User talk:JAn Dudík

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Thank you for uploading files on Commons.

Please add your files to appropriative pages and/or categories where other users could easily find them.

EugeneZelenko 16:27, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  /−


Hello, JAn Dudík!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:54, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Vimperk-vlajka.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--El-Bardo (talk) 14:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  /−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:20, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

"The" in category names

[edit]

Zdravím. Máš nějaký vyhraněný názor na to, že v kategorii Category:Cadastral maps of the Czech municipalities a jejích 43 podkategoriích typu Category:Cadastral maps of the Benešov District musí být člen "the"? Já nevím, jak je to správněji anglicky, ale většina kategorií, kde je název kraje nebo okresu spojen s předložkovou vazbou, se tady na Commons používá bez členu. Myslíš, že by se tyhle "katastrální" kategorie tomu měly přizpůsobit? Nebo naopak že bychom měli přejmenovat všechny ty ostatní kategorie a přidat tam člen? --ŠJů (talk) 23:11, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tusim, ze jsem tehdy vychazel z jedine existujici kategorie (Brno), kde The bylo. Se sjednocenim at tak nebo tak problem nemam. JAn (talk) 08:39, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Please give images good descriptions

[edit]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  occitan  polski  português  sicilianu  suomi  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  עברית  العربية  /−


I noticed you've uploaded File:Benešov nad Černou-náměstí.jpg and I thought I should draw your attention to a common error.
Please give some thought to writing a good description of uploaded images. This ensures that they can be used. It also helps those that review and improve categories do a better job, which also ensures that images will get used in novel and interesting ways. Thanks, and happy editing!

High Contrast (talk) 17:38, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I describe images in its name. JAn Dudík (talk) 17:39, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Location

[edit]

Ahoj. Všiml jsem si téhle tvé editace. Pro zadávání souřadnic k fotkám je určena šablona {{Location}} (tou se udává pozice fotografa a případně i azimut pohledu v parametru "heading"), popřípadě šablona {{Object location}} pro pozici fotografovaného objektu. Tyhle šablony zajišťují i zanesení souřadnic fotky do indexovaných seznamů, díky nimž lze pak fotky z Commons vyhledávat pomocí mapy (viz odkazy v šabloně). --ŠJů (talk) 01:31, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problém je, že ten nástroj co jsem používal ke zjišťování pozice mi napíče celou šablonu coord ale jen část šablony location, což jsem považoval za chybu a tudíž používal coord. Nebo je to tak schválně a já musím ty chybějící části (|E}}) dopsat ručně? JAn Dudík (talk) 12:33, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Mně tenhle nástroj nefunguje teď vůbec, takže to nemůžu posoudit. Obecně platí, že když nějaký nástroj něco dělá špatně, tak se to po něm buď musí opravovat anebo to dělat jinak (jiným nástrojem nebo ručně), dokud ten nástroj někdo neopraví. Nahradit slovo "coor" slovem "location" a ruční doplnění směru (heading) je ještě celkem snesitelný postup. Kdysi mi ještě někdo doporučil tenhle nástroj, ale třeba pro mě je pohodlnější využívat mapy.seznam.cz, i když ty čísla do šablony přepisuju ručně a směr odečítám úhloměrem.

Kategorie chráněných území

[edit]

