User talk:Hangsna
 First steps tutorialOur first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.  Getting helpMore information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
 Goodies, tips, and tricks
 Made a mistake?
|
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the 
→ Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:43, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
- Strange. something wrong when uploaded, its Template:PD-Sweden-photo and its fixed now. /Hangsna (talk) 09:49, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Episyrphus balteatus on blue flower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
{{File:Miriam Bryant.jpg}} High Contrast (talk) 12:00, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
This tag happened accidently - of yourse the image does not get deleted. But please insert in future our review-tag {{licensereview}} in order to countercheck it and get it clear forever. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 12:05, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- Hm, do i need to add {{licensereview}} when i already added Source? /Hangsna (talk) 12:09, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- In general, yes. Well, this has the advantage that another user must look over it and confirms the license. As such, if the source homepage should move over the years we still have the confirmation and there is no reason to doubt the free CC-license even the source page is no longer available. The Commons experience shows that images get deleted due to the fact that the source homepage are gone and the licensing gets doubted by other users and thus deleted. --High Contrast (talk) 12:12, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- That makes sence, thanks for awnser and i will try to remember adding it in simular cases. /Hangsna (talk) 12:15, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for your support! Regards, High Contrast (talk) 16:33, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
{{File:Oriflame Hand & Nail.JPG}} Stefan4 (talk) 21:37, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Guds hand, Carl Milles, 1954, brons.JPG
[edit]
{{File:Guds hand, Carl Milles, 1954, brons.JPG}} And also:
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it. If you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 15:44, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Relief av yrkesmän av Carl Fagerberg, granitrelief, Fristadstorget i Eskilstuna.jpg
[edit]
{{File:Relief av yrkesmän av Carl Fagerberg, granitrelief, Fristadstorget i Eskilstuna.jpg}}
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it. If you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 16:09, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Rörelse av Per Hammarström, rondeller Eskilstuna.JPG
[edit]
{{File:Rörelse av Per Hammarström, rondeller Eskilstuna.JPG}} And also:
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it. If you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 16:11, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.Dear Hangsna, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, |
|
Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!Dear Hangsna, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, |
|
Copyvio?
[edit]You have tagged several images that I had made myself and uploaded to Wikimedia as copyright violations. I don't understand how this can be as it was I who made these photos. Did you perhaps mistakenly tag them as such where it actually should have been tagged as being against COM:PACKAGING? - Takeaway (talk) 20:32, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
- Well, I could be wrong but I was reasoning like this: If its against Commons:PACKAGING, then its copyrighted and thus can not be released under a free (commons) license. Therefore its a violation of the copyright to upload them. /Hangsna (talk) 15:06, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
- Is there no way to photograph packaging of (food) products without running into this issue? - Takeaway (talk) 15:13, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- Well, it depends on the package. I think that Commons:PACKAGING explains it rather well together with what you can find here. /Hangsna (talk) 19:44, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- COM:PACKAGING more or less forbids any images of commercial packaging. What is unequivocally allowed by it hardly applies to any packaging out there. What interests me is that I've noticed that certain images which show both wrapping and the content of the package, don't seem to be deleted as copyvios. Is it perhaps because the subject matter is the (non-copyright?) content, more than the copyrighted design of the packaging? - Takeaway (talk) 18:45, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
- If something on a package is considered enough "work of art" or what you should call it, if it's "copyright-able" then it can't be released as free. The things kept should only be what does not meet threshold of originality, and thus can't be copyrighted. /Hangsna (talk) 12:05, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
- COM:PACKAGING more or less forbids any images of commercial packaging. What is unequivocally allowed by it hardly applies to any packaging out there. What interests me is that I've noticed that certain images which show both wrapping and the content of the package, don't seem to be deleted as copyvios. Is it perhaps because the subject matter is the (non-copyright?) content, more than the copyrighted design of the packaging? - Takeaway (talk) 18:45, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
- Well, it depends on the package. I think that Commons:PACKAGING explains it rather well together with what you can find here. /Hangsna (talk) 19:44, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- Is there no way to photograph packaging of (food) products without running into this issue? - Takeaway (talk) 15:13, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments är på gång igen!
