User talk:Dmitry G

English: Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Dmitry G!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, which produces: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|correct name}}` For more information read the full deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot 17:14, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Commons is not censored

Hi. Please note that Commons is not censored, and that you don't like something is not a valid reason for deletion. Thanks. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:36, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Using Your Circuit

Hello Dmitry G. Thought that you might like to know that I have added your cct. (circuit) "Spark_ignition.jpg" to article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignition_system

I have labelled it "Example of a basic Electronic Ignition System"

Is this correct?

It appears to be a type of CDI, Capacitor Discharge Ignition?

Is this correct?

Is this a published cct. so that I can 'verify'it?

Can you tell me a bit about it? ie.

The pre-existing text mentions thyristor switching, is VT1 a thyristor?

Looks like a (power) transitor to me. Text might have to be re-written to match cct.

Are R7 to 10 the spark plugs?
S1 is obviously the 'trigger, but is it a set of points/ Hall effect switch or 'what?

--220.101.28.25 05:14, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You can check it in Multisim if you're not sure, it is working and it was my check work at university. These system can start the engine during a cold, mechanically timed ignition do it badly in such weather conditions.Dmitry G (talk) 21:34, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Domino cookies.JPG

File:Domino cookies.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When you add author info to someone else's photo...

... do be careful to add the correct author info. At http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Box_of_squibs.jpg&diff=17297717&oldid=15851324 you attributed an image to someone who had nothing to do with it. He (or she) was not happy with this, and complained on the Village Pump. - Jmabel ! talk 23:15, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I was tired, so couldn't put my attention into details and have put incorrect data :-) Dmitry G (talk) 14:06, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Or maybe something or somebody distrcted me during editing data and I've written that delirium Dmitry G (talk) 14:09, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stockholm

Very interesting pics of Stockholm. Photojournalism or how the city is for the people. Many thanks. It was very rainy during my short visit which was mainly in Uppsala which is not a typical place. I got some apartment, street and shop pics though but missed the taxis.Best regards from Ireland Robert aka Notafly (talk) 21:32, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. But as I see, journalists make only positive or negative description of something and give very little information, but I make photos of real things as they are in real life. I remember my 1^st visit to Stockholm... it began from Arlanda airport very big 5^th terminal and about 10 minutes to search place where is the "Belt 6" to get my bags and their strange way of Arlandaexpress ticket buying. That is why I prefer to make informative material as it possible.

* What I'd seen positive: inhabitans are friendly there and absolutely nobody watch your camera, mobile phone, gold and other to thief (maybe thanks to Stockholm's police);

* What I'd seen negative: very poor information for guests from other places and very high prices for food.

Also you can see my photos from Tallinn and Narva-Jõesuu on commons if you have no enough time to visit them or have no possibility.

Best regards from Tallinn and you're welcomed, Dmitry aka Dmitry G (talk) 14:21, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ships

Thanks for adding categories to the Tallink ships. I changed the categories to bring them in line with all other ships. When you add extra categories to the images, the images show up where the categories should show up. Glad to find people who see the importance of using IMO numbers. --Stunteltje (talk) 21:19, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:EU-EE-Tallinn-Kesklinn-Old town-Kiek in de Kök 071.JPG

Hi Dmitry G,
images restricted to non-commercial use such as File:EU-EE-Tallinn-Kesklinn-Old town-Kiek in de Kök 071.JPG are not allowed on Commons. This is also in contradiction to your CC-BY-SA license. Either you remove this restriction or the image has to be deleted. --Túrelio (talk) 07:42, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Free images I realise to public domain, but these images weren't free and I've paid some money to take them, so I put to them Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license. Some people from Africa can't go to Tallinn and see it, so they can see it on wikipedia. But if they restricted to non-commercial use, you can remove that text Dmitry G (talk) 07:51, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you agree to the removal, you should do that by yourself (for legal reasons and) as you are the uploader. When you are doing that, you may at the same time remove my no-commercial-tag (I authorize you to do so). However, you should think if there are no foreign copyrights over these images. For example some artwork whose creator is not dead since >70 years. --Túrelio (talk) 07:54, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Metal halide power supply.JPG

What is the source to this schematic? As far as I know, IR2153 is designed to drive field-effect transistors, not bipolar transistors. Which type of transistors should be used? Capacitor capacity labeling mkF should internationalized to µF. Thanks! --1-1111 (talk) 07:37, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

*1) As I remember, it was copied from HMI seachlight's manual (maybe italian "Pinguino" searchlight). I decided to draw it in sPlan, as I had bad-quality camera at those time and photo of manual wasn't understandable. talk

Do you think, this was a good choice to put that much work to a not really reliable source?--1-1111 (talk) 21:29, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's not commons rules enforcement. Also, it purpose was to show way of working, but not coping that diagram for manufacturing new searchlight with the 1:1 same wiring diagram. Dmitry G (talk) 08:45, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

*2) They both have similiar way of working. If you put some low current to base or drain or gate, they will switch on main circuit. As I remember, there were bipolar transistors with big aluminium radiator. talk

R4 and R5 are dimensioned with only 25 ohms. This amount indicates field-effect transistors, which are common due to the data sheet. And even power-field-effect transistor are available since some decades. But they need higher voltages at their gates but current to reload die gate capacities only. Bipolar transistors therefore need a base current to operate. --1-1111 (talk) 21:29, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are R1, which U/R makes ~4mA (or 0.004A). R4 and R5 are consecutive to R1 only (and also to IR2153). But IR2153 have no power source inside it, current cames to IR2153 throught R1. I can't understand, why you put your attention to R4 and R5. If I need 1000Ω resistor, but have no it in store, I also can use 2x500Ω or 10x100Ω or 20x50Ω or even 10x80Ω 2x100Ω. Resistance will leave the same, but quantity of resistors will increase. Here we have 100025Ω instead of 25Ω.

Also, there is writen, that we have pulsing signal at output in your datasheet and only example diagram with field-effect transistors. Due to characteristics, field-effect transistors are most suitable to IR2153.

But as you can see, there is no writen exact nomenclature, just "VT1" and "VT2" to show, that there are transistors without more detailed explanatory. Dmitry G (talk) 08:45, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

*3) I'd tried to do it lot of times, but sPlan doesn't want to accept Greek alphabet. Instead Greek letters, it put "???" marks Dmitry G (talk) 11:53, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What about C1 and C2? A µ is shown there. --1-1111 (talk) 21:29, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you've done some edits in sPlan ver.6, you know, that it put "µ" to electrolytic capacitors as the default, but to other capacitors t put "n" as default. If you try to change "n" to "µ", there will appear "???" instead of "µ". That is why "µ" are changed to "mkF" Dmitry G (talk) 08:45, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, oh, oh... --1-1111 (talk) 14:19, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What? Some capacitors are missing in the store, I can't birth them. Also, it is voluntary project, so you can correct drawings and upload new versions of it. Dmitry G (talk) 14:25, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Second, if you offence at my action and concentrate your attention to my insignificant trifles:

a) you have created Category:Insulating screw joints, but hadn't put anything to it;
b) you spielst gern mit Spannung, but do remarks for me, that someone can touch metal parts if I do experiments with ballast alone and from safe distance;
c) you write that I sell ballasts to someone without fixture (right after experiments from the test bed);
d) you think, that Croatia has 3-phase system and rank bridge between N and PE to improper European installations courageously (this way of thinking all car inverters DC12 -> AC230 are improper and danger goods). Thanks for attention. Waiting your сonscientious attitude to the things Dmitry G (talk) 14:59, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category mistake?

Hello, In this edit you added the Category:Mercury-vapor light bulbs. But the image is used in articles about sodium lights. Are you sure you added the right category? /Ö 11:01, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I've done mistake. Thank you for putting my attention to it! Dmitry G (talk) 11:50, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Vandalismo Virgen

Hi Dmitry G. This is the link in Google Earth with the exact location of the place. Whatever, let me know. Sincerely, --Banfield - Amenazas aquí 18:18, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Dmitry G (talk) 11:23, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Action under voltage

I work with electrical engineering since 1970, but for the first time in my life I see the guy confidently catching energized wires barehand. All of my 40...50 y.o. electricians are affraid stripped wires, but this young guy quickly copes with them. I couldn't say anythyng for some minutes seeing his confident action first time.

Why I need to afraid electrcity, if I hold wire's insulated area and push stripped area to the terminal by insulated pliers?????? Dmitry G (talk) 07:20, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't been at his home :LOL: It is electrical laboratory instead of living apartment :D

And what is wrong? Energy company says clear: "After electricity meter you can do everything you want at your own risk and at your own responsibility; if your installations will damage somebody's property or take other injuries you response at the court; but if your installations for your own purposes work properly there is no reasons to make complaints to you."

As for me, it is advantage to have possibility to check 80% of designed circuits in practice. If some inspector objects me, I say him: "OK, see it on the video how does it work".

The reason why energy company spits on consumer units - is the clearless written electric code. Politicians thiefed it from North-European countries and accepted the curve translation. As the politicians don't know anything in electricity, accepted by them electric code turned out very funny. Even long-expirienced companies follows those rules at their own discretion. By the way, USA have more paranoia laws and as the result enforced everywhere (reading American's NEC, there becomes inpression that American students spend 10 years to study what is the wire and 15 years to study how to screw terminal by screwdriver).

But why it is need to suffer by politician's americanisms and limit yourself in your career? Human should improve himself where it is possible. If it is not hazard, you're welcomed. So, energy companies limit access only where are hazards (like high voltage or where is not possibility to turn electricity off immediately). As for usual tower apartment, there are more time and possibilities to react on non-staff situations, that is why energy companies close their eyes on builders or other DIYers pornography. Also, nobody can check 100000 or more homes. Only earth resistance and RCDs, sometimes circuit brekers conformity to wire gauges. All works inside apartment or house is for consumer's conscience. Dmitry G (talk) 19:14, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

He is such person :=) In 2004 I had problems with refrigerators and all specialists said me they cannot repair without circuit diagrams. But my business partner from Estonia said «oh, don't worry, I know who can do it». It had invite him to Norway for some days, but I'm glad by quality despite he was too young boy those time.

Stein, aren't this you?

Yes, I remember. I was 15 or 16 and looked for work in some company to have training. All what they suggested me in Estonia was draging bags with building materials or clean garbage after the builders. But after two week your offer to go to work in Norway fell on my head. Your partner had said me, that it is interesting work, so I thought, it is light bulb replacing or something like this; but appeared really big refrigerators with really huge AC motors. After this it became more easy to find the work and work on my timetable, entrepreneurs begin to trust me. But as my parents and grandmother told me, it was more easy to find work during USSR times, so capitalism has also negative sides. Or maybe improper laws in young democratic republic untied hands to entrepreneurs.

But if something is wrong or need to repair, just call, I always can help. Glad to read you on my talk page, thanks for message Dmitry G (talk) 20:10, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Today I really wanted to complain, that I can't work without wiring diagrams, when one of my friend asked to help him with the old Soviet elevator in tower block. When I'd come to the motor room and opened door of the motor control centre, my eyes have gone out of orbits seeing such amount of relays and contactors. I counted there approximately 150 relays and 27 contactors. I havent seen such complex circuits before.

Construction of Soviet contactors from 1960's really "killed" me: for 50 Amps dimensions like vacuum cleaner, when contactor is switching it makes noise like the blacksmith beats by sledge hammer on anvil and it weights like 70 or 80 kilograms, so I couldn't lift it alone. When we had bought modern one for 63 Amps, it weighted less than 1 kilogram and had too small dimesions (only 4 modules instead of vacuum cleaner).

It is real puzzle to work in elevator company. When I asked him about dialy work, he has said that modern elevators are coped by small microcontrollers, it was the first old elevator in his practice. Oh, my brain has really exploded after "small helping to the friend". Dmitry G (talk) 19:24, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The coolest elevators ever. Dark wooden cabin, weak 10W or 15W light bulb, broken buttons with sharp angles... Unforgettable impressions while travelling by this vechile... Push any floor button, doors are closed, the light goes off, is the noise of gun shot somewhere on the top, the light illuminates again and cabin begin to move with sound operating a circular saw. Russians knew how to make elevators.

Well, in 1960's they were constructed to servicing time 20 to 25 years. But they still servicing nowadays being 40 years old with fully worn-out equipment as nobody have money to replace them (sometimes it cost ~300000 EUR, but public services have no such money at all, especially during crisis). As I see, some foreigns from Europe like to ride them. You can also see videos with those fear rooms:

But the problems begin from imperfection of technics in 1960's till 1980's, cause relays working loudly, voltage droped from 220V to 180V in whole house during motor starting moment and nowadays vandals made their contributions. So, those vechiles still joy city's inhabitans Dmitry G (talk) 20:51, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

85.17.162.100, if you want to know statistics: 85% of estonian elevators exhausted themself and can't be recovered due to bad technical status, ~1500 were banned by inspectors due to worned out or improperly worked safety systems; >10000 of such moving coffins still operate in old tower blocks and nobody had repaired them since USSR fail due to unliftable heavy price. As result, <20 elevators fall and 5 or 6 persons getting injuries annually. Dmitry G (talk) 18:40, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Primary world level category system is by country

Hi. It should be noted that the primary world level category system is by country where all the country category trees are to be found. The reason is that many countries have territories on up to 6 continents, so a continetal category tree beteen the world and country level makes no sense. All by continent categories are parallel categories to the by country categories. --Foroa (talk) 14:56, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Some categories have salad, so it is better to separate countries to continents Dmitry G (talk) 15:00, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As you can see in Category:Categories by country (flat list), there are more than 4000 categories by country without an intermediate continent subcategory level. We are not going to change some of them nor the 150000 involved categories. we need one consistent category system. Please stop that restructuring. --Foroa (talk) 15:31, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:RCD_instructions_for_blonde_woman.JPG

File:RCD_instructions_for_blonde_woman.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Andy Dingley (talk) 22:43, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is photo and corners of the paper are clearly seen Dmitry G (talk) 13:18, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

national electrical safety boards

[7]

I am amazed at young man who put them to talk the truth (-: Best regards! 62.109.11.180 20:19, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is one more article about defective home appliences in mass-media, which was written after strong pressure to them from my side. But as I see, west-European people like, when some governmental organisation is cheating them. Guess, what always happening, when some west-European machinery company taking for use improper applince with beautiful exterior. And those safety boards as usual name any absurd reasons of accidents instead of malfunction inside home appliences. Dmitry G (talk) 07:44, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I like your work... 150.250.101.64 23:35, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you much! Dmitry G (talk) 08:36, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Electrical safety drawings

Hi- I have started redrawing the [File:How_to_help.jpg] as a vector image and wondered if there should be just one image or four or seven? It might take some time but I hope to complete the work sometime. /Gregor

Hi! Thank you for working on image! Four images combined into one.Dmitry G (talk) 09:09, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Who is the author of the photo File:Olli-Markus_Taivainen,_2009.jpg

Дмитрий, по поводу вашего ответа. Я не могу понять, что означает «Õigused: avalik Attribution». И по поводу «nobody will upload copyrighted photos into public accessibility; even if photo has some copyrights, it's uploaded with watermarks or into hidden folders», вы же понимаете, что это не может быть аргументом. Поймите правильно, мне самому хотелось бы использовать некоторые фотографии из работ Piret Ahman, но просто так загружать их под cc-by только потому, что «никто бы не стал загружать несвободные фото в публичный доступ» не выход. Рано или поздно их удалят с викисклада, как нарушающие лицензию. Самый верный способ это выйти с автором фото на контакт и попросить разрешение на использование. Процедура подробно описана на OTRS/ru.

Спасибо --Dnikitin (talk) 22:33, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Я уже как-то связывался с авторами фото подобных альбомов по поводу разрешения загружать их на википедию... И что? Мне им по часу приходится объяснять, что такое лицензия, и что, оказывается, их фото может быть использовано на основании их разрешения. Не весь народ ведь в штатах живёт, большинство "хозяев" этих фото вообще не в курсе относительно авторских прав и я потом сам себя дураком чувствую за то, что спрашивал у них разрешение на использование их фото. Dmitry G (talk) 09:14, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image File:Circuit_breaker_selectivity.JPG

	Thank you for uploading File:Circuit_breaker_selectivity.JPG! Did you know that the SVG format is often the best alternative for this type of image? Scalable Vector Graphics have a lot of advantages: they scale better, the file size is usually smaller, and they are easier to modify.
Deutsch \| English \| français \| /−

RE RILLKE Questions? 22:12, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Human_with_mobile_phone_in_his_pocket.JPG

File:Human_with_mobile_phone_in_his_pocket.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Reinhardhauke (talk) 20:19, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Farola donostia 001.JPG H

The photo was taken in Donostia-San Sebastian (Basque Country). Thank you for your interest and your work. Joxemai (talk) 07:57, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Dmitry G (talk) 11:47, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Essay like descriptions

Please don't add essay-like descriptions to file (eg this) and category pages (eg this). Your personal opinion that unfortunately is more or less biased and has unsourced statements in it, is not needed. Just tell shortly what's on the picture or what the category consists of and if longer explanaion is needed, a link to corresponding Wikipedia article should do. 88.196.241.249 07:51, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thank you for remark. But descriptions or clarifications shouldn't be interpreted as essay or personal opinion. Sometimes description should be little longer, cause some people (especially who is writing articles) may understand improperly. Guess, what I've found last year on French wikipedia? One author wrote, that Lasnamäe is the city near Tallinn, and such statement had lasted there too long time. Imagine persons from Vietnam or Brasil or some other contry, who is writing article, but knows nothing about situation here. Dmitry G (talk) 11:25, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, a description should be clear enough to be understood properly.

But unless you are citing reputable sources and not dealing with plain facts, these descriptions are essay-like. That doesn't help understanding the subject properly (in an unbiased way), rather it is vice versa. I found another extreme example. It may be fine on your user page but should be kept away from image and category pages as these are strictly connected to Wikipedia content. 88.196.241.249 11:52, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, your words are true. Usually I use short description. But some files require more longer description. I can't find any reputable sources on political topics due to strict war in mass-media and other web-sources between countries. Speaking about extreme example, I can't use any sources at all due to senseless war of histories between two countries. On some topics, persons from other countries can really know nothing cause of information lack in reputable sources.

Essay-like descriptions I'm using on my user page and galleries, where I write my opinion in a free form. Dmitry G (talk) 19:40, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:EU-EE-Tallinn-Kesklinn-Advertisment.JPG

File:EU-EE-Tallinn-Kesklinn-Advertisment.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 12:19, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RCBOs

Hi Dmitry, as you work as an electrician, sorry if a'm guessing wrong, i'm wondering how often do you install RCBOs in your area? Devices like this one. I'm asking, because RCBOs are very uncommon here in Austria - We use here mostly dedicated RCDs in the main distribution with seperated circuit breakers. Is this also true for your area in Estonia?--Wdwd (talk) 16:50, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Electrical code regulates, that all sockets (since 2008) and electrical equipment in wet rooms (since 2005 or 2006) in new installations must have protection against leakage up to 30mA. There is no limitations how you're gonna to protect - by RCBO or RCD. In America you have no choice (only GFCI and nothing other); but you can choice between RCD and RCBO in Europe. As experience showing, RCBO better going for appliences, where electricity missing is critical like refrigerators or servers. Also, RCD circuit breaker will take more place in fuse box than RCBO. You have purpose to protect against 30mA leakage, but the way is not significant.

Better to think about economical advatages between RCDs and RCBOs. RCD costs 21 EUR circuit breaker 2.25 EUR and RCBO costs 23.15 EUR:

RCD 5 circuit breakers will cost 32-33 EUR
5 RCBOs will cost 116 EUR
5 RCDs 5 circuit breakers will cost 116.25 EUR

But imagine situation, when you spend your time at job till evening but RCD has disenergized all 5 circuits while you worked, where was also refrigerator. Some hours without electricity and the food will be spoiled. Better to say, that existing of RCD and RCBO is freedom of engineering. Dmitry G (talk) 22:24, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

About Image:EEUU(GE)BreakerpanelInnards.jpg

The main cutoff is the black box to the right of the neutral busbar. Also, all the wires on the right side (odd) are black. The camera flash on the thin plastic coating gives them the white color. 76.117.247.55 06:27, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot! Yes, main switch is seen only when you strain your vision. Dmitry G (talk) 06:57, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Next time I have that panel open, I will take a better photograph that shows those things more clearly and doesn't distort colors. 76.117.247.55 03:02, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, it will be good idea. Dmitry G (talk) 21:29, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I enjoy your pages on old Soviet wiring and Estonia. 76.117.247.55 03:02, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Many people from the "west" can't understand, how it might work, cause it doesn't look like beautiful :) It is result of fast building in extremely poor economical conditions :) But what belongs to Soviet-era buildings, they have the most tough walls I've seen ever, even expensive drill bits blunting fast (imagine noise and dust during drilling hole for socket or light switch)... where is lack of "cheap fast" building - flatness of rooms, nobody of builders grinded their work. Commonly saying, high-tech construction Dmitry G (talk) 21:29, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: little mistake

Hallo Dmitry G, a little mistake by you corrected at File:Fluchtwegbeschilderung_als_Scheibenleuchte,_Inotec,_LED,_rechts.jpg by me. Just to let you know it. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 03:49, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mavrodi adv in Tallinn.JPG

File:Mavrodi adv in Tallinn.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nice fotos with LEDs

	Nice fotos with LEDs
	Hi, could we discuss your experience in LED implementation for Tallin? With respect, Alexei Sindiukov, Belarus Moromer (talk) 06:02, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for your comment!

It's only experiment of municipal government and only one LED-lamp was produced in Estonia, others have been imported from Asia. Seems, this experiment will develop to nowhere, cause the main purpose was to present money from city's budget to friends and relatives of centre party from electrical companies. Those lamps were installed in 2010 for 1 year in Pelguranna street and then must appear in all Tallinn, but nowadays we can see that city's government forgot about LED experiments 2 years later.

