Commons:Segnalazioni per la vetrina
Segnalazioni per la vetrina in altre lingue:
Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | Tiếng Việt | 粵語 | 中文(中国大陆) | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | /− |
Shortcut: [[:]] |
Queste immagini sono candidate per la vetrina. Fare attenzione a non confondere questa pagina con le immagini del giorno.
Guida
[edit]Candidare un immagine
[edit]Linee guida per candidare un'immagine
[edit]È importante leggere le linee guida prima di candidare un'immagine.
A seguito è riportato un riassunto dei punti essenziali per candidare e valutare le immagini candidate:
- Risoluzione - Le fotografie con una risoluzione inferiore a 2 milioni di pixel vengono generalmente rifiutate e rimosse ad eccezione di motivi contrari di particolare importanza. Si noti che le immagini con risoluzione 1600 x 1200 hanno 1.92 Mpx, appena inferiore al limite minimo di 2Mpx.
- Ricordiamo che le immagini caricate su Commons vengono visualizzate non solo su schermi tradizionali di PC ma sono utilizzate anche per stampa e visualizzazione su schermi ad alta risoluzione. Non possiamo certo prevedere quali tecnologie verranno utilizzate nel futuro quindi è importante che le immagini scelte per la vetrina abbiano una risoluzione quanto più alta è possibile.
- Scansioni - È consigliabile seguire la guida alla scansione, che propone suggerimenti per l'ottenimento di immagini ottimali
- Fuoco - ovviamente ogni oggetto significativo dell'immagine deve essere ben definito e a fuoco.
- Primo piano e sfondo - Oggetti in primissimo piano o di sfondo possono distrarre dalla vista dal oggetto principale dell'immagine. È il caso di controllare se qualche elemento in primo piano non copra nessun elemento importante e che lo sfondo non distolga l'attenzione e renda confusa l'immagine (per esempio evitare che vi sia una luce forte alle spalle di un viso)
- Qualità generale - le immagini candidate devono essere di alta qualità tecnica.
- Le manipolazioni digitali non devono essere effettuate per ingannare, ma vanno usate solo limitatamente e con cura per correggere difetti fotografici. Le manipolazioni comunemente accettate sono il ritaglio e la correzione di prospettiva, focale, colore ed esposizione. Manipolazioni più estese, come può essere la rimozione di un elemento di distrazione dello sfondo, vanno chiaramente descritte nel testo di descrizione per mezzo del template {{Retouched picture}}. Manipolazioni non descritte o descritte in modo insufficiente non permettono la candidatura alla vetrina.
- Valore - il nostro principale obiettivo è eleggere le immagini con il maggior valore rispetto a tutte le loro simili. Le immagini devono essere in qualche modo speciali, perciò fai attenzione:
- quasi tutti i tramonti sono esteticamente piacevoli, infatti molte immagini sono simili alle altre,
- gli scatti notturni sono gradevoli ma generalmente le foto scattate di giorno mostrano molti più dettagli,
- non tutte le belle foto hanno in realtà un valore che non sia esclusivamente personale.
Per quanto riguarda l'aspetto tecnico abbiamo come parametri l'esposizione, la composizione, il controllo del movimento e la profondità di campo.
- L'esposizione si riferisce alla combinazione tra tempo di esposizione e diaframma. Questa combinazione permette generalmente di avere una curva di tono che è in grado di rappresentare ombre e luci con un dettaglio accettabile. Questa curva viene detta latitudine di posa. Un'immagine può essere nella banda bassa, media o alta. Le fotocamere digitali (e le loro foto) hanno una latitudine di posa più stretta delle macchine a pellicola. La mancanza di dettagli nelle zone d'ombra non è necessariamente una caratteristica negativa. Infatti questa può essere parte dell'effetto desiderato, mentre ampie zone eccessivamente sovraesposte possono distrarre la vista.
- La composizione si riferisce alla distribuzione degli elementi nell'immagine. La “Regola dei Terzi” è una buona linea guida per la composizione e eredita molto dagli studi di disegno. Il concetto principale considera l'immagine divisa con due linee orizzontali e due verticali, che dividono l'immagine in tre parti. Generalmente se l'oggetto viene centrato si ha un effetto poco interessante, mentre se l'oggetto viene posizionato in uno dei punti di interesse, ovvero l'intersezione delle quattro linee, si ottiene un effetto decisamente migliore. Le linee dell'orizzonte infatti non dovrebbero essere posizionate nel centro, perché taglierebbero la foto a metà; è invece preferibile scegliere una delle linee orizzontali. Complessivamente bisogna tendere a creare un'immagine dinamica.
- Il controllo del movimento si riferisce al modo viene rappresentato il movimento nell'immagine. Il movimento può essere bloccato (seguito dalla fotocamera) oppure può essere lasciato scorrere, tuttavia l'oggetto principale dell'immagine deve essere visibile. Nessuna delle due tecniche è migliore dell'altra, la buona riuscita dipende esclusivamente dal tipo di effetto ricercato. Per esempio, fotografando una vettura da corsa che appare statica in relazione allo sfondo, che invece scorre sul retro, si ottiene l'oggetto principale in una condizione statica mentre lo sfondo crea il senso di movimento. (questa tecnica è chiamata "panning"). D'altra parte, fotografando un giocatore di basket in salto, bloccato in relazione a tutto il resto dello sfondo, si otterrebbe un buono scatto proprio per la posa innaturale.
- La profondità di campo (PdC o DOF dall'inglese depth of field) è la distanza davanti e dietro il soggetto principale che appare nitida (a fuoco). Questo parametro viene scelto a seconda delle necessità di ogni immagine e può parimenti migliorare o peggiorare la qualità di una fotografia. Generalmente viene utilizzata una PdC ridotta per mettere al centro dell'attenzione il soggetto principale, separandolo da tutto il resto dello sfondo. Invece viene utilizzata una grande PdC per enfatizzare la profondità di un immagine. Gli obiettivi grandangolari in genere una grande PdC mentre i teleobiettivi ne hanno una decisamente ridotta. In gran parte la PdC dipende dall'apertura del diaframma: aumenta con il diminuire dell'apertura e viceversa.
Per quanto riguarda l'aspetto grafico prendiamo invece in considerazione nitidezza, profondità, colore, superficie, prospettiva, bilanciamento, proporzione, ecc.
- La nitidezza si riferisce alle linee di contorno del soggetto principale.
- La profondità si riferisce alla qualità dell'aspetto tridimensionale del soggetto. Ciò si ottiene soprattutto tramite un'adeguata illuminazione laterale (come quella della prima mattinata o del tardo pomeriggio) e non esclusivamente frontale, al fine di evitare l'appiattimento del soggetto.
- Il colore è un elemento molto importante e non deve essere né troppo né poco saturo.
- La superficie si riferisce alla qualità della superficie degli oggetti fotografati.
- La prospettiva si riferisce all'angolazione dalla quale è stata scattata la fotografia. Essa crea una serie di rette immaginarie che seguono gli spigoli paralleli degli oggetti e si incontrano in un punto che può essere dentro o fuori l'immagine.
- Il bilanciamento si riferisce alla disposizione degli oggetti nell'immagine e può essere equilibrato o porre maggior peso verso una direzione.
- La proporzione si riferisce alla relazione tra le dimensioni degli oggetti all'interno dell'immagine. Generalmente si tende a rappresentare oggetti con ridotta relazione, ma una buona tecnica è quella di rappresentare gli oggetti di dimensioni minori in modo più esteso, contrariamente a quanto è in realtà. Per esempio, un piccolo fiore che viene rappresentato con le stesse dimensioni di una grande montagna: questa tecnica viene chiamata inversione di scala.
- Ovviamente, non tutte le caratteristiche devono essere necessariamente presenti. Le immagini possono essere giudicate sia per una sola caratteristica che per diverse caratteristiche, anche contemporaneamente.
- Significato simbolico o rilevanza particolare …Le guerre d'opinione possono iniziare!…. Va ricordato che una pessima fotografia di un soggetto difficilissimo da fotografare è sicuramente migliore di un'immagine ordinaria e tradizionale (come un comune tramonto).
- Le immagini possono essere scelte da un fotografo o da un osservatore anche per motivi culturali, tenendo però sempre conto del contesto dello scatto e non di quello dell'osservatore. Un'immagine inoltre può "parlare" alle persone e avere la capacità di evocare emozioni, che tuttavia non devono essere necessariamente piacevoli.
Per ottimizzare le possibilità di successo delle candidature delle tue immagini è consigliabile leggere le linee guida complete.
Come candidare un'immagine
[edit]Se credi di aver trovato o creato un immagine che può essere presa in considerazione per la vetrina, che abbia una appropriata descrizione e una licenza adeguata, allora segui queste indicazioni.
Punto 1: copia il nome dell'immagine dentro la casella di testo (includendo anche il prefisso Image: ) a seguito del testo già presente nella casella (per esempio Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:IL-NOME-DELLA-TUA-IMMAGINE.JPG.) ed infine clicca il pulsante candida una nuova immagine.
Punto 2: segui le istruzioni della pagina alla quale vieni collegato e salva le modifiche apportate.
Punto 3: inserisci manualmente un collegamento alla pagina creata in cima alla lista candidati:
Clicca qui e aggiungi il testo che segue all'inizio della lista di candidature:
- {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:IL-NOME-DELLA-TUA-IMMAGINE.JPG}}
Votare
[edit]Per votare puoi usare i seguenti templates:
- {{A favore}} ( Support) per supportare la candidatura,
- {{Contrario}} ( Oppose) per opporsi alla candidatura,
- {{Neutrale}} ( Neutral) per esprimere un parere neutrale,
- {{Commento}} ( Comment) per esprimere solo un commento,
- {{Info}} ( Info) per aggiungere delle informazioni riguardanti l'immagine,
- {{Domanda}} ( Question) per chiedere informazioni.
Puoi inoltre evidenziare che l'immagine non ha possibilità di essere eletta con il template {{FPX|motivo}}, inserendo al posto di motivo le ragioni per cui è chiaramente inaccettabile per la vetrina.
Ogni votante è pregato di motivare il proprio voto con qualche parola, in particolar modo se si vota contro. Ricorda inoltre di aggiungere la tua firma (~~~~). I voti anonimi non sono accettati.
Candidare un'immagine alla rimozione dalla vetrina
[edit]Gli standard della vetrina cambiano col tempo. Può succedere che un'immagine che era stata eletta per la vetrina non sia più adatta agli standard attuali.
Questa lista è perciò composta dalle immagini considerate non più adatte a rimanere nella vetrina. Vota:
- {{Mantenere}} Keep per far sì che l'immagine rimanga nella vetrina.
- {{Rimuovere}} Oppose per far sì che l'immagine venga rimossa dalla vetrina.
Se consideri che un'immagine non rispetti più i criteri delle immagini in vetrina, candidala per la rimozione copiando il nome dell'immagine dentro questa casella di testo (includendo il prefisso dell' Image:) a seguito del testo già presente in essa:
Nella pagina appena creata includi:
- Le informazioni sull'origine dell'immagine (autore dell'immagine, autore della candidatura);
- Un collegamento all'iniziale candidatura per l'inserimento nella vetrina (che va inserito sotto ==Collegamenti== nella descrizione dell'immagine);
- Il motivo per cui l'hai candidata per la rimozione dalla vetrina e il tuo Nome utente.