Ahoj, všiml jsem si, že zakládáš kategorie pro chráněná území, třeba Týřov nebo brdskou Kuchyňku. Vím, že nejde dělat všechno najednou, ale zkus takové kategorie rovnou řadit nejen mezi přírodní rezervace okresu, ale i do dalších kategorií, kam patří: například podle širšího přírodního celku (pohoří, chráněná krajinná oblast, národní park, přírodní park) a podle katastrální příslušnosti (sice někdy vypadá divně, když se fotky z lesa octnou mezi fotkami vesnice, ale oficiální členění republiky na obce a katastrální území je ten nejspolehlivější objektivní způsob k tomu, aby se nakonec fotky téhož místa sešly pohromadě a aby kategorie navzájem blízkých míst měly mezi sebou nějakou vazbu). Chápu že ne vždycky má člověk čas a náladu si otevírat čtyři mapy najednou a pátrat tam po nějakých imaginárních hranicích - ale někdy už jsou fotky správně zakategorizovány a stačí jen ty kategorie opsat do nové kategorie, kterou zakládáš. Pokud třeba fotky Kuchyňky byly zakategorizovány v Hřebenech, tak neuděláš chybu, když z nich kategorii Hřebenů umázneš a místo toho do ní zařadíš celou novou kategorii Kuchyňky. Nemělo by se stát, že fotky brdského vrcholku najednou zmizí z kategorie Brd, a až někdo další bude přidávat další fotky do kategorie Kuchyňka, tak ho třeba nenapadne pochybovat o tom, že tahle kategorie už je správně zařazena do nadkategorií. --ŠJů (talk) 23:10, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jo, napadlo mě to, ale chtěl jsem za večer zvládnout určitý objem fotek a kategorie jsem zakládal podle dalších chráněných území v daném okrese. Já radši dělám některé věci na víckrát, takže jednou nahrávám a jen minimálně kategorizuju, jindy si zase pohraju s kategorizací, přidám souřadnice nebo upravím popisy. Holt bych rád aspoň nahrál ty fotky, což za mě nikdo jiný neudělá, kategorizace třeba někdy někdo udělá. Času je málo :-( JAn Dudík (talk) 08:34, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Tohle naprosto chápu. Mně, když se snažím všechno dělat už při nahrávání, trvá jedna fotka v průměru kolem 6 minut (po dvouhodinové procházce s foťákem má člověk týden co dělat), a to ještě pokud mě od toho neodvede, že při tom hledání vhodných kategorií narazím na něco úplně jiného, co je třeba nejprve uspořádat, než tam budu něco přidávat - když se člověk nesoustředí na jeden cíl, tak se v tom ztratí. --ŠJů (talk) 09:37, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Já nahrávám hlavně z archivu od roku 2003, u některých skenovaných fotek od dědy i let šedesátých. Ale teď jsem se zase pustil na chvíli do nějakých popisů... JAn Dudík (talk) 09:41, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]



беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  français  italiano  മലയാളം  Nederlands  русский  slovenčina  српски (ћирилица)  srpski (latinica)  svenska  Tagalog  українська  /−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear JAn Dudík,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 09:38, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Bot request

[edit]

JAn Dudík, are you still interested in pursuing your bot request? --Dschwen (talk) 23:14, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Same question again. --99of9 (talk) 15:05, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
File:Konice - kostel focený za jízdy 02.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RomanM82 (talk) 22:08, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  català  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  eesti  français  galego  magyar  italiano  Nederlands  polski  română  svenska  ไทย  українська  /−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear JAn Dudík,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo



العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | magyar | Nederlands | polski | svenska | ไทย | /−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear JAn Dudík,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

František Dvořák

[edit]

Můžu se zeptat, jak jsi přišel na to, že František Dvořák je maďarský malíř? --Gampe (talk) 08:46, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Já ne. Já jen slučoval dvě kategorie do jedné - zkopíroval jsem vše z Category:Franz Dvorak. JAn Dudík (talk) 09:39, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, malíř z České republiky to taky nebyl... JAn Dudík (talk) 09:43, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
BTW Painters from Bohemia je podkategorie Painters from the Czech Republic. Samozřejmě, že je to blbina, ale všiml jsem si, že je zvykem to takto označovat a respektuji to. Pokud vymyslíš chytřejší systém, pak hurá! Ale byly tu už debaty, například, zda Joža Uprka je malíř český (národností), moravský (geografickým bydlištěm), rakouský (geografickým rodištěm), rakousko-uherský či československý (státní příslušností) či protektorátní (státem úmrtí), který vlastně...? Zdraví --Gampe (talk) 21:32, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Australia and Oceania has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Alan Liefting (talk) 06:32, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Australia and Oceania has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Auntof6 (talk) 07:46, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Where?

