User talk:Cun Cun

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Cun Cun!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:53, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

lí-hó!

[edit]

lí-hó, góa sī tâi-oân lâng, 誠感謝汝兮留言,近期吾佮無佇wiki頂懸進行編輯,我會較緊轉來,為 lán tâi-oân-kok bûn-hôa kòng-hiàn châi-lêng.汝會當利用email聯絡 [email protected] Oliver515 (talk) 16:56, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!

[edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Cun Cun,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tanjung Piayu Batam.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 10:32, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cemara dan pinus

[edit]

Halo Cun Cun, mohon maaf baru merespons. Terima kasih atas bintangnya . Foto-foto Anda pun cantik-cantik, terutama di Babel. (Jadi pengin ke sana lagi ..ha ha).

Kebetulan, pekerjaan saya memungkinkan saya untuk mendapatkan foto-foto flora dan fauna di tempat-tempat yang saya kunjungi. Sebetulnya flora dan fauna itu kebanyakan bukan dari jenis yang langka, bahkan mungkin banyak ditemukan di lokasi yang menjadi tempat hidupnya, namun barangkali tidak banyak orang yang mengenalinya secara ilmiah (kecuali yang mendalami bidang itu). Jadi saya ingin sedikit berbagi lewat foto, karena sesungguhnya kekayaan flora-fauna Indonesia sangat luar biasa.

Mengenai cemara dan pinus, kedua jenis pohon itu memang secara sepintas sukar dibedakan, meskipun sebetulnya berasal dari dua kelompok tumbuhan yang jauh berbeda, yakni bila dilihat pada esensi alat-alat perkembang biakannya ("bunga" dan buah). Dulu pun saya acap tertukar, terutama bila dari kejauhan.

Untuk membedakannya, yang paling mudah agaknya, dengan melihat "daun"nya yang kecil panjang. Daun pinus biasanya dalam berkas, dua hingga lima helai terkumpul dalam satu berkas yang pangkalnya terbungkus semacam selubung dari sisik-sisik halus (mirip sapu lidi berisi 2-5 batang lidi). Helai daun ini polos licin. Pada pihak lain, "daun" cemara mirip daun pinus, tetapi beruas-ruas seperti batang tebu. "Daun" cemara ini adalah daun palsu, karena pada hakekatnya adalah ranting yang mengecil. Daun cemara yang sebenarnya pun turut mengecil, tinggal berupa rambut atau sisik kecil pada buku-buku "daun" cemara tadi. Jadi, kalau helai-helai daun itu polos licin, itulah daun pinus. Bila beruas-ruas, itu "daun" cemara. Mudah-mudahan cukup membantu . Salam dari Bogor, Wie146 (talk) 06:12, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cun Cun, salah satu kiat mengenali tumbuhan, adalah dengan memeriksa bunga, buah, atau sekurang-kurangnya daun; yakni bentuk, sifat (warna, ketebalan, ada tidaknya rambut/sisik, dst.), tata letak pada ranting, dan beberapa ciri lainnya. Walau begitu, saya pun tidak selalu --malahan kebanyakan juga miss-- dalam mengidentifikasi tumbuhan ..lol. Jadi, saya akan mulai dari yang paling mudah saja:


tanaman menjalar di pasir pantai ....

Ini memang tipikal tumbuhan pantai berpasir. Namanya katang-katang (Ipomoea pes-caprae). Umum di pantai-pantai berpasir di seluruh Indonesia, pada bagian terdepan ke arah laut.


tanaman semacam rerumputan yang tumbuh di rawa-rawa?

Sebetulnya "rumput" ini tidak begitu jelas. Tetapi melihat siluet buahnya, kemungkinan adalah lembang atau embet (Typha angustifolia L.).


pandan berduri tumbuh di rawa-rawa?

Ya, ada beberapa jenis pandan yang tumbuh di rawa, seperti misalnya rasau (Pandanus helicopus), rasau kecil (Benstonea affinis) dan banyak lagi, yang bisa dikenali dari bentuk buahnya. Tetapi saya tak bisa mengidentifikasi jenis yang ada di fotomu.


hutan ini bukankah dari golongan cemara laut, mengingat tumbuhnya di pesisir?