Dopo aver fatto ciò devi inserire manualmente un collegamento alla pagina creata all'inizio della lista di rimozione dalla vetrina.
Politica di elezione per la vetrina
[edit]Regole generali
[edit]- Il periodo di votazione è di 9 giorni completi, a partire dalla candidatura. I risultato verrà determinato alla fine di questo periodo. I voti aggiunti il decimo giorno o a seguito non verranno considerati.
- Sono benvenuti i contributori anonimi.
- I contributi di anonimi alle discussioni sono benvenuti.
- I voti di contributori anonimi non saranno accettati.
- La candidatura non conta come voto. Il voto di supporto va esplicitato.
- Gli autori delle candidature possono ritirare le loro immagini candidate in ogni momento. Questo si ottiene scrivendo semplicemente "I withdraw my nomination" (in inglese: ritiro la mia candidatura)
o aggiungendo il testo{{withdraw|~~~~}}
. - Ricorda che l'obiettivo del progetto Wikimedia Commons è di costruire una raccolta di immagini utilizzabili da tutti i progetti Wikimedia, inclusi possibili progetti futuri. Perciò non bisogna pensare che questo sia una raccolta dedicata esclusivamente al progetto Wikipedia e per tanto le immagini non vanno valutate in funzione di ciò.
- Le immagini vengono rimosse dalla lista di candidature se non hanno voti a supporto (escluso quello dell'autore della candidatura) entro il quinto giorno dalla candidatura (La regola del quinto giorno)
- Le immagini dotate del template {{FPX}} non devono essere rimosse dalla lista entro le 48 ore successive al momento in cui è stato applicato il template, purchè non vi sia nessun voto a supporto oltre quello dell'autore della candidatura.
Regole di ammissione e rimozione dalla vetrina
[edit]Un'immagine candidata viene ammessa alla vetrina se si verificano le seguenti condizioni:
- La licenza è adeguata (ovviamente).
- Se ha almeno 5 voti a supporto.
- Se il rapporto tra voti pro/contro è almeno 2/1 (se ha due terzi di maggioranza).
- Non possono essere ammessi alla vetrina diverse versioni della stessa immagine, ne deve essere scelta una sola versione.
I criteri per la rimozione dalla vetrina sono gli stessi per l'ammissione ad essa, compreso il periodo di voto e la regola del quinto giorno (vedi nelle Regole generali).
Ogni utente esperto può portare a termine una votazione: per istruzioni su come compiere questa operazione vedi la guida per portare a termina la votazione.
Infine, sii cortese
[edit]Per piacere non dimenticare che l'immagine che stai giudicando è frutto del lavoro di qualcuno. Evita di usare frasi come è orribile: se devi opporti non fare spiacevoli considerazioni. Inoltre ricorda che è necessario scrivere in inglese se vuoi essere compreso dagli altri utenti e che il tuo utilizzo di questa lingua e quello degli altri utenti può comunque generare incomprensioni se non si ha un'ottima conoscenza, perciò scegli le parole con cura.
Buon voto… e ricorda che.... tutte le regole possono avere qualche eccezione.
Vedi anche
[edit]- Per modificare la lista di candidature: Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list
- Per una lista cronologica delle candidature: Commons:Featured_pictures/chronological
- Per un archivio delle precedenti candidature: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log
- Per istruzioni su come portare a termine una procedura di voto: Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished
- Lista di termini base del linguaggio fotografico
- Candidature per le immagini di qualità
- Critica fotografica
- Guida alla scansione
Indice
[edit]Candidati per la vetrina
[edit]Featured picture candidates
[edit]Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2024 at 20:19:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait
- Info Man dressed as the pagan god Veles at the traditional Rękawka festival in Kraków. All by me -- Jakubhal 20:19, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Jakubhal 20:19, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2024 at 19:46:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Automobiles
- Info Abandoned Ford E-Series van by Gerritsen Creek in Brooklyn, New York. I like the mix between urban waste and nature at the edge of a city. I was torn which to nominate, this one or this wider view that includes a glimpse of Manhattan, but I think making the van the subject probably works best. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 19:46, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 19:46, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2024 at 10:55:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Storms
- Info created by Greg Henshall/FEMA, uploaded by Consequentially, nominated by Yann
- Info Greensburg, Kansas, USA, May 16, 2007. The center of town twelve days after it was hit by an F5 tornado with 200 mph (approx. 321 km/h) winds.
- Support -- Yann (talk) 10:55, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2024 at 10:52:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus_:_Alopochen
- Info Quite a common bird these days in Europe. FPs of an adult's head and of a chick. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:52, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:52, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose as long as not sufficiently COM:CAT'egorized --A.Savin 16:39, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2024 at 10:18:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Ukraine
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 10:18, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 10:18, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Question Would the castle and reflection be more interesting than the foreground grass? Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:43, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2024 at 09:45:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Others
- Info created by en:Eloise Harriet Stannard - uploaded by Amitchell125 - nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 09:45, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Zquid (talk) 09:45, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- I think the artist made many beautiful paintings, but this is something extra. And the wasps make it soo realistic... Who hasn't have wasp visit on the fruits/berries or near the coffee table in the summertime? // Zquid (talk) 09:56, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Sorry, but this 1 megapixel image is below the required minimum resolution of 2 megapixels. Please try to find a higher resolution version and we would appreciate a new nomination. Sincerely, -- Radomianin (talk) 10:52, 25 November 2024 (UTC) | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |
- Comment @Radomianin "Featured picture candidates-rookie" mistake. I forgot to check the pixels. Sorry! // Zquid (talk) 19:50, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Zquid (talk) 19:50, 25 November 2024 (UTC).
File:Wooden hut fence mountains and blue sky in the green rice fields of Vang Vieng in Laos.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2024 at 07:59:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Laos
- Info created & uploaded by Basile Morin - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 07:59, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomer T (talk) 07:59, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you very much, Tomer T, for the nomination. Tiny isolated hut in a green environment -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:15, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:24, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:19, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Bukchon-ro 11-gil street with hanok houses at blue hour in Bukchon Hanok Village Seoul.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2024 at 07:56:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#South Korea
- Info created & uploaded by Basile Morin - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 07:56, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomer T (talk) 07:56, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Interesting but lacking that special thing to make it extraordinary IMHO --Poco a poco (talk) 08:55, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you very much, Tomer T, for the nomination. It's a pretty street surrounded by authentic hanok houses in Seoul, and I was lucky that evening to find it deserted after a sunny day -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:12, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:24, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2024 at 22:22:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes/United States#New York City
- Info created by Superbass - uploaded by Superbass - nominated by Superbass -- Superbass (talk) 22:22, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Superbass (talk) 22:22, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Dramatic sky, great colours and composition Cmao20 (talk) 01:29, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:58, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 08:45, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 08:55, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 10:01, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:02, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:44, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:20, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:46, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:21, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Incredible. Wolverine X-eye 17:37, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 19:55, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 20:23, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2024 at 21:55:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Ukraine
- Info Landscape in the Carpathian Biosphere Reserve in the Zakarpattia Oblast. One of my favorites from Wiki Loves Earth 2024 in Ukraine. Created and uploaded by Estolyarov - nominated by -- Radomianin (talk) 21:55, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great landscape panorama in which, in my opinion, everything is somehow coherent and doesn't need any big words. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:55, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:25, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fantastic Cmao20 (talk) 01:28, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Foreground and background are in focus due to the very wide depth of field. Nice light and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:28, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:58, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 10:20, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:18, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:46, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:21, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nothing much to complain about. Wolverine X-eye 17:38, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 20:24, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Gorgeous — Rhododendrites talk | 20:40, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2024 at 11:34:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Rhineland-Palatinate
- Info created by Rolf Kranz - uploaded by Rolf Kranz - nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 11:34, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 11:34, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:12, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:25, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:48, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:49, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:59, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Mystical foggy atmosphere, good candidate and deserved 4th place at WLM. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:49, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 10:01, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 10:21, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:21, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 20:26, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2024 at 10:01:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Ukraine
- Info created by Ryzhkov Oleksandr - uploaded by Ryzhkov Oleksandr - nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:01, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:01, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Nice but it needs a perspective correction Poco a poco (talk) 15:11, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:48, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 08:40, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking red facade and pink combination with the sky -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:15, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:11, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:46, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:21, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
File:035 Vertical panorama of the Milky Way during Perseids seen from Oeschinensee Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 21:16:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Sky
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:16, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:16, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good idea to do a vertical pano Cmao20 (talk) 22:33, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:15, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:54, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice! Also good to see variety in your nominations. A vertical strip of the milky way galaxy in this case :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:11, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:23, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:47, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The black foreground is too big, and there is nothing interesting there (compared with File:Milky way in Elbrus.jpg). Cropping that would improve the picture. Yann (talk) 10:04, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your comment. I will crop approximately half of the foreground this evening once I'll have access to my computer -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:10, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 19:35:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures outdoors
- Info created by מקף־עברי - uploaded by מקף־עברי - nominated by מקף־עברי -- מקף־עברי (talk) 19:35, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- מקף־עברי (talk) 19:35, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 22:32, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:15, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 15:03, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:22, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:47, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 16:17, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:58, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 16:01:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)
- Info Good quality, a different composition to any of the lion pictures currently in the category, and taken on safari. created by Byrdyak - uploaded by Byrdyak - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:01, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:01, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support Ain't no way was I going to pass the chance of supporting this absolutely magnificent, perfectly captured piece of art. Woah!! You have no idea how good this image is man. I don't think FP is enough! Wolverine X-eye 18:10, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Wolverine Je-str (talk) 19:57, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:15, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:41, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 08:49, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:54, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Subjects, light and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:42, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 12:02, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good, good. Per others, and no annoying unsharp or blurry areas on the motif, and the composition is well handled. Both cats are looking into the same direction, both heading right, and a peaceful scene. As a little interpretation, the male lion has the control over the situation while the lioness is relaxing :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:38, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:44, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile and PantheraLeo1359531. – Aristeas (talk) 15:02, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:10, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:20, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:47, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 16:25, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 10:02, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:58, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 20:26, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 16:01:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1940-1949
- Info created by Claude Dettloff, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann
- Support Notable historical image with its own article. This was a delicate restoration. It was heavily damaged. Apparently the print was scratched with a sharp tool. All copies on the Net have the same defect. -- Yann (talk) 16:01, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Historical or not, this is an atrocious image. Wolverine X-eye 18:13, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think it's lovely Cmao20 (talk) 01:46, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:15, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Happy end :-) I checked the restoration work and find it well handled, given the difficulty.
- Photographically the focus is wrong (and the crop tight at the left), it's a shame, but this image has its own story (and yes, also own article on en-wiki). It has become an iconic photograph. We should take this into account.
