User talk:ArnoLagrange
Hello Arno, I made a similar picture as you did. Regards, Elly 18:28, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
change of tags
[edit]I'm very sorry for this. I put the template publication ufficielle at the biginning, but on Commons Chat, an expert user of french laws, saw me that this image isn't necessary PD and I changed the license. For this I put copyvio, but, after this, this user (sorry I can't remember who is) saw that he send a mail to french govern and he is expecting the answer. For this, he saw me to leave the template Publication Ufficielle (for find thoose images in the case to must be delected for copyviol). I hope that my english was clear, but I speak a little english, and if I wasn't very clear, ask me further. :-) --RED DEVIL 666 08:40, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
sorry Arno, I can't know very vell your sentence. You use this image for Esperanto article? If is this, is right. The image isn't deleted and if is on commons, you can use it how you want. --RED DEVIL 666 14:03, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
sorry, but your italian is more esperanto than italian :-). However, we can speak in english. But my english isn't good too. --RED DEVIL 666 14:49, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Shahnameh3-5.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Shahnameh3-5.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 15:08, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
- OK avec le changement en PD-Art. Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 20:18, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:47, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
"Maldika intesto"
[edit]Kara Arno,
en la komuneja dosiero File:Digestive system diagram eo.svg vi faris la etan tajperaron skribi "mladika intesto". Ĉu vi volus laŭokaze mem korekteti tion?
Sincere, ThomasPusch (talk) 10:41, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Esperanto-,moneroj
[edit]Saluton, Arno. Mi vidis vian bildon pri esperanto-moneroj. Cxu vi hazarde scias, kie aux kiel mi povus akiri ilin?
Dankon!
Carrero
File:Tibor_Sekelj.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ö 10:14, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Saluton.
Estas problemo kun la dosiero Ses logo.gif: ĝi havas liberigan ŝablonon, sed la priskribo diras, ke la bildo ne estas libera, sed uzeblas nur en Vikipedio por enciklopediaj celoj.
Ĉu ĝi estas mallibera, aŭ ĉu eble temas nur pri mallibereco de la registrita emblemo (®) sed ne kopi-rajtoj?
Dankon.
--AVRS (talk) 13:13, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- Mi fakte estas reprezentanto de Svisa Esperanto-Societo kaj alshutis la emblemon al la Esperanto-vikipedio kun licenco-klarigo, ke ghi povas esti uzata por enciklopediaj celoj en vikipedio (fair-use). Iu nun sxovis gxin al commons kaj aldonis licencon, por libera commons, kiun mi fakte ne aldonis. - Mi nun ne scias, kiu-speca licenco ekzakte tauxgas, eble vi povas helpi min: Nome kiu licenco tauxgas. Kiel kunprezidanto de SES mi fakte jure reprezentas la kopirajtoposedanton, do povas mem decidi pri la konvena lincenco. La intenco estas, ke la emblemo povas esti uzata sen modifo libere cxiam indikante, ke temas pri la emblemo de SES kaj neniel sxajnigante, ke oni nun reprezentas SES-n uzante la emblemon - do en la senco de justa uzo, ekzemple se iu volas raporti au informi pri SES.DidiWeidmann (talk) 20:42, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
- Mi preksaŭ nenion scias pri emblemoj, do povas nur prezenti ekzemplojn…
- Unuflanke, Wikimedia mem ne jam volas publikigi siajn emblemojn sub libera permesilo (jen estas laŭvica ĉiukelkmonata diskuto, serĉu „The rational has been, in part“: Commons_talk:Licensing#Wikimedia_Chapter_Copyrights).
- Laŭ tiu mesaĝo, oni maldevas fari tion se oni volas posedi la varomarkon. Tiaj emblemoj ne taŭgas por Komunejo, krom se temas pri Wikimedia mem.
- Unuflanke, Wikimedia mem ne jam volas publikigi siajn emblemojn sub libera permesilo (jen estas laŭvica ĉiukelkmonata diskuto, serĉu „The rational has been, in part“: Commons_talk:Licensing#Wikimedia_Chapter_Copyrights).
