User talk:Croberto68
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Croberto68!
Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator (find an active one) on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
BotMultichillT 05:48, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 05:48, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Minaretooo.jpg is uncategorized since 2 March 2009. BotMultichillT 05:48, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Cafarnao07.JPG is uncategorized since 11 March 2009. BotMultichillT 05:46, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- Image:GF091112.JPG was uncategorized on 7 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:25, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Falerii Novi - Mura 9.JPG was uncategorized on 5 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:52, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
File:Monastero san vincenzo bassano romano.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Túrelio (talk) 20:11, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Villa_bonelli.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Villa_bonelli.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Villa_bonelli.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Eusebius (talk) 10:53, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
File:Collatino_-_S._Maria_della_Visitazione_08.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
sугсго 09:50, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
Cathedrals
[edit]Hi. Please have a look at this, in order to improve your work with categories. This is important. Also (this second point is about details) I understand from what I read that a cathedral does not cease to be a cathedral when the bishop is gone. Therefore there shouldn't be "former cathedrals", merely "cathedrals of former dioceses". --Eusebius (talk) 11:08, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- Please stop over-categorizing. I've said it nicely. --Eusebius (talk) 13:06, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
File:Jakarta_Cathedral_Exterior1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eusebius (talk) 12:12, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
File:Labaro (Rome) - S. Alfonso M. de Liguori 08.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Túrelio (talk) 08:00, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:Labaro (Rome) - S. Alfonso M. de Liguori 13.JPG
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Labaro (Rome) - S. Alfonso M. de Liguori 13.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Labaro (Rome) - S. Alfonso M. de Liguori 13.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
You need a written permission from the original artist. Túrelio (talk) 08:02, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:Labaro (Rome) - S. Alfonso M. de Liguori 12.JPG
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Labaro (Rome) - S. Alfonso M. de Liguori 12.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Labaro (Rome) - S. Alfonso M. de Liguori 12.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Same problem. Túrelio (talk) 08:04, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
In case you hadn't read my answer, I'm copying it to here, as I have it archived from my talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 20:59, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
Purtroppo non parlo inglese (je ne parle pas l'anglais). Je ne comprend pas (Non capisco perché) cette photo et l'autre aussi (File:Labaro (Rome) - S. Alfonso M. de Liguori 13.JPG) sont menacées d'être effacées. Non capisco perché si vuole cancellare queste due foto. Qui a décidé que ces photos son des oeuvres d'arts? Con quali criteri si è deciso che sono opere d'arte coperte da copyright? Solo perché sono belle e moderne? Une photo peut violer le copyright? Una fotografia può violare il copyright? Les permissions (licenza) données sont liées aux photos, non à l'oeuvre-d'art en soi. In ogni caso è una battaglia persa, tanto le foto le cancellate comunque.--Croberto68 (talk) 11:37, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
- Hallo Croberto68,
- though I don't fully understand what you are saying, I think, you are asking why File:Labaro (Rome) - S. Alfonso M. de Liguori 12.JPG has been tagged with "no permission". This photo reproduces a station of a Via Crucis, which seems to consists in a 3-dimensional colored sculpture. This sculpture is a work of art and was likely made by another artist. If this artist is dead since >70 years, everything is fine and you can take as many photos of it as you want. But, if the artist is not dead since >70 years, he (or his heirs) still hold the copyright over this sculpture and any reproduction, including photographies. So, you should find out the artist who created this sculpture and whether he/she is still living or already dead and since when.
- Per capire questo, utilizzare il traduttore di Google o chiedere di User:Trixt, che parla italiano. (Google translation) --Túrelio 14:07, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
File:Vatican - Modern Religious Art 02.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Violates the copyright of the painter. Flickr license is bogus. --Túrelio (talk) 09:18, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
File:Antipolo - National Shrine.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Stefan4 (talk) 13:10, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
File:Farnesina.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Friedrichstrasse (talk) 19:25, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
File:Aurelio - Santa Maria Mediatrice.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
User:G.dallorto (talk) 10:03, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
Ciao CRoberto, grazie per i contributi. Ricordati però che purtroppo non è consentito caricare su WikiCommons immagini di edifici progettati da architetti (e da artisti in genere) che siano morti da meno 70 anni, a meno che il paese in cui sono preveda la clausola della "Freedom of Panorama" (FOP in gergo wikipediano). Purtroppo l'Italia NON ha la clausola del FOP. Mi spiace. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 10:03, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
- Esatto, i suoi amici architetti non conoscono la legislazione. Del resto sono architetti, non avvocati. Non solo l'immagine di un'opera architettonica è proprietà intellettuale del suo autore per tutta la vita e per 70 anni dopo la sua morte, ma addirittura i concepts dell'edificio, a parte quelli strettamente tecnici, lo sono. La stupirà sapere che anche su un quadro esiste la proprietà intellettuale del pittore, non del possessore, che non può opporsi a che l'autore utilizzi l'immagine a sua volontà (e che non può usarla a meno che ne abbia acquisito il diritto). Il possessore possiede (o abita) l'oggetto; l'autore ne possiede l'idea. Siamo arrivati all'assurdo di architetti che si sono opposti in tribunale, e con successo, a lavori di ristrutturazione iniziati dal proprietario e che alteravano il disegno dell'edificio stesso.