- Finally, a reminder about the voting process. COM:FPC: The meaning of the image should be judged according to the cultural context of the image, not by the cultural context of the observer. An image "speaks" to people, and it has the capacity to evoke emotion such as tenderness, rage, rejection, happiness, sadness, etc. Good photographs are not limited to evoking pleasant sensations... -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:37, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nomination, per Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:48, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nomination, per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 15:01, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:18, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:47, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:57, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 20:38, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 12:18:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Ukraine
- Info created by Andrew4you - uploaded by Andrew4you - nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:18, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:18, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Big tilt. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Checked, image not tilted -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:08, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Building looks vertical but check the reflections please. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:31, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- So, a part of the polished stone structure has a slight tilt. This is not a problem for the perception of the image as a whole and not a quality problem IMO. -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:44, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:27, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support You got the lighting spot on! Well done! Wolverine X-eye 18:15, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:37, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:21, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:15, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:40, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 08:53, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:54, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 10:28, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 12:53, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:56, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:10, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:16, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:47, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 08:43, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:56, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 07:38:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Others
- Info created by Janeklass - uploaded by Janeklass - nominated by Janeklass -- Janeklass (talk) 07:38, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Janeklass (talk) 07:38, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 12:31, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:02, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive shot considering the subject you had to work with. Wolverine X-eye 18:19, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:19, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 08:54, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tupungato (talk) 13:52, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Here the darkness works well IMHO. – Aristeas (talk) 14:56, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:10, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:14, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 16:35, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:56, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 20:27, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 20:35, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing moisture sucking of Appias lalage (Doubleday, 1842) - Spot Puffin (Male) WLB.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 04:59:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
- Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 04:59, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 04:59, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:02, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment What is the blurry object in the background beneath the wing? Cmao20 (talk) 16:26, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- I think it's a motion blurred droplot of water falling -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:19, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Okay then Cmao20 (talk) 14:40, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:39, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:54, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:12, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:17, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support High level of detail, good focus -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:01, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:52, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:55, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 20:35, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 03:06:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Sky
- Info created by Zwiebackgesicht - uploaded by Zwiebackgesicht - nominated by Zwiebackgesicht -- Zwiebackgesicht (talk) 03:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Zwiebackgesicht (talk) 03:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Why PNG? I would support a JPEG version. Yann (talk) 12:31, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:35, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I've never seen the Milky Way look anything like this. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:00, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Per Charles, the colours certainly do look very strange. I'd like to know more about how this picture was taken. Was it during an aurora, or is a special filter being used? Cmao20 (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- The image was strongly edited : the milky way was brightened a lot and everything else extremely darkened with a painting brush. Also the stars are sadly out of focus (these shots always require manual focus and usually to achieve a good focus on the stars the cursor must be set just slightly before infinity because at infinity the focus is always missed, at least on Sony cameras but I don't know what camera was used for this one since the exif data are missing). As for the colors they are either a side effect of the strong edits or were painted in the image with a brush -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:09, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Je-str (talk) 19:59, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Giles Laurent. Surprised this is still picking up support votes. Cmao20 (talk) 22:32, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose What are these red and green stripes? The picture also looks overprocessed -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:47, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Finally no, per others. Yann (talk) 12:05, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
File:010 Greater flamingos male and female in the Camargue during mating season Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2024 at 22:57:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Phoenicopteridae (Flamingos)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent focus on the pair, appealing light and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:40, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 06:04, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:25, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:35, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:02, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Zero complaints from me. Wolverine X-eye 18:17, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:40, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:39, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 08:53, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:55, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:17, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 10:02, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:54, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2024 at 22:32:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications/Germany#Bavaria
- Info All by me -- Ermell (talk) 22:32, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ermell (talk) 22:32, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Subject, composition and weather -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:42, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:01, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Superb Cmao20 (talk) 16:03, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile, and excellent quality for a drone photo. – Aristeas (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:17, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:38, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 08:52, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:48, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:19, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:15, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 08:41, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 10:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:53, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2024 at 17:46:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Poland
- Info created by Jakub T. Jankiewicz - uploaded by Jakub T. Jankiewicz - nominated by EUPBR -- EUPBR (talk) 17:46, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- EUPBR (talk) 17:46, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow. Great atmosphere Cmao20 (talk) 19:47, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 20:46, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Nice but too dark IMHO Poco a poco (talk) 22:09, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Underexposed Agree with Poco. Even an atmospheric image needs to offer a little more distinguishable content. The roof and the trees are currently too dark in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:36, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Heavily manipulated image. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:38, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Question Frank, this is a very important hint, can you elaborate a bit on the manipulation? Thank you! – Aristeas (talk) 08:25, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- The overprocessing (in particular with regard to the colors) makes this look super artificial to me. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 09:45, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your assessment, Frank! It seems the photographer was after a very painterly look … – Aristeas (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I hear you. I guess it's more a matter of taste and what the image is being used for. In my opinion, for a piece of art to be hung on the wall, it would be wonderful. But in an encyclopedic context, the heavy-handed processing is just to much. At least for me. Given the artistic merit, I'd be perfectly ok with it being promoted.--Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral I’m torn on this one: on the one hand I am conviced by Frank’s assessment, on the other hand I can’t deny the atmosphere and effect of the result. After looking at other photos of the church it seems not totally unrealistic to me, so I am inclined to regard the editing as within the creative freedom of the photographer. – Aristeas (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support The image looks natural to me (eventhough it's a bit underexposed in my opinion, hence the weak support) and I honestly think the image was not edited much from what was captured with the camera. In night photography long exposure shots like this one (6sec exposure) often lead to such colors and such light effects -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:24, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per Giles –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:14, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:00, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Dark but very nice IMHO -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:02, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support After some reflection and thought, I agree with Giles' evaluation. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:57, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:53, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:13, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2024 at 09:54:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Iceland#Western Region (Vesturland)
- Info created by C-M - uploaded by C-M - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 09:54, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tupungato (talk) 09:54, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great selfie! ;o) Yann (talk) 10:43, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Is the author near the table near the lighthouse? -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:22, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 15:22, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 15:37, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --EUPBR (talk) 17:58, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:43, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 20:47, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition and viewpoint -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:22, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:59, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Apparently a stitched pano, should be marked and categorized as such. --A.Savin 08:17, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:28, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive landscape, impressive photo. The lighthouse is slightly leaning to the right, so maybe a tiny rotation or perspective correction would be useful. And obviously A.Savin is right that {{Panorama}}, Category:Panoramics in West-Iceland etc. should be added. – Aristeas (talk) 15:39, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas, I think the tower is visibly crooked.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:37, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:30, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Per Aristeas, would support if the perspective correction is applied Poco a poco (talk) 15:14, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 10:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:52, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
File:RDAF General Dynamics F-16AM Fighting Falcon E-006 Royal International Air Tattoo 2024 01.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2024 at 10:00:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Military_jet_aircraft
- Info created by Julian Herzog - uploaded by Julian Herzog - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 10:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tupungato (talk) 10:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:02, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:42, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:47, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive view of the cockpit -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:17, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you for the nomination! — Julian H.✈ 07:41, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:26, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:01, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well frozen, beautiful colour contrast. – Aristeas (talk) 15:33, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:31, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Aristeas. It's also nice how well the traces on the wings and the exhaust system are captured. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:28, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Jakubhal 14:52, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:15, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:41, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Elefante africano de sabana (Loxodonta africana), parque nacional de Amboseli, Kenia, 2024-05-22, DD 07.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 20:55:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Elephantidae_(Elephants)
- Info African bush elephant (Loxodonta africana), Amboseli National Park, Kenya. It's the largest living land animal with bulls reaching an average shoulder height of 3.04–3.36 metres (10.0–11.0 ft) and a body mass of 5.2–6.9 tonnes (11,500–15,200 lb). Since 2021, it has been listed as Endangered on the IUCN Red List. It is threatened foremost by habitat destruction, and in parts of its range also by poaching for meat and ivory. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:55, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:55, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:56, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain Isn't the image slightly tilted to the right? I'm estimating it based on the cloud bottoms. I tried to rotate it to the left by about 1.75 degrees, and I believe it looks more correct this way. I also modified the white balance to make it look somewhat colder. I know that elephants can be quite yellowish-brownish, but in this image the plants seem to have too warm hue/white balance. I don't know what the rules and etiquette are about uploading "new versions" or variants, so I haven't uploaded it.--Tupungato (talk) 15:27, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, fair, thank you for your feedback. I made some changes, please, have a look. To your question, please, don't upload versions on your own, that makes no sense. I have the RAW file as source and if somebody requests a change later one I wouldn't have the right version, so it makes sense that I do those changes. Furthermore I consider myself skilled enough to make a tilt or change the WB. I believe that uploading an own version is appropiate if the author requests for help of if the uploader is not active on Commons. Poco a poco (talk) 16:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- I don't necessarily mean uploading the version to replace your version, but to upload a reference version to better illustrate what I mean. Tupungato (talk) 17:55, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, ok, I got you, well, you can do that if it's necessary. I'm rather interested in your feedback about the new version Poco a poco (talk) 19:26, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, fair, thank you for your feedback. I made some changes, please, have a look. To your question, please, don't upload versions on your own, that makes no sense. I have the RAW file as source and if somebody requests a change later one I wouldn't have the right version, so it makes sense that I do those changes. Furthermore I consider myself skilled enough to make a tilt or change the WB. I believe that uploading an own version is appropiate if the author requests for help of if the uploader is not active on Commons. Poco a poco (talk) 16:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Majestic. – Aristeas (talk) 19:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Weak supportIt could be sharper, but it's a big impressive photo Cmao20 (talk) 19:39, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your feedback. I can apply more sharpness but personally I feel that sharpness is good Poco a poco (talk) 22:07, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Huh, the version since the edits you've made appears way sharper to me. Strange that. Great candidate now Cmao20 (talk) 15:25, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:49, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Harsh light at 10 am but the orientation of the sun is appropriate and the view point excellent -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:46, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
OpposeNeutral The harsh sunlight spoils it for me. Otherwise nice. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:40, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Frank, ok, I've adjusted the curves. Poco a poco (talk) 08:23, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 09:49, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Frank. Why replaced in Wikidata that photo (better compo, almost same quality level) by this one? --A.Savin 08:07, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- You alreday said not same quality level, this one has better lighting and IMHO better lighting and a more encyclopedic pose. Is this really the right frame to discuss wikidata edits? --Poco a poco (talk) 11:28, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Nice, but I think this was not fast enough to freeze all movements. There is motion blur on the ear. Yann (talk) 12:39, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- I agree, the right ear has motion blur and 1/125s is too slow for a moving subject and it is much preferable to have a frozen subject than reaching ISO 100 in a situation like this in my opinion, otherwise nice composition -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:23, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 08:52, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Excellent viewpoint but the lighting still kinda spoils it. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:57, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support for the improved version. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:59, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 10:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:15, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 18:17:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Sweden
- Info The upper part of Parkaden, a multi-storey car park built 1965 built by the luxury department store Nordiska kompaniet in Stockholm. The design is a combination of one express ramp and inclined parking ramps. Architect was Hans Asplund. Hans Asplund, son of the legendary architect Gunnar Asplund, and a architect and tarchitectural theorist most know today for Parkaden and Eslöv civic centre but also said to is have coined the term neo-brutalism. Over time, Hans Asplund became increasingly critical of modernism and, in 1980, published the book Farväl till functionalism, which systematically reviewed what the author considered to be the shortcomings of modernist architecture and his father's famous manifesto acceptera.
