User talk:ASDFGH

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, ASDFGH!

-- 21:34, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  /−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  /−


Hello, ASDFGH!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:40, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 5181844ffa581831d15f9bce2fb85496

[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Provinces of North Korea.PNG

[edit]

Hi ASDFGH, on June 25 you changed the image File:Provinces of North Korea.PNG and altered the numbering. Please do not do that! You broke several articles that used the image and referred to the numbers to name the provinces. All these articles do now show incorrect information. If you do changes like this, please always upload an image under a new name and keep the old image as it is. --Slomox (talk) 09:44, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  /−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 05:55, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 10:44, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pyongyang montage.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 19:01, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I added quantity of ethnic townships by counties.--Kaiyr (talk) 16:54, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shenyang montage.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gunnex (talk) 20:37, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chongqing montage.png = was affected by copyvio of File:朝天门长江大桥.jpg. Can you fix it? As I could verify, all historic versions of that montage affected by copyvio(s) or otherwise deleted images so a simple revert to later version will not work. Thx. Gunnex (talk) 09:07, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
File:Jiangmen montage.jpg --> File:Sanwui-hokgung.jpg was affected by Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sanwui-hokgung.jpg. Gunnex (talk) 14:53, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Guizhou map

[edit]

Do you have Guizhou township-level map?--Kaiyr (talk) 14:16, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Chuanchang Road Station

[edit]

Great job with the map of Shanghai Metro! There is one minor mistake, with caused some confusion today: Chuanchang Road Station (Line 7), which is on the current map, doesn't exist under that name anymore; it was renamed to Middle Longhua Road Station in December 2012. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_Longhua_Road_Station

File:Shanghai Metro logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cube00 (talk) 13:38, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


File:Shanghai Metro full logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Siyuwj (talk) 17:07, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Same the map image with File:South Gyeongsang-Goseong.svg. I think this is your mistake. So this part needs to be corrected. Thanks.

File:South Gyeongsang-Goseong.svg라는 지도 그림과 똑같은 걸로 보아, 파일을 올리실 때에 실수를 하신 것 같은데, 정정해야 할 필요가 있어 보입니다. --Idh0854 (talk) 22:08, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Li Keqiang 2012.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

russavia (talk) 01:25, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Sejong City.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−

whym (talk) 10:45, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

strips

[edit]

Could you make diagonal strips in this map File:Townsips map guizhou.PNG as File:Ethnic minorities areas in Guizhou.png for county and prefecture? With Equal width of strips--Kaiyr (talk) 10:03, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

日喀则

[edit]

您好,我看到您更改了中国地级行政区图File:China Prefectural-level.png中的地级日喀则市的颜色,所以也想请您修改一下县级行政区图File:China County-level.png的桑珠孜区(原县级日喀则市)的颜色,谢谢!从前我能改图的,但最近没了电脑。--faofao (talk) 12:11, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

KTo288 (talk) 10:37, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

图木舒克 Tumxuk

[edit]

Hello. Could you improve this map → File:China County-level.png. Tumxuk got an exclave in 2014. The new land is in the west of Kashgar Prefecture, on the border of Shule County, Shufu County and Akto County, about 10 km to the south of Kashgar Downtown. I don't know how to get the new border of Tumxuk, maybe you can? There is some information → http://202.108.98.30/description?dcpid=2014

您好。不知您能否改进此图关于新疆图木舒克的部分 → File:China County-level.png。图木舒克2014年获得了一块飞地,在喀什地区西部,喀什市区以南10公里左右,在疏勒县、疏附县和克州的阿克陶县交界处,涉及塔孜洪乡、巴合齐乡、布拉克苏乡和皮拉勒乡各一部分。我不知如何获取边界,也许你能?国函(2014)81号原文在这里 → http://202.108.98.30/description?dcpid=2014 --faofao (talk) 13:28, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What is the source of it?--Antemister (talk) 13:14, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yan Jiagan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wcam (talk) 12:52, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have an SVG for that file?--Antemister (talk) 08:38, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Taiwan Province (PRC) prfc map.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−

B dash (talk) 05:02, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

[edit]

Since you do a good job on East Asia's map. I would like to ask you a favor to help create a district-level map for Malaysia like what you did before. I had do the map which is File:West Malaysia location map district.png and File:East Malaysia location map district.png before but the cons are the border are thicker. (and not clear as I refer the boundary fron [this picture] and this) All in all, I hope you can create the file and there will be easier to do for Wikipedians, Regards.*angys* (talk) 10:15, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sükhbaataryn Batbold.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Russian Rocky (talk) 08:50, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Detailed boundary lines

[edit]

On 20:34, 13 April 2018 you removed some detailed boundary lines from this map of Hubei: File:Hubei prfc map.png

Why remove them there, where details about Hubei are important to the readers, but keep them here: File:China_Districts.png where details are not important?

I like the color coding of the counties cities and districts, but I don't agree with lumping all the contiguous districts into one thing, especially when larger maps that don't need as much detail actually do include those boundaries.

Please let me know what you think. Thanks for your relentless work. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 18:10, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

Can you update File:Greater China Rapid Transit.svg where only the color of the names of Urumqi, Xiamen, Shijiazhuang, Jinan, Guiyang, Lanzhou, Fuzhou, Xiamen, Taoyuan, Wenzhou, Nanning and Dongguan need to be changed from red (under construction) to green (operational). These cities' metro networks are in service.

