User talk:Heb/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Welcome

Welcome to the Commons, Heb/Archive 1!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Permission to use your image

Hi Heb, I would like to use your photo of the Maersk container ship found at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Edith_Maersk_Suez.jpg in a textbook. Please email me at [email protected] so I can give you more details. Thank you. ~ Marcav

TUSC token 5535b5a0e86975e0adc0e4fe507bf7fe

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Category move ?

Because Denmark is a small country, it was not appropriate to create a Denmark subcategory with a so special subject like Category:Military vessels/vehicles of Denmark. Therefore, I split that special category in several ones matching existing subjects in Commons (standardization allows easy browsing through the database). You'll find a list of available subjects in Category:Categories by country. --Juiced lemon 22:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions

Thanks for uploading your fine images. Have you considered releasing http://www.flickr.com/photos/hebster/1364348611/ as well? We don't have an image of Skaden yet and I think we only have a single image of a Flyvefisken-class vessel. Thanks again for your contributions. Valentinian ^{T / C} 23:40, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. Btw, this is a great image of Absalon-class. Unfortunately, we still have to wait a few more years to see the new patrol vessels. Thanks again for your contributions. Valentinian ^{T / C} 21:24, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Dine kategoriseringer af et helikopterbillede

Hej Hebster. jeg har beærket at du har tilføjet et par DK cats på dette billede. Jeg er tvivl om det er helt korrekt. Godt nok har Grønland et rigsfællesskab med Danmark, men at sige at det er "Rescue helicopters in Denmark" ved jeg ikke helt om er retvisende. Jeg ved ikke om det har været drøftet her på Commons, men det lader til at konventionen her er at billeder relaterende til Grønland kategoriseres i en "Grønlandsstruktur" sideordnet med kategoristrukturen for Danmark. Hvis man endelig vil kunne navigere til Grøndlandske kategorier fra DK sider, tor jeg en bedre metode er at have f.eks. Tildele billedet kategorin "Rescue helicopters in Greenland" og have den som en subcat til både "Helicopters in Greenland" og "Rescue Helicopters In Denmark". Har du nogen holdning til det? -- Slaunger 09:49, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Hej Slaunger. Jeg er principielt slet ikke uenig med dig. Det ideelle ville være at have en kategori der hed Rescue helicopters in Greenland, som der så var indgang til både via den overordnede kategori Aircraft of Greenland og Rescue helicopters in Denmark.

Men i og med at hverken Aircraft of Greenland eller Rescue helicopters in Greenland eksisterer, hører de efter min mening mest naturligt hjemme i det danske tilsvarende. På sigt skal kategorierne Aircraft of Greenland og Rescue helicopters in Greenland (og tilsvarende for Færøerne) såmænd nok blive oprettet, både som selvstændige kategorier og via det danske kategori-hieraki (idet de bærer OY-præfikset), men i første omgang fokuserer jeg på de "lokal-danske" skibe, køretøjer og fly. /Hebster 12:56, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Ok, men jeg er ikke sikker på at det giver mening helt at følge et parallelt kategori-hierarki for Grønland. Det er der simpelthen slet ikke materiale nok til. Der er trods alt kun 55000 indb i dette enorme land. jeg mener derfor en mere grovkornet kat struktur er relevant for Grønland. Den eksisterende Category:Helicopters of Greenland mener jeg faktisk er alt nok. Slaunger 19:59, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Jeg er tidligere blevet orienteret om at såfremt der findes en eksisterende struktur for UK/US bør man - så vidt muligt - følge den for øvrige lande også - uanset hvor basalt det måtte være. I mit tilfælde drejede det sig om at der var 5 billeder af fly/helikoptere, 8 af skibe og 4 af køretøjer fra forsvaret, som jeg så slog sammen til en gruppe. Det gør man så åbentbart ikke :) Hebster 21:12, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Hej igen hebster. Jeg prøvede at se mig lidt omkring efter retningslinier, men kunne ikke finde det. Da jeg ikke kan dokumentere hverken dit eller mit standpunkt med en reference til en politik eller instruks synes jeg blot vi skal lade det være. Ikke den store skade at der kommer et par ekstra kategorier på nogle få billeder... Hilsen -- Slaunger 21:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Hej igen igen :) Du har ret - der er ingen formaliserede retningslinjer vedr. fly (jeg har i hvert tilfælde heller ikke kunnet finde dem) som der er for f.eks. skibe, men der er Creating categories og Naming categories (der er et udkast) . Jeg vil slet ikke udelukket at jeg på et tidspunkt opretter Rescue helicopters in Greenland og Rescue helicopters on the Faroe Islands som underkategorier til h.h.v. Aircraft of Greenland og Aircraft of Faroe Islands men medmindre antallet af billeder derfra pludseligt eksploderer, bliver det ikke lige med det første :) MVH Hebster 21:52, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:P570 Knud Rasmussen.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:47, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:P547 Sehested.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:47, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:RDN LCP2 SRC90E.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:47, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Glædelig overraskelse