- This is one of my own favorite pictures (I have a large enlargement in my apartment). I like the lines, the shadows and the contrasts and the, perhaps for many unexpected, beauty of this rather dilapidated sixties dream. The photo was taken before the upper floor was rebuilt. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 18:17, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ArildV (talk) 18:17, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:57, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support A great, interesting, abstract way to illustrate an ugly building Cmao20 (talk) 00:14, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:03, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 12:54, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Revealing beauty in ugly things is one of the great gifts of art (here: photography). – Aristeas (talk) 19:17, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:52, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support. --Ratekreel (talk) 10:12, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very abstract. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:58, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 10:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 14:37:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Estonia
- Info created & uploaded by Kalev Kuljus - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 14:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 14:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lots of wow Cmao20 (talk) 17:05, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great with lights and contrast.--Paracel63 (talk) 17:26, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I'm puzzled, on one side the lights are wow, but the details quality are unsharp (and sometimes blurry). --PierreSelim (talk) 17:33, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The light is undoubtedly great, but unfortunately the overall quality is too low. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:38, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose per PierreSelim. Clear wow factor, but low quality. I think a tripod was necessary here, in this dark room, to allow more parts in focus with a larger depth of field and also less ISO for a better quality. Incidentally the highlights could have been more carefully handled -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per above, I am not fond of the top crop either Poco a poco (talk) 12:06, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:37, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per above. -- Karelj (talk) 09:35, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 14:09:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Callaeidae (New Zealand wattlebirds)
- Info Translocations, which started in the 1980s, have helped secure the future of this near-threatened New Zealand endemic. No FPs of this family. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:09, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:09, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cute Cmao20 (talk) 17:05, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow. --PierreSelim (talk) 17:35, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Expressive. – Aristeas (talk) 19:16, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:27, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 10:35:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family_:_Polyporaceae
- Info Yellow green fungi (tentative: Trametes sp.) on log, growing around silver oak leaves. The large fungi are about 7.5 cm (3 in) across. Green colour may be due to algal growth. Focus stack of 25 images. Singnally, Somwarpet, Coorg, Karnataka, India. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 10:35, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tagooty (talk) 10:35, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:20, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:47, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very high level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:02, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:56, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:15, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:11, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:54, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:30, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 08:52, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Field of Iceland poppies in the flower garden near Cheomseongdae Observatory in Gyeongju South Korea.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 00:44:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#South Korea
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:10, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I just love the pet insect you placed on the flower! Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:25, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- :-) A divine hand placed many in that field. You have to wait less than one minute to get one (or two, three...) on any flower :-) Basile Morin (talk) 10:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 10:33, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support amazing detail for such a large expanse. --Tagooty (talk) 10:38, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The white balance seems a bit too warm for the lighting conditions, especially the greens and reds in the foreground appear to have a strong yellow cast. I'm on an unfamiliar, uncalibrated monitor, though, so that may be just my perception being off. --El Grafo (talk) 11:11, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment. It's the original temperature, so I would expect accurate colors in this situation, at 8:22 am, almost golden hour. Colors also look normal on my calibrated screen. I agree it's quite warm, but I tend to believe that a colder temperature would correspond to a later time of day -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:26, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- It's great as it is, but I reduced yellow a bit and that worked nicely. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:14, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 11:13, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very beautiful, and it’s impressive how you achieved constant sharpness without sacrificing too much detail to diffraction. – Aristeas (talk) 15:52, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:03, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Jakubhal 20:10, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:46, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:54, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 15:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 15:38, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:11, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Golden poppies -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:50, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:31, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:58, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:05, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 20:45:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Singapore
- Info Night view of the Helix Bridge and the Marina Bay Sands Hotel, Marina Bay, Singapore. Note: I've already a featured image of this area, this one taken a different day, with different light, from a different location and with the ArtScience Museum in the compo. I opted for this nom after the discussion that took place here. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Outstanding. Very different to the other FP in composition and light. Cmao20 (talk) 00:24, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Nice but perspective should be improved. You can see pillars leaning and the reflections in the water are not vertical -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:48, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- I'll look into it this evening CET Poco a poco (talk) 08:22, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Done, FYI Basile Morin Poco a poco (talk) 18:28, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well done. Special architecture -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:19, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:57, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:35, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very nice and very nice place. May there are some stars, may they light spots are hot pixel. Please have a look. --XRay 💬 10:33, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Stunning scenery and photograph. (I assume you will tweak the perspective acc. to Basile’s hint.) – Aristeas (talk) 15:50, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:03, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Paracel63 (talk) 17:24, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Jakubhal 20:09, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:55, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:52, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:48, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:29, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support One of the best night photos of MBS I've seen. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:59, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 10:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 21:04:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Giraffidae (Giraffes)
- Info created by SanNikGar - uploaded by SanNikGar - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 21:04, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- JukoFF (talk) 21:04, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Useful picture, but bad crop and weird colours Cmao20 (talk) 00:28, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Cmao20. And weird vignetting -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:45, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Artificial background... Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:33, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose colours and backlight are not well handled here. --PierreSelim (talk) 09:41, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Milky way in Elbrus.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 21:00:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Sky – Milky Way over the Elbrus, Russiа
- Info created by Oliwok - uploaded by Oliwok - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 21:00, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- JukoFF (talk) 21:00, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 22:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Quite a lot of chroma noise. I don't feel strongly either way, but I'm not sure this is the quality we'd expect. Cmao20 (talk) 00:29, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
{{cmt}}Support I did just add some notes to identify the portion of the Milky Way visible in the star field. It is the Serpens–Aquila Rift. The two main stats are Altair in the center of the image and Alpha Ophiuchi on the right. The third one, lower on the left, is Jupiter, that in August 2021 was in the constellation Capricorn. Several star clusters are also visible. I agree with Cmao20 on the fact that there is a lot of chroma noise, but the picture has some value. --Harlock81 (talk) 11:36, 21 November 2024 (UTC)- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:25, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:50, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:10, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:36, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 19:14:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Sciuridae (Squirrels)
- Info Red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris) in Bednarski Park in Kraków, Poland. Created and uploaded by Jakub Hałun, nominated by – Aristeas (talk) 19:14, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I know I know I know: Just like “all sunsets are beautiful”, all squirrels are cute ;–), we already got quite some nice squirrel FPs and we are very demanding when it comes to photos of common animals. But I can’t resist to nominate this one. The light is so beautiful, the colours are so good, the pose is so nice. Since my last move I am watching these little rascals on my walks and this is a very typical posture and behaviour. Bon appétit, dear squirrel, and congratulations to the photographer! -- Aristeas (talk) 19:14, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good choice to nominate this irresistible rascal. Sometimes they can be very tame, the picture reminds me of the Łazienki Park in Warsaw, there they get incredibly close to people for a nut. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 22:33, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:56, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas. This is also a special squirrel, looking at viewer with giant eyes, ears stretched, paws on belly, its booty well buried in his mouth :-) Yum -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:56, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:03, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:46, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:25, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:05, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:59, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:07, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:48, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --EUPBR (talk) 17:58, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:45, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:34, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 08:52, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Respublik (talk) 13:25, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 16:11:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Rail tracks
- Info IMO superb composition, quality, and subject. created by Ermell - uploaded by Ermell - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:11, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:11, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent idea and realization. One of my favourites from WLM 2024/Germany. – Aristeas (talk) 16:38, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I love geometric structures, clear lines and shapes in photography. Saubere Arbeit, Ermell! -- Radomianin (talk) 21:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 22:24, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 22:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thanks for the nom.--Ermell (talk) 23:15, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Geometrical shapes and patterns of the composition, and also rusty / decaying materials at full resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:25, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:14, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:58, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:22, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:03, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking perspective, geometry and colours.--Paracel63 (talk) 17:39, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:47, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:25, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:06, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:58, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:08, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:43, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:10, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:43, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very well done aesthetic composition. I am sure you'll be able to take some good orthophotos in Hof, too ;) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 15:58, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 10:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 13:43:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#France
- Info Architect Paul Abadie was commissioned to design the basilica, initially (1875), in a Romanesque-Byzantine style. He died in 1884, and then other architects continued his work with the result that a structure was obtained without a predominant characteristic, and for this reason unique in the world. Since 1900 this place full of meaning has been a symbol of Montmatre in Paris. c/u/n by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:43, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:43, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Nice weather but the picture is not horizontal. See the two horses, not leveled. And not vertical either (see the walls leaning to the center on both sides) -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:25, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- I willingly corrected the verticals because a very slight convergence was actually visible with three-point perspective. Instead, the majestic staircase with gardens that leads to the basilica, and consequently the balcony where people are looking out, is not aligned with the basilica, because they have different angles. For this reason there remains a slight perspective shape whereby the horse on the right is slightly higher than the other. By the way, thanks for your comment. Terragio67 (talk) 11:28, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the correction of the verticals. About the horizontal lines, I'm sorry to disagree, after having taken the time to listen the arguments (Aristeas's in particular) and looking at maps, I believe that such a distance of the camera associated to such a minor angle (to the right) cannot realistically justify a strong horizontal inclination. This could be calculable geometrically :-)
- I think this aspect is correct. Top AND bottom -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Basile, thank you very much for your additional effort and for your edited version! My statement (below) was mostly about the obvious misalignment between the axes of the church and the balcony. You are right that this does not necessarily imply the strength of the horizontal inclination and hence of the differences of the height e.g. of the two horses or of the two minor domes. There must be some difference, and it should indeed be possible to calculate it, but this exceeds my possibilites. So it is quite possible that these differences could/should be smaller and more like in your edited version – which indeed looks very appealing. I would like to ask you to upload your edited version as a derivative file to Commons; I guess that many people would appreciate your version. Best, – Aristeas (talk) 16:14, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Possible in the next few days. Thank you very much, Aristeas, for your suggestion -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:05, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Today I tried some adjustments based on the above considerations made during the FPC. I have to say that the result looks very good to me, with minimal changes. I would still be curious to see the derivative work from Basile.