[edit]

Hi JAn Dudík. Please, can you tell me where these two sculptures are? File:Vlt06m20.JPG and File:Vlt06m21.JPG. It's important that you write the location in the description of the two pictures, and add the category of the location. Thank you very much! Best regards, --DenghiùComm (talk) 18:41, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I added ditririst. 9 years ago I am not able to say It is in this village - But is somewhere around (<10 km) Nový Knín. JAn Dudík (talk) 06:42, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much ! Today with the pictures automatically geo-localized it's easyer to identify the place. Cheers, --DenghiùComm (talk) 07:46, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Dragon fruit has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 20:50, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Prague Castle?

[edit]

Ahoj. Můžeš, prosím, do popisu nebo do shrnutí editace vysvětlit, jak jsi přišel na to, že by fotka File:Прага (Чехия) Интерьер собора с росписью потолка - panoramio.jpg měla mít něco společného s Pražským hradem? Souřadnice ukazují na staroměstského svatého Mikuláše, ovšem ač je to trochu podobná architektura, zjevně fotka z tohoto kostela není, na což zřejmě přišelJiriMatejicek. Žádný z kostelů na Pražském hradě mi to ovšem také nepřipomíná, a přijde mi zvláštní, že bys poznal, že je to na Pražském hradě, ale přitom bys neměl konkrétní představu, co by to mělo být za stavbu.

Сергей Алексеев tu má z toho dne několik pražských fotek, tahle fotka je z 2008-03-02T15:27:20, o 36 minut dříve byl dotyčný na Hradčanském náměstí, o 32 minut později už na Karlově mostě, takže by to teoreticky mohlo být někde z oblasti Malé Strany. --ŠJů (talk) 05:13, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, tak je to jasný, je to malostranskej Mikuláš. A dotyčný tam dal souřadnice staroměstskýho Mikuláše. To ještě dopadlo dobře, tentýž člověk totiž dal pražské souřadnice a jméno Praha taky k několika fotkám z Drážďan a z Karlových Var. Naštěstí fotí samá notoricky známá místa. --ŠJů (talk) 05:20, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Asi jsem se ukliknul, když jsem přesouval fotky, co měly v názvu "Пражский Град". Hlavně, že je vyřešeno :-) JAn Dudík (talk) 16:18, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, do you remember where you took this image? A nearby town or village would be a good information. --Te750iv (talk) 05:36, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Te750iv: . It was somewhere near Velká Lečice. JAn Dudík (talk) 06:13, 20 July 2018 (UTC)Pozice na mapě,[reply]

49°48'27.283"N 14°18'9.912"E, https://mapy.cz/s/2RFd5

[1] thank you very much. --Te750iv (talk) 07:02, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

National parks of the England and Wales has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Finavon (talk) 18:44, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Burned hut.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  /−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Burned hut.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Castillo blanco (talk) 12:16, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Přihlaste své fotky do Czech Wiki Photo 2020!

[edit]
Czech Wiki Photo
Czech Wiki Photo

Milí fotografové a editoři projektů Wikimedia,

každý rok společně nahrajete na Commons tisíce svobodných fotografií. Chceme vám všem poděkovat a také vás ocenit. Vyberte ty nejlepší z vašich fotek a přihlaste je do 30. 10. 2020 do soutěže Czech Wiki Photo 2020! Soutěž je otevřená i úplným nováčkům. Autoři tří nejlepších fotek si odnesou vouchery do Foto Škoda a speciální wiki-odznaky. Přihlášené fotky bude hodnotit i Honza Rybář, držitel Czech Press Photo.

Baví vás focení pro Commons i mimo soutěže? Staňte se fotografem Wikimedie, půjčujeme fototechniku a proplácíme cesty - více na Fotíme Česko.