Hej Hebster.

Dette var en glædelig overraskelse og jeg glæder mig derudover til at komme ombord på dette skib, som jeg kan se du har leveret et billede af d. 22/10 i Nuuk. -- Slaunger (talk) 13:19, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Hej Slaunger. Dit fine billede passede simpelthen fint som et Selected Picture - også fordi det havde koordinater ;). Billedet af Knud Rasmussen har jeg nu ikke selv taget men blot fået "krattet op under neglende" med en passende licens. Jeg håber - på værnets vegne - at du får en god tur ombord :) MVH Hebster (talk) 13:53, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

IMO

Have a look at the IMO category for your Freja. Regards, --Stunteltje (talk) 10:20, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Heh. I was just writing on your talkpage about the shipinfo template. I'm not really sure what to think about the IMO-category concept. It is obvious that it makes it very easy to track ships though name- and flagstate-changes, but my concern is that it may "hide" certain information from people, whom aren't familar to the IMO numbering. One solution could be to either implement a "Ship specification is probably available at the IMO xxxxxxx category"-banner or to utilize both a template-kindda thinge. The latter is a poor solution, because it would require double entries so i think the former would be prefereble. On thoughts i think it makes quite a effecient and clean solution. Kind regards Hebster (talk) 10:50, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Heb!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:53, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Protective glove.jpg is uncategorized since 21 March 2009.
• Image:UBX-food.jpg was uncategorized on 24 February 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:45, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Category:Rigid-hulled inflatable boats

Hi! Category:Rigid-hulled inflatable boats already contains category:ETRACO, so there's no need to add on pictures representing an ETRACO. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 08:57, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

I'm aware of that. The reason for adding Category:Rigid-hulled inflatable boats to the two files in category:ETRACO, is that it isn't specified in the category description of category:ETRACO what ETRACO is or the relation between ETRACO and RHIB's and a google search didn't reveal much either. --Hebster (talk) 09:28, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

It's now fixed. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 13:38, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Template:Cc-by-2.0/lang‎

The answer on your question is here: base template. A cascade protection was removed because cascade protection is dangerous. I will protect the /lang and the /language versions, thanks for the pointer. --Martin H. (talk) 18:34, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Question

Why did you remove the "current ministers of Denmark" category from Lene Espersen? [1]. Ysangkok (talk) 12:06, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Because it is empty. The category description clearly specifies that only relevant photos and categories with content should be added to the category. This is in order to avoid confusion :o) --Henrik (Talk · Contributions · E-mail) 09:13, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Der står i parantesen efter kategorierne til ministrene om der er noget i kategorien. Jeg mener at personernes kategori skal kategoriseres rigtigt, lige meget om der er indhold eller ej. Det kan man jo så se på tabellen om der er, hvilket jeg troede var formålet med den. Ellers kan man jo chekke parantesen. Det bør ikke være nødvendigt at ændre kategorien når der kommer billeder i kategorierne. Hvorfor har vi overhovedet personkategorierne hvis de ikke må være kategoriseret rigtigt? Det er jo forvirrende at vi har nogle kategorier på personkategorierne, men ikke minister-kategorien...