Mungkin iya, bila melihat bentuk tajuk dan siluet daun-daunnya, namun tidak berani memastikan. Karena foto itu dari kejauhan, saya tidak bisa memastikan tingginya. Pohon cemara laut (Casuarina equisetifolia) dewasa bisa tumbuh hingga belasan meter tingginya. Tetapi, semak sesapu padang (Baeckea frutescens) juga punya bentuk tajuk dan siluet daun yang mirip; cuma paling-paling tingginya 1-2 m. Sapu padang banyak didapati di Babel dan tumbuh di tanah-tanah miskin, termasuk pula di pantai berpasir dan di sekitar kolong/bekas tambang timah.


pohon dengan dedaunan merah merah di pesisir pantai bangka?
Nah, yang ini saya betul-betul tidak tahu. Ada banyak jenis pohon kita yang menggugurkan daun di musim tertentu. Jenis-jenis pohon tertentu (tidak semua) yang tergolong flora Asiatik, akan menggugurkan daun bila musim gugur melanda Asia. Begitu sebaliknya yang tergolong flora Australis. Pohon-pohon semacam ini akan "berhias" daun yang kemerah-merahan, sebelum pada akhirnya rontok.

Demikian pendapat saya. Untuk memastikan lebih lanjut, silakan periksa pada link nama lokal dan nama ilmiah di atas. Salam lol, Wie146 (talk) 02:04, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Selamat berburu foto lagi . Tetap semangat! Salam, Wie146 (talk) 05:29, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!

[edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Cun Cun,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:32, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

xplicit 07:05, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Earth 2019 in Indonesia

[edit]

Halo! Kompetisi Foto Wiki Cinta Alam kembali hadir. Unggah foto terbaik Anda pada tanggal 1-31 Mei 2019 ke Wikimedia Commons. Partisipasi Anda membantu kami mendokumentasikan foto bentang alam, flora, dan fauna di Indonesia.

Kunjungi Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2019 in Indonesia untuk ketentuan mengenai lomba.

Terima kasih,
Panitia Wiki Cinta Alam 2019
--20:08, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Glico Sign June 2019.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 13:33, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Biskuit Roll Kacang dan Pisang.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ƏXPLICIT 00:10, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 鹿石墳墓.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:27, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oei Hui-lan portrait painting.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wcam (talk) 12:35, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:35, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kompas Multimedia Tower.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:52, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder

[edit]

Hi Cun Cun. I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than the automatic Nominate for deletion or Nominate category for discussion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests and COM:CFD#Starting requests), you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually policy or the "By hand" portion of COM:CFD#Starting requests, normally collapsed), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 09:59, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the reminder Jeff G. ! Cun Cun (talk) 04:34, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 08:18, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You did it again in this edit: omitting the subpage and transclusion. Warning: if you do it one more time, I will be forced to report your actions, as "We cannot work here with people who are not willing to follow our procedures, in particular for deletion requests."   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 06:07, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Willy Dozan.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−


modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 16:19, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Willy Dozan Kungfu Beyond The Grave.jpg this too ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 16:24, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @Modern primat, thank you for your notification. I have got the permission from the copyright holder. I will contact COM:VRT in order to get free license. Cun Cun (talk) 16:40, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikimedia Commons. While everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the project, one or more of your file uploads had missing or false information regarding its source and copyright status. Please note that Wikimedia Commons takes copyright rules and infringement very seriously. Files may only be uploaded and included if their copyright status meets the conditions stated in our licensing policy, and if their source is clearly documented. Files that fail to meet those conditions may be deleted, and users who fail to meet them may be blocked. Please follow our first steps, if you haven't already. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the Village Pump copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you.


modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 16:20, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Udaya Halim.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 16:33, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reminder @Modern primat. I have got permission from the copyright holder for the file. I will send email to COM:VRT to resolve the license problem. Cun Cun (talk) 16:52, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
ok, i got it. stop mention me. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 16:52, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:蘇年昌 (Su Nian Chang).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:蘇年昌 (Su Nian Chang).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Kadı Message 18:34, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Alex Cheung (Lim Kim Hwat).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Alex Cheung (Lim Kim Hwat).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Kadı Message 18:34, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Chen Han Chang (Tan Tjio Han Tjiang).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Chen Han Chang (Tan Tjio Han Tjiang).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Kadı Message 18:34, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Didi Kwartanada.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Didi Kwartanada.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Kadı Message 18:35, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Fiona Yuan 袁玲.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Fiona Yuan 袁玲.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Kadı Message 18:35, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:17, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Didi Kwartanada in Jakarta, July 2023.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  /−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Didi Kwartanada in Jakarta, July 2023.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:05, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Siti Fang Fang has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 06:02, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kopi mr.brown.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Solomon203 (talk) 13:59, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]