User talk:Garion96

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Feel free to leave me a message, either here or on en:User talk:Garion96.

Image:Mats sundin1.jpg

[edit]

you did not give any good reason for speedy deletion ! Please add one otherwise the deletion request is not legal. I could have alot of unfree photos in any account, but one that I shot myself. So this is not a good reason. Other than that the pic was reviewd by trusted admins --Xgeorg 11:51, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Rashi.jpg

[edit]
Image deletion warning Image:Rashi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

  — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 23:26, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Klaudia Cieśla

[edit]

I'm sorry but no! The picture is already categorized in Category:Klaudia Cieśla which is categorized in 1987 births and adult models so you shouldn't add these categories on this picture. If you do so, why don't you also categorize in Category:1987 because 1987 births is categorized there? Please be logical! Thanks for your comprehension...--212.195.106.136 21:40, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I had no idea the claudia Ciesla category was already categorized there. I just made it the same as the other Ciesla picture on commons. Garion96 19:44, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Election poll reply

[edit]

Hi! I replied to you in this section. rootology (T) 21:34, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:James Edward Murphy.jpg

[edit]
Image deletion warning Image:James Edward Murphy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

--Teofilo (talk) 13:30, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token b252a2affbe24b2bcdcd2ede8c5ddc95

[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Mother Teresa.jpg

[edit]

Hi Garion96,
sorry for questioning an image uploaded two years ago. But, after a search on Photobucket gave seven hits and after I read in your description that it was taken by Evert Odekerken, I had to ask whether Evert Odekerken is you (then you might think about complaining to Photobucket[1] about the massive violation of your copyright). If you are not Evert Odekerken, then it might be wise to get a permission from him and forward it to OTRS. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 19:38, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

rv in File:Sieds logo2.png

[edit]

Hi, i reverted your edit in File:Sieds logo2.png. The image is the logo of "Italian society of economics demography and statistics" and the original source (www.sieds.it) states "Copyright © 2005-2006 SIEDS". Without an OTRS ticket there's no way to prove that the uploader and the legal owner was the same person. Nanae (talk) 12:58, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I replaced {{PD-ineligible}} with {{PD-textlogo}} and provided, as source, Sieds website which should fit better your change of license from cc-by-sa to pd-inelegible. In effect, PD ineligible could be a good alternative, because this logo is quite simple and it could not meet the threshold of originality (TOO). Anyway, I'm not much sure about TOO applicability: in it.wiki we are more restrictive and keep only logos that are registred trademarks (as non-free images and under EDP). Nanae (talk) 21:25, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
p.s.: I hid part of the original description about the author because I think OTRS is necessary for a proper attribution.

Image: Concertgebouw, Amsterdam

[edit]

Hi, I happened to fall in on the page of Concertgebouw, where your picture shows the front-facade... Personally, I think it's a shame that one can't see also the INTERIOR of the hall(s). Originally, I intended to insert another picture, under yours ... but then again - I think it would be smarter to make one split-view of it. So, I found this marvelous picture of the interior at http://www.concertcardiologie.nl (just google concertgebouw). I made this edit of your photo, with the addition of the interiors. Although - I don't want to decide over your work; If YOU want - you can upload/change this picture.

http://s27.postimg.org/tp5190l0z/Concertgebouw_2.jpg

Thanks.

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Garion96&oldid=139951370"