Desuden mener jeg linksne til personerne skal puttes tilbage. Hvis det er vigtigt at koden er præcis den samme på dansk Wikipedia og her, kan man jo eksplicit bruge "commons:" præfiket. Det virker også her selv om vi allerede er på Commons. På den måde ville det også virke på dansk Wikipedia. --Ysangkok (talk) 22:51, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Det giver ingen mening at have tomme kategorier. De forurener blot og kan altid blive oprettet når der er indhold til dem.

Det giver god mening at bruge :commons:-præfikset og det kan botte også håndtere. --Henrik (Talk · Contributions · E-mail) 19:43, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Edith Mærsk

Hi! One of your pictures was used on index.hu, one of the most popular news sites in Hungary. I'm not affiliated with them or anything, I just thought you would be interested, and I know I'm proud when one of my pictures pops up somewhere "on the interwebs" :) Bye Villy (talk) 19:19, 24 November 2009 (UTC) -- Thanks for the notice mate :o) --Henrik (Talk · Contributions · E-mail) 19:40, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

S-togs stationer

Hej Hebster. Jeg har fået et forslag om s-togs stationer, jf. User_talk:MGA73#Fusion_af_kategorier. Vil du kigge forbi? --MGA73 (talk) 17:51, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Tak for info; "jeg har været der". --Henrik (Talk · Contributions · E-mail) 19:40, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Files still awaiting OTRS confirmation

Hello, Hebster. The file(s) listed below have been marked with {{OTRS received}}, but there has been no complete confirmation of its permission status in the last 30 days. From what I'm able to tell, you were the person who added this template. Would you mind taking a look at this again? If confirmation cannot be found, this file should probably be marked for deletion. This should be the only notification you will receive regarding this image, so long as the comment I added to the image description page is not altered. Thanks! HersfoldOTRSBot^{(talk/opt out)} 09:17, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

If you are not an OTRS volunteer or did not add the "received" template to this file, it's possible I made a mistake identifying the correct user. I look for the most recent diff where the template was added, so if you reverted an edit where this template was removed, I can't tell the difference. If this is the case, please let my operator know at w:en:User talk:Hersfold. Sorry for the inconvenience!

The file(s) in question are:

• File:JohnDahlJun07.jpg
• File:TéaLeoniJun07.jpg

Template:PD-DenmarkEVH

Template:PD-DenmarkEVH has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eusebius (talk) 09:55, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Military rank insignia of Denmark

As these files have sit in Category:Copyright violations for over a month, without any sysop willing to delete them, I declined speedy and opened a mass-request. Cheers, Jean-Fred (talk) 20:50, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Lifeguard flags.svg

Hate to be hypercritical, but it says "Svimming" at upper left... -- AnonMoos (talk) 15:48, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Woups! Thanks, I've corrected the typo now :o). IKR Henrik (Talk · Contributions · E-mail) 16:13, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:G3-CTD.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:G3-CTD.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Lycaon (talk) 08:47, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

File:DK-Navy-RLG2.png

[being technical] I declined the deletion on the grounds that you listed, though if you wish to pursue simply on the grounds of UPLOADER REQUEST, then that should be sufficient to deem the removal.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:43, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Category:Church_buildings_in_Copenhagen

Category discussion notification

Category:Church_buildings_in_Copenhagen has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

NVO (talk) 19:41, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Date of File:Danish air force R-771.jpg

Hi Heb,

Just curious, how did you determine that the picture was taken on August 4? --  Docu  at 09:52, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

I didn't. It was an most unfortunate error on my part (actually applied to several images). It has been fixed on all affected images now. Sorry for the inconvenience. --Henrik (heb: Talk · Contributions · E-mail) 09:59, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Thank you! Have a nice day :D

|EPO| ^da: 13:21, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Thank you very much :o) --Henrik (heb: Talk · Contributions · E-mail) 13:30, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

2011 UCI Road WC photos

Hey there; I have seen your photos in the main cat, and you were looking for a few names for the photos, so I helped out and gave you a few for the files to be moved to. Hope you don't mind that! Some others may be close numerical-wise to the other photos, so here's the result list if you want to patch the other missing riders up! Regards, Cs-wolves(talk) 13:50, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