- @Aristeas , @Cmao20 , @Radomianin , @VulcanSphere , @Famberhorst , @Poco a poco , @Agnes Monkelbaan , @EUPBR , @Iwaqarhashmi , @Giles Laurent , @George Chernilevsky Terragio67 (talk) 18:37, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your efforts with this difficult object. If I'm honest, I like Basile's version the best. In this version the cross looks a bit crooked. But please wait with any further changes until the other colleagues have given their opinion. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 19:08, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support this version. Improved from the previous one, in my opinion. This might be a guess, but mine above too, and I find the perspective credible in this case. Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:41, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I was confused by the perspective, but Terragio67’s answer has opened my eyes: the basilica and the stairs/balcony are indeed not on the same axis ([1]), so in any photo of the south façade either the basilica or the monumental stairs and balcony will look misaligned. In photos taken from further away this is less appearant, but still visible (see the category). I can’t blame the photographer for this. A brownie point for this photo: the perspective avoids the usual vast crowd of people in the foreground – there are still enough people in the photo, of course, but they appear rather few when compared to the commons shots from the stairs. – Aristeas (talk) 15:46, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thanks to Aristeas for his detective work, and to Terragio67 for this fine image. -- Radomianin (talk) 17:35, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:25, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:06, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:08, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:41, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --EUPBR (talk) 17:59, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:09, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:33, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 10:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 02:34:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Clothing_and_textiles
- Info Moschino ensemble from the fall 2014 ready-to-wear collection, on display at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in the Camp - Notes on Fashion exhibit. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 02:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 02:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:14, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Eye-catching, appealing composition and subject. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:39, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:23, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 15:26, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:56, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:38, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:36, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 22:25:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Germany
- Info Rodach bridge in Seßlach. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 22:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ermell (talk) 22:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 01:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:16, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Charming bridge with history and character; good light and atmosphere. I like how the statue of Saint (John of) Nepomuk seems to contemplate the facing wayside shrine … – Aristeas (talk) 09:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:56, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:44, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:51, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:08, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:26, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Nice subject (although it's a shame that we have no details about it) but I find the right crop too abrupt spoiling the compo, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 19:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:08, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 08:53, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 14:30:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports
- Info Wheelchair tennis at the 2012 Summer Paralympics - Janel Manns. Created by Sport the Library - uploaded by Laurenrobertson1 - nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 14:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Zquid (talk) 14:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Paracel63 (talk) 14:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Very interesting. Unfortunately the crop is too tight at the top -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with Basile and in fact the issue is making me oppose --Poco a poco (talk) 19:36, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 08:53, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:35, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 10:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The crop is indeed very narrow. Maybe(!) it is possible to extend the background on the image top with good image editing skills --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 16:13, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 10:09:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family_:_Camelidae_(Camelids)
- Info Camels at Aït Benhaddou, Saharan caravan route, Marocco (آيت بن حدّو, ⴰⵢⵜ ⵃⴰⴷⴷⵓ). My shot. -- Mile (talk) 10:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 10:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 01:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:19, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:35, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:15, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 08:53, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 13:35:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Painted ceilings
- Info all by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 13:35, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 13:35, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:14, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Part of the painting is hidden at the right. We just see a bit of an arm and of a head, because the camera was not in the axis. Also black distracting shape at the right in the foreground. Problem of composition in my view, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:54, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I'm glad you say that, this is trompe-l'œil and the painter Francesco Battaglioli did a perfect job because the ceiling is flat. The black spots on the right are floodlights I could not hide.--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment
Good point :-)Sorry, I don't read Italian (for the title) though I think the word Trompe-l'œil is missing there. Still, there is "flat" and "flat", and the camera doesn't seem in the axis. The bottom and the sides are not symmetrical. To be honest, at first sight my eyes were attracted by the distracting black shape. That part could be cropped out. The two columns at the bottom are showing the same perspective, as if the picture was taken from the right -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)- I'm terribly sorry, I was tromped, the right part is missing. Trompe-l'oeil is in the English description, the other is just the filename. By the way I was going to delete my comment. You can see it in the other fotos of the painting.--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Re-updated comment Yes, after looking at this view I realized my first impression was rather right. And it seems also possible to take the picture from the center, like here. Thanks for your comment. -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:56, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- And at least I was fooled a short time at thinking it was a real trompe-l'oeil :-) Is maybe worth visiting again :-) Basile Morin (talk) 23:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Re-updated comment Yes, after looking at this view I realized my first impression was rather right. And it seems also possible to take the picture from the center, like here. Thanks for your comment. -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:56, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- I'm terribly sorry, I was tromped, the right part is missing. Trompe-l'oeil is in the English description, the other is just the filename. By the way I was going to delete my comment. You can see it in the other fotos of the painting.--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment
- Comment I'm glad you say that, this is trompe-l'œil and the painter Francesco Battaglioli did a perfect job because the ceiling is flat. The black spots on the right are floodlights I could not hide.--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like it the way it is. Not every single Featured Picture has to be in the axis. This is a photo depicting a three dimensional object with details in variety of levels. I appreciate the fact that I can see the sculpted balustrade, which would be invisible or almost invisible in symmetrical axis composition encouraged by many Commons users. This perspective allows me to appreciate the painted ceiling, but also to better understand the surrounding architecture, which is a great thing taking into account Wikimedia Commons image should be encyclopedically useful. Don't get discouraged in submitting unusual perspectives for Featured Pictures. Other voters, don't be intimidated by seasoned users who discourage unusual perspectives. --Tupungato (talk) 22:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Tupungato: "don't be intimidated by seasoned users" who spread unusual perspectives through optical illusions! -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Wow, “seasoned users” – I must remember that cultivated phrase. Very useful, as nobody can say for sure whether this is a respectful description or a refined insult. Well, every FPC regular knows that Basile and me often disagree, but when Basile is called a “seasoned user” I hope I am allowed to share this designation with him. Or am I already a rotten user, having been on Commons for six years longer? Who knows … ;–) But I agree that nobody should be intimidated by any other user, of course. Please take our arguments, check them, compare them, form your own opinion based on reasons, vote. Thank you. – Aristeas (talk) 10:12, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I'm afraid I'm a "seasoned user" too: born in the first half of last century A.D. 1947, with commons for 17 years, 150 FP and 7000 QI hahaha --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 11:19, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Welcome to the club of seasoned users, Wolfgang! ;–) We should request a privileged users group with many “members only” features … – Aristeas (talk) 12:38, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Can I get a membership card please? ;o) Yann (talk) 20:02, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- only if you support my FP candidate ;-) Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:56, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Can I get a membership card please? ;o) Yann (talk) 20:02, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I'm not too keen on the crop, but the photo itself is great Cmao20 (talk) 22:34, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:35, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 11:51:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Ukraine
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 11:51, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 11:51, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Certainly not the most romantic one of the many castles and manors of the Ukraine, but the longer I look at it the more I like the clear geometric construction and how the fortress hides an imposing palazzo in fortezza. One hint: On the roofs of the palace there is some blue/orange/red moiree. In Lightroom or Photoshop/ACR, paint a brush mask over it and set “Moiree removal” e.g. to 60; it may be useful to increase (with the same mask) the saturation a bit, e.g. 20, because moiree removal often decreases saturation. If this is unclear, just drop me a note. – Aristeas (talk) 19:31, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you for review. I didn't notice moiree on the roofs. I fixed this and deployed new version. --Rbrechko (talk) 12:58, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you very much! Now the roofs are perfect. – Aristeas (talk) 15:44, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you for review. I didn't notice moiree on the roofs. I fixed this and deployed new version. --Rbrechko (talk) 12:58, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:11, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Inimese peatäi.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 18:09:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Pediculidae (Lice)
- Info created by Janeklass - uploaded by Janeklass - nominated by Janeklass -- Janeklass (talk) 18:09, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Janeklass (talk) 18:09, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- I modified this file a little. I didn't do anything with the lighting, but I cropped it a little and changed the aspect ratio from 2:3 to 4:5 Janeklass (talk) 17:56, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Perhaps a bit dark? Cmao20 (talk) 01:54, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Underexposed Yes, though the picture looks interesting -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:21, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- It's impossible to agree with the claim that this image is underexposed. This is clearly proven by the excellent visibility of every detail on the head louse's body - its tiny hairs, complex body texture, and even various color shades. The dark, almost black background is not an exposure error, but rather serves to highlight the main subject more clearly. The image's tonality is well balanced - we can clearly see details in both lighter and darker areas, confirming that the exposure is not incorrect. This lighting choice is intentional here, designed to give the image a slightly dramatic effect. If the picture were truly underexposed, we wouldn't be able to see such fine details and color tones that are now clearly visible. Janeklass (talk) 04:19, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Disagree. You will see more details if the photo is better exposed. Currently the contrasts are very hard to distinguish, especially at thumbnail size.
- Note that you can also see a lot of details here, although the photo is underexposed too. And that one was properly fixed.
- Hard to hear that "it's impossible to agree with the claim that this image is underexposed" while the two first reviewers here both find the image too dark :-) Then above you write "This lighting choice is intentional here, designed to give the image a slightly dramatic effect" (by the way, I don't understand this dramatic intention. It's just a close-up of an animal, no special background / context). Sorry, clear light problem for me, in state -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:45, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- I have responded to the criticism and want the evaluators to know that the lighting choice here is clearly intentional. How you choose to evaluate it is up to you. Janeklass (talk) 04:56, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Underexposed Yes, though the picture looks interesting -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:21, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. Please fix the light as you did here -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:00, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- The subjects are different and unfortunately the same approach cannot be applied here. Increasing the light would also amplify surface reflections and this would ruin the image completely Janeklass (talk) 05:17, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think so, but the same was said here. At least one stop could be easily gained in that case IMO -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:26, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- I think this would cause more issues for the image. Unfortunately, I can't make those changes to this photo. This image stays as is. If there's no support... no worries, I'll try with another photo in the future (maybe) :D Janeklass (talk) 05:45, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think so, but the same was said here. At least one stop could be easily gained in that case IMO -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:26, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It is too dark for my eyes. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:58, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support It is a very fascinating image. The darkness is not a problem, as the object is clearly seen, and that seems more like a creative choice on this dark creature. I am thinking that maybe a square format would be better for this image... but I'm not sure. Kruusamägi (talk) 13:24, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 13:40, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry. I agree that there are dark photographs which do not tolerate an increasure of the exposure – reproductions of dark paintings, some gloomy atmospheric landcape photographs, low-key photos etc. However I fail to see why this would apply to this photo, despite of the explanations. I have played a bit with this JPEG file and can confirm that a careful increase of the brightness works very well when at the same time the light parts are dialed down a bit. If you have a raw image or a 16 bit TIFF file, this should work even better. Of course you have all right to keep your photo as you think it should be (so keep it!), but I cannot support it here. Sorry again, – Aristeas (talk) 10:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- As I mentioned before, this solution was intentional. I did try making changes but wasn't satisfied with the result. I can see that opinions are divided on this one - and I suppose not everyone has to like the picture. It's clear that I won't get much support for this image, but that's okay. I'm already looking forward to when this period ends and I can submit my next works 🙂 Janeklass (talk) 13:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support but I agree it should be brightened. if it fails, anyone could just upload a new [separate] version and nominate it. — Rhododendrites talk | 22:17, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 03:10, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Aristeas Poco a poco (talk) 12:10, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Петергоф, Нижний парк, Львиный каскад. Фонтанная статуя «Нимфа, льющая воду из кувшина» 2.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 17:34:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Fountains
- Info Lion Cascade, Peterhof, Saint Petersburg created by Игорь Гордеев - uploaded and nominated by -- FBilula (talk) 17:34, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- FBilula (talk) 17:34, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 18:23, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Interesting place, good composition light Cmao20 (talk) 01:52, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:55, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 20:15, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support —-Llez (talk) 13:32, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support —- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:45, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 01:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:39, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I like it but I think that taking the picture from the back of the scultpure is not the best idea Poco a poco (talk) 19:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Link-Lee House (HDR).jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 15:23:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_States
- Info created by Euthman - uploaded by Euthman - nominated by DragonflySixtyseven. We have other images of the Link-Lee House, but this is the only one that combines high resolution, interesting angle (it would not look anywhere near as interesting seen head-on), and interesting light (File:Link-Lee House at an Angle.jpg was taken on an overcast day). -- DS (talk) 15:23, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- DS (talk) 15:23, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I agree that the angle and composition is great. I do think the shadows have been lifted too much, though, or else the HDR has gone a bit far. The tree branches particularly on the right don't IMO look natural. Cmao20 (talk) 01:51, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Ghost leaves at the right. No metadata but I would doubt this is a long exposure shot. Thus, more a problem of processing or Photoshopping in my opinion. We can see sorts of diffuse clear halos behind the trees. (Probably same impression as Cmao20, evoking "lifted shadows" / "branches don't look natural") -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:05, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not sharp enough and a bit distorted. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:44, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Constancy - Julius Klinger.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 14:05:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Printed#Posters_and_advertisements
- Info created by Julius Klinger - uploaded by Balkanique - nominated by EUPBR -- EUPBR (talk) 14:05, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- EUPBR (talk) 14:05, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 14:44, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent reproduction of an excellent example for a progressive poster of the 1920s. (This reduced style was ultra-modern then, and unlike many advertisings from the 1950s [not even to mention the terrible Nazi kitsch] it still works well.) – Aristeas (talk) 11:21, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:07, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 01:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:39, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 23:13, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Candidati per la rimozione dalla vetrina
[edit]Featured picture candidates
[edit]Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2024 at 20:19:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait
- Info Man dressed as the pagan god Veles at the traditional Rękawka festival in Kraków. All by me -- Jakubhal 20:19, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Jakubhal 20:19, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2024 at 19:46:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Automobiles
- Info Abandoned Ford E-Series van by Gerritsen Creek in Brooklyn, New York. I like the mix between urban waste and nature at the edge of a city. I was torn which to nominate, this one or this wider view that includes a glimpse of Manhattan, but I think making the van the subject probably works best. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 19:46, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 19:46, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2024 at 10:55:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Storms
- Info created by Greg Henshall/FEMA, uploaded by Consequentially, nominated by Yann
- Info Greensburg, Kansas, USA, May 16, 2007. The center of town twelve days after it was hit by an F5 tornado with 200 mph (approx. 321 km/h) winds.