- Tutto è questo è effetto di una legislazione sulla cosiddetta, e inesistente, "proprietà intellettuale", che è stata estesa negli ultimi decenni allo spasimo per effetti delle lobbies interessate. Gli edifici, e tutte le opere dell'ingegno permanentemente esposte al pubblico, in base alla convenzione internazionale sul diritto d'autore, possono godere di una eccezione, che qui su WikiCommons chiamiamo "freedom of panorama" (FOP), che può essere introdotta da ogni singolo paese a sua discrezione. L'Italia, sotto la guida dell'on Berlusconi, cioè colui che ha fatto causa a Youtube per infrazione di proprietà intellettuale, ha scelto di NON applicare questa clausola, DUNQUE in Italia, a differenza che in Germania, o Usa, o Regno Unito, NON esiste la libertà di riprodurre immagini di opere dell'ingengo permanentemente esposte al pubblico, come un edificio -- o se è per questo una statua. Benvenuto nella realtà. Se la realtà non fosse questa, noi non staremmo facendo WikiCommons per sottrarre quanto più materiale possibile alla follia della "proprietà intellettuale".
- PS proponga ai suoi amici di donare a WikiComnmons il permesso di riprodurre le loro realizzazioni. Farebbe cosa utile a loro, e a noi...
- PS 2 Grazie per la segnalazione del Colosseo Quadrato. Vado subito e richiedere la cancellazione. La legge fa SCHIFO, ma fino a che non riusciamo a cambiarla, E' LA LEGGE... --User:G.dallorto (talk) 11:47, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
- PS3 La Grecia ha minacciato di causa WikiCommons perché in base a una legge che si è fata lei, solo il governo greco può riprodurre le immagini del Partenone... QUESTA legge, essendo contraria alle convenzioni internazionali firmate dalla Grecia, non è valida, ma se lei è un cittadino greco ed abita in Grecia, ebbene, lo è.
Freedom of Panorama
[edit]Qualche link per divertirti...
In inglese:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Italy
User:G.dallorto/Freedom of Panorama issues (debate on the Village pump, in English)
In italiano:
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussioni_progetto:Coordinamento/Immagini#Quesito_su_immagini_di_palazzi http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bar/2007_04_20#Problema_con_architetti_viventi http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utente:Alcuni_Wikipediani/Lettera_aperta_sulle_leggi_sul_copyright http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bar/Discussioni/Il_mondo_Open_Source_ricevuto_in_Parlamento._E_l'Open_Content? http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bar/Discussioni/Segnalazione_articolo_PI
Ciao. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 11:52, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
Tue osservazioni
[edit]No, paradossalmente la Ferrari no, perché gli oggetti industriali seguono una legge diversa: una macchina si brevetta, non si mette sotto la protezione del diritto d'autore. I guai nascono in effetti dalla pretesa delle lobbies di applicare il concetto di "proprietà intellettuale" anche ad oggetti industriali, o a un edificio, che ha avuto molto successo negli ultimo 30 anni. Per dirne una, un tempo non era permesso brevettare un farmaco (ma se ne poteva brevettare il nome, come Aspirina), oggi invece è possibile brevettare non solo il farmaco ma anche un gene, o un gruppo di cellule, o un seme, o un essere vivente. Il comune di New York ha brevettato la sua skyline, quello di Parigi l'illuminazione della Tour Eiffel, come ti dicevo, la Grecia il Partenone. E Berlusconi ha messo il copyright dello stato su tutti gli oggetti di proprietà statale, inclusi quelli ormai nel pubblico dominio, il cui sfruttamento lo stato - sotto la sua direzione - ha monopolisticamente ceduto a un editore, che è l'Electa, che è di Mondadori, che è di Silvio Berlusconi. Ops!