Please also check, if other Chinese cities with metro networks are also missing.

Yours sincerely, Maphobbyist (talk) 12:56, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

Wenzhou needs to be added in File:Metro map of China.svg, because it has a metro network.

Please also check, if other Chinese cities with metro networks are also missing.

Yours sincerely, Maphobbyist (talk) 12:57, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ngari prefecture's eastern boundary

[edit]

@Keithonearth and Xhtongyin: Hey all, the eastern boundary of Ngari prefecture is not the same on these two maps: File:Xizang prfc map.png File:Ngari map.svg --Geographyinitiative (talk) 10:35, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know Geographyinitiative. It looks like my map is out of date. I cobbled these Tibet maps together in Inkscape, not the best software to use for GIS work. The image is they are not particularly maintainable, as boundaries (or other features) change. What I'd like to do is use QGIS with OSM data to render an image, which could be re-rendered from more up to date data, when required. That is above my skill set, which are mostly based on making goofy pictures with graphics software, and the occasional image for Wikipedia. I may look into the working on my skills with QGIS, but I'm not going to get there quick. You have "Geo" in your name, how are your QGIS skills? --Keithonearth (talk) 07:29, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hotan mcp.png requires updating

[edit]

Hi ASDFGH,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed File:Hotan mcp.png is out of date. Could you update it? Thanks again. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 03:27, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The map doesn't show Kunyu, Xinjiang --Geographyinitiative (talk) 07:47, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ASDFGH,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed File:Xinjiang prfc map2alt.png is out of date. Could you update it? Thanks again.

The China-Tajikistan border has changed. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 07:46, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Provinces of China Shadow.png

[edit]

您好,ASDFGH,感谢您为共享资源做出贡献。我注意到北京天津上海的Shadow.png早在2009年于英文维基百科就被删除(en:File:Beijing Shadow.pngen:File:Tianjin Shadow.pngen:File:Shanghai Shadow.png),不知您是否留有原图片,可否烦请您拨冗更新上传,十分感谢!祝编安!——Zzhtju (talk) 17:35, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ASDFGH,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed File:China Prefectural-level divisions (PRC claim).png is out of date. The China-Tajikistan border has changed and more territory has been added to China- the Aksu Prefecture and Kashgar Prefecture boundary's tripoint with Tajikistan will be different too. Could you update it? Thanks again. Geographyinitiative (talk) 23:45, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ASDFGH,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed File:COVID-19 cases in Greater China by Prefectures.png is out of date. The China-Tajikistan border has changed and more territory has been added to China- the Aksu Prefecture and Kashgar Prefecture boundary's tripoint with Tajikistan will be different too. Could you update it? Thanks again. Geographyinitiative (talk) 23:45, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ASDFGH,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed File:China administrative.svg is out of date. Xinjiang is not spelled "Xingjiang" Could you update it? Thanks again. Geographyinitiative (talk) 08:49, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have hidden the image from the China page [1][2] and am currently requesting assistance to learn how to correct the error in this map [3]. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 22:48, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
'Xingjiang' is recognized as a common misspelling: [4] --Geographyinitiative (talk) 03:13, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


File:Flag of the City of Guangzhou.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr. 21:38, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Wcam (talk) 03:45, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Wcam (talk) 20:10, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Changchun Light Rail Transit icon.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 11:55, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ASDFGH,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed File:China administrative alt.svg is out of date. It is not known whether or not Taipei will ever be known as Taibei in English and it is inappropriate to give a name which is not the name in use in English. Could you update it? Thanks again. Geographyinitiative (talk) 07:02, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:China administrative alt.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 20:09, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, 13:52, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wolong SAR Emblem.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Larryasou (talk) 03:11, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ASDFGH,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed File:China provinces numbered.svg is out of date. Yellow and Yellowish are designed to be so similar that they can not be distinguished by a normal reader- this diminishes the value of the map by pretending that ROC controlled areas are also PRC controlled. Could you update it? Thanks again. Geographyinitiative (talk) 19:09, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Busan montage.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:10, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ulsan montage.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:58, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gwangju montage.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:49, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:COVID-19 cases in PRC-claimed territory by Prefectures.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 12:28, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Wcam (talk) 16:54, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
阁下您好:

最近中山市行政区划有所变动——民众镇变为民众街道,南朗镇变为南朗街道;东升镇和小榄镇合并成为新的小榄镇。您是中山市地图的作者,迫切期望您能对中山市地图作出修改。万分感谢。 Ksoooooo (talk) 16:22, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bangladesh and Syria are not "to be dialogue partners", Qatar and Saudi Arabia are, however. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:49, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ASDFGH,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed File:Political parties of south korea en.svg is out of date. Could you update it? Thanks again. Braganza (talk) 07:43, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wang Qishan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 10:50, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikimedia Commons. While everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the project, one or more of your file uploads had missing or false information regarding its source and copyright status. Please note that Wikimedia Commons takes copyright rules and infringement very seriously. Files may only be uploaded and included if their copyright status meets the conditions stated in our licensing policy, and if their source is clearly documented. Files that fail to meet those conditions may be deleted, and users who fail to meet them may be blocked. Please follow our first steps, if you haven't already. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the Village Pump copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:05, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Gbawden (talk) 06:53, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Wcam (talk) 19:39, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]