[edit]
This is an invitation to participate in the Swedish part of the Wiki Loves Monuments competition. You are getting it since you participated in 2013. The message below is in Swedish, should this be an issue you can get more information in English here or drop a message on my talk page.
Hej Hangsna,
I september genomför vi fototävlingen Wiki Loves Monuments igen.
I år har vi till den svenska deltävlingen lagt till ytterligare en kategori med objekt du kan fotografera, nämligen arbetslivsmuseum. Vi har även passat på att förtydliga instruktionerna för hur man deltar. För mer information se tävlingens hemsida.
Det finns gott om fina priser och tio av bilderna går vidare till den internationella finalen. Så varför inte delta i år igen!
Vänliga hälsningar,
Arrangörerna av Wiki Loves Monuments i Sverige
- Message delivered by L PBot (talk) 14:47, 27 August 2014 (UTC).
Deletion requests/File:Medve sajt 1.jpg
[edit]Hi, I wrote my opinion on the deletion page of my file, please read it! Thanks! --Fmvh (talk) 10:48, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Upphovsrätt eller bildrätt till foton av statyer
[edit]Hej! Ett foto av en staty eller byggnad är både skyddat som exemplar av det avbildade verket och som foto, bild eller verk. Om den som gjort en fotografisk bild föreställande ett ett konstverk eller en byggnad påstår sig vara "upphovsman" till det fotografiska "verket" utan att ange konstnärens eller arkitektens namn eller på annat sätt uppmärksamma att det enbart är fotot man hävdar rättigheter till så skulle det kunna uppfattas som att man utger sig för att vara skulptör eller arkitekt och därmed utgöra intrång i upphovsmannens rätt. De mallar som normalt används här på Commons när man laddar upp foton inbjuder till den formen av tveksamma claims. Kanske mallarna borde ändras så att det för svenska bilder framgår att det enbart är de närstående rättigheterna till fotobilden som avses och inte upphovsrätten till verket (the work)? Svensk och amerikansk rätt skiljer sig här. Edaen (talk) 10:29, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
- Hm, jag är inte helt klar över vad du menar. Menar du exempelvis här där jag anget "eget arbete" och borde anget konstnären där? Räcker det annars att skriva konstnärens namn i bildbeskrivningen/filnamnet för att man inte ska uppfatta att jag har någon upphovsrätt till verket? I så fall bör nog mallarna ändras, jag ser inte riktigt att jag kan göra andra val när jag laddar upp med de nuvarande mallarna. /Hangsna (talk) 10:47, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
- Det gäller inte dig specifikt utan mallarna. Det var en tanke jag fick med anledning av en annan bildsidas angivande av fotografer som "upphovsmän" till verk utan angivande av arkitektens namn. Pga pågående tvist vill jag hålla funderingarna lite mer lågmälda och eftersom du visat intresse för upphovsrättsfrågor vände jag mig till dig.
- Det är mallarna jag tänker på. Att de inbjuder till denna typ av möjligt intrång samt att de kanske borde formuleras mer så att de lockar till att ta fram metadata om avfotograferade föremål. Edaen (talk) 11:00, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
- Aha, ja jag håller med dig, det blir inte helt tydligt. Jag som fotograf säger ju inte att jag vill ha upphovsrätt för verket och det är ju "min bild" jag släpper fri, inte själva konstverket. Det borde gå att förtydliga men jag vet inte riktigt hur. På Special:UploadWizard blir ju alternativen "Den här filen är skapad av mig." och "Denna fil är inte mitt eget verk." uppenbart val ett för mig. För filen är mitt eget "verk". Kanske är det möjligt att längre fram ange något som gör att om jag väljer att det är ett konstverk så kan det bli kanske ett delat fält för "Skapare".