- Aliflanke, multaj organizaĵoj posedas emblemojn, kiuj estas pro iu aŭ alia kialo kopirajte liberaj. Ekzemple,
- kelkaj mem publikigis ilin laŭ libera permesilo, lasante ŝanĝadon ktp laŭ la kopirajtaj leĝoj, sed nenion laŭ la varmarkaj:
- la germana KDE e.V. posedas varmarkon pri la emblemoj de KDE („K“ kun dentrado en Category:KDE icons), sed kopirajte la bildoj estas sub la permesilo GNU LGPL (malforte kopilefta [kopilasa?]).[1]
- The Apache Software Foundation kopirajte permesas uzi sian emblemon laŭ sia libera permesilo, sed varmarke ĝi restas mallibera.[2]
- Canonical havas plurajn emblemojn por siaj Ubuntu ka, almenaŭ iuj versioj el kiuj estas sub la permesilo Creative Commons BY-SA 2.5. Ili tamen havas malnetan dokumenton pri varmarkoj, laŭ kiu la emblemoj ne estas liberaj.[3] Troveblas aliaj versioj de la emblemo de Ubuntu, kiuj probable tute ne estas liberaj, sed ili aspektas simile al la libera.
- multaj emblemoj estas aŭ tro simplaj por kopirajto, aŭ ne plu protektataj kopirajte pro malnoveco ks. Vidu ekz-e Category:Company logos.
- kelkaj mem publikigis ilin laŭ libera permesilo, lasante ŝanĝadon ktp laŭ la kopirajtaj leĝoj, sed nenion laŭ la varmarkaj:
- Aliflanke, multaj organizaĵoj posedas emblemojn, kiuj estas pro iu aŭ alia kialo kopirajte liberaj. Ekzemple,
- Tiaj emblemoj, kopirajte liberaj kvankam varmarke neliberaj, estas akceptataj al la Komunejo, kvankam ilia taŭgeco por ĝi estas iomete pridisputata.
- Software in the Public Interest, Inc. uzas por Debian plurajn emblemojn kun diversaj permesiloj[4]:
- „Debian Open Use logo“ uzeblas laŭ libera kopirajta permesilo por ĉia ajn celo.
- Ĝia variaĵo kun la vorto „Debian“ uzeblas, originale aŭ modifite, por paroli pri Debiano sed ne ŝajnigi ĝian aprobon.
- Oficiala emblemo estas mallibera kaj uzeblas nur sub certaj kondiĉoj, kaj SPI rajtas malpermesi iun uzon.
- --AVRS (talk) 19:20, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
- Software in the Public Interest, Inc. uzas por Debian plurajn emblemojn kun diversaj permesiloj[4]:
File:Kidal.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Captain-tucker (talk) 18:51, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
File:Djemal Belava Cultures Méditerranéennes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Hektor (talk) 09:16, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Please help replace this outdated license
[edit]Hello!
Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.
The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.
Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.
The images we would like you to check are:
BotMultichillT 20:12, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Uncyclopedia logo.png
[edit]Image:Uncyclopedia logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
-- 山吹色の御菓子 (talk) 04:33, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
- Image:VectorNavigation-eo.png was uncategorized on 14 June 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Vector flanka strio.png was uncategorized on 1 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:38, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- Image:VectorEditorBasic-eo.png was uncategorized on 1 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:38, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Abbaye Fontfroide AL 22.jpg was uncategorized on 5 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:59, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Durbans Genevrier cade tri-centenaire.jpg was uncategorized on 5 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:59, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Ornaisons Pont des Etats du Languedoc AL 11.jpg was uncategorized on 21 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:06, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Puèglaurenç AL 15.jpg was uncategorized on 26 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:15, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Puèglaurenç AL 34.jpg was uncategorized on 26 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:15, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
Files you uploaded may be deleted
[edit]The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have not sent the permission, please send it to "permissions-commonswikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. If you have, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard, quoting the file name, so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 05:18, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
SVG file "fixes" causing problems
[edit]Dude, if the method you're using to try to fix things is very obviously producing clearly incorrect results, then THAT'S THE TIME TO STOP USING THAT PARTICULAR METHOD! You couldn't have seen generated images such as those in the image at right and not have known in some way that there were significant problems. Looking at the file history of File:Tinizong-Rona wappen.svg, User:Jahobr realized that his attempted fix wasn't fully successful, and followed the principle of "first do no harm", something which it would be nice if you were to also keep in mind.... AnonMoos (talk) 21:58, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but you didn't actually succeed in fixing one single Fig2Svg file. In every single one of your uploads there were elements missing (such as the bells in File:Savognin wappen.svg, one of the candles in File:Tinizong-Rona wappen.svg etc. etc. So all of your work had to be redone from scratch. Furthermore, even if you didn't notice such cases, when your uploads were producing obviously bogus and nonsensical results (as with the three files shown in the GIF image), then that was clearly the time to scale back and reassess -- instead of just going full-speed ahead gung-ho to mess up yet further files. There's no great secret to fixing these files -- User:Ilmari Karonen managed to fix File:Molinis wappen.svg correctly, and User:Perhelion posted the most essential part to Commons:Village_pump#two_recent_svg_issues._Cache_problems.3F_New_malicious_files_filter.3F . However, they CANNOT BE FIXED BY OPENING THEM IN INKSCAPE AND RESAVING THEM THERE, so it's time for you to stop doing that, then. AnonMoos (talk) 14:08, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
