User talk:17Drew~commonswiki
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Morningwood photographs
[edit]I've confirmed the release. Good for you for getting freely licensed images. You can read about how an OTRS system works at en:OTRS, or how we use it at m:OTRS. We archive license release emails in order to demonstrate that our licensing assertions are correct. Jkelly 23:51, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Image cleanup
[edit]Hi. There are some resources at Commons:Quality images for improving image quality, and links to mini-projects that help with image editing. Jkelly 17:18, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Fueled by Ramen Promo Pics
[edit]Before uploading the pictures, I emailed FBR's web guy along with all of the GFDL documentation asking for permission. I forwarded his response to [email protected]. Should I have waited for a response from them before uploading? I'm really new at this licensing/free use stuff, so chances are I didn't follow protocol exactly. Lebroyl 19:12, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image Image:BiodegradablePlasticUtensils1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:BiodegradablePlasticUtensils1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
--Simonizer 07:57, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Yep, the flickr guy isn't the copyright holder. Yonatan talk 01:20, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:CoolGwenStefani1.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:CoolGwenStefani1.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS ([email protected]).
Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. GeorgHH 09:58, 6 April 2007 (UTC) The same for:
- Image:WhatYouWaitingFor1.jpg
- Image:GwenStefaniLuxurious1.jpg
- Image:GwenStefaniCrash1.jpg
- Image:HarajukuGirls.jpg
--GeorgHH 09:58, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Paul Colman pic
[edit]Hi Shadowhalo. I guess the flickr user who took the photo here changed the license as it's not currently available under a valid commons license. Quadzilla99 12:23, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Photographs from Flickr
[edit]When you upload photographs from Flickr, could you also include a direct link to the original source, such as on this one? (i fixed it now). Also, when you edit a photograph (such as enhancing the color, making a crop, etc.) please describe your modifications in the description field. Thanks, Husky (talk to me) 22:43, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:CourtneyLove.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
200.100.146.133 22:36, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Rihanna
[edit]Thanks! :) Yonatan talk 08:17, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Obamatalk.JPG
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Obamatalk.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Magnus Manske 09:11, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:PeterFurler.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
--Patstuart 19:44, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Shakira - La Coruña.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Shakira - La Coruña.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Magnus Manske 09:09, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:ShadowHalo.JPG
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:ShadowHalo.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 13:49, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:AnthonyKiedis.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:AnthonyKiedis.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS ([email protected]).
Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Siebrand 13:51, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:DaddyYankee.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:DaddyYankee.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 15:45, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Re:Rihanna
[edit]- I have no way of knowing this image is from Getty Images but I do believe you so you may delete it. Best, --Kudret abi 05:15, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
Image:SlimThug.jpg
[edit]How can you possibly know the licence of this image? I don't see it on the source.--190.172.188.63 02:46, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
- The message that says " Some rights reserved." 17Drew 18:13, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you. So I can't use this image in Wikipedia? [1]--190.172.155.37 19:38, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
- No, the image is copyrighted, and from the look of the user's uploads, (s)he isn't the copyright holder anyway. 17Drew 18:32, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you. So I can't use this image in Wikipedia? [1]--190.172.155.37 19:38, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Note
[edit]Hello, 17Drew~commonswiki, and thanks for your contributions to the Wikimedia Commons! I have noticed that you're using the {{user trusted}} (or the babel alternative) template on your user page. This template is generally reserved for users that review Flickr images and are trusted users. It is easy to apply and become trusted in order to review images from Flickr, and I welcome you to do so if you are interested in helping out. Please feel free to discuss any concerns on my talk page. Cheers, --Pumpmeup
- Ahhh... I see, thanks for alerting me to that - just going on a round of people with the template. Sorry for any inconvenience! Happy editing --Pumpmeup 05:00, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Hello!
Thank you for providing images to the Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.
To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.
You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.
The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on the Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!
Thank you. 78.48.230.57 06:34, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:JamieBamber.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Kelly 17:00, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Images from Emil Rensing on Flickr have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these images, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 12:27, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Equol.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Edgar181 (talk) 11:37, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Moscow2012_adbanner.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 18:25, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT (talk) 05:35, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:WolfgangPuck.jpg is uncategorized since 8 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:35, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:ThePussycatDolls.jpg is uncategorized since 11 June 2009.
- Image:UniformitySlantTest.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Hillary Clinton speaking at Families USA.jpg was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:37, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
The factual accuracy of the chemical structure Image:Turinabol.png is disputed
[edit]Dispute notification | The chemical structure Image:Turinabol.png you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Images in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the image talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the image to be deleted.
In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Xasodfuih (talk) 16:31, 12 January 2009 (UTC) |
File source is not properly indicated: File:Juanes2006Concert3.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Juanes2006Concert3.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
High Contrast (talk) 14:35, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Juanes2006Concert2.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Juanes2006Concert2.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
High Contrast (talk) 14:35, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:PinkVienna.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:PinkVienna.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:PinkVienna.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
High Contrast (talk) 14:42, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
The factual accuracy of the chemical structure Image:GlycyrrhetinicAcid.png is disputed
[edit]Dispute notification | The chemical structure Image:GlycyrrhetinicAcid.png you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Images in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the image talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the image to be deleted.
In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Edgar181 (talk) 15:13, 22 June 2009 (UTC) |
File source is not properly indicated: File:ThePussycatDolls.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:ThePussycatDolls.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
High Contrast (talk) 20:08, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
help me help
[edit]heloo i need to edit page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Afshin-ghotbi.jpg
why i can't edit...i upload this photo and i write i don't know(Author) and now i have answer to this help Milad Mosapoor (talk) 21:12, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Odie5533 (talk) 19:43, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
File:CornmealProducts.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
96.127.194.90 14:04, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
File:CMME.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Yikrazuul (talk) 11:09, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Inactive Image-reviewers
[edit]Hello 17Drew, there is a discussion about a request regarding your image-reviewer userright, which have never been used or not used recently. You can participate discussion in Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Inactive_Image-reviewers. This is just a notification of discussion you may be involved. Best regards, --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Your account will be renamed
[edit]Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called 17Drew. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name 17Drew~commonswiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
19:37, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Renamed
[edit]This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
01:33, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
File:Hüfthose.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Damiens.rf 20:00, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Alice in Wonderland.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
173.228.249.243 18:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
File:JohnLegend.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 14:34, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
File:Arsenate.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |