User talk:Arofol~commonswiki

English: Welcome to the Commons, Arofol!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Image:LeopoldUllstein2.gif

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you.--Orgullomoore

I changed that. Kind Regards, Arofol.

Kommunikationsweisen

Du hast nicht etwa ein Profil bei de:GayRomeo?--Bhuck 08:54, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Kurz nach Einrichtung von gayromeo, gayroyal, gaydar, gaychat hab ich dort mal was eingerichtet. Benutz ich leider nicht mehr. Reallive ist spannender. Internetgefühle sind immer irgendwie aus einer Konserve, deren Verfallsdatum überschritten ist. Arofol 09:02, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Die Entfernung von Berlin nach Mainz kann virtuell schneller überbrückt werden als im Real Life.--Bhuck 12:56, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Mit einem erkläglichen Prozentsatz der Lichtgeschwindigkeit. Aber in diesen elektrisch-optischen Kanälen geht mir zu viel reizvolles verloren. Meine fünf Sinne werden nur zu einem erkläglichen Prozentsatz adressiert durch diese IP4-Pakete. Das ist mir zu wenig. Arofol 19:18, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Arofol~commonswiki!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

--EugeneZelenko 15:01, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

The name of the text generating template, which you put into my discussion page, sound please link image. There are some links to this image. But you are right, I will search for some categories. Greetings from Berlin, Arofol 22:27, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Kleine Anmerkung

Zunächst einmal herzlich willkommen in Wikimedia Commons. Um zu vermeiden, dass du Commons als Asyl der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia betrachtest und somit um Frustration zu vermeiden möchte ich dir unseren Projektrahmen sehr nahelegen. Übrigens gibt es für die von dir hochgeladenen Bilder [1] geeignete Werkzeuge zum Finden der geeigneten Kategorie (einfach den Link anklicken und dort schauen). Kategorisierung ist wichtig, sonst findet keiner die Bilder mehr. Zum Thema "Kryyptonazis" und "Freizeitdiktatoren": Ich finde weder HardDisk noch du haben sich in der Sache irgendwie mit Ruhm bekleckert. Die Krryptonazis kommen mir allerdings verdächtig bekannt vor (wir "kennen" uns oder?). Lass es einfach bleiben dich hier über de.wikipedia auszulassen (es wird kein Mensch davon wachgerüttelt werden) und konzentriere dich z.B. auf Fotos aus deinem Interessensgebiet und eine Menge unnötiger Frustration kann vermieden werden. Viele Grüße, Arnomane 10:32, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Ich mache genau das, was ich für richtig halte und du wirst es nicht schaffen, dass ich meine Meinung für micht behalte. Und ich halte die deutsche Wikipedia in signifikanten Anteilen für eine Veranstaltung von 10t-Klässlern, unter die sich Krryptonazis gemischt haben. Deine Verdächtigungen kannst du zu Gedanken weiterentwicklen. Arofol 22:07, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Pass auf mir ist es gleich was in Wikipedia war. Aber hier in Commons sind wir mit den unbegrenzten Benutzersperen weit diktatorischer (nix Abstimmung). Das nur als kleine allgemeine Warnung, da du den freundlichen Rat nicht annimmst. Arnomane 00:39, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Wenn dein Rat beinhaltet, meine Meinung für mich zu behalten, kannst du deine Meinung für dich behalten. Ansonsten kann ich nichts entdecken, was einem Ratschlag nahe kommt. Meine Meinung. Solltest du deine Drohung wahr machen und meine Benutzerkennung sperren, werde ich mich zu wehren wissen. Auf meiner Benutzerseite hast du nicht zu editieren. Zu meinen, ein offenes und freies System mit diktatorischen Maßnahmen berrschen zu können, zeigt m.E. nur, wes Geistes Kind man ist. Man kann zwar alle Leute einige Zeit zum Narren halten und auch einige Leute allezeit; aber alle Leute allezeit zum Narren halten kann man nicht. Geklaut bei Abraham Lincoln. Sperrern werde ich ihren Ruf klauen. Und mein Ruf geht weit über Wikipedia hinaus. Arofol 18:25, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