- I'm sorry if you feel excessively scolded, but this is really not about technical expertise or lack of technical expertise, it's about you choosing to ignore some very clear warning signs that your uploads were not doing any good... AnonMoos (talk) 20:15, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it,if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 17:20, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
- Please delete the file. --Arno Lagrange ✉ 21:19, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Dankon
[edit]pro via helpo envikiigi la norvegan mapon --209.16.182.132 00:15, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
File:Tibor Sekelj Kumewawa Iben il-Gungla.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
— Cheers, JackLee –talk– 10:26, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
File:Tibor Sekelj Kumeŭaŭa eo.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
— Cheers, JackLee –talk– 10:28, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
File:Tibor Sekelj Oluja na Aloncagui.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
— Cheers, JackLee –talk– 10:29, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
File:Tibor Sekelj Tempesta sobre el Aconcagua.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
— Cheers, JackLee –talk– 10:34, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
- I'm afraid you haven't provided sufficient information to show that you own the copyright in the illustrations on the book covers, or that you are authorized by the copyright holder to license the illustrations under the free licences indicated. If you are the copyright holder or are authorized by the copyright holder, please see "Commons:OTRS" for the procedure you need to follow. If you have any queries, do post a message here or at "Commons:Village pump/Copyright". — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 10:36, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Château de Lafage
[edit]Bonjour Arno,
J'ai vu passer ta photo de la tour de Lafage dans ma liste de suivi sur la Wikipédia francophone. Je voulais t'indiquer que pour que les catégories Wiki Loves Monuments (etc.) apparaissent tu peux utiliser ce modèle :
{{Wiki Loves Monuments 2011|fr}}{{Mérimée|type=classé|PA00102709}}
.
Comme tu le vois, ça permet également de faire un lien avec la base Mérimée des monuments historiques. Ça n'a rien d'obligatoire, que je sache, mais bon si ça peut t'être utile… Bonne continuation, cordialement, --Wikinade (talk) 14:22, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 00:21, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Tibor Sekelj, Leon Maurice Anoma Kanie, Lugano, 1987 .png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Tibor Sekelj, Leon Maurice Anoma Kanie, Lugano, 1987 .png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Martin H. (talk) 17:47, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Tibor Sekelj sur la supro de la monto Kosciuszko, 1970.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Tibor Sekelj sur la supro de la monto Kosciuszko, 1970.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Martin H. (talk) 17:49, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Tibor kaj Maria Sekelj ĉe la Wajuru-oj en Guapore, Brazilo,1950.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Tibor kaj Maria Sekelj ĉe la Wajuru-oj en Guapore, Brazilo,1950.png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Martin H. (talk) 17:49, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Fondasambleo de Esperanto-Grupo en Katmanduo, 1957.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Fondasambleo de Esperanto-Grupo en Katmanduo, 1957.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Martin H. (talk) 17:49, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Tibor Sekelj Tombo Subotica 1988.png
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Tibor Sekelj Tombo Subotica 1988.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Tibor Sekelj Tombo Subotica 1988.png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Martin H. (talk) 17:49, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Tibor Sekelj 1952a.png
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Tibor Sekelj 1952a.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Tibor Sekelj 1952a.png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
And also for:
- File:Tibor Sekelj, Vukovar 1983.jpg
- File:Tibor Sekelj Poetry between two summers 1987.jpg
- File:Tibor Sekelj Werner Bormann Pekino 1986.jpg
- File:Tibor Sekelj Bogoljub Grabarević Subotica.jpg
- File:Estraro de Internacia Geografia Asocio, Bruselo 1960 .jpg
- File:Tibor Sekelj, Krste Crvenkovski, Branko Radaković , Belgrado 1959.jpg
- File:Tibor Sekelj 1952.png
- File:Tibor Sekelj Julio Baghy 1959.jpg
- File:Tibor Sekelj Horace Barks 1960.jpg
Martin H. (talk) 17:52, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- You asked me on my talkpage, I answered there. --Martin H. (talk) 19:34, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Concours 2011
[edit]Bonjour,