Noi tutti siamo su Wikipedia/Wikicommons per porre un argine a questa invadenza che fra un poco ci costringerà a pagare anche per usare il nostro nome e cognome. Il che però ci rende un bersaglio primario delle lobbies della proprietà intellettuale per farci chiudere, ragione per cui le wiki devono essere super-super-caute in questo campo.
Quanto alle foto da cancellare, non hai idea di quante ne ho dovute cancellare io di mie prima di imparare le regole. Ed ogni tanto vado a fare un giro sul "Pirellone" a togliere le immagini che nel frattempo si sono accumulate nonostante l'espresso avviso che non si possono mettere... --User:G.dallorto (talk) 11:43, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
- Perché ogni versione linguistica di Wikipedia fa capo a un diverso gruppo di responsabili, che possono decidere di correre o meno il rischio di essere denunciati, se lo vogliono, per una certa immagine (potrebbe essere un'occasione per una battaglia legale che stablisca dei principii), mentre WikiCommons fa capo alla Wikimedia Foundatione e deve rispettare maniacalmente i trattati internazionali sulla proprietà intellettuale per non fare la fine di WikiLeaks. Succede anche l'inverso: ci sono foto che sono su WikiCommons ma non possono essere su Wikipedia.it. Esempio, se il fotografo è italiano, le opere d'arte esposte nei musei statali italiani. La legge va contro i trattati internazionali, ma in Italia è pur sempre legge, e se sei un cittadino italiano non ti conviene infrangerla perché sul territorio italiano per ora è valida. In passato abbiamo fatto cancellazioni di massa di foto scattate da italiani a Firenze e Venezia, data l'aggressività delle Sovraintendenze di quelle città. Ma quelle foto sono state sostituite da immagini scattare da stranieri, dato che l'idea che l'Italia possa fare una rogatoria internazionale contro cittadini stranieri per un reato che nel loro Paese non è tale, è impensabile. Il govero ha taglito i fondi alle Sovraintendenze anche per comprare la carta da fotocopie, figuriamoci per gli avvocati per una rogatoria internazionale per UNA foto...
- Incidentalmente: in caso di causa, sei tu che hai caricato la foto a risponderne personalmente, e non la Wikimedia foundation: leggi bene l'accordo che appare quando carichi una foto. Quindi èanche nel tuo interesse che le foto controverse vengano cancellate. Ma, insisto, la soluzione c'è: convinci i tuoi amici architetti a donare il diritto di riproduzione delle loro opere a WikiCommons: quando ce ne sarà un numero sufficiente si accorgeranno tutti che NON esserci è un danno d'immagine.
- Con alcuni musei sta già succedendo così: essere su Commons è tutta pubblicità gratuita per i musei piccoli e poco noti, dato che Google adora Commons e lo mette sempre fra i primi risultati. Qualche grosso museo stonzo e stitico se ne sta finalmente accorgendo e inizia a far finta di non accorgersi degli "abusi" commessi da Commons. Una Sovraintendenza ha addirittura chiesto la cancellazione di immagini per compiacere il partito-azienda da cui dipendiamo tutti, però ne ha mandato una serie da pubblicare al loro posto... il che per me è ok.