- Det är ju inte riktigt samma sak att jag anger filen vara mitt verk som att jag anger konstverket vara mitt verk, men med nuvarande upplägg/mallar så blir det ju
precis såett tillfälle att tolka det så. /Hangsna (talk) 11:09, 5 December 2014 (UTC)- Kanske default borde vara "detta fotografi" eller "denna bild" och "jag, fotografen" samt "bildrättigheterna" eller "rättigheterna" istället för "upphovsrätt" eller "copyright"? I de flesta fall handlar det om fotografier. I de färre fall då någon laddar upp en teckning eller ljudinspelning kanske man kan vara villig att leta upp en mer rättvisande licens längre ner på listan. Filer är väl inte uppenbart upphovsrättsskyddade utan faller mer naturligt under katalogskyddet. Edaen (talk) 11:46, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
- Ett tredje alternativ "Jag har avbildat/återanvänt någon annans material" kanske kan vara naturligt annars? Då kan man hamna på någo sida där man får visa varför det är okej (som när jag väljer någon annans verk) och kanske även kan ange derivate work i de fall det är frågan om det. /Hangsna (talk) 20:14, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
- Kanske default borde vara "detta fotografi" eller "denna bild" och "jag, fotografen" samt "bildrättigheterna" eller "rättigheterna" istället för "upphovsrätt" eller "copyright"? I de flesta fall handlar det om fotografier. I de färre fall då någon laddar upp en teckning eller ljudinspelning kanske man kan vara villig att leta upp en mer rättvisande licens längre ner på listan. Filer är väl inte uppenbart upphovsrättsskyddade utan faller mer naturligt under katalogskyddet. Edaen (talk) 11:46, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
|
File:Palle Kuling med paket.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Smial (talk) 08:44, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi, It can't be CC-BY-SA if the author is unknown. SA means Attribution, therefore an auhtor is needed. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:27, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
- See also here. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:12, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
- I will follow that discussion. However, I don’t understand what else I could do? I see the file released under that license but I don’t see any author. Interesting problem thou. /Hangsna (talk) 17:36, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi Hangsna, taking a photo from a photo is not always a copyvio. In the current case there is a photo on a sign in Israel. Acc. to Commons:Freedom of panorama#Israel this sign is covered by FoP. So there isn't any reason for a delition request! Greetings, -- Ies (talk) 07:34, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry for mistake and thanks for the info. I had no idea that some countries had that "broad" FOP. /Hangsna (talk) 07:42, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Your cfd request regarding Category:Lego minifigures of Discworld has been moved from Commons:Categories for discussion/2015/07/Category:Lego minifigures of Discworld to Commons:Village_pump/Copyright. --Achim (talk) 20:28, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
On nomination a media for deletion
[edit]Dear sir, I saw your request in which you have nominated a photo for deletion (File:Hamid (2012.06).jpg). I have added this photo to "Wikimedia" as "Hamidhassani1968", another user account of myself.