Těšíme se na vaše snímky!
Za spolek Wikimedia Česká republika
Jakub Holzer
[email protected] -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:06, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Copyright status: File:CoA Vimperk.png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  /−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:CoA Vimperk.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 09:05, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Copyright status: File:TGM a dítě 1928.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  /−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:TGM a dítě 1928.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 19:12, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:4 sochy u Krajského úřadu v ČB 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Moydom (talk) 02:09, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:4 sochy u Krajského úřadu v ČB 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Moydom (talk) 02:11, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All personal referenced pictures

[edit]

Thank you for your thanks :-)

(I haven't quite finished uploading all the pictures yet.)

One question: could you tell me how to do this for myself?

Greetings from Germany to the Czech Molgreen (talk) 19:57, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Got notified through the tag, so I'm gonna jump in.
There are two options - the one I used originally and @JAn Dudík is using, where you grab pictures that have your name in the author field of structured data (SDC) - you can get the query by going to the right of the map and clicking "Edit SPARQL", then copy the code and just insert your nickname instead of the original one.
This way is limited, since the SDC isn't quite consistent. AFAIK, there have recently been two bots filling in the SDC for uploaded picutres - SchlurcherBot and BotMultichillT. Only one of these bots fills in the author field, therefore only a subset of your pictures gets matched this way and the map will be incomplete (unless you're willing to add your name to SDC for each picture manually).
I'm currently using a slightly different version, where I'm adding all my pictures into a hidden category Category: Photos by A.Patek and then showing its content on the map - the result can be seen on my page and you can copy the relevant SPARQL from the map view as well. This requires to keep all images categorized, so it's not perfect either.
Hope this is at least somewhat coherent, the whole thing is kinda messy. A.Patek (talk) 21:25, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Molgreen your map, but this is actually limited to uploads before half of march 2024, because BotMultichill stopped adding username to structured data. JAn Dudík (talk) 09:57, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank You very much: see here Molgreen (talk) 20:01, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@JAn Dudík From my understanding, BotMultichillT is out of service for now for technical reasons, but SchlurcherBot still runs - however, it's currently overwhelmed, probably due to BotMultichillT being out.
So, hopefully, that's only a temporary gap and either BotMultichillT gets fixed, or SchlurcherBot beefed up soon. A.Patek (talk) 23:10, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@A.Patek, I also very much hope that BotMultichillT will return to work in the future.
By the way, I last received a message from SchlurcherBot on February 13, 2024, and haven't received one since.
Molgreen (talk) 04:25, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Molgreen Or you can use this map. JAn Dudík (talk) 20:33, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@JAn Dudík, Thank you very much, of course it's even better because the pictures are also linked. Molgreen (talk) 17:45, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good morning A.Patek, thank you for replying here. I would opt for the first option (as JAn Dudík uses it). This saves me the effort/difficulty of having to create a hidden category for all images. I'm not that familiar with the details. (For example, I can't find the point "right of the map and clicking "Edit SPARQL""). Could you imagine adding this directly to my personal page (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Molgreen)? (The following image has been edited by both SchlurcherBot and BotMultichill: File:20230904 xl 0953-Wanderung - Nesselwang - Maria-Trost-Weg - Kappeleralp - Wurzelsteig - Wasserfallweg - Nesselwang 103.jpg) Best regards


Removal of coordinates

[edit]

Hi JAn Dudík. What was the problem with the coordinates? Thanks!--Jetam2 (talk) 19:00, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Problem was locality near Saarbrucken, not in Brno. IMHO better without coords than hundrets kilometers away. JAn Dudík (talk) 20:37, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. Maybe you could have alerted me to the small mistake (of leaving out the leading 1) or something rather than deleting.--Jetam2 (talk) 12:58, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jetam2 I use for corrections [2]. In some category was this far far away and I was not able to recognize good position. JAn Dudík (talk) 17:59, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I corrected it already.--Jetam2 (talk) 18:00, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:Senatni obvody 1 3n.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taylor 49 (talk) 07:18, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Indiáni Jižní Ameriky - obr 04 (cropped).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Indiáni Jižní Ameriky - obr 04 (cropped).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Skot (talk) 15:18, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

[edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.


Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:15, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]