That is so great! I'll get on with moving them right away. Thank you so much :o). In kind regards 14:02, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

You're most welcome! Cs-wolves(talk) 14:09, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Kattegatforbindelse 2007.svg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 14:21, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

User:Hebster/Shipinfo

Heb, I have replaced "User:Hebster/Shipinfo" with {{Ship}} in all categories. It is clearer to use template that are in the template namespace rather than in the user namespace. I integrated every parameter of User:Hebster/Shipinfo that was in use, but not those that were not used, because with translations and formatting, the template is becoming quiet complex, but they can be added if necessary. I hope it is fine for you, else just let me know.:)--Zolo (talk) 10:04, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Category:S-train stations in Denmark

S-train stations in Denmark has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

og Category:S-train stations in Copenhagen --MGA73 (talk) 16:18, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

OTRS

Hi Heb, I gave my answer on http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#Henk_Obee_.28talk.C2.A0.C2.B7_contribs.29 Henk Obee 14:08, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Administrator

---

An offering for our new administrator from your comrades...

Heb, congratulations! You now have administrator rights on Commons. Please take a moment to read the Commons:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Commons:Administrators' noticeboard and Commons:Deletion requests), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other admins, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care.

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons on irc.freenode.net. There is also a channel for Commons admins, which may be useful for more sensitive topics, or coordination among administrators:#wikimedia-commons-admin.

You may find Commons:Guide to adminship to be useful reading.

Please also check or add your entry to the List of administrators and the related lists by language and date it references.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Done. And thank you :) In kind regards, heb [T C E] 05:14, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Congratulations. --Túrelio (talk) 20:48, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

User:Hebbot

Congratulations! It has bot status now. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Stol

Hej! Var det verkligen rätt stol du lade in en bild på här? Ska det inte vara File:Tripp-Trapp-stolen2.JPG istället? --Stefan4 (talk) 21:21, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

You are absolutely right. File:Tripp-Trapp-stolen2.JPG is a more correct one, though I couldn't find any, when I searched for it. I have updated COM:TOO accordingly. Thank you for your notice :). In kind regards, heb [T C E] 03:50, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Emsig sletning uden undersøgelse

Man kan blive træt af at hjælpe Wiki til at blive et leksikon, når folk som dig sletter indhold uden at undersøge, om det er i orden. Du skal ikke bare slette uden at spørge, når det drejer sig om materiale, som jeg har ophavsret til, således at der ikke er tale om copyright violation. --Hans Christophersen (talk) 17:58, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Hej Hans,

Desværre fremgår det ikke nogle steder på medie1.dk, at du har ophavsretten til pågældende billeder. Tilgengæld bliver der lagt bunker af billeder op - hver eneste dag -, der er ophavsretsmæssigt beskyttet. Det er til tider svært at se, hvad der er hvad, så derfor har Commons et forsigtighedsprincip, der kan hjælpe os på vej. Hvis du kan godtgøre at du retteligt har ophavsretten til billederne, skal jeg hjertens gerne gendanne dem. Endeligt skal du være opmærksom på, at vi alle er frivillige og at der er meget at gøre (f.eks. har jeg i dag håndteret over 100 nyoploadede filer), så der kan også ske menneskelige fejl ind i mellem. Med venlig hilsen, heb [T C E] 18:07, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Der er nu indsat en side til godkendelse af, at billeder fra Medie1.dk anvendes på Wiki. Se: http://medie1.dk/wikilicense.htm - Er det ikke legitimering nok? --Hans Christophersen (talk) 12:02, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Hej Hans,

Det er fint. Jeg har gendannet filerne MaxMeyer-2011.jpg, SherinKhankan-2011.jpg og SusanneMoller-2011.jpg og indsat {{tl|cc-by-sa-3.0}} in accordance with [http://medie1.dk/index.php?p=wikilicense.htm medie1.dk/index.php?p=wikilicense.htm] i permission feltet. Jeg har desuden indsat den samme permission-tag på PeterNeerupBuhl.jpg og MogensCamre-2011.jpg. MVH heb [T C E] 14:24, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Fotografisk bild eller ej