- Insomma, a mio parere Commons non può cambiare il mondo, ma fare la differenza sì. Per questo ci collaboro... :-) --User:G.dallorto (talk) 16:39, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
- P.S. Ti consiglio questo libro. Sorprendentemente non è stato scritto da un adepto del "partito dei pirati" ma da un economista (iper)liberista... http://www.amazon.it/Contro-proprietà-intellettuale-Stephen-Kinsella/dp/8849827997/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1349800708&sr=8-1
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sun Ladder (talk) 15:25, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Della Vittoria - S. Cuore di Cristo Re 1.JPG
- File:Della Vittoria - S. Cuore di Cristo Re 3.JPG
- File:Della Vittoria - S. Cuore di Cristo Re 4.JPG
- File:Della Vittoria - S. Cuore di Cristo Re 5.JPG
- File:Della Vittoria - S. Cuore di Cristo Re 6.JPG
- File:Della Vittoria - S. Cuore di Cristo Re 7.JPG
Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 00:11, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 00:28, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
File:Roma palazzo regione.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
84.61.188.147 13:45, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
File:Don Bosco - Basilica di San Giovanni Bosco 02.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Túrelio (talk) 19:27, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
File:Don Bosco - Basilica di San Giovanni Bosco 08.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Túrelio (talk) 19:30, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
File:Don Bosco - Basilica di San Giovanni Bosco 07.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Túrelio (talk) 19:30, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Pietralata - S. Romano martire 02.JPG
- File:Pietralata - S. Romano martire 03.JPG
- File:Pietralata - S. Romano martire 04.JPG
- File:Pietralata - S. Romano martire 05.JPG
- File:Pietralata - S. Romano martire 07.JPG
- File:Pietralata - S. Romano martire 08.JPG
Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 00:48, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Q11 Portuense - S. Volto di Gesù 03.JPG
- File:Q11 Portuense - S. Volto di Gesù 05.JPG
- File:Q11 Portuense - S. Volto di Gesù 07.JPG
- File:Q11 Portuense - S. Volto di Gesù 08.JPG
- File:Q11 Portuense - S. Volto di Gesù 09.JPG
- File:Q11 Portuense - S. Volto di Gesù 15.JPG
- File:Q11 Portuense - S. Volto di Gesù 20.JPG
- File:Q11 Portuense - S. Volto di Gesù 21.JPG
- File:Q11 Portuense - S. Volto di Gesù 23.JPG
- File:Q11 Portuense - S. Volto di Gesù 25.JPG
- File:Q11 Portuense - S. Volto di Gesù 26.JPG
- File:Q11 Portuense - S. Volto di Gesù 29.JPG
- File:Q11 Portuense - S. Volto di Gesù 30.JPG
- File:Q11 Portuense - S. Volto di Gesù 31.JPG
- File:Q11 Portuense - S. Volto di Gesù 32.JPG
- File:Q11 Portuense - S. Volto di Gesù 33.JPG
- File:Q11 Portuense - S. Volto di Gesù 35.JPG
- File:Q11 Portuense - S. Volto di Gesù 40.JPG
- File:Q11 Portuense - S. Volto di Gesù 44.JPG
- File:Q11 Portuense - S. Volto di Gesù 45.JPG
- File:Q11 Portuense - S. Volto di Gesù 47.JPG
- File:Q11 Portuense - S. Volto di Gesù 50.JPG
Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 00:53, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 00:57, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Roma (Q. Monte Sacro) - S. Maria Assunta 02.JPG
- File:Roma (Q. Monte Sacro) - S. Maria Assunta 03.JPG
- File:Roma (Q. Monte Sacro) - S. Maria Assunta 04.JPG
- File:Roma (Q. Monte Sacro) - S. Maria Assunta 05.JPG
- File:Roma (Q. Monte Sacro) - S. Maria Assunta 06.JPG
- File:Roma (Q. Monte Sacro) - S. Maria Assunta 07.JPG
- File:Roma (Q. Monte Sacro) - S. Maria Assunta 08.JPG
- File:Roma (Q. Monte Sacro) - S. Maria Assunta 09.JPG
Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 01:00, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Prima Porta (Rome) - SS. Elisabetta e Zaccaria 02.JPG
- File:Prima Porta (Rome) - SS. Elisabetta e Zaccaria 03.JPG
- File:Prima Porta (Rome) - SS. Elisabetta e Zaccaria 04.JPG
- File:Prima Porta (Rome) - SS. Elisabetta e Zaccaria 05.JPG
- File:Prima Porta (Rome) - SS. Elisabetta e Zaccaria 06.JPG
- File:Prima Porta (Rome) - SS. Elisabetta e Zaccaria 07.JPG
- File:Prima Porta (Rome) - SS. Elisabetta e Zaccaria 08.JPG
- File:Prima Porta (Rome) - SS. Elisabetta e Zaccaria 09.JPG
- File:Prima Porta (Rome) - SS. Elisabetta e Zaccaria 10.JPG
- File:Prima Porta (Rome) - SS. Elisabetta e Zaccaria 11.JPG
- File:Prima Porta (Rome) - SS. Elisabetta e Zaccaria 12.JPG
- File:Prima Porta (Rome) - SS. Elisabetta e Zaccaria 13.JPG
- File:Prima Porta (Rome) - SS. Elisabetta e Zaccaria 14.JPG
- File:Prima Porta (Rome) - SS. Elisabetta e Zaccaria 15.JPG
Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 01:46, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 01:51, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Alessandrino - S. Francesco di Sales 02.JPG
- File:Alessandrino - S. Francesco di Sales 03.JPG
- File:Alessandrino - S. Francesco di Sales 04.JPG
- File:Alessandrino - S. Francesco di Sales 05.JPG
