User talk:Konarski

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Tawań na mapie ==Image:Podział administracyjny I RP.png ?

[edit]

Witaj, nie ma sprawy. Dzisiaj nie zdążę, ale postaram się jutro poprawić. Pozdrawiam Poznaniak (dyskusja) 13:08, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mapkę poprawiłem. Przepraszam, że tak długo ale miałem pewne problemy techniczne. Pozdrawiam Poznaniak (dyskusja) 10:45, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Podział administracyjny I RP.png

[edit]

Witaj, dziękuję za uwagi. Nie mam tego broń Boże za złe. W wolnej chwili postaram się ponanosić te miejscowości. Dopiero jak się zabiorę do pracy to będę w stanie stwierdzić czy wszystko się zmieści, ale mam nadzieję, że jakoś się uda. Mam jednak pewne wątpliwości co do części granic. Ostatnio jeden użytkownik zwrócił mi uwagę, iż wschodnia granica województwa wołyńskiego przebiegała na Słuczu. Jest też kwestia województwa ruskiego i ziemi chełmskiej. Wg nowszych ustaleń jednak ze sobą graniczyły. Posiadam najnowsze opracowania co do granic województw w obecnych granicach oraz koronnych na Kresach. Największy problem stanowi jednak WKL. W opracowaniach litewskich i białoruskich część granic m.in. woj. mińskiego i nowogródzkiego jest zupełnie inaczej przedstawiana niż w polskich. W przyszłości chciałbym opracować nową wersję tej mapy z dokładniejszym wykreśleniem granic województw oraz również granicami powiatów. Jeżeli posiadałbyś jakieś materiały nawet dla poszczególnych województw będę bardzo wdzięczny. Pozdrawiam Poznaniak (dyskusja) 09:28, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Witaj, mapę poprawiłem. Przepraszam, że to tyle trwało ale byłem bardzo zajęty. Większość udało się ponanosić. Nie dodałem tylko: Bendery (poza mapą) i Busza (brak miejsca). Pozdrawiam Poznaniak (dyskusja) 09:50, 1 July 2017 (UTC) P.S. Mam nadzieję, że następne zlecenia będę wykonywał szybciej.[reply]
Mapkę od razu poprawiłem. Co do granic województw to właśnie z mińskim jest chyba najgorzej. W ogóle w WKL granice nie były chyba aż tak precyzyjnie wyznaczone jak w Koronie. Do tego współcześnie i Litwini i Białorusini trochę inaczej rysują te granice. W Instytucie Historycznym PAN powstała jakiś czas temu komisja do opracowania atlasu historycznego I RP w XVI w. i mam opracowane przez nią granice województw i powiatów, ale niestety tylko dla obecnego terytorium RP. Uznano, iż częścią wschodnią będą się zajmować historycy litewscy i białoruscy. Nie mam żadnych informacji czy w którymś z tych państw coś takiego opracowują, ale z drugiej strony mam dosyć ograniczone zaufanie do wyników ich badań. Po ciekach wodnych niestety też się nie da bo nie mam żadnych dokładnych opisów tych granic. Pozdrawiam Poznaniak (dyskusja) 18:48, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Mapki są bardzo dobre. Jakbyś mógł w wolnej chwili przesłać skany to bardzo proszę na ten adres: wikipedysta.poznaniak[małpa]wp.pl. Z góry dziękuję. Nie jest to żadna pilna sprawa bo mapką taką i tak zajmę się najwcześniej na jesieni. Wcześniej mi czas niestety nie pozwoli. Pozdrawiam Poznaniak (dyskusja) 12:38, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Medieval Baltic Tribes.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Medieval Baltic Tribes.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

JDavid (talk) 18:58, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Wawel Kraków 13c.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Given source is NOT licenced under the CC-BY-SA-4.0
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−

WTM (talk) 21:26, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Wawel Romanesque buildings 11-12th c.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Given source is NOT licenced under the CC-BY-SA-4.0
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−

WTM (talk) 21:26, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Kraków Wawel Romanesque buildings 11-12th century.tiff has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Given sources are NOT licenced under the CC-BY-SA-4.0
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−

WTM (talk) 21:30, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Bronice tower house.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  /−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bronice tower house.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

jdx Re: 14:54, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Izabelin Izabielin zbór.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  /−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Izabelin Izabielin zbór.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

jdx Re: 15:05, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bystrzyca Kłodz portal gotic.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Konarski (talk) 10:16, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]