I don't think, that near 20-30 years there will appear something serious in Estonia, cause estonian society is taking care about other excrements, which seriously brakes any development in the country. If we can talk about serious LED implementation - it's only private mansions and commercial buildings, where owners have final purpose to use LEDs and get some advantages. But again - there is no such big economical demand for building new houses during economical crisis, especially in poor Estonia (~80% of my customers are persons, who are earning money by illegal ways; mere mortals ordering only cheap simple works). I've no global experience of LED implementation - I can only tell about small territories of private property, like buildings or gardens near mansions. Dmitry G (talk) 10:40, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Je6-13A.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Je6-13A.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Je6-13A.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

russavia (talk) 13:24, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, original file had been removed from russian wikipedia, even google doesn't keep it in cache... it's difficult to fix this problem, delete if something wrong. Dmitry G (talk) 20:09, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category titles

Following up the concerns on essay-like descriptions, I've tagged three categories created by you for discussion: [1], [2], [3]. Again, please try keeping statements reflecting your personal opinion (e.g "policy of money terror") at least off the content pages (file pages, categories) and don't fill edit summaries with random political statements like here. 88.196.241.249 17:07, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for remark! Well, the reason of protests was economical problems, such as "high taxes" an "low income", so I'd named category according to reason of this protests. Or should I name those categories: "idiots don't know what they want?" I've named as I found the most suitable name, you can rename if you see more suitable name. I really don't see problems with editing, cause you may edit here even without registration. If you want to see wikipedia without negative descriptions or negative texts in descriptions, you should press wikipedia's administrators to prohibit write any articles about politics to avoid any critics - but it will be censorship like in North Korea. You can find more than 10000 articles in wikipedia about governments of different countries in the world and of course all of them did some wrong actions, which have brought into conflict situations later. I hadn't wrote, that someone is idiot - I wrote only statement of a fact "poeple weren't satisfied by this conditions of life and protested agaist it". So please don't make cult of idolatry from artificially created stuff. Government or border between countries were created artificially by human without intrusion of nature. Dmitry G (talk) 19:29, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category titles in question are just inaccurate or misleading and that's why I suggested simpler ones. Other than that is's about the neutral point of view and that Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought, not that texts are negative. 88.196.241.249 19:58, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading? I was the first person, who had created this category, so while creating I've found this name more suitable, cause people came to protest against poor economical situation. If you want to discuss why I've found this name of category and description correct, I can say that officialy Estonia has the most beautiful data in Europe, but authorities considering only positive rates and ignoring negative. Description "money terror" is coming from this fact, that exchequer of Estonia focused a tight number of people and those people want to save their preferred positions in society. Dmitry G (talk) 13:45, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter how you justify your opinion, it's still your opinion and as said Wikipedia is not a publisher of original (and biased) thought. 88.196.241.249 16:50, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, of course 1 1=2 is my own biased opinion :) and our Earth is flat, and sun is moving above the Earth :) Or should I write "dumbs without reasons met near parliament"? Or maybe taking or uploading such photos is forbidden? I really can't find my own opinion in name of categories, only ascertaining of facts:

*a) people had come to protest (what you can see on photos)

*b) protests were aimed at economical problems (cause population can't buy expensive products from Europe having such small salaries)

I really can't find more suitable names for those categories. Also, even Estonian law doesn't ban writing any critics against politicians, who're getting quite big salaries from taxes. Soviet Union, where saying "wrong" things about country were prosecuted by the law failed 21 years ago. Today we're living in uncensored Europe and 50%...80% of wikipedia's articles contain section "critics" or whole article about criticism. Dmitry G (talk) 20:53, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't the case unless you really believe that "police outrage" in this context and "policy of money terror" are neutral expressions. By the way, at the category pages / CfD page I've tried to explain in detail why the titles are misleading or inaccurate. 88.196.241.249 21:09, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I also doupt if it's justifed to consistently move license tags away from separate section. As upload forms have been built in way that license tag is put in a separate section, this way seems to be generally preferred. Also usually it makes a page less compact if a hugh license box is placed inside a table cell and side-cell is also big but mainly empty due to that. Not that it's wrong to place license tag inside a permission cell of the table for your own images, but this cell is more likely there to hold other permission related information, e.g an OTRS tag or further details on attribution. 88.196.241.249 17:07, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For editing (20-30-50 files at once), it is more handy, than waste time for using mouse wheel. Dmitry G (talk) 19:29, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean? There barely is a difference in page height or as for usual big license boxes (other than PD-self) and not the biggest screen resolution, license tag put into a table cell clearly stretches it out more than in a separate full-width section. I see no consesnus for wide-spread changes in original layout. 88.196.241.249 08:00, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, license-box in "permission" takes less lines, than independent section. It's more easier, than scrolling page by mouse wheel. Or you're using some other browser, than me and those changes are differently seen in different browsers. Dmitry G (talk) 13:45, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:USSR current reactors from 1980's.JPG

Hi Dmitry, I'm wondering about the function of these two reactors. Is this a special typ of filter for power line communication signals like this one or a current limiting choke to the limit the short circuit current on the overhead power line like this one? The third phase don't have a coil, so it looks like for me as a filter for low frequency communication signals (signals for load managment applications, for example to switch remotly the street lights on or off). Do you have any additional information about this picture?--Wdwd (talk) 15:43, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! As I remember, those gadgets are hanging there since 1989 or 1990, but Soviet Union hadn't used the PLC. Probably, visiting some west country, Soviet developers thiefed some drawings of inventing PLC and applied it as current reactors (and live example is automatic fuses: they used technology, which appeared in European circuit breakers 10 years later). As I know, for operating high-voltage switches, our energy companies use optical cables. But of course all of today modernization is limited by coping present technologies (despite increase in tariffs is explained by capital investment), so retail companies might use them as low-frequency communication.

Why third phase is missing - I've uploaded here too much photos with technical lacks of those time production. Soviet authorities have developed industrialization much more hardly than China today (look photos of Tallinn before Soviet Union and after - few wooden buildings versus thousands of concrete boxes), so quality were controlled only at important objects and many times minimal requirements have been underestimated. Dmitry G (talk) 20:06, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Käärasoo 14, Pärnu - cable salad in fuse box.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ /−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 19:00, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, I was tired after work :) It is corrected now. Dmitry G (talk) 06:33, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

work

Hi! Where had you learned electrical engineering so good? Many people of your age can't find the job in technical disciplines.88.196.11.64 16:41, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

a) Job discussion boards (related to professional occupation) in internet.

b) Well, it is not surprise for me, that many people are sitting without work after graduating :) I'm really sorry, that I've spent 5 years of my life for studing at university. One and only benefit of graduating is piece of toilet paper with name "diploma". Level of knowledges is lower than apprentice despite of loud name "academic degree". There are spinning big money in education with zero payoff. Even unpaid Wikipedia can give much more knowledges, than expensive universities and colleges. Better to spent this time for something more useful. Dmitry G (talk) 09:30, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

But why do they bring big money for useless waste of time? Nobody protest against it, education is associated with "high status" and "successful future".88.196.11.197 09:26, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Those people have serious problems with self-image - they're feeling themself imperfect without diploma. As I remember clearly, 90% came to quasy-study cause their parents promised to present car/apartment/etc, so knowledges have the lowest importance for them.

Look to results:
- Self-education: real knowledges, real skills, all works passed real inspection
- College/university: real unemployment, nobody of employers want to talk to recent graduates

See the difference - despite university took lot of money, all of my vocational skills have been acquired at job or internet. So, it is not surprise, that Europe (don't know about other countries) is full of unemployment among 16-24 y.o. people. Dmitry G (talk) 15:29, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bad story. Why those educational programmes have accreditation? 90.190.58.191 08:19, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Those programmes are accredited by usual people (politicians), but mistakes are inherent to human. I also can do mistakes when I'm tired or nervous or have other problems.

Structurally they consist of 60% waste and 40% outdated material, so after studing you should learn outside of educational institution, which will take additional time, but the day is limited by 24 hours and human resources are also limited. I have earned neurasthenia at age 25 with such rhythm of life.