- File:Alessandrino - S. Francesco di Sales 06.JPG
- File:Alessandrino - S. Francesco di Sales 07.JPG
- File:Alessandrino - S. Francesco di Sales 08.JPG
- File:Alessandrino - S. Francesco di Sales 09.JPG
- File:Alessandrino - S. Francesco di Sales 10.JPG
- File:Alessandrino - S. Francesco di Sales 11.JPG
- File:Alessandrino - S. Francesco di Sales 12.JPG
Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 02:06, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
File:Ethiopia - Arcieparchia di Addis Abeba.jpg
[edit]Hello, can you do a new draw of this file ecause the pope has divided the arcieparchia in two, and so draw a new map for the new arcieparchia. Thanks Olivier LPB (talk) 11:40, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 21:57, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Aurelio - S. Gregorio VII 2.JPG
- File:Aurelio - S. Gregorio VII 4.JPG
- File:Aurelio - S. Gregorio VII 5.JPG
Yours sincerely, José Luiz disc 23:51, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, José Luiz disc 01:46, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Category:Tirana_Cathedral has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Glorious 93 (talk) 22:22, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, José Luiz disc 00:38, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Catedral de Ipiales.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Gunnex (talk) 07:18, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:48, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Mrcl lxmna (talk) 15:40, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Mrcl lxmna (talk) 11:01, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:57, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
File:New Daet Cathedral.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:32, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 20:42, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
File:Appio Latino - Santo Nome di Maria 3.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 07:38, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Map of Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Dhaka.png
[edit]Copyright status: File:Map of Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Dhaka.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Map of Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Dhaka.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:05, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:40, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Collatino - S. Maria della Visitazione 04.JPG
- File:Collatino - S. Maria della Visitazione 05.JPG
Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 11:55, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Torre Maura - SS. Gioacchino e Anna 02.JPG
- File:Torre Maura - SS. Gioacchino e Anna 03.JPG
- File:Torre Maura - SS. Gioacchino e Anna 04.JPG
- File:Torre Maura - SS. Gioacchino e Anna 05.JPG
- File:Torre Maura - SS. Gioacchino e Anna 06.JPG
Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 14:36, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 14:41, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Tuscolano - S. Gaspare del Bufalo 02.JPG
- File:Tuscolano - S. Gaspare del Bufalo 03.JPG
- File:Tuscolano - S. Gaspare del Bufalo 04.JPG
- File:Tuscolano - S. Gaspare del Bufalo 05.JPG
- File:Tuscolano - S. Gaspare del Bufalo 06.JPG
- File:Tuscolano - S. Gaspare del Bufalo 07.JPG
- File:Tuscolano - S. Gaspare del Bufalo 08.JPG
- File:Tuscolano - S. Gaspare del Bufalo 09.JPG
- File:Tuscolano - S. Gaspare del Bufalo 10.JPG
Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 16:46, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 02:12, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 02:15, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Pietralata - S. Atanasio 02.JPG
- File:Pietralata - S. Atanasio 03.JPG
- File:Pietralata - S. Atanasio 04.JPG
- File:Pietralata - S. Atanasio 05.JPG
- File:Pietralata - S. Atanasio 06.JPG
- File:Pietralata - S. Atanasio 07.JPG
Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 02:19, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Collatino - S. Giovanni Battista 02.JPG
- File:Collatino - S. Giovanni Battista 03.JPG
- File:Collatino - S. Giovanni Battista 04.JPG
- File:Collatino - S. Giovanni Battista 06.JPG
- File:Collatino - S. Giovanni Battista 07.JPG
Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 02:57, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
File:Collatino - S. Giovanni Battista 05.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Adamant1 (talk) 03:04, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Q12 Gianicolense - NS di Coromoto 2.JPG
- File:Q12 Gianicolense - NS di Coromoto 3.JPG
- File:Q12 Gianicolense - NS di Coromoto 4.JPG
- File:Q12 Gianicolense - NS di Coromoto 5.JPG
- File:Q12 Gianicolense - NS di Coromoto 7.JPG
Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 03:24, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 03:26, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
File:Bangued Cathedral.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 09:50, 2 November 2024 (UTC)