Hej! Har du någon åsikt om huruvida File:Sølyst Teglværk 1930.jpg är en bild eller ett verk? Jag har ingen aning om hur danska domstolar skulle bedöma ett flygfoto. Se diskussion på COM:HD#Danish Aerial pPhotography 1930. --Stefan4 (talk) 07:56, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Tak for hintet. Jeg har givet mit input til diskussionen :) MVH heb [T C E] 11:47, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#Arabic volunteer needed

Hej! Jag antar att du inte läser Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. Eftersom det är du som har godkänt ärendet vore det bra om du kunde kommentera. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:14, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Given the activity level and amount of topics on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard I mostly only skim the topics, and react when it is a subject I feel I can contribute sufficiently with, depending on my time available etc. As you point out I do not indicate any knowledge of Arabic, which is because I don't really have any and thus a subject titled Arabic volunteer needed is not something I dwell upon or go into details about. And to be honest, I can't remember the ticket numbers of the ticket I have handled, so I don't catch that one either :). In kind regards, heb [T C E] 07:27, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

OK, mange tak for commenting. —LX (talk, contribs) 12:45, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Convert all interlaced JPGs

Hello, can you by any chance give a look at this bot work request? Thanks, Nemo 10:38, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Surroundings of The Little Mermaid in Copenhagen.jpeg

File:Surroundings of The Little Mermaid in Copenhagen.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 15:50, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Kort fjernet fra Hadsten-artikel

Hej

Jeg har opdaget, at du har fjernet filen "Kort25-Hadsten.tif" fra Commons. For en god ordens skyld vil jeg lige høre, hvorfor denne angives som "Copyright violation", når dette går under det nye tiltag Frie Data fra Geodatastyrelsen. Det er netop fra kortforsyningen.dk at de frie data kan hentes, så måske er der sket fejl. Loven om Frie Data trådte i kraft d. 1. januar 2013, og det kan derfor sagtens være at du ikke har hørt om den. Læs mere på: www.gst.dk

Mvh --Jonassoeby (talk) 00:40, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Hej Jonas,

Filen er nu blevet gendannet. Det var en fejl at den ikke var blevet det. Vær dog opmærksom på, at filen risikerer at blive slettet på et senere tidspunkt, da Geodatastyrelsens 'Frie data' muligvis rent faktisk ikke er frie data. Du kan følge og deltage i diskussionen på Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Danish_open_public_geographic_data. MVH Henrik/heb [T C E] 08:24, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Modified WB for Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Schloss-Linnep-Vorderansicht.jpg

Thanks for your review. I've slightly modified the white balance on my FP candidate. I think the blue cast is now cone, probably you can give the photo a second chance: Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Schloss-Linnep-Vorderansicht.jpg Thanks! --Tuxyso (talk) 15:07, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Another redraft of Photographs of identifiable people

Commons talk:Photographs of identifiable people#Another redraft

I would very much appreciate your comments on this redraft. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 13:11, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi Heb. Thanks for your comments. I think we are ready to move my draft into the guideline, where we can directly address the issues you raised wrt scope/etc. I'm not sure of the procedure for doing this as several people have edited the draft and we need to keep their contributions recorded. See the question I made at User talk:Kaldari. Perhaps you know the answer? -- Colin (talk) 12:33, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Hmm. I see the move has preserved the history of the draft but not of the original guideline. I think it is vital that the original history is kept (moreso than that of the draft even). I wondered if it was possible to edit the original guideline page but with a summary that had a link to the draft version -- this is what Wikipedia seems to suggest but I'm confused about it. Colin (talk) 14:03, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

ang sletning af billede på Commons

Jeg synes det er forhastet og overengageret at slette et relevant billede. Hvis der mangler "essentiel information" kunne du jo lige bede derom, før du sletter. Nu aner jeg jo ikke hvad fejlen var. Det var ingen hjælp, nærmere sabotage. M v h 212.242.240.13 01:23, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Såfremt du har ret, og et billede er slettet af mig, uden der har været sendt en notits på uploaders diskussionsside, så har du da helt ret. Men jeg plejer normalt at kontrollere dette. Dog er det ikke umiddelbart muligt for mig at be- eller afkræfte dette, medmindre du løfter sløret for hvilket billede, der er tale om... --heb [T C E] 14:01, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Hammel Sygehus

