User talk:Clay

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Clay!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 01:42, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extracting images from pdf files

[edit]

Hi Clay,

You can extract images from pdf files with LibreOffice Draw. A right click on it > Save and it'll save it in the original format and size. The RedBurn (talk) 19:01, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alondra Nelson, OSTP Acting Director.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Corky 08:05, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alondra Nelson, OSTP Acting Director (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Corky 08:08, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Christopher-Schroeder-Justice.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ich (talk) 18:49, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

It's not usually useful to replace a category that exists with one that doesn't. Are you planning to create this category? If so, fine, please do so. If not, then this change should be reverted. - Jmabel ! talk 16:18, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am planning to create it. I have been creating these categories over the last two days and plan to continue for a few more. Clay (talk) 16:20, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


From, of, and in have different meanings

[edit]

In this edit which you describe as "updating", instead radically changes the meaning of the category and makes much of the media in the category falsely categorized. I strongly object. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:32, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Infrogmation: I disagree with of/from being functionally different on Commons because that is just not the case on Commons in my experience. I can tell you have some strong feelings about it though, so the category Category:Writers of New Orleans can continue to be the only writers category with an "of" instead of "from" in the title, if you wish. Clay (talk) 15:47, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bad categories

[edit]
Fix it, please. Wieralee (talk) 23:08, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Got them! Thanks for catching those! Clay (talk) 23:17, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) While we're on this subject, is there a good reason why you've created so many categories in haphazard fashion AND failed to properly populate them? On the former, you're removing categories from files which were relevant to the file and not the newly-created category. Also, in case you don't follow discussions in project space, there was a recent discussion confirming that single-item categories with a poor chance of expansion are not a net positive, yet here you are creating exactly that left and right. On the latter, I've already reached my limit of desiring to follow behind you and populate categories after witnessing the pace you're setting creating those categories. Once again, be aware of a recent discussion in project space. Commons uses the same software / interface as Wikidata and Wikipedia. That's where the similarities end. Commons is not bound to mimic their conventions. Looking over your contributions, I question whether you understand this.RadioKAOS (talk) 03:21, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@RadioKAOS Well, hello to you too! Since your rant goes over quite a few points, I will separate my response out a bit:
  • I don't agree that my creation of categories is haphazard. I initially created some judge categories, and recently have gone back through and created some of the red-linked categories that are most likely to be populated by other categories/files, e.g. "People of", "Politicians of", "Military people of", and "Lawyers from" categories.
  • You seem to be applying your own set of rules in place of the actual Commons guidelines, and may need to read some discussions yourself. See the (still ongoing) village pump discussion that brings up most of the same issues you have listed. In that discussion people have stressed multiple times that there is no consensus or guidelines as to these points.
  • You are correct in that I have caught myself moving some file-specific categories from a file to a category where it is inappropriate, but I like to think I have paid more attention to that recently and made better decisions on which categories stay on a file and which can be transferred to the encompassing category's level. Please give me examples if I have done this incorrectly by your standards.
  • Your desire (or not) to follow behind me is none of my concern. It sounds like you could have saved yourself some time and effort by communicating these perceived issues sooner, however.
Clay (talk) 14:19, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Doclys👨‍⚕️👩‍⚕️ 🩺💉 10:12, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Juan S. Gonzalez, NSC Senior Director.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: COM:CSD#F1, Possible copyright violation: No evidence of a free license at the claimed source.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−

MiguelAlanCS (talk) 19:52, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Juan S. Gonzalez, NSC Senior Director.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 13:34, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chester J. Culver, Farmer Mac Director.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

SecretName101 (talk) 18:04, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given

[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. Regards, Aafi (talk) 09:37, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:James C. Ho, U.S. Court of Appeals Judge.webp. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:James C. Ho, U.S. Court of Appeals Judge.webp]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

北極企鵝觀賞團 (talk) 12:15, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]