I can give you some example: I have explained Kirchhoff's_circuit_laws using few minutes, but university stretches the same material for 5 months. Of course, many useful material is not covered there, so final knowledges are very poor for employment. As result, having academic degree many young people are suffering at low-paid jobs, where education is not required. Dmitry G (talk) 11:12, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Универ дает только базовые знания, и наличие диплома никто не отменял. Остальныое уже на работе по мере карьерного роста. 195.50.206.63 09:10, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Какие нафиг базовые знания? Просто более углублённое изучение математики без осознания к чему эта математика относится... Вобщем продолжение 12 класса школы, не более того. Крайне бестолково приходить в ТТУ просто потому что по окончании выдадут диплом, а сами знания получать в google или на работе.

Я вот сейчас помню: кабель под землёй укладывать не учили, щиты собирать не учили, наконечники опрессовывать не учили, стены штробить не учили, замерять контур заземления не учили, даже грамотного составления проектов не было (так, квартира побаловаться). Просто запарили мозг кучей интегралов и на этом всё, ничего толкового так и не увидел. Dmitry G (talk) 14:00, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 0000 [UTC].
This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:51, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year[reply]

File:Siemens lethal RCD.jpg

File:Siemens lethal RCD.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 07:24, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dmitry G/gallery/Electricity/Failures

User:Dmitry G/gallery/Electricity/Failures has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 07:24, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help please

Hi ! My soviet machines are failing to work with RCD. All cables are okay. I don't want to buy modern garbage cause of short lifetime. Thank you for consultation and interesting contribution! 83.176.2.44 10:33, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Those appliences use ground wire as neutral, so you have problem cause ground wire is carrying currents of neutral wire. To treat this problem, you should replace existing power cable with 4 wires to modern power cable with 5 wires and use related power connectors with 5 pins (3 phases neutral ground). When new power cable is installed, you should shift connection to all neutrals in your machines from body to neutral wire through related busbar.

In other words, blue wire is missing in Soviet-era appliences, so relays and control lamps are using yellow-green wire as neutral, that is why RCD trips. You should separate ground from neutral and pass neutral wire through "N" terminals on RCD; ground wire should execute only protective mission.

Look one more time to your fuse box: three hot wires comes to main switch and one ground wire to big copper busbar (if you have old panel). Turn main switch off before work and connect N contact of RCD with ground busbar by blue wire of suitable gauge. RCD should be powered by brown, black, grey and blue wires (load wires); the same wires should depart from RCD to sockets or appliences. Yellow-green (ground) wire must go directly without any switching devices (permanently). If you have new panel, there should be independent N and PE busbars, so you have to add blue wire.

I hope, my my explanations helped you Dmitry G (talk) 15:19, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, helped. You are so young, but hard-headed specialist. 212.119.142.238 09:38, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I also recommend to use Soviet-build appliences with upgraded innards. Modern ones from west able to work only 5-7 years and then they fall apart. Dmitry G (talk) 12:59, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Response to message

Where is what ???? Your english is incomprehensible, I'm afraid. Anyway, If you have any questions I think you should ask the original uploader wich is en:user:Andrew Parodi.

Filament Protection

Дмитрий, наткнулся на вашу схему Filament_Protection.jpg. Схема удачная, при минимуме деталей делает то что нужно. Как я понимаю, симистор будет открываться на все больший промежуток времени и в конце зарядки С1 будет открываться на весь полупериод? Есть ли необходимость в 5Вт стабилитроне или его можно заменить на более дешевый и доступный 0.5-1Вт? Спасибо!

Там около 6 Вт нужно рассеивать, так что на стабилитронах неразумно экономить. Я думаю, в чип-дипе или ещё какой-то свалке должно быть что-то совдепское в стальном корпусе.

Принцип работы несколько другой: тиристор пропускает ток только в одну сторону - то есть срезает нижнюю часть синусоиды; ну и к тому же из-за постоянной времени зарядки конденсатора С1 нить накала лампочки получает не эффективное значение, а ток через нить накала увеличивается по нарастающей. Dmitry G (talk) 20:12, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Electric_lamps_with_emergency_exit_pictograph

Category:Electric_lamps_with_emergency_exit_pictograph has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

Bohème (talk) 12:19, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Привет

Привет, это я Максим с фотоконкурса. Мой телефон 58244441.

Координаты понял? В 9:45 пустырь на месте снесённой художественной академии напротив голой бабы на Гонсиори, там будет ждать Виталик на серой хонде. Если быть точнее, то N59.43500 E24.75855; по поводу дополнительных пассажиров ничего не говорили, но ещё 1 человека втиснуть можно, а вот третий будет уже перегрузом.

Ладно, завтра пятница 13-е, так что не проспи в субботу :)

Ну если не в ТТУ, то куда поступать? В Тарту или за границу?

С моего класса 2 дебила пошли учиться в Тарту, так они ещё умудрились и магистратуру там закончить. Боюсь, в Эстонии нет ничего стоящего, лучше за границу валить. Хотя в Германии ничуть не лучше - бюргеров учат так, что они даже схемы читать не умеют. По ходу настоящие ВУЗы остались только в России, да и то парочка, куда хрен попадёшь из-за громадного конкурса.

Special:RecentChangesLinked/Category:Language templates with no text displayed

Hi Dmitry. Please fix your uploads that appear in the maintenance category Category:Language templates with no text displayed. --Leyo 19:41, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:E27 CFL.JPG

File:E27 CFL.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Gazebo (talk) 07:43, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Visby 036.JPG

File:Visby 036.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Gazebo (talk) 07:52, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Härmatise street in Tallinn.JPG

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ /−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Härmatise street in Tallinn.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 15:21, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Problem is fixed. Dmitry G (talk) 17:27, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Sõmera street in Tallinn.JPG

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ /−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Sõmera street in Tallinn.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 14:28, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is fixed. Dmitry G (talk) 17:31, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

⧼Wikibase-terms/Dmitry G⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

Dear Dmitry G,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:2014 tram tracks replacement in Tallinn 070.JPG

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ /−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:2014 tram tracks replacement in Tallinn 070.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 11:59, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Dmitry G (talk) 16:28, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion nominations

Amongst your pictures, the following have been nominated for deletion because of copyviolation:

File:Bronze Soldier.JPG

See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Bronze Soldier of Tallinn for details.

My condolences, --Pildirüüstaja (talk) 21:45, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Helsinki 042.JPG

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ /−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Helsinki 042.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:23, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed Dmitry G (talk) 07:26, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Helsinki 011.JPG

File:Helsinki 011.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Apalsola ^{t • c} 07:31, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Väike-Õismäe pond panorama.jpg

Здравствуйте, два из ваших фотографий были предложены для сборки. В результате, мы надеемся, вам будет удобно. С уважением. François de Dijon (talk) 23:25, 15 September 2014 (UTC)(машинный перевод)[reply]

Bonjour, deux de vos photographies étaient proposées pour être assemblées. Voici le résultat, en espérant que cela vous conviendra. Cordialement.François de Dijon (talk) 23:25, 15 September 2014 (UTC) (traduction par ordinateur)[reply]

File:Väike-Õismäe pond panorama.jpg

Thank you! Dmitry G (talk) 14:24, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for help

Hello Dmitry G!!!: My name is Ivan Robaina, I am a 20 years old Cuban wikipedian (Usuario: Nayesda). I am currently working on a university project about Estonian history and politics and I´ve collaborated (mainly in translations) in several articles about Estonia on the Spanish Wikipedia. The reason why I am writing to you is because, after reading your user page I´ve got surprised about your opinions regarding politics and reality of Estonia. I think what you say contradicts everything I´ve read or heard about your country and my own vision of it. As I am deeply interested in your country I would be very glad if we could contact each other and you could help me to make clear some doubts about Estonia. Since I have very low internet connectivity and I cannot connect to Wikipedia for a long time, I would be glad if you could write directly to my email ([email protected]). Your help would be very welcomed. On the other hand, I loved the pictures you took and I would like to see more. Waiting for your answer, Ivan

Hello!