FYI: Ich habe deine Benutzerseite schreibgeschützt bis der Affenzirkus aufhört. Ich könnte dich problemlos mit den Gründen aus de.wp sperren aber ich tu's nicht. Und ich habe als Administrator sehr wohl auf deinen Benutzerseiten zu editieren, wenn sie eklatant gegen unsere Projektziele verstoßen und gezielt Unfrieden stiften. Es ist mir vollkommen gleich ob das Zensur ist. Wenn du was grundlegend zu kritisieren hast dazu gibt es kostenlose werbefreie Blogserver, wie bspw. Wordpress.com. Wir führen hier keine Sinnlosdebatten um "Hausrecht" auf Benutzerseiten (sowas gibt es hier einfach nicht). Arnomane 21:33, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Dass du mich problemlos sperren kannst, ist mir bewußt, beindruckt mich aber nicht. Ich halte mich an die Projektziele und sehe nicht, wo ich gegen sie verstoße. Unfrieden stiften jene, die ungestraft andere mobben (z.B. ist das Mobbing und die Vandale gegen Hans Bug und seine Beiträge in der deutschen Wikipedia eine Kulturschande). Sehr wohl verstoßen jene gegen die Projektziele - und darüber hinaus gegen die Idee einer Enzyklopädie - die nicht diskutieren (sondern Diskussionen sogar als Sinnlosdebatten verhöhnen), Demokratie (besonders in der deutschen und holländischen WP, weniger in der französischen und englischen) verächtlich machen, ihre Macht mißbrauchen, Benutzer beleidigen und andere Meinungen zensieren. Solche Freizeitdiktatoren haben mit Enzyklopädie ungefähr so viel zu tun, wie Esel mit dem Transrapid. Ich betrachte deine Manipulation an meiner Benutzerseite sowie die Seitensperrung als Vandalismus. Zur Erstellung einer Enzyklopädie gehöhrt ein freier Diskurs (Meinungsäusserung) und eine unverbogene Öffentlichkeit. Du wirst mich nicht hindern, diese herzustellen. Arofol 10:29, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

User_talk:Essjay#:Image:Voltaire.27s_deathmask.jpg

Image has been restored, but note you can't cite other Wikimedia projects as sources for "PD-old" stuff and unless a proper source is provided, it will be deleted again. regards, pfctdayelise (translate?) 05:49, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Why will it be deleted again? Isn't it obvious that no one could claim copyright of this deathmask of a man who died more then 200 years ago? Arofol 16:38, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

There is a difference between the obviously public domain 3D work (the deathmask) and a 2D photo of it. The photo can nontheless be copyrighted. So if you can't proof that this image is PD itself (exact source, death of photographer etc.) we have to delete it as copyvio. Please read Commons:Licensing for details. Arnomane 10:30, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Adressbuch-Berlin-1937-Eintrag-Familien-Manes.gif

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you.--Orgullomoore 19:43, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

I resolved that. Arofol 20:33, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Copyright German Registration Office Data

Thanks for uploading Image:Adressbuch-Berlin-1937-Eintrag-Familien-Manes.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 05:23, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

The content was created by the Einwohnermeldeamt Berlin. As far as I know - I'm not a lawyer - , this content is public domain, as you could see in Commons:Licensing#official_works. Arofol 22:38, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Ich sehe es als ziemlich problematisch an, diese Seiten hochzuladen. Ist denn überhaupt bekannt, ob das ein privates oder staatliches Telefonunternehmen war? Gruß --Philipendula 09:48, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Es war gar kein Telefonunternehmen, sondern das Berliner Einwohnermeldeamt. Dass die Post zum damaligen Zeitpunkt selbst eine staatliche Behörde war, hat mit dem Adressbuch nichts zu tun. Auch habe ich keine Seite hochgeladen, sondern einen kurzen Ausschnitt (weniger als die Hälfte einer Spalte ohne Ränder) zitiert. Arofol 14:32, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

IMHO: This book is not part of an official "Gesetz", "Erlass" or "Verordnung". Thafor the "official work" exception cannot apply. So please take the time and look for german court decissions about such database works like phone books and adress books. Any results will help us in future with similar cases. As it is now it is simply unknown if it is PD or not and images with unknown license status have to be deleted. It is not the duty of an admin looking for sources of PD claims (although in this case it is likely) in its the duty of the uploader. Arnomane 10:30, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

I have done that. At that time (1937) the official adress data of all inhabitants of Berlin was published on the behalf of the city of Berlin. Till today you could this common data which is published in internet by the ZLB (library of the city of Berlin). The Berliner Einwohnermeldeamt (the town registration of address office) which collected and administered the data in 1937 is evidently established by law. The internet-site, powered by ZLB, which is today publishing the data, only requests, that citations must have a tag saying published by use of official sources. Der publishing company in 1937, was the nazi-company Franz-Eher-Verlag, which was interdicted by Kontrollratsgesetz Nr. 2 by the 29th of october 1945 as part of the nazip-party NSDAP. The copy- and other rights were inherited to and are today owned by the Freistaat Bayern which is part of german state. In my eyes - I'm not a lawyer - there are only public institutions which could claim copyright. The onliest remaining legwork of the publishing company in my color taged image could be seen in the work of textprocessing and printing in a font called fraktur. I don't think, that this work could claim the necessity Schöpfungshöhe which ist imperative, if someone claims Urheberrechte (copyright) in german law. On the other side this image could be seen a citation. For all this reasons I would think, that there is neither a copyright-claimer, a law grounding such claims nor there is a way preventing citations, in the case, a copyright is held. But I'm not a lawyer an so I will try to find other informations about this case. Arofol 14:32, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

BTW @Arnomane I would prefer if you stop asking for help and speaking for the WP-projects, as long as [you don't stop to devastate] and protecting krryptonazis vandalising of my userpages User:Arofol/Links and User:Arofol.

