User talk:Frans90245

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Frans90245!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 13:12, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  /−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:BE Vesting Antwerpen.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 22:24, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Hendrik Geeraert.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−

--Krdbot 06:13, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:BE Aftocht uit Antwerpen 1914.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Whaledad (talk) 01:55, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Categorie Rijksbasisschool

[edit]

Hallo Frans, ik zag dat je de categorie Rijksbasisschool hebt aangemaakt voor de school in Nieuwpoort in België. Er zijn echter veel meer Rijksbasisscholen. Ik stel voor dat je een nieuwe categorie maakt bijvoorbeeld "Rijksbasisschool Nieuwpoort (Belgium)" en daar alles in stopt wat nu in je categorie Rijksbasisschool zit. De categorie Rijksbasisschool kan dan vallen onder "Schools in Belgium". De categorie Rijksbasisschool Nieuwpoort (Belgium) wordt dan een subcategorie van categorie Rijksbasisschool. Daar kunnen dan ook alle (toekomstige) foto's van Rijksbasisscholen in België in komen. Groet, Wouter (talk) 14:04, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wouter, Ik heb de categorieën veranderd zoals gesuggereerd --Frans90245 (talk) 18:58, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please read this note. --sasha (krassotkin) 10:51, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marcophilie huldeblijk voor Luitenant Calberg 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ww2censor (talk) 15:06, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on the Deletion request File:Marcophilie huldeblijk voor Luitenant Calberg 01.jpg

The president of the Royal Stamp Club of the Westhoek, Etienne Moons, sent me this picture (e-mail 1 november 2017). Bpost, the Belgian postal services, have no link with the sheet as such. The memorial sheet was designed by Etienne Moons, president of the Royal Stamp Club of the Westhoek. In an e-mail, dated 5 november Etienne Moons stated: “Ik heb er geen probleem mee dat je de foto's gebruikt. Ik stel ook geen voorwaarden.” (Translation: I have no problem with you using the pictures. And I do not set any conditions). Bpost put the special postmark on the sheet as a kind of authentication that the owner of the sheet was present on august, the 2nd 1987.

--Frans90245 (talk) 08:16, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marcophilie huldeblijk voor Luitenant Calberg 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ww2censor (talk) 15:07, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on the Deletion request: File:Marcophilie huldeblijk voor Luitenant Calberg 02.jpg

The president of the Royal Stamp Club of the Westhoek, Etienne Moons, sent me this picture (e-mail 1 november 2017). It is a picture of an envelope with the text “memory of Lieutenant Calberg” around a number of smaller images, and a postage stamp. The circular drawing, wthout a date, was made by Etienne Moons, president of the Royal Stamp Club of the Westhoek. On basis of that drawing Bpost made a unique postmark. The envelope was stamped on 2nd August 1987 with that special unique postmark, used only on that occasion. In an e-mail, dated 5 november Etienne Moons stated: “Ik heb er geen probleem mee dat je de foto's gebruikt. Ik stel ook geen voorwaarden.” (Translation: I have no problem with you using the pictures. And I do not set any conditions)

--Frans90245 (talk) 08:19, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We checked with BPost

From: Etienne Moons [1] 
Sent: maandag 13 november 2017 22:04 
 To: RECTOR Ilse


Cc: Frans De Smedt


Subject: Copyright probleem met wikimedia

Dag Ilse,

Een collega van mij heeft een artikel over een officier, gesneuveld te Nieuwpoort in 1917, gepubliceerd op Wikimedia. Om de tekst te illustreren wil hij gebruik maken van illustraties door mij gemaakt. Voor een tijdelijk postkantoor te Nieuwpoort op 2 augustus 1997 heb ik toen aan het Design Office (MVTM) een ontwerp van poststempel overgemaakt dat integraal werd overgenomen en als dagtekeningstempel gebruikt werd in voornoemd tijdelijk postkantoort (zie illustratie in bijlage). Tevens heb ik een geïllustreerd blad ontworpen waarop de Europazegel uitgegeven door bpost op 7 mei 1977 (IJzermonding te Nieuwpoort - zie illustratie in bijlage) aangebracht werd en met hoger vernoemde stempel ontwaard werd.

Wikimedia doet moeilijk omdat zij problemen zien in verband met het copyright. Kan de Directie Filatelie mij hier een duidelijk schriftelijk antwoord geven of deze afbeeldingen mogen gepubliceerd worden of niet. Bedankt bij voorbaat.

P.S. Ik ben actueel in revalidatiemodus na mijn hartoperatie. Ik zal dus op 17 november niet aanwezig zijn op de voorstelling van de nieuwe uitgiften 2018. Mag ik u vragen mij de uitgiftebrochure 2018 op te sturen zodat ik de nodige documentatie heb voor publicatie in mijn clubtijdschrift. Hartelijk dank.

Vriendelijke groet,

Etienne Moons 
 Cdt b.d.

Tarwestraat 15

8400 Oostende

Tel : 0497 616165 @ : [email protected] @ : [email protected]

Van: RECTOR Ilse <[email protected]>

Onderwerp: RE: Copyright probleem met wikimedia

Datum: 14 november 2017 09:07:13 CET

Aan: Etienne Moons <[email protected]>

Kopie: Frans De Smedt <[email protected]>

Goedemorgen Etienne,

Heb me net geïnformeerd.

Is ok voor ons mits onderstaande te respecteren.

Postzegels moeten in hun geheel worden gereproduceerd (met inbegrip van de tanding en alle bijhorende tekst). 
Om frauduleus gebruik van de kopie te vermijden, is het raadzaam om in zwart-wit te drukken, of om een veel kleinere of veel grotere schaal te gebruiken dan het origineel. Gelieve ook een copyright-verklaring toe te voegen ('© bpost') en ons een kopie van de uitgave te bezorgen.

Wilt u enkel het beeld op de postzegel gebruiken, dan moet u daar altijd de toestemming voor vragen aan de ontwerper of de eigenaar van de intellectuele eigendomsrechten.   Alvast veel beterschap en ik stuur je het collectieboekje op.   Fijne dag

Ilse   Ilse Rector 
Sales Account 
Philately & Stamps Printing 
 T. 32 (0) 15 285 818  F. 32 (0)2 276 51 00

GSM 32 (0) 470 99 45 48


Egide Walschaertsstraat 1b, 

2800 Mechelen
[email protected] | [email protected]    


Ik vat samen

Vraag van Etienne Moons aan BPost (e-mail 13 november 2017 om 22.05 uur aan [email protected]; in de e-mail drie files waaronder File:Marcophilie huldeblijk voor Luitenant Calberg 01.jpg en File:Marcophilie huldeblijk voor Luitenant Calberg 02.jpg

“Kan de Directie Filatelie mij hier een duidelijk schriftelijk antwoord geven of deze afbeeldingen mogen gepubliceerd worden of niet. Bedankt bij voorbaat.”

Antwoord van BPost (e-mail [email protected] 14 november 2017 09.07 uur)

“Is ok voor ons mits onderstaande te respecteren.”

Gevolgd door een uitleg die gaat over de reproductie van postzegels as such

In English, shortend

Question aked by Etienne Moons to Bpost, Belgian Post services

“Can those images be published or not”

Answer by BPost

OK with us

Follows an explanation on reproduction of poststamps as such, which is not the question we asked

--Frans90245 (talk) 19:13, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  /−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 09:05, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  /−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 11:06, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:00, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:19, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 19:57, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Copyright status: File:Het Geleed.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  /−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Het Geleed.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 14:06, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]