Well, it is typical CIA-controlled country like Jamaica or Panama. Today politics is aimed for 2 purposes: NATO-belt around Russia and destructive politics to European Union through pro-american president like in other Baltic states (Latvia and Lithuania). Mass-media is also stricly monitored by political organizations and any negative article or statement about Bretton-Woods monetary system will cause getting into the blacklist of KAPO. More details about mass-media in EU-countries you can read in article Udo Ulfkotte (that is why I'm writing here openly instead of email). For suppliyng policy of NATO-belt around Russia, authorities are regularly bullying population by threat from east to justify high concentration of American soldiers in Estonia and very high price for their living in Estonia. This fact is very difficult ignore cause politics of Estonia are directly or indirectly meddle in all spheres of life today.

Which is interesting in Estonia - is culture and history. As Estonia all of time was enclosed, it's strictly affected to culture: Estonian culture saved distinctive feature despite of all enemies - song festival were performed even during USSR times (noone of other USSR countries had such celebration). And of course enclosed condition formed Estonia to very quiet country: all of talked to me tourists and other guests matched Estonia with village - life here is going forward without "mad racing". You'll never see here over-active life like in China or Germany.

Economically Estonia is strictly depending on tourists and migrant employment. Official propaganda claims, that Estonia is strong IT-country with world's greatest computer industry, which of cause are making lot of laugh. Only small number of population are feeling themself economically sure in tomorrow day but politicians use bullying to save their popularity and pro-american privileges in government. Economy strictly suffered after 1991, when Germany and France rid from their rivals in former ex-USSR countries through deindustrialization (many Soviet factories were closed in Estonia after USSR fail), but official propaganda still think up "Wall Street" and "Great Britain"-style economical theories even today (~40% citizens of Estonia believe to this baloney about economicsis, even economical faculties are teaching this applesauce), which are blaming socialist past and USSR in economic troubles. Of course noone of Estonian newspapers or TV-channels says about USA national debt 17x10⁷$ or unprofitability of European households (today lot of European families, especially in Spain and Italy, spent for their life 20% more than they earn... but nobody says about this fact in news).

I think, I've explained important questions about Estonia. Dmitry G (talk) 15:25, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've forgot to mention next things:

1) During scandal with Edward Snowden, Swedish TV had broadcasted this news from morning till night; but Estonian mass-media has mentioned it only in few short articles and next week president said, that Estonian government accepts United States as leader in the world.

2) In 2014 summer State Department published information, that Russia is shoting through Ukrainian board and confirmed this information by 100px screenshots from PC-games... and Estonian politicians agreed with those proofs.

3) Estonian mass-media hadn't published any information about Udo Ulfkotte in 2014 autumn.

4) Socialists said, that NATO is important partner of Estonia... it's head Sven Mikser saturated country till explosive value by american soldiers, when got to defence ministry.

5) Estonian authorities still support Ukraine even after Leonid Roytman disclosed all past activities of current Ukrainian politians.

Believe to internet and other mass-media fewer. They print only "required" information, especially for strictly politically correct west countries. Is anybody writing, that both Europe and America are living today like USSR in 1989-1990? Is anybody worrying about oncoming downfall of European Union next year? Is anybody worrying about full economical collapse in United States during 2016? I have found this information nowhere, despite it's lack will not cancel events. Dmitry G (talk) 23:50, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dmitry, I'm not going to argue any of those interesting opinions above, but as you seem to be quite comfortable with the concept of propaganda(s), then have you also ever considered a chance that you youself might be slightly affected by the Russian propaganda? :) 193.40.10.180 14:40, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

*62% of Americans are living near poverty,

*Euro is becoming cheaper to US dollar,

*Soldiers of Donetsk found NATO guns in Ukrainian army. Better to read news about real situation from North Korea cause they are the most truthful and unbiased. Dmitry G (talk) 13:40, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Last 6 years US economy can survive only by 3-trillion debt injection, but in 31 december 2014 US managed loan only 65 billion from Belgium banks. 65 billion from 3 trillion is 2%. Converting 2% from 365 days, we'll get only 7 days. Paris shooting have happened on 7 january 2015. French investigator was killed immediately. Will you say again, that I'm slightly affected by the Russian or any other propaganda? Dmitry G (talk) 19:28, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's October today, but nothing failed in the Europe. 195.250.166.226 09:58, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thank you for your objection!

Answer is very simple: authorities from European Union and their administrators from Washington are doing everything to show that nothing had collapsed in Europe and all the problems are temporal stagnations in economy. As NATO members spend for millitary propaganda much more money than North Korea, over half of European population believe to professionally formed mainstream propaganda from Brussels cause it looks like truth for many people. Population of European Union is diverted by culture, gay weddings, migrants, wars in Middle-East, etc. - nobody put attention, that totalitarian regime of Europe is artificially creating visibility of wealth. Dmitry G (talk) 12:33, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

European economy is working good. I don't see any problems. 195.250.166.226 17:44, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Economy will always work cause people want to eat, live, etc. When Germany has closed Estonian factories in 1990's and European Union presented unrealistic requirements for new factories, many people got thier job in taxi or trade. That is why Estonian market is oversupplied by taxi companies and stores - people need to survive independently from government's dirty tricks. You can't find any serious factories in Estonia - everything is done for tourists, but population is managing to survive even in those extreme conditions cause people wish to continue their life. Dmitry G (talk) 13:58, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And why European authorities can't see their mistakes? Why are they sure in themself? 88.196.38.27 12:16, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Authorities of European countries have believed in witches and magicians during middle-ages. Scientists of Europe believed in caloric theory during XVIII century. In 1900's doctors used heroine as cough medicine. Authorities of Third Reich believed in Aryan race superiority. And of course today European Union is believeng in liberalism. Nothing has changed since middle-ages in Europe. There existed scientific communism in Soviet Union, today liberalists have created scientific liberalism in 80% of world's countries.

They are living like religious persuasion and liberalists will torture real life by their fantasies until fail if the real life doesn't match with their superstition. They wish implementation of liberal ideology by any price instead of real economical growth. Dmitry G (talk) 14:19, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tallinn trolleybuses on smartphone.JPG

File:Tallinn trolleybuses on smartphone.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

193.40.10.180 14:40, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fuses 1.0 1.6A.JPG

File:Fuses 1.0 1.6A.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

🎂CAKE🎂 12:52, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Фото 2013

Привет, вод удосужился найти и скинуть тебе фотки с конкурса фоторафий в Тарту. Скинь мне свой емайл на [email protected] я пришлю.

Отправил, лучше залей куда-то и пришли ссылку. Dmitry G (talk) 14:53, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Приветики! Я сейчас в черногорске на 10 этаже в невралгии, меня врачи накачали галоперидолами, я даже с трудом по коридору хожу :) В скорой ночью дали таблетку под язык, а в больничку велели на такси ехать; но прикол в том, что утром в дешёвых фирмах нет свободных машин :) Короче как выпишусь, свяжусь с тобой, сейчас с телефона пишу, через час ночной покой. Тебе успехов, а я буду выздоравливать. Димон.

