User talk:Artemis Dread

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Artemis Dread!

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  /−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  /−


Hello, Artemis Dread!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:42, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  /−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

ОБЕРЕЖНО - помилка! Центральний хрест винен бути прямим, а не нагадувати "залізний" німецький хрест (див. старовиннi гравюри, наприклад, тут "Знамёна казаков" © Russian Centre of Vexillology and Heraldry. All rights reserved last modified 8.12.2009). А ще, ця корогва має оборотну сторону, див. File:Козацька січова корогва (XVI-XVIII ст.).PNG File:Козацька січова корогва (XVI-XVIII ст.).PNG Sceptic (talk) 08:48, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Звідки данні про оборотну сторнону , чому колір хреста однаковий з кольором світил ?--Artemis Dread (talk) 07:54, 28 May 2011 (UTC) І взагалі , якщо подивитися на оригінал (збільшити прапор) , то форма хреста досить не рівна . На більшості козацьких корогв білий хрест зображается подібним чином--Artemis Dread (talk) 20:07, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

До того ж , перед тим як вносити зміни у текст зображення треба прийти до консенсусу в обговоренні--Artemis Dread (talk) 20:11, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Поскольку начатую вами дискуссию (на w:ru:Обсуждение участника:Scriber) я предложил продолжить на File talk:Козацька січова корогва (XVI-XVIII ст.).PNG), то я решил сообщить вам об этом. А также, в своем ответе вы отослали к своему изображению w:uk:File:Прапор В.З..png, по которому (как видно из обсуждения выше) ранее также были определенные разногласия. В подтверждение точки зрения вашего оппонента привожу цитату из моего ответа вам на File talk:Козацька січова корогва (XVI-XVIII ст.).PNG: "Перші флотилії козацького флоту з кінця XV століття виходили з Січі в походи Чорним морем під малинового кольору січовою корогвою, на лицьовому боці якої був зображений золотий хрест в оточенні небесних світил, а на зворотному – зображення святого Архангела Михаїла, предводителя і воєводу Небесного Воїнства і покровителя козаків під час морських походів" (см. здесь), а по поводу изображения креста — см. здесь, точно — прямой (может где-то и были "тевтонские кресты", но явно — не тут). Переношу и это обсуждение на с. File talk:Прапор В.З..png. С уважением, Scriber 21:40, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

  • Здравствуйте, Artemis. Я отыскал в сети и залил на викисклад увеличенный фрагмент гравюры послужившей основой для реконструкции прапора Сичи, в неплохом разрешении, на котором виден ряд интересных деталей, а именно: 1) Как уже писал ранее коллега Sceptic, крест является прямым; 2) Звезда имеет семь лучей, вместо шести; 3) У верхнего полумесяца есть «лицо»; 4) У солнца нет лучей. Нельзя ли в связи с этими открывшимися обстоятельствами внести соответствующие коррективы ? А также мое небольшое соображение: крест на гравюре изображен темным на светлом фоне, и учитывая, что на казацких знаменах действительно красный и белый видимо самые распространенные цвета, то в данном случае расцветка скорее реверсивная - красный крест на белом фоне (как на штандарте Хмельницкого, например). И спасибо вам, что в принципе делаете эту работу.--Иван Дулин (talk) 14:28, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Там точно должно быть "отечство" или всё-таки "отечество"? --OiL (talk) 14:06, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Прошу прощения, сейчас заменю--Artemis Dread (talk) 14:46, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Я бы не хотел отрывать русский вариант изображения от английского — оно наверняка еще будет обновляться, и я хочу, чтобы русская версия в точности отражала изменения английской. Так что если вы хотите что-то добавить, просите об этом тех, кто патрулирует английское изображение. Лично я считаю, что ГУАМ и Бенилюкс не являются евроинтеграционными организациями, а потому их обозначать не стоит. А вот Восточное партнерство, может быть, стоит. Hellerick (talk) 02:41, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Прапор УНР

[edit]

Привіт. Щодо прапора УНР, то це досить широко розповсюджена помилка, що він був жовто-блакитним, я поверну ці зміни. Зверніть, будь ласка, увагу на ось це обговорення [1]. uk:Гречило Андрій Богданович авторитетне джерело у цьому питанні, він відомий історик і геральдист, співавтор малого Державного герба. --Yakudza (talk) 16:47, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:PMR UA.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Brateevsky (talk) 08:44, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Moved discussion from w:Википедия:Сообщения об ошибках#Вооружённые силы Республики Абхазия

На фото знамени ВС РА вместо "Ҳаԥсадгьыл азы" написано Хапсадгьып азы.

Автор сообщения: Ихьыпшым Апсны 20:17, 22 июня 2015 (UTC)

File:Герб Альфи СБУ.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kwasura (talk) 07:51, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Statue of Sviatoslav in Kyiv.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

SealMan11 (talk) 15:59, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Slavic languages.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 23:35, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Slavic languages.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 21:38, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Anatoliy (talk) 19:14, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine

[edit]

Hey I believe the map is wrong, look at the bbc map. Jerryacutedoggy (talk) 16:34, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Artemis Dread https://www.bbc.com/

Regards, Fogener Haus (talk) 20:20, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The map is wrong

[edit]

Your revision of the map is totally against the facts and actual situation. Total bias. 2A01:B340:83:6FD8:4CC1:B98D:E45C:913B 21:14, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sanctions against Russia and Belarus

[edit]

Bosnia and Serbia have placed no sanctions to Russia, while Serbia has sanctioned Belarus Bosnia hasn't announced anything as far as I know. Also I have a proposal make a new colour for those countries that have sanctions only to Belarus. S.G ReDark (talk) 18:14, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]