- Support -- Yann (talk) 10:55, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2024 at 10:52:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus_:_Alopochen
- Info Quite a common bird these days in Europe. FPs of an adult's head and of a chick. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:52, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:52, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose as long as not sufficiently COM:CAT'egorized --A.Savin 16:39, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2024 at 10:18:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Ukraine
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 10:18, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 10:18, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Question Would the castle and reflection be more interesting than the foreground grass? Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:43, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2024 at 09:45:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Others
- Info created by en:Eloise Harriet Stannard - uploaded by Amitchell125 - nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 09:45, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Zquid (talk) 09:45, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- I think the artist made many beautiful paintings, but this is something extra. And the wasps make it soo realistic... Who hasn't have wasp visit on the fruits/berries or near the coffee table in the summertime? // Zquid (talk) 09:56, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Sorry, but this 1 megapixel image is below the required minimum resolution of 2 megapixels. Please try to find a higher resolution version and we would appreciate a new nomination. Sincerely, -- Radomianin (talk) 10:52, 25 November 2024 (UTC) | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |
- Comment @Radomianin "Featured picture candidates-rookie" mistake. I forgot to check the pixels. Sorry! // Zquid (talk) 19:50, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Zquid (talk) 19:50, 25 November 2024 (UTC).
File:Wooden hut fence mountains and blue sky in the green rice fields of Vang Vieng in Laos.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2024 at 07:59:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Laos
- Info created & uploaded by Basile Morin - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 07:59, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomer T (talk) 07:59, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you very much, Tomer T, for the nomination. Tiny isolated hut in a green environment -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:15, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:24, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:19, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Bukchon-ro 11-gil street with hanok houses at blue hour in Bukchon Hanok Village Seoul.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2024 at 07:56:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#South Korea
- Info created & uploaded by Basile Morin - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 07:56, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomer T (talk) 07:56, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Interesting but lacking that special thing to make it extraordinary IMHO --Poco a poco (talk) 08:55, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you very much, Tomer T, for the nomination. It's a pretty street surrounded by authentic hanok houses in Seoul, and I was lucky that evening to find it deserted after a sunny day -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:12, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:24, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2024 at 22:22:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes/United States#New York City
- Info created by Superbass - uploaded by Superbass - nominated by Superbass -- Superbass (talk) 22:22, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Superbass (talk) 22:22, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Dramatic sky, great colours and composition Cmao20 (talk) 01:29, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:58, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 08:45, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 08:55, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 10:01, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:02, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:44, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:20, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:46, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:21, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Incredible. Wolverine X-eye 17:37, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 19:55, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 20:23, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2024 at 21:55:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Ukraine
- Info Landscape in the Carpathian Biosphere Reserve in the Zakarpattia Oblast. One of my favorites from Wiki Loves Earth 2024 in Ukraine. Created and uploaded by Estolyarov - nominated by -- Radomianin (talk) 21:55, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great landscape panorama in which, in my opinion, everything is somehow coherent and doesn't need any big words. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:55, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:25, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fantastic Cmao20 (talk) 01:28, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Foreground and background are in focus due to the very wide depth of field. Nice light and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:28, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:58, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 10:20, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:18, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:46, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:21, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nothing much to complain about. Wolverine X-eye 17:38, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 20:24, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Gorgeous — Rhododendrites talk | 20:40, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2024 at 11:34:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Rhineland-Palatinate
- Info created by Rolf Kranz - uploaded by Rolf Kranz - nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 11:34, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 11:34, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:12, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:25, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:48, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:49, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:59, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Mystical foggy atmosphere, good candidate and deserved 4th place at WLM. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:49, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 10:01, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 10:21, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:21, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 20:26, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2024 at 10:01:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Ukraine
- Info created by Ryzhkov Oleksandr - uploaded by Ryzhkov Oleksandr - nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:01, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:01, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Nice but it needs a perspective correction Poco a poco (talk) 15:11, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:48, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 08:40, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking red facade and pink combination with the sky -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:15, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:11, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:46, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:21, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
File:035 Vertical panorama of the Milky Way during Perseids seen from Oeschinensee Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 21:16:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Sky
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:16, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:16, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good idea to do a vertical pano Cmao20 (talk) 22:33, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:15, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:54, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice! Also good to see variety in your nominations. A vertical strip of the milky way galaxy in this case :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:11, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:23, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:47, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The black foreground is too big, and there is nothing interesting there (compared with File:Milky way in Elbrus.jpg). Cropping that would improve the picture. Yann (talk) 10:04, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your comment. I will crop approximately half of the foreground this evening once I'll have access to my computer -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:10, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 19:35:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures outdoors
- Info created by מקף־עברי - uploaded by מקף־עברי - nominated by מקף־עברי -- מקף־עברי (talk) 19:35, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- מקף־עברי (talk) 19:35, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 22:32, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:15, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 15:03, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:22, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:47, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 16:17, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:58, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 16:01:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)
- Info Good quality, a different composition to any of the lion pictures currently in the category, and taken on safari. created by Byrdyak - uploaded by Byrdyak - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:01, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:01, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support Ain't no way was I going to pass the chance of supporting this absolutely magnificent, perfectly captured piece of art. Woah!! You have no idea how good this image is man. I don't think FP is enough! Wolverine X-eye 18:10, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Wolverine Je-str (talk) 19:57, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:15, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:41, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 08:49, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:54, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Subjects, light and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:42, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 12:02, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good, good. Per others, and no annoying unsharp or blurry areas on the motif, and the composition is well handled. Both cats are looking into the same direction, both heading right, and a peaceful scene. As a little interpretation, the male lion has the control over the situation while the lioness is relaxing :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:38, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:44, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile and PantheraLeo1359531. – Aristeas (talk) 15:02, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:10, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:20, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:47, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 16:25, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 10:02, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:58, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 20:26, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 16:01:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1940-1949
- Info created by Claude Dettloff, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann
- Support Notable historical image with its own article. This was a delicate restoration. It was heavily damaged. Apparently the print was scratched with a sharp tool. All copies on the Net have the same defect. -- Yann (talk) 16:01, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Historical or not, this is an atrocious image. Wolverine X-eye 18:13, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think it's lovely Cmao20 (talk) 01:46, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:15, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Happy end :-) I checked the restoration work and find it well handled, given the difficulty.
- Photographically the focus is wrong (and the crop tight at the left), it's a shame, but this image has its own story (and yes, also own article on en-wiki). It has become an iconic photograph. We should take this into account.
- Finally, a reminder about the voting process. COM:FPC: The meaning of the image should be judged according to the cultural context of the image, not by the cultural context of the observer. An image "speaks" to people, and it has the capacity to evoke emotion such as tenderness, rage, rejection, happiness, sadness, etc. Good photographs are not limited to evoking pleasant sensations... -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:37, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nomination, per Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:48, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nomination, per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 15:01, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:18, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:47, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:57, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 20:38, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 12:18:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Ukraine
- Info created by Andrew4you - uploaded by Andrew4you - nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:18, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:18, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Big tilt. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Checked, image not tilted -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:08, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Building looks vertical but check the reflections please. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:31, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- So, a part of the polished stone structure has a slight tilt. This is not a problem for the perception of the image as a whole and not a quality problem IMO. -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:44, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:27, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support You got the lighting spot on! Well done! Wolverine X-eye 18:15, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:37, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:21, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:15, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:40, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 08:53, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:54, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 10:28, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 12:53, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:56, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:10, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:16, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:47, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 08:43, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:56, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 07:38:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Others
- Info created by Janeklass - uploaded by Janeklass - nominated by Janeklass -- Janeklass (talk) 07:38, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Janeklass (talk) 07:38, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 12:31, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:02, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive shot considering the subject you had to work with. Wolverine X-eye 18:19, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:19, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 08:54, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tupungato (talk) 13:52, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Here the darkness works well IMHO. – Aristeas (talk) 14:56, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:10, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:14, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 16:35, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:56, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 20:27, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 20:35, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing moisture sucking of Appias lalage (Doubleday, 1842) - Spot Puffin (Male) WLB.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 04:59:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
- Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 04:59, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 04:59, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:02, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment What is the blurry object in the background beneath the wing? Cmao20 (talk) 16:26, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- I think it's a motion blurred droplot of water falling -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:19, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Okay then Cmao20 (talk) 14:40, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:39, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:54, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:12, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:17, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support High level of detail, good focus -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:01, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:52, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:55, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 20:35, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 03:06:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Sky
- Info created by Zwiebackgesicht - uploaded by Zwiebackgesicht - nominated by Zwiebackgesicht -- Zwiebackgesicht (talk) 03:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Zwiebackgesicht (talk) 03:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Why PNG? I would support a JPEG version. Yann (talk) 12:31, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:35, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I've never seen the Milky Way look anything like this. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:00, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Per Charles, the colours certainly do look very strange. I'd like to know more about how this picture was taken. Was it during an aurora, or is a special filter being used? Cmao20 (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- The image was strongly edited : the milky way was brightened a lot and everything else extremely darkened with a painting brush. Also the stars are sadly out of focus (these shots always require manual focus and usually to achieve a good focus on the stars the cursor must be set just slightly before infinity because at infinity the focus is always missed, at least on Sony cameras but I don't know what camera was used for this one since the exif data are missing). As for the colors they are either a side effect of the strong edits or were painted in the image with a brush -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:09, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Je-str (talk) 19:59, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Giles Laurent. Surprised this is still picking up support votes. Cmao20 (talk) 22:32, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose What are these red and green stripes? The picture also looks overprocessed -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:47, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Finally no, per others. Yann (talk) 12:05, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
File:010 Greater flamingos male and female in the Camargue during mating season Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2024 at 22:57:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Phoenicopteridae (Flamingos)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent focus on the pair, appealing light and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:40, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 06:04, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:25, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:35, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:02, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Zero complaints from me. Wolverine X-eye 18:17, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:40, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:39, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 08:53, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:55, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:17, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 10:02, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:54, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2024 at 22:32:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications/Germany#Bavaria