File:Hammel Sygehus 1960.jpg

Beskrivelsen fra billedefilen: Dette er et billede af Hammel Sygehus fra 1960 (nu Regionshospitalet Hammel Neurocenter), som er uploadet til at kickstarte en diskussion, omkring hvad der er tilladt at lægge op. Jeg synes ikke jeg har kunne finde et klart svar, der fortæller om rettigheder ved brug af billeder fra sider som f.eks.: www.hammel-billeder.dk? Jonas Søby 12:08, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Svar venligst på min egen disskussionside :-)

Det er svært at sige noget generelt om billeder fra www.hammel-billeder.dk, da det er så blandet en masse. Du er derfor nød til at foretage en individuel vurdering af hvert enkelt billede (hvilket man jo principielt skal gøre hver gang, men nogle gange er der samlinger, der har en klar og entydig linje, der gør at de kan vurderes samlet). Grundlæggende er reglen for fotografier at:

• Hvis fotografiet har værkshøjde, så løber ophavsretten 70 hele kalender år, efter det år hvor fotografen døde.
• Hvis fotografiet ikke har værkshøjde, og er fra før 1. januar 1970, er der ingen ophavsret og du skal anvende {{PD-Denmark50}}.
• Hvis fotografiet ikke har værkshøjde, og er fra efter 31. december 1969, er der ophavsret i 50 år fra billedet blev taget.

Om et billede har værkshøjde eller ej, er en skønsmæssig vurdering fra gang til gang. Det har på Commons f.eks. været en principiel diskssuion, hvor det blev konkluderet at simple portrætfotografier ikke har værkshøjde. Simple situationsbilleder som det ovenfor har vi nogle stykker af, men der har mig bekendt aldrig været en principiel diskussion om emnet, så den er lidt åben. Hvis du er i tvivl, er du ikke i tvivl og filen skal slettes. MVH heb [T C E] 13:19, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Se Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hammel Sygehus 1960.jpg. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:42, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Gedser imo5404407.jpg

Du lade till {{PD-1996}} här. Är du verkligen säker på att detta är riktigt? Enligt källan användes bilden ursprungligen som ett vykort. Kravet är att bilden först publicerades i Danmark, men bilden föreställer en båt som gick mellan Danmark och Tyskland. Finns det inte en risk att vissa av vykorten kanske inte publicerades i Danmark utan i Tyskland? --Stefan4 (talk) 14:26, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

No. I can't be 100% sure that it was. But given that it is a Danish shipping company and that the photo has most likely been reviewed by, people who a most likely in Denmark at the time (HQ was in Denmark as far as I can see) and thus most likely falls within the scope of published, I think that there is no significant doubt and thus we are beyond COM:PCP. --heb [T C E] 08:03, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Gendannelse af fotografier

Hej Heb! User:Randers Skyttekreds har overfor OTRS gjort rede for, at alle hidtil uploadede og slettede filer er retmæssige. Vil du gendanne dem? Se [2]. I mailen står også hvilken kreditering er ønsket. Du kan indsætte {{OTRS|2013031610004089}} på filerne. Mange tak Nillerdk (talk) 10:48, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Check. Det er hermed gjort :)

Bemærk at der på alle filer står {{Own}} under kilde (source). Jeg har ikke længere OTRS-adgang, så jeg ved ikke hvad der står i mailen fra Randers SK, men det virker måske lidt usandsynligt at det er brugeren User:Randers Skyttekreds der er skaber af f.eks. File:Randers SK, Randers Skyttekreds - Logo.png, så der kan blive sat spørgsmålstegn ved det på et senere tidspunkt. MVH heb [T C E] 11:00, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Brugeren er nok ikke selv fotograf, men har fyldstgørende gjort rede for, at foreningen har rettighederne og at brugeren er bemyndiget til at forvalte dem. Tak for gendannelserne! Nillerdk (talk) 11:32, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Danish road signs

