanus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 18:20, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dolichotis patagonum - Head - Karlsruhe Zoo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Caecum semitrachea, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:42, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Struthio camelus - female - Rülzheim 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:58, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panthera uncia - Zoo Karlsruhe 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - Awwww! Big pussycats! Could be sharper, but sharp enough for QI, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 16:07, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aonyx cinerea - Karlsruhe Zoo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like it -- DerFussi 19:06, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Caecum glabellum, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:56, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macropus rufogriseus rufogriseus - Karlsruhe Zoo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:49, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vanellus miles - Karlsruhe Zoo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Caecum vitreum, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:28, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vanellus miles - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 12:20, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Caecum vitreum 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Caecum vitreum 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hemicycla consobrina, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Great! Since the other photo in scope, File:Naturalis Biodiversity Center - ZMA.MOLL.400330 - Hemicycla (Hemicycla) consobrina (Férussac, 1822) - Helicidae - Mollusc shell.jpeg, appears to show two varieties of shell coloring for this species, should anything about that be mentioned in this file's description? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:53, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Info In the other picture the "periostracum" is still present, whereas in this specimen it is not. This explains the difference. --Llez (talk) 13:48, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

• Thanks for explaining. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:12, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:04, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balearica regulorum - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:13, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hemicycla consobrina 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basile Morin 14:20, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balearica regulorum - Karlsruhe Zoo 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 14:18, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Caecum gracile, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 21:23, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Caecum maori, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:36, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Balearica regulorum - Karlsruhe Zoo 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Balearica regulorum - Karlsruhe Zoo 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain- Stadtgarten Karlsruhe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:51, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Caecum atlantidis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:10, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xerosecta submoesta 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit out of focus, but Good quality. The Photographer Sat, 28 Apr 2018 20:34:04 GMT

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Lago Tagish, Yukón, Canadá, 2017-08-26, DD 89-97 PAN.jpg

Hallo Llez, also, ich habe die ganze Zeit bei dem Bild nach Stitching Problemen gesucht, aber ich nehme an, dass was du gemeint hattest, was anderes war, nämlich u.a. "Doppel"-Stämme, weil der letzte Frame nicht so gut wie die anderen war (vermutlich wegen Wackeln). Ich habe eine neue Version hochgeladen, ich hoffe, jetzt ist das Problem weg, was du gemeint hattest. Viele Grüsse, Poco² 11:54, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain- Stadtgarten Karlsruhe 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Basotxerri Sun, 29 Apr 2018 14:59:26 GMT

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xerosecta submoesta, shell, brown form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:56, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bookcase - Stadtgarten Karlsruhe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. XRay Mon, 30 Apr 2018 09:39:50 GMT

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 May 2018 (UTC)