- Info All by me -- Ermell (talk) 22:32, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ermell (talk) 22:32, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Subject, composition and weather -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:42, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:01, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Superb Cmao20 (talk) 16:03, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile, and excellent quality for a drone photo. – Aristeas (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:17, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:38, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 08:52, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:48, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:19, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:15, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 08:41, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 10:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:53, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2024 at 17:46:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Poland
- Info created by Jakub T. Jankiewicz - uploaded by Jakub T. Jankiewicz - nominated by EUPBR -- EUPBR (talk) 17:46, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- EUPBR (talk) 17:46, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow. Great atmosphere Cmao20 (talk) 19:47, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 20:46, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Nice but too dark IMHO Poco a poco (talk) 22:09, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Underexposed Agree with Poco. Even an atmospheric image needs to offer a little more distinguishable content. The roof and the trees are currently too dark in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:36, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Heavily manipulated image. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:38, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Question Frank, this is a very important hint, can you elaborate a bit on the manipulation? Thank you! – Aristeas (talk) 08:25, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- The overprocessing (in particular with regard to the colors) makes this look super artificial to me. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 09:45, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your assessment, Frank! It seems the photographer was after a very painterly look … – Aristeas (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I hear you. I guess it's more a matter of taste and what the image is being used for. In my opinion, for a piece of art to be hung on the wall, it would be wonderful. But in an encyclopedic context, the heavy-handed processing is just to much. At least for me. Given the artistic merit, I'd be perfectly ok with it being promoted.--Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral I’m torn on this one: on the one hand I am conviced by Frank’s assessment, on the other hand I can’t deny the atmosphere and effect of the result. After looking at other photos of the church it seems not totally unrealistic to me, so I am inclined to regard the editing as within the creative freedom of the photographer. – Aristeas (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support The image looks natural to me (eventhough it's a bit underexposed in my opinion, hence the weak support) and I honestly think the image was not edited much from what was captured with the camera. In night photography long exposure shots like this one (6sec exposure) often lead to such colors and such light effects -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:24, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per Giles –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:14, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:00, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Dark but very nice IMHO -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:02, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support After some reflection and thought, I agree with Giles' evaluation. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:57, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:53, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:13, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2024 at 09:54:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Iceland#Western Region (Vesturland)
- Info created by C-M - uploaded by C-M - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 09:54, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tupungato (talk) 09:54, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great selfie! ;o) Yann (talk) 10:43, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Is the author near the table near the lighthouse? -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:22, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 15:22, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 15:37, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --EUPBR (talk) 17:58, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:43, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 20:47, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition and viewpoint -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:22, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:59, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Apparently a stitched pano, should be marked and categorized as such. --A.Savin 08:17, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:28, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive landscape, impressive photo. The lighthouse is slightly leaning to the right, so maybe a tiny rotation or perspective correction would be useful. And obviously A.Savin is right that {{Panorama}}, Category:Panoramics in West-Iceland etc. should be added. – Aristeas (talk) 15:39, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas, I think the tower is visibly crooked.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:37, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:30, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Per Aristeas, would support if the perspective correction is applied Poco a poco (talk) 15:14, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 10:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:52, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
File:RDAF General Dynamics F-16AM Fighting Falcon E-006 Royal International Air Tattoo 2024 01.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2024 at 10:00:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Military_jet_aircraft
- Info created by Julian Herzog - uploaded by Julian Herzog - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 10:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tupungato (talk) 10:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:02, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:42, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:47, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive view of the cockpit -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:17, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you for the nomination! — Julian H.✈ 07:41, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:26, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:01, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well frozen, beautiful colour contrast. – Aristeas (talk) 15:33, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:31, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Aristeas. It's also nice how well the traces on the wings and the exhaust system are captured. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:28, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Jakubhal 14:52, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:15, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:41, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Elefante africano de sabana (Loxodonta africana), parque nacional de Amboseli, Kenia, 2024-05-22, DD 07.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 20:55:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Elephantidae_(Elephants)
- Info African bush elephant (Loxodonta africana), Amboseli National Park, Kenya. It's the largest living land animal with bulls reaching an average shoulder height of 3.04–3.36 metres (10.0–11.0 ft) and a body mass of 5.2–6.9 tonnes (11,500–15,200 lb). Since 2021, it has been listed as Endangered on the IUCN Red List. It is threatened foremost by habitat destruction, and in parts of its range also by poaching for meat and ivory. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:55, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:55, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:56, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain Isn't the image slightly tilted to the right? I'm estimating it based on the cloud bottoms. I tried to rotate it to the left by about 1.75 degrees, and I believe it looks more correct this way. I also modified the white balance to make it look somewhat colder. I know that elephants can be quite yellowish-brownish, but in this image the plants seem to have too warm hue/white balance. I don't know what the rules and etiquette are about uploading "new versions" or variants, so I haven't uploaded it.--Tupungato (talk) 15:27, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, fair, thank you for your feedback. I made some changes, please, have a look. To your question, please, don't upload versions on your own, that makes no sense. I have the RAW file as source and if somebody requests a change later one I wouldn't have the right version, so it makes sense that I do those changes. Furthermore I consider myself skilled enough to make a tilt or change the WB. I believe that uploading an own version is appropiate if the author requests for help of if the uploader is not active on Commons. Poco a poco (talk) 16:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- I don't necessarily mean uploading the version to replace your version, but to upload a reference version to better illustrate what I mean. Tupungato (talk) 17:55, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, ok, I got you, well, you can do that if it's necessary. I'm rather interested in your feedback about the new version Poco a poco (talk) 19:26, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, fair, thank you for your feedback. I made some changes, please, have a look. To your question, please, don't upload versions on your own, that makes no sense. I have the RAW file as source and if somebody requests a change later one I wouldn't have the right version, so it makes sense that I do those changes. Furthermore I consider myself skilled enough to make a tilt or change the WB. I believe that uploading an own version is appropiate if the author requests for help of if the uploader is not active on Commons. Poco a poco (talk) 16:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Majestic. – Aristeas (talk) 19:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Weak supportIt could be sharper, but it's a big impressive photo Cmao20 (talk) 19:39, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your feedback. I can apply more sharpness but personally I feel that sharpness is good Poco a poco (talk) 22:07, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Huh, the version since the edits you've made appears way sharper to me. Strange that. Great candidate now Cmao20 (talk) 15:25, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:49, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Harsh light at 10 am but the orientation of the sun is appropriate and the view point excellent -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:46, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
OpposeNeutral The harsh sunlight spoils it for me. Otherwise nice. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:40, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Frank, ok, I've adjusted the curves. Poco a poco (talk) 08:23, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 09:49, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Frank. Why replaced in Wikidata that photo (better compo, almost same quality level) by this one? --A.Savin 08:07, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- You alreday said not same quality level, this one has better lighting and IMHO better lighting and a more encyclopedic pose. Is this really the right frame to discuss wikidata edits? --Poco a poco (talk) 11:28, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Nice, but I think this was not fast enough to freeze all movements. There is motion blur on the ear. Yann (talk) 12:39, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- I agree, the right ear has motion blur and 1/125s is too slow for a moving subject and it is much preferable to have a frozen subject than reaching ISO 100 in a situation like this in my opinion, otherwise nice composition -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:23, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 08:52, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Excellent viewpoint but the lighting still kinda spoils it. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:57, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support for the improved version. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:59, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 10:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:15, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 18:17:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Sweden
- Info The upper part of Parkaden, a multi-storey car park built 1965 built by the luxury department store Nordiska kompaniet in Stockholm. The design is a combination of one express ramp and inclined parking ramps. Architect was Hans Asplund. Hans Asplund, son of the legendary architect Gunnar Asplund, and a architect and tarchitectural theorist most know today for Parkaden and Eslöv civic centre but also said to is have coined the term neo-brutalism. Over time, Hans Asplund became increasingly critical of modernism and, in 1980, published the book Farväl till functionalism, which systematically reviewed what the author considered to be the shortcomings of modernist architecture and his father's famous manifesto acceptera.
- This is one of my own favorite pictures (I have a large enlargement in my apartment). I like the lines, the shadows and the contrasts and the, perhaps for many unexpected, beauty of this rather dilapidated sixties dream. The photo was taken before the upper floor was rebuilt. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 18:17, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ArildV (talk) 18:17, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:57, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support A great, interesting, abstract way to illustrate an ugly building Cmao20 (talk) 00:14, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:03, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 12:54, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Revealing beauty in ugly things is one of the great gifts of art (here: photography). – Aristeas (talk) 19:17, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:52, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support. --Ratekreel (talk) 10:12, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very abstract. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:58, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 10:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 14:37:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Estonia
- Info created & uploaded by Kalev Kuljus - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 14:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 14:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lots of wow Cmao20 (talk) 17:05, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great with lights and contrast.--Paracel63 (talk) 17:26, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I'm puzzled, on one side the lights are wow, but the details quality are unsharp (and sometimes blurry). --PierreSelim (talk) 17:33, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The light is undoubtedly great, but unfortunately the overall quality is too low. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:38, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose per PierreSelim. Clear wow factor, but low quality. I think a tripod was necessary here, in this dark room, to allow more parts in focus with a larger depth of field and also less ISO for a better quality. Incidentally the highlights could have been more carefully handled -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per above, I am not fond of the top crop either Poco a poco (talk) 12:06, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:37, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per above. -- Karelj (talk) 09:35, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 14:09:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Callaeidae (New Zealand wattlebirds)
- Info Translocations, which started in the 1980s, have helped secure the future of this near-threatened New Zealand endemic. No FPs of this family. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:09, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:09, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cute Cmao20 (talk) 17:05, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow. --PierreSelim (talk) 17:35, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Expressive. – Aristeas (talk) 19:16, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:27, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 10:35:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family_:_Polyporaceae
- Info Yellow green fungi (tentative: Trametes sp.) on log, growing around silver oak leaves. The large fungi are about 7.5 cm (3 in) across. Green colour may be due to algal growth. Focus stack of 25 images. Singnally, Somwarpet, Coorg, Karnataka, India. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 10:35, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tagooty (talk) 10:35, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:20, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:47, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very high level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:02, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:56, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:15, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:11, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:54, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:30, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 08:52, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Field of Iceland poppies in the flower garden near Cheomseongdae Observatory in Gyeongju South Korea.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 00:44:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#South Korea
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:10, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I just love the pet insect you placed on the flower! Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:25, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- :-) A divine hand placed many in that field. You have to wait less than one minute to get one (or two, three...) on any flower :-) Basile Morin (talk) 10:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 10:33, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support amazing detail for such a large expanse. --Tagooty (talk) 10:38, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The white balance seems a bit too warm for the lighting conditions, especially the greens and reds in the foreground appear to have a strong yellow cast. I'm on an unfamiliar, uncalibrated monitor, though, so that may be just my perception being off. --El Grafo (talk) 11:11, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment. It's the original temperature, so I would expect accurate colors in this situation, at 8:22 am, almost golden hour. Colors also look normal on my calibrated screen. I agree it's quite warm, but I tend to believe that a colder temperature would correspond to a later time of day -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:26, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- It's great as it is, but I reduced yellow a bit and that worked nicely. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:14, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 11:13, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very beautiful, and it’s impressive how you achieved constant sharpness without sacrificing too much detail to diffraction. – Aristeas (talk) 15:52, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:03, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Jakubhal 20:10, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:46, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:54, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 15:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 15:38, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:11, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Golden poppies -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:50, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:31, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:58, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:05, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 20:45:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Singapore