Hello. Thank you for your message. I haven't found any official model with Danish road signs, so I have used, as a base for making Danish road signs, the Vejdirektoratetmodel (I didn't know what it is). Do you have a pdf source with all official Danish road signs? So I can use this as model to make other signs. I'm in Italy, so I have used models of the Vejdirektoratet... I supposed they are official signs... Let me know! Thank you! --Gigillo83 (talk) 16:37, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

→ answer. --heb [T C E] 09:35, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your answer...I've make a new version of the motorway road sign...please take look and tell me if the new version (made with the RAL colour 6017) is correct or not. Instead for the sign E80, I've noted that actually is made also with the EU80, but also on the paper you've written to me is only with the speed limit and the panel is onother riad sign, used above the main sign but separate...doesn't it? Thank you again!! --Gigillo83 (talk) 12:45, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

→ answer. --heb [T C E] 06:22, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Yes, I've found a converetr ([:http://www.pats.ch/formulaire/unites/unites11.aspx here]), so I've made the motorway sign in this way. If you tell me that is now correct I can proceed in making also other road sign. For the border sign, in next days I'll make a version using also UE panel... hoping that it's correct. I suppose you're Danish: can you kindly indicate to me also the road signs in Faer Oer and in Greenlad, so I can make also those? Because all text are in Danish and I can't understand your language... :) Thank you a lot! --Gigillo83 (talk) 14:26, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

→ answer. --heb [T C E] 20:12, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Danish Royal Life Guard musician.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 12:12, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 UCI Road World Championship - László Bodrogi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great! --Ralf Roletschek 22:30, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ambulances for Syria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is no colors in the top of the picture --Christian Ferrer 11:54, 23 July 2013 (UTC) That's intentional. Mattbuck 11:22, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Hjælp omkring billede

Hejsa!

Jeg så lige din tilføjelse på min side, og jeg er ret ny på 'Commons'. Derfor kunne jeg rigtig godt bruge en hurtig hjælp til uploadning af billedet og de rettigheder. Kontakt mig venligst på mail ***@***.**

JKNN (talk) 15:17, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

new Commons brochure draft

Thanks for your comments on the Commons brochure draft. We're getting close to a final version, and I've put up a new draft that includes a lot of the suggested changes from the previous version. Please look it over if you have a chance, and post any final suggestions or corrections.--Sage Ross (WMF) (talk) 14:22, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

FYI: Dansk/dansk

There’s no point editing one template by hand, it will get overwritten by {{subst:lle}} soon. And that template got all-titlecased with Add {{ucfirst:}}, language names are now lowercase for languages where they are natively not uppercased in sentence context, but it is used here as button/list context, it should be uppercased. --Mormegil (talk) 06:39, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

You are aware that the linked discussion (COM:VP#Link problems) dates back to 2009? I'm sorry but I don't see anything more recent about it being "overwritten by {{subst:lle}} soon" and I don't see any discussions supporting User:Krinkle's action for that matter... :( --heb [T C E] 07:29, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Umm, sorry, I do not understand. I did not link to any discussion and the Link problems discussion does not have anything to do with this.

The fact is that /lang subpages are routinely updated using a {{subst:lle}} shortcut, without the need to list the languages by hand. So, any manual change of such a subpage will get overwritten sooner or later as a matter of technical procedure. In other words, if you want to have lower-case dansk on /lang subpages, you need to change Template:lle, not a single such subpage (or many of them). And in that case you probably should talk with Krinkle about his reasoning to change the language names to title-case. And even though I understand (and partially agree with) his stated reason (note that for Czech, which is my native language, we also use česky, as it is not a proper name, but that does not mean that a button would use česky, it would use Česky just like the first word of a sentence would), I am not really opposed of any variant; I do not really care, I just wanted to inform you about the futility of changing a single subpage instead of doing the change in the template where it needs to be done.

--Mormegil (talk) 10:25, 31 July 2013 (UTC)