User talk:Kurmis~commonswiki

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This image has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. Thuresson 20:41, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)


This is apparently a photo from the 1933 film SOS Eisberg. You tagged it as public domain but did not leave any explanation why. German copyright law protects the copyright of a movie for 70 years after the deaths of the film's director, producer and script writers. Thuresson 12:47, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, so we will have to delete it from commons (but what is the difference to an image like Image:Marlene-Dietrich.jpg ?). Can we use it at least at en: unter any kind of "fair use"? Kurmis 00:14, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:Klaus Kleinfeld.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  ދިވެހިބަސް  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  조선말  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  پښتو  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−

("only for editorial purposes") – Sebari 22:26, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

IBM-Schreibmaschine

[edit]

Hallo, Herr Kurmis, Sie bezeichnen die von Ihnen fotografierte Kugelkopfschreibmaschine als "IBM Selectric". Dieser Name ist mir nicht bekannt, obwohl ich mich als Lehrer für Kurzschrift, Maschinenschreiben und Bürotechnik viel mit Schreibmaschinen befasste und vor allem mit der IBM im Unterricht arbeitete. Ich kenne das Modell nur als "IBM 72". Freundlichen Gruß Lothar Spurzem

Gutes Bild

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! München Hofgartentempel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Für die ganz guten Bilder hats nicht gereicht, wohl aber für ein Gutes, Gratulation! --Ikiwaner 18:48, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Braun-Fernseher

[edit]

Hallo Kurmis, hast du das Bild noch in höherer Auflösung? Ist sehr nett, könnte aber noch ein bisschen getuned werden. Rainer ... 22:45, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, ich hatte das Foto seinerzeit nur mit dem Foto-Handy gemacht und das hatte leider nur diese Auflösung. Aber ich gehe gerne noch mal mit einem richtigen Fotoapparat in die Pinakothek der Moderne und versuch ein besseres Bild zu machen. Hoffentlich wurde das Exponat in der Zwischenzeit nicht schon weggeräumt. --Oliver Kurmis 00:30, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Faming June

[edit]

Would you mind if I upload a hi-res of it?

Flaming June

The one I want to uplad is at [1]

Thanks, --JuanPDP 05:28, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, feel free --Oliver Kurmis 21:03, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, done. --JuanPDP 09:02, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  /−


Hello, Kurmis~commonswiki!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 17:55, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Kanoldt, Der rote Guertel,1929-1.jpg

[edit]

Hallo Kurmis, du hast mein Foto durch das deine überschrieben. Mit deiner Begründung bin ich einverstanden, aber so geht das nicht. Lade bitte deine Version unter einem anderen Dateinamen hoch und tausche die Bilder dort aus, wo sie eingesetzt werden. Schließlich muss es möglich sein, von einem Kunstwerk mehr als nur ein Foto bei Commons zur Verfügung zu stellen. Bei einer Skulptur oder einem Gebäude ist das selbstverständlich, aber auch bei einem Gemälde sollte man es so halten. Es gibt genügend Beispiele dafür. Versionen auszutauschen ist eher dafür gedacht, verschiedene Bearbeitungen der gleichen Aufnahme hochzuladen. Grüße --Rufus46 (talk) 07:27, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Garden_in_Kalmthout.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FA2010 (talk) 12:21, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Usage has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 16:03, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  /−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Rathaus Erfurt.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 11:59, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kihon for the 5th Kyu test.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

UAwiki (talk) 22:24, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

[edit]

21:42, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

[edit]

03:59, 21 April 2015 (UTC)