User talk:Jarash

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hello wikipeople! I'm from Belarus. Feel free to contact me about any Interwiki problems. Jarash 09:00, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Вялікі дзякуй за дапамогу! --EugeneZelenko 15:04, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Вітаю!

[edit]

Чаму Вы лічыце, што лепей пакінуць дошку з Жарабковіцкага ДК без катэгорыі ўвогуле? --Belarus2578 (talk) 20:22, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

На гэтай выяве варта паглядзець катэгорыі больш падрабязна, але я пакуль што не магу дадумацца, якія найбольш падыходзяць, каб хтосьці мог лёгка знайсьці тое, што паказана на дошцы. Мабыць было б прасьцей, калі б фатаграфіі зь яе былі па-асобку. --Jarash (talk) 10:59, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Briges in Viciebsk

[edit]

Hello, and nice that you are interested ... its a simple problem for a native people) I have a request: the numerous main bridges should be sorted in the Wikipedia Commons with their own directories to which I have already made some smal maps. But I lack the knowledge of the place and I can not assign the images of older (gone) bridges. So just store the missing categories and paste the historical pictures in the right category - that would be my dream destination. Best greetings --Metilsteiner (talk) 10:29, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Dormition in Viciebsk.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

DRs

[edit]

Aloha! Please check your deletion requests, they show up as incomplete. You might want to have a look here: Com:VFC, the script takes care of the details. :-) Best, --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 10:10, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, gotcha. Sorry to disturb. Check the script out anyway. Best, --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 10:15, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!

[edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Jarash,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:41, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Захаранка

[edit]

Паўтару па-беларуску тое самае, што напісаў у абмеркаванні файла па-ангельску. У "Вытокаў" няма правоў на выяву. Яны ёй карыстаюцца з дазволу Паліны Сцепаненкі. Апошняя не бачыць ніякіх праблем у іншым выкарыстанні здымкаў, зробленых Сапаговым, у любых мэтах. Пры гэтым яна Сапагову дакладна не правапераемнік. Я нават не ўяўляю, хто мог бы выступіць правапераемнікам у сітуацыі, калі ў чалавека няма сваякоў, а запавету ён не пакінуў. Яго рэчы з інтэрната, дзе ён жыў, камендант проста вынікуў на сметнік (негатывы, на шчасце, не выкінуў). Uladz_v User talk:Uladz_v 18:38, 1 June 2018 (CET)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!

[edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Jarash,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Августин

[edit]
  • Привет, здание не тема фото, судно у набережной, на набережной люди, понятно?--PjotrMahh1 (talk) 08:02, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • На втором фото здание на заднем плане, при съёмках в городе это неизбежно, читай внимательно правила,--PjotrMahh1 (talk) 08:04, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
      • Кроме того ты должен думать над тем, как сохранить фото в Wikimedia, а не удалять их, последнее проще всего. Но если работу автора Bestalex File:Minsk. Unfinished hotel on the bank of the Svisloch River.jpg переименовать, так как основой композиции является старинный мост через Свислочь, то работа укладывается в рамки правил, comprendo?--PjotrMahh1 (talk) 08:18, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yulia Slesarchik.JPG

[edit]

Hi @Jarash: ! You have uploaded a cropped image of a Belarusian women's footballer under the title Yulia Slesarchik. As I tried to find another image of the person in my archive, I realized that the footballer with jersey number 11 was Nastasia Popova in that match. Yulia Sliasarchyk (the correct romanized name) had the number 6. You can check that fact at [1]. I will try to find images of both in my archive and upload them if any. Please comment on the correct romanized name of Yulia also. Thanks. CeeGee (talk) 10:14, 9 July 2020 (UTC) Please also check footballer other images in the category:Belarus women's national association football team with the above mentioned entry list of the match. Newly uploaded image for your information: File:NastasiaPopova&EylülElgalp.jpg CeeGee (talk) 10:45, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@CeeGee: And UEFA says it was her number 11. The spelling is also Yulia Slesarchik. There is also a page about Yulia on our football federation where you can see her signature hair. --Jarash (talk) 21:16, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I see. However, there is now a confusion. Is it possible for you to check her jersey number at that match with the Belarussian Football Federation, although the UEFA list might be the correct one? Thank you for your efforts. CeeGee (talk) 09:28, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@CeeGee: There are highlights from that match in youtube where it is seen that Yilua is number 11. --Jarash (talk) 07:10, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Сяргей Антонавіч Чыжык.jpeg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  /−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Сяргей Антонавіч Чыжык.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 11:05, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:7nov1990Mensk e.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Incall talk 06:18, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]