I don't need to accept being called a "krryptonazi". My patience with you is over. Good bye. You have been blocked permantently. Arnomane 16:53, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

P.S.: If you are honestly interested in a substantial improvement of your behaviour towards others you can write anonymously on my talk page and we will see (I don't demand an apology, I am just interested in good will). Arnomane 16:58, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

You are devastating my user page and you are protecting krryptonazis against my critics and don't demand an apology? How about your apology? In future I will call you a Freizeitdiktator aswell. Arofol2 13:59, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Opinion of Historiograf

Wie siehst Du das? Arofolo 17:23, 3. Jul 2006 (CEST)

Die Daten sind eindeutig gemeinfrei. Ein altes Telefonbuch ist urheberrechtlich nicht geschuetzt und einen Auszug duerfte man ohne weiteres auch einem neuen entnehmen, da nicht die Daten, sondern die Datenbank geschuetzt ist. Gruesse aus Marbella --Historiograf de:Wikipedia:Bibliotheksrecherche 19:47, 3. Jul 2006 (CEST)

Vancancy Dictator Arnomane

devastated my user page and is protecting german krryptonazis against my critics. Now he ist blockading my account (Freizeitdiktator) and askes for apology for his devastatings. Should I write a newsgroup article against him? Arofol 09:12, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

It gets boring with your sock puppets. I did show a lot of patience with you especially given the fact that you were blocked many times because of heavy POV, threats and edit wars in de.wikipedia. Please see your talk page User talk:Arofol how to get your old account unblocked. I did write there quite in detail that I don't demand much from you in order to get it unblocked. So please stop creating silly sock puppets of you and try to solve the issue in a positive manner as I suggested to you manytimes (in German and English). Arnomane 09:21, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

You are requesting a Kowwtow. But I do not give respect to people who support the mobbers and the mobbing against Hans Bug in the german wikipedia (in fact this mobbing is nazism which respect to godwins law and a Hanswurstiade with respect to Hannah Arendt), abuseres of their privileges, who are unable to argue and people like you, who are going the easy way. Arofol 09:37, 5 July 2006 (UTC) BTW: it is a cooked lie, that I was blocked because of heavy POV.

• Calling people (krrypto)nazis invalidates your argument and is a reason for blocking
• Threats against other users are a reason for blocking
• registering under a new name after being blocked is a reason for an indefinite block on the new account.

Have a nice day -- Duesentrieb^(?!) 09:36, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

I will no cooperate with people who are marching in and suggest trustfully cooperation. I will tret them into the Hintern. KowwtowRefuser 09:40, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

And I'm very good in that. RssFeeder 09:49, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

I will support you. The violence against Hans Bug in the german wikipedia is a scandal, which is impairing the whole WP-project.

EarlyBird 09:56, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

∑	User Arnomane is abusing his privileges.

New idle threads and an answer to that

Maybe you just have noticed it. With every day more people revert and block you after very short time. So you definitely will not reach your aim if you go further along that way regardless how right or wrong you are with your initial problem.

I have seen your history comment regarding contacting you in private via email but honestly such a short hint is by far not enough and as it is now every communication with you will be done in public (a private email statement that you maybe decline from your actions is not worth the time).

You know what what you are supposed to do and what not. I don't need to repeat myself once again. Maybe you have noticed that I didn't block one of your sock puppets because it had only a useful edit so I can and do differentiate. So you can write some civil answer here that clearly states that you decline from your actions either with that account or as IP. I do not accept any answer that states a sentences like "but Arnomane...". Every further sock puppet of you will be blocked ASAP.

If you decide to proceed with your action I can promise you that it will have some (legal) implications on your real life. This is no joke. Thanks for your understanding. Arnomane 12:49, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

As long as you devastate my discussion page and as long as you are blocading my user page, I will not stop to say loud and clear about this factum. I will do this according to german and american law. It will harm your reputation and as long as you don't stop to violate wikiquette rules: you have to bear the consequences. You behaviour is harming the WP project. I am prepared to give evidence of your dissemination of documented untruth about me, which could be subject of a lawsuit according to german law. I am prepared to give evidence of beeing subject of nazi devastatings of my WP participations. And I accuse you publically to protect such devastatings. And I do not use methodes like yours as I try to read and hear - and not to hide - the other side: audiatur et altera pars. Novelscale 14:14, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Arofol. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Arofol~commonswiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

19:53, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

01:54, 21 April 2015 (UTC)