Apparement vous avez mis au concours des photos uploadées sur Commons avant l'ouverture du concours. En fait, ne sont éligibles à ce concours que des photos uploadées pendant la durée du concours même si prises avant. Cordialement. Ludo (talk) 10:30, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Tour ronde de remparts à Bouleternère
[edit]Bonjour,
Je viens de voir que tu as importé deux photographies d’une tour ronde de remparts à Bouleternère : File:Bouleternère AL 01.png et File:Bouleternère AL 04.jpg. Mais je n’ai pas l’impression que cette tour soit un monument historique. Pourrais-tu me dire à quoi correspond les identifiants que tu as utilisé ?
Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 17:59, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
- D'accord, merci de m'avoir éclairer ainsi que d'avoir corriger les deux fichiers.
- La base Mémoire que tu es utilisé contient effectivement des clichés de bâtiments qui ne sont pas des monuments historiques.
- Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 06:48, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished
[edit]Dear ArnoLagrange,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. |
- Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 20:26, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
File:1_5_10StelojKapflanko.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) 15:11, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Kobac (talk) 08:13, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
File:SaintGaudericChristopheColomb.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 23:14, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Ĝermanaj Lingvoj.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
ツツ Dyveldi ☯ 18:02, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:William Auld.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:William Auld.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
--Rlevente (talk) 18:13, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Kamaishi-Linio eo.png
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Kamaishi-Linio eo.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Kamaishi-Linio eo.png]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Jcb (talk) 18:34, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
File:Slavaj lingvoj mapo eo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 15:56, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Anatoliy (talk) 19:14, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
File:Claus J. Killing-Günkel 2010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Robin van der Vliet (talk) 20:36, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
Template deletion due new and correct version of template.
[edit]Template:Other versions/Biologia klasifiko L Pengo has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
Kirill Borisenko (talk) 17:55, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
Template:Other versions/Biologia klasifiko L Pengo has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
JuTa 01:31, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
File:Diagram Anomalies Kepler orbit-fr.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Cherkash (talk) 13:28, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Diagram Anomalies Kepler orbit-eo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Cherkash (talk) 13:58, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Karl Max Liniger.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
1989 (talk) 15:47, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019
[edit]Bonjour,
Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8310 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !
Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !
Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.
Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.
P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !
Bonne journée,
Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:50, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Eclipse051003 AL0.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Eclipse051003 AL0.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Eclipse051003 AL0.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
A1Cafel (talk) 04:27, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Eclipse051003 AL1.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Eclipse051003 AL1.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Eclipse051003 AL1.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
A1Cafel (talk) 04:27, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
File:Shahnameh3-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hanooz 08:12, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France !
[edit]Bonjour,
Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !
Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.
Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.
P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:35, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use content.
We do this because Commons is a shared media repository. Downstream wikis have different policies based on local laws. Uses that are acceptable under US law, for example, may not be acceptable in many other countries with more restrictive rules. In addition, fair use is not compatible with our aim as a collection of freely distributable media files. Therefore, Commons cannot legally rely on fair use provisions. Non-free content that may be used with reference to fair use may be uploaded locally if your project allows this.
|
And also:
Yours sincerely, Jonteemil (talk) 09:50, 28 August 2023 (UTC)