Category:LED_light_bulbs_with_screw_for_halogen_light_bulbs

Category:LED_light_bulbs_with_screw_for_halogen_light_bulbs has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

Andy Dingley (talk) 15:19, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:2015 tram tracks replacement in Tallinn 017.JPG

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ /−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:2015 tram tracks replacement in Tallinn 017.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 08:53, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Problem is fixed, thanks! Dmitry G (talk) 11:53, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove licenses

Dmitry, this edit removed license template from the file. Please do not move or remove licenses. It is quite disruptive. --Jarekt (talk) 04:49, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also it'd be much appreciated if you constantly didn't change the default page layout by moving license template from it's own section into permission field of the information table. This makes the layout less compact by narrowing the license and introducing empty space on the left. It's fine by me if you use this layout for your own files, but please also respect the choice of other users who use the default layout. 90.191.109.9 15:23, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Просьба сфотографировать

Здравствуйте.
Я создал статью Ensto, но в ней не хватает фотографий заводов из Эстонии. Поэтому не могли бы вы, конечно если сможете, сфотографировать заводы в Таллине и в Пайде. Возможно вам попадётся продукция Ensto, или их зарядные станции, которые также можно сфотографировать и разместить в категории Ensto на викискладе.
А также, не могли бы вы сфотографировать Таллинскую фондовую биржу? Возможно на викискладе уже есть её снимки, а вот на страницах википедии ничего нет ː-(
С уважением --Донор (✉) 27 декабря 2015

Здравствуйте!

Продукцию Ensto я использую довольно редко из-за низкого качества, да и зарядники электромобилей у нас АВВ. Заводы в свободное постараюсь сфотографировать, просто автомобиль есть только у знакомых, а выпрашивать у них съездить в Пайде или Кейла ради фотографий как-то неудобно. Дешёвые такси туда наотрез оказываются ездить, а платить кучу денег дорогим таксофирмам ради фотографии не представляется разумным. По поводу биржи, она находится не в самом удобном для фотографирования месте, а доступа на крыши окружающих здания у меня нету.

Чем смогу, тем помогу, но золотых гор обещать не буду. Dmitry G (talk) 12:42, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Поздравляю с прошедшими праздниками. Дополняю просьбу о создании фотоснимков. Если получится, то сфотографируйте пожалуйста офис/завод TUGE Energia. Или их установленный ветрогенератор. Это будет хорошей иллюстрацией для статьи. Если захотите, то можете создать статью на русском. С уважением --Донор (✉) 15:54, 11 января 2017 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:BOSCH security camera in Tallinn.JPG

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ /−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:BOSCH security camera in Tallinn.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:31, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, thanks Dmitry G (talk) 10:39, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Near Bronze Soldier.JPG

File:Near Bronze Soldier.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Pildirüüstaja (talk) 11:08, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

please, dont delete {{int:license-header}}

You do destroy the work of many, many people (and their bots)

=={{int:license-header}}== is correct
|permission = {{Self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} is outdated and shall not be used anymore (not with the template)

--Anika (talk) 19:58, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seasonal categories

Hi! I wonder what's you criteria for categorizing images in "Autumn in Estonia", "Summer in Estonia" etc. I'd expect that these categories contain images that depict scenery which is explicitly characteristic to a season. E.g. there would be colourful leaves for autumn images or snow for winter images or summer activities (people at the beach, haymaking etc.) for summer images. In other words an image in such category should be a reasonably good illustration for a season article (autumn, summer etc.) Any image with green grass or trees probably isn't straightforwardly characteristic to summer. Without taking EXIF date data into account, some images like this, this and this which you have categorized as seasonal could be taken during any season. This makes the seasonal categorizing schema quite useless and it generally means disturbance whilst browsing categories. 90.191.109.9 10:57, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I like your electrical photographies. 24.161.60.195 18:07, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

I've studeid at university during Bologna system and found, that I know nothing in electrical engineering as studing progamme is not related to occupation. Studing programme consisted of such useless waste as philosophy, economy, psychology, etc. which I will use never in my life, but it took too much time for clogging the brain. I begin to understand something in electrical engineering only by researching disassembled electrical appliences and doing something by my own hands. The other lack of Bologna system is wrong organization: studing process begining from apprenticeship on bachelor's degree and finishing by theory on master's degree - this way student will forget higher mathematics and other craft subjects studied 4 years ago on bachelor's degree.

Having outlived such nightmare, I call others not to go to modern education institutions to avoid my mistake cause of 2 reasons:

*1) studing programmes are not optimized and composed according to fantasies or dreams;

*2) 90% of professors are incompetent nerds who couldn't find job in normal companies.

This way you will work some years under supervision of chief specialist after graduating like somewhere in Europe because many of studied material was not understood. Dmitry G (talk) 07:52, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^{[survey 1]} The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^{[survey 2]} The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to [email protected].

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Question about circuit schematic

Hi Dmitry, I was wondering about some details regarding to one of your photos/diagrams: File:COG LED.JPG. After disassemble one of these "LED filament lamps" (different type than your lamp) and investigate the power supply, I found in the socket a very simple circuit consist only of a bridge rectifier and series film-capacitor on AC side used as electrical impedance to limit the current. That's all, it's very simple. There is no polarized electrolytic capacitor on DC-side (as in your diagram) and no z-diode/transistor as a voltage regulator inside. My LED-lamp was rated for 230V/50Hz only, to keep the design as cheap as possible. This cheap lamp has a 100 Hz flicker, sometimes visibly and annoying. (because of the pulsed DC and no e-cap on DC-side to compensate it)

I'm asking because of curiosity: Did you disassemble your lamp to get details and reverse engineer the circuit diagram? Has this lamp some sort of flicker? (when you shake the lamp, and there is flicker, you will see the pulse on/off cycles easily)--Wdwd (talk) 12:46, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

It depends on the model or manufacturer: somebody is using voltage drop on LED chips (File:Wrong power supply for icicle lamps.JPG), somebody is limiting current throught capacitor, some manufacturers even using linear voltage regulators like in this lamp: File:HENSKE SL-G9D-200.JPG. There is missing any universal way to apply correct electrical parameters to LED chips and their designers are free to choose schematics of power supply. I will try to do autopsy with some COG filament lamps, but I have no good tool for opening their glass cover. Previous times I've cut my fingers many times by glass trying to examine their power supplies - that is why photos are missing. Dmitry G (talk) 17:29, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for your thoughts. A good method to open the bulb is a simple glass cutter to make a scar in the glass and than a soft hit on the bulb.--Wdwd (talk) 09:14, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You can see one here: File:OSRAM AB42613.JPG Dmitry G (talk) 12:33, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

One cheap (5€) flickering light bulb with capacitive power supply is found: File:KOBI FGS.JPG. This way, only cheap lamps have capacitive power supply. Dmitry G (talk) 08:29, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or [email protected]. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Dmitry G,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:41, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Image without license

File:GTV LD-PC3A60-10W.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ /−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 07:35, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is fixed. Dmitry G (talk) 20:33, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Melting_fuses

Category:Melting_fuses has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

Andy Dingley (talk) 09:46, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Don't swim with alcohol.JPG

File:Don't swim with alcohol.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Stopselliese (talk) 14:03, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

62.65.58.165 20:06, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

--62.65.58.165 13:30, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tuhala nature trail map.jpg is not my photo. Dmitry G (talk) 16:11, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Apocheir (talk) 20:34, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

light switch symbols meaning

wtf is the meaning of the symbols on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Symbols_of_light_switches.JPG ? thank you for the image btw! keep up the good work! cheers!