Best, Hamidhassani1 (talk) 11:53, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
hello
[edit]hi mr hasgsna please dont delete my photos all the photos are free and they were made by me you can delete pierre aldaher photo but the rest staar saad samer alsaaeed joumana bou eid walid farraj nawal are taken by me im editor on wiki arabia thanks user:wisam yazeedoWisam yazeedo (talk) 14:12, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
- I have not deleted any of your photos, i am not an admin here. I think that Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Wisam yazeedo is the place you could comment in. /Hangsna (talk) 14:17, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
White-throated dipper
[edit],_Eskilstuna,_Sweden,_November_2015_0001.jpg)
,_Eskilstuna,_Sweden,_November_2015_0002.jpg)
I recorded the first here that day.Admired your photo.Notafly (talk) 13:30, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Nice, they sure are beautiful! I have not taken any image more of it until today!! I bought a new lens for the camera and had to try it out, didn’t know there was any of this birds there now. And then you write to me now! That is a very big coincidence I must say. Uploading two from today now. :) /Hangsna (talk) 13:42, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
|
|
File:Bubs Hallon-Lakritsskalle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Josve05a (talk) 22:18, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bubs Hallon-Lakritsskalle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
|
|
File:Klaus Egge.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JuTa 02:14, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! King Edward.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Removing "Akwa-Ibom-State-Govt-Logo.jpg"
[edit]Thanks for the correction.... Will take note on my next page creation
Samma
[edit]Jag valde även jag att begära mina bilder raderade. Jag hittade dock bara en, File:Vittrorna vid Vispsjön.JPG som i beskuret format faktiskt varit med i ett inslag på SVT. -- Innocent bystander (talk) 09:06, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- Och fick den faktiskt raderad! -- Innocent bystander (talk) 17:45, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
- Nästan, eller "i praktiken", eller vad man nu ska kalla det. :) /Hangsna (talk) 17:49, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I just saw your reply about the picture in QI. We do review the images at full size, therefore cropping them so tight is not a good idea to provide detail. Thumbs are not for that. If I want to se details in a picture I magnify it. Regarding the exposure, well, I know that it is hard sometimes but it doesn't count for QI but if you have a RAW that should be possible (or I can give it a try if you like). Cheers, Poco2 17:14, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Poco a poco and thanks for contacting me! I Would love to send you the RAW, can you email me and i send it to you?
- /Hangsna (talk) 17:25, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
- Or no, we skip it. /Hangsna (talk) 06:10, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Your VFC installation method is deprecated
[edit]Hello Hangsna, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
|
|
File:Stockholm. Gösta Bohmans Plats.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Lars (Lon) Olsson (talk) 11:49, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
_Olsson-2017-10-09T11:49:00.000Z-File:Stockholm._Gösta_Bohmans_Plats.JPG){kind=link}
File tagging File:KristinaSvenssonfotoJohanGustavsson.jpg
[edit]
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:KristinaSvenssonfotoJohanGustavsson.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:KristinaSvenssonfotoJohanGustavsson.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Smooth O (talk) 13:45, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
September är nästan slut: missa inte Wiki Loves Monuments 2019!
[edit]Hej,
Du får det här meddelandet då du tidigare bidragit med bilder till den svenska deltävlingen av Wiki Loves Monuments, och jag hoppas att du vill vara med i år också. Kategorierna är som vanligt byggnadsminnen, fornminnen, K-märkta fartyg och arbetslivsmuseer, och du är välkommen att bidra med bilder hela september. Om du varit ute i världen och rest kan du även se om resorna sammanfaller med övriga internationella deltävlingar, och i så fall vara med och tävla även där.
Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 15:31, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
Nu är det dags för Wiki Loves Monuments 2020!
[edit]
Hej!
(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Sweden or other participating countries.)
Du får det här meddelandet då du tidigare har deltagit i de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Monuments eller Wiki Loves Earth! För någon vecka sedan blev det klart vem som tog hem förstapriset i Wiki Loves Earth 2020 – stort grattis till Brydand100 och hans fotografi av Röttlefallet! Alla vinnare kan du se här – tack alla deltagare för fina bidrag!
Den 1 september inleds 2020 års svenska deltävling av Wiki Loves Monuments, där det skulle vara väldigt roligt om du ville vara med och delta! Målet med Wiki Loves Monuments är att fotografera svenska kulturarvsmonument. De kategorier som ingår är byggnadsminnen, fornminnen, K-märkta fartyg och arbetslivsmuseer – och du är välkommen att bidra med bilder hela september.
Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Eric Luth (WMSE) (talk) 14:25, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Ytoyoda (talk) 13:24, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Jonteemil (talk) 02:15, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Komarof (talk) 07:29, 15 October 2023 (UTC)