Symbols are explained now. Dmitry G (talk) 14:57, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Electronic_sphygmomanometers

Electronic sphygmomanometers has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

80.108.81.70 17:12, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Categorization by image details

I think it isn't a good idea categorize images by subjects that are not the main subject, notable or noteworthy subject. E.g. on this image individual cars aren't the subject, it's about the street and traffic in general. Generally, categories contain images that are reasonably good illustrations of given subject. Individual cars that are shown as small objects on the side of an image, or that are barely visible without viewing image in full resolution, or that are barely visible behind other objects, are not reasonably good illustrations of these car brands. That sort of categorization makes it harder to find useful images when browsing categories and it probably makes readers puzzled why these categories are there (as the purpose of categorization is not to play hide and seek).

You might want to check what other users have added into categories like Category:Mazda6 and its subcategories. In contrast to your categorization these are images where individual cars are centered and clearly the subject. Also, as per COM:C#Categorization tips users are expected to determine things like the main subject or the noteworthy features when categorizing. 90.191.81.65 15:00, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

File:Fuse disconnector 5x20.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ /−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 08:10, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is fixed Dmitry G (talk) 11:00, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amigo Takso in Pelguranna.JPG

File:Amigo Takso in Pelguranna.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

NWWT (talk) 06:54, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Dmitry G,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:32, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Image without license

File:North bypass designed in 1978.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ /−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 07:02, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Problem is fixed Dmitry G (talk) 07:04, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tallinn TV tower.JPG

File:Tallinn TV tower.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

WikedKentaur (talk) 13:49, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Electronic filters.JPG

File:Electronic filters.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Alan Liefting (talk) 01:47, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Dmitry G,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Dmitry G,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Dmitry G,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to some of your uploads

Hi there,

I've made some minor changes to a few of your photos of batteries. As these were either crops or brightness adjustments (i.e. not major changes if I understand the guidelines correctly), I uploaded them over the originals, which I hope was okay.

However, you're welcome to look through my upload history and revert the changes if you don't like this being done. If so, please let me know and I'll upload the brightened/cropped versions separately.

Thanks!

Ubcule (talk) 21:27, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tallinn Airport gate4.jpg

File:Tallinn Airport gate4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

JIP (talk) 13:17, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Bikeway in Kadriorg.JPG

Copyright status: File:Bikeway in Kadriorg.JPG

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ /−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bikeway in Kadriorg.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 08:05, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is fixed. Dmitry G (talk) 05:42, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

File:308TAK.JPG

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 15:07, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

File:Hotel "Olümpia" in evening.JPG

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 02:50, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:EU-EE-TLN-LAS-Laagna-15-storey living house.JPG

File:EU-EE-TLN-LAS-Laagna-15-storey living house.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:02, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

File:Church in Lasnamäe.JPG

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:25, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

File:Alcohol beverage advertisement in Tallinn.JPG

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:59, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gussev's images of Tallinn

You have made reverts like Special:Diff/629288214. I don't think that my previous edit can be considered vandalism really. I'm pretty sure I categorized given image more accurately (as street furniture). Given image on the other hand doesn't depict anything characteristic to Tallinn old town nor is the old town recognizable on given image.

As for imagess like File:Tallinn (34538484985).jpg, location is recognizable, but only hardly duo to very poor lightening, and so I don't think it's useful to caregorize this image under "Tallinn old town" either. This image rather illustrates part of the day, and hence I [[categorized it accordingly).

As, for edits by another user who piles images in Category:Tallinn, like Special:Diff/629232854, even though image is already included in several subcategories of given category – this doesn't make sense to me either. 2001:7D0:81DA:F780:1495:4D3D:EABC:BD08 14:58, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This makes sense for Wikimedia Commons. You are not alone on Wikimedia Commons. Location might be recognizable for local citizens, but Wikimedia Commons is available for people everywhere on Earth where existing internet. I recommend you to read Commons:Categories for understanding policy of categorization. Dmitry G (talk) 08:07, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly should I read in Commons:Categories? I don't think that my suggestion conflicts this page. I think that relevant bit from that page is the following: when choosing categories you should answer "what or whom does the file show? What is the main subject? What are the noteworthy features of the image?". This is up to editorial discretion and you are not alone in Wikimedia Commons either. My point is that if the subject is hardly recognizable then given image is a poor illustration of given subject, as such the category subject isn't a noteworthy feature on given image, and given image rather confuses users who look for images of the subject of this category. 2001:7D0:81DA:F780:9508:F58A:430:5E37 09:43, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have removed geographical category and replaced it with seasonal category. If the object on photo can be identified by location (e.x. Tallinn old town), it should contain this category. You can create category "Tallinn old town in morning" if you want more suitable categorizing. Dmitry G (talk) 13:13, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lasnamäe tram depot 010.JPG

Добрый день! Этот Ваш снимок с 2017 года находится в статье Таллинский трамвай, но за это время подпись под ним дважды радикально менялась: вначале это был заброшеный туннель для движения трамваев, затем заброшенный ремонтно-диспетчерский корпус и, наконец, недостроенный мост. Не могли бы Вы прояснить ситуацию? --85.249.17.11 04:42, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Здравствуйте! Точной информации нет, спросите у вносящих изменения в подпись к снимку пользователей. Dmitry G (talk) 07:15, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rävala puiestee in evening.JPG

File:Rävala puiestee in evening.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:29, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at 18 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

File:Tõnismägi antennas.JPG

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 02:21, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Currency

Currency has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

JopkeB (talk) 09:23, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:EE-TLN-LAS-Church.JPG

File:EE-TLN-LAS-Church.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Taivo (talk) 17:25, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Undeveloped_streets_in_Tallinn

Undeveloped streets in Tallinn has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

Josh (talk) 19:15, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

File:Europe-Estonia-Tallinn-Tallinn University.JPG

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:58, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:EU-EE-TLN-Kesklinn-Tallinna Polütehnikum.JPG

File:EU-EE-TLN-Kesklinn-Tallinna Polütehnikum.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:52, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vandalised advertisement of reform party in Kadriorg.JPG

File:Vandalised advertisement of reform party in Kadriorg.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:41, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 14 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at 28 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:14, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.

[2] Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

[survey 1]

[survey 2]

User talk:Dmitry G

Commons is not censored

Using Your Circuit

When you add author info to someone else's photo...

Stockholm

Ships

Category mistake?

RE:Vandalismo Virgen

Action under voltage

Primary world level category system is by country

national electrical safety boards

Electrical safety drawings

Re: Who is the author of the photo File:Olli-Markus_Taivainen,_2009.jpg

Image File:Circuit_breaker_selectivity.JPG

File:Farola donostia 001.JPG H

Essay like descriptions

RCBOs

About Image:EEUU(GE)BreakerpanelInnards.jpg

Note: little mistake

Nice fotos with LEDs

File tagging File:Je6-13A.jpg

Category titles

work

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Help please

Response to message

Filament Protection

Привет

Copyright status: File:Härmatise street in Tallinn.JPG

Copyright status: File:Sõmera street in Tallinn.JPG

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

Copyright status: File:2014 tram tracks replacement in Tallinn 070.JPG

Deletion nominations

Copyright status: File:Helsinki 042.JPG

Väike-Õismäe pond panorama.jpg

Looking for help

Фото 2013

Copyright status: File:2015 tram tracks replacement in Tallinn 017.JPG

Please do not remove licenses

Просьба сфотографировать

Copyright status: File:BOSCH security camera in Tallinn.JPG

please, dont delete {{int:license-header}}

Seasonal categories

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Question about circuit schematic

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!

Image without license

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

light switch symbols meaning

Categorization by image details

Image without license

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!

Image without license

Community Insights Survey

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Changes to some of your uploads

Copyright status: File:Bikeway in Kadriorg.JPG

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

Gussev's images of Tallinn

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

Navigation menu

Search