- Info Night view of the Helix Bridge and the Marina Bay Sands Hotel, Marina Bay, Singapore. Note: I've already a featured image of this area, this one taken a different day, with different light, from a different location and with the ArtScience Museum in the compo. I opted for this nom after the discussion that took place here. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Outstanding. Very different to the other FP in composition and light. Cmao20 (talk) 00:24, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Nice but perspective should be improved. You can see pillars leaning and the reflections in the water are not vertical -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:48, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- I'll look into it this evening CET Poco a poco (talk) 08:22, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Done, FYI Basile Morin Poco a poco (talk) 18:28, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well done. Special architecture -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:19, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:57, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:35, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very nice and very nice place. May there are some stars, may they light spots are hot pixel. Please have a look. --XRay 💬 10:33, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Stunning scenery and photograph. (I assume you will tweak the perspective acc. to Basile’s hint.) – Aristeas (talk) 15:50, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:03, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Paracel63 (talk) 17:24, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Jakubhal 20:09, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:55, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:52, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:48, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:29, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support One of the best night photos of MBS I've seen. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:59, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 10:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 21:04:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Giraffidae (Giraffes)
- Info created by SanNikGar - uploaded by SanNikGar - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 21:04, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- JukoFF (talk) 21:04, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Useful picture, but bad crop and weird colours Cmao20 (talk) 00:28, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Cmao20. And weird vignetting -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:45, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Artificial background... Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:33, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose colours and backlight are not well handled here. --PierreSelim (talk) 09:41, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Milky way in Elbrus.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 21:00:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Sky – Milky Way over the Elbrus, Russiа
- Info created by Oliwok - uploaded by Oliwok - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 21:00, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- JukoFF (talk) 21:00, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 22:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Quite a lot of chroma noise. I don't feel strongly either way, but I'm not sure this is the quality we'd expect. Cmao20 (talk) 00:29, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
{{cmt}}Support I did just add some notes to identify the portion of the Milky Way visible in the star field. It is the Serpens–Aquila Rift. The two main stats are Altair in the center of the image and Alpha Ophiuchi on the right. The third one, lower on the left, is Jupiter, that in August 2021 was in the constellation Capricorn. Several star clusters are also visible. I agree with Cmao20 on the fact that there is a lot of chroma noise, but the picture has some value. --Harlock81 (talk) 11:36, 21 November 2024 (UTC)- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:25, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:50, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:10, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:36, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 19:14:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Sciuridae (Squirrels)
- Info Red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris) in Bednarski Park in Kraków, Poland. Created and uploaded by Jakub Hałun, nominated by – Aristeas (talk) 19:14, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I know I know I know: Just like “all sunsets are beautiful”, all squirrels are cute ;–), we already got quite some nice squirrel FPs and we are very demanding when it comes to photos of common animals. But I can’t resist to nominate this one. The light is so beautiful, the colours are so good, the pose is so nice. Since my last move I am watching these little rascals on my walks and this is a very typical posture and behaviour. Bon appétit, dear squirrel, and congratulations to the photographer! -- Aristeas (talk) 19:14, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good choice to nominate this irresistible rascal. Sometimes they can be very tame, the picture reminds me of the Łazienki Park in Warsaw, there they get incredibly close to people for a nut. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 22:33, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:56, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas. This is also a special squirrel, looking at viewer with giant eyes, ears stretched, paws on belly, its booty well buried in his mouth :-) Yum -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:56, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:03, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:46, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:25, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:05, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:59, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:07, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:48, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --EUPBR (talk) 17:58, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:45, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:34, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 08:52, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Respublik (talk) 13:25, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 16:11:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Rail tracks
- Info IMO superb composition, quality, and subject. created by Ermell - uploaded by Ermell - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:11, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:11, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent idea and realization. One of my favourites from WLM 2024/Germany. – Aristeas (talk) 16:38, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I love geometric structures, clear lines and shapes in photography. Saubere Arbeit, Ermell! -- Radomianin (talk) 21:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 22:24, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 22:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thanks for the nom.--Ermell (talk) 23:15, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Geometrical shapes and patterns of the composition, and also rusty / decaying materials at full resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:25, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:14, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:58, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:22, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:03, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking perspective, geometry and colours.--Paracel63 (talk) 17:39, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:47, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:25, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:06, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:58, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:08, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:43, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:10, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:43, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very well done aesthetic composition. I am sure you'll be able to take some good orthophotos in Hof, too ;) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 15:58, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 10:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 13:43:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#France
- Info Architect Paul Abadie was commissioned to design the basilica, initially (1875), in a Romanesque-Byzantine style. He died in 1884, and then other architects continued his work with the result that a structure was obtained without a predominant characteristic, and for this reason unique in the world. Since 1900 this place full of meaning has been a symbol of Montmatre in Paris. c/u/n by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:43, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:43, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Nice weather but the picture is not horizontal. See the two horses, not leveled. And not vertical either (see the walls leaning to the center on both sides) -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:25, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- I willingly corrected the verticals because a very slight convergence was actually visible with three-point perspective. Instead, the majestic staircase with gardens that leads to the basilica, and consequently the balcony where people are looking out, is not aligned with the basilica, because they have different angles. For this reason there remains a slight perspective shape whereby the horse on the right is slightly higher than the other. By the way, thanks for your comment. Terragio67 (talk) 11:28, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the correction of the verticals. About the horizontal lines, I'm sorry to disagree, after having taken the time to listen the arguments (Aristeas's in particular) and looking at maps, I believe that such a distance of the camera associated to such a minor angle (to the right) cannot realistically justify a strong horizontal inclination. This could be calculable geometrically :-)
- I think this aspect is correct. Top AND bottom -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Basile, thank you very much for your additional effort and for your edited version! My statement (below) was mostly about the obvious misalignment between the axes of the church and the balcony. You are right that this does not necessarily imply the strength of the horizontal inclination and hence of the differences of the height e.g. of the two horses or of the two minor domes. There must be some difference, and it should indeed be possible to calculate it, but this exceeds my possibilites. So it is quite possible that these differences could/should be smaller and more like in your edited version – which indeed looks very appealing. I would like to ask you to upload your edited version as a derivative file to Commons; I guess that many people would appreciate your version. Best, – Aristeas (talk) 16:14, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Possible in the next few days. Thank you very much, Aristeas, for your suggestion -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:05, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Today I tried some adjustments based on the above considerations made during the FPC. I have to say that the result looks very good to me, with minimal changes. I would still be curious to see the derivative work from Basile.
- @Aristeas , @Cmao20 , @Radomianin , @VulcanSphere , @Famberhorst , @Poco a poco , @Agnes Monkelbaan , @EUPBR , @Iwaqarhashmi , @Giles Laurent , @George Chernilevsky Terragio67 (talk) 18:37, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your efforts with this difficult object. If I'm honest, I like Basile's version the best. In this version the cross looks a bit crooked. But please wait with any further changes until the other colleagues have given their opinion. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 19:08, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support this version. Improved from the previous one, in my opinion. This might be a guess, but mine above too, and I find the perspective credible in this case. Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:41, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I was confused by the perspective, but Terragio67’s answer has opened my eyes: the basilica and the stairs/balcony are indeed not on the same axis ([2]), so in any photo of the south façade either the basilica or the monumental stairs and balcony will look misaligned. In photos taken from further away this is less appearant, but still visible (see the category). I can’t blame the photographer for this. A brownie point for this photo: the perspective avoids the usual vast crowd of people in the foreground – there are still enough people in the photo, of course, but they appear rather few when compared to the commons shots from the stairs. – Aristeas (talk) 15:46, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thanks to Aristeas for his detective work, and to Terragio67 for this fine image. -- Radomianin (talk) 17:35, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:25, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:06, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:08, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:41, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --EUPBR (talk) 17:59, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:09, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:33, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 10:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 02:34:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Clothing_and_textiles
- Info Moschino ensemble from the fall 2014 ready-to-wear collection, on display at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in the Camp - Notes on Fashion exhibit. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 02:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 02:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:14, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Eye-catching, appealing composition and subject. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:39, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:23, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 15:26, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:56, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:38, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:36, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 22:25:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Germany
- Info Rodach bridge in Seßlach. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 22:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ermell (talk) 22:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 01:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:16, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Charming bridge with history and character; good light and atmosphere. I like how the statue of Saint (John of) Nepomuk seems to contemplate the facing wayside shrine … – Aristeas (talk) 09:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:56, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:44, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:51, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:08, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:26, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Nice subject (although it's a shame that we have no details about it) but I find the right crop too abrupt spoiling the compo, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 19:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:08, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 08:53, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 14:30:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports
- Info Wheelchair tennis at the 2012 Summer Paralympics - Janel Manns. Created by Sport the Library - uploaded by Laurenrobertson1 - nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 14:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Zquid (talk) 14:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Paracel63 (talk) 14:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Very interesting. Unfortunately the crop is too tight at the top -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with Basile and in fact the issue is making me oppose --Poco a poco (talk) 19:36, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 08:53, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:35, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 10:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The crop is indeed very narrow. Maybe(!) it is possible to extend the background on the image top with good image editing skills --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 16:13, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 10:09:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family_:_Camelidae_(Camelids)
- Info Camels at Aït Benhaddou, Saharan caravan route, Marocco (آيت بن حدّو, ⴰⵢⵜ ⵃⴰⴷⴷⵓ). My shot. -- Mile (talk) 10:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 10:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 01:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:19, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:35, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:15, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 08:53, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 13:35:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Painted ceilings
- Info all by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 13:35, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 13:35, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:14, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Part of the painting is hidden at the right. We just see a bit of an arm and of a head, because the camera was not in the axis. Also black distracting shape at the right in the foreground. Problem of composition in my view, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:54, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I'm glad you say that, this is trompe-l'œil and the painter Francesco Battaglioli did a perfect job because the ceiling is flat. The black spots on the right are floodlights I could not hide.--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment
Good point :-)Sorry, I don't read Italian (for the title) though I think the word Trompe-l'œil is missing there. Still, there is "flat" and "flat", and the camera doesn't seem in the axis. The bottom and the sides are not symmetrical. To be honest, at first sight my eyes were attracted by the distracting black shape. That part could be cropped out. The two columns at the bottom are showing the same perspective, as if the picture was taken from the right -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)- I'm terribly sorry, I was tromped, the right part is missing. Trompe-l'oeil is in the English description, the other is just the filename. By the way I was going to delete my comment. You can see it in the other fotos of the painting.--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Re-updated comment Yes, after looking at this view I realized my first impression was rather right. And it seems also possible to take the picture from the center, like here. Thanks for your comment. -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:56, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- And at least I was fooled a short time at thinking it was a real trompe-l'oeil :-) Is maybe worth visiting again :-) Basile Morin (talk) 23:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Re-updated comment Yes, after looking at this view I realized my first impression was rather right. And it seems also possible to take the picture from the center, like here. Thanks for your comment. -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:56, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- I'm terribly sorry, I was tromped, the right part is missing. Trompe-l'oeil is in the English description, the other is just the filename. By the way I was going to delete my comment. You can see it in the other fotos of the painting.--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment
- Comment I'm glad you say that, this is trompe-l'œil and the painter Francesco Battaglioli did a perfect job because the ceiling is flat. The black spots on the right are floodlights I could not hide.--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like it the way it is. Not every single Featured Picture has to be in the axis. This is a photo depicting a three dimensional object with details in variety of levels. I appreciate the fact that I can see the sculpted balustrade, which would be invisible or almost invisible in symmetrical axis composition encouraged by many Commons users. This perspective allows me to appreciate the painted ceiling, but also to better understand the surrounding architecture, which is a great thing taking into account Wikimedia Commons image should be encyclopedically useful. Don't get discouraged in submitting unusual perspectives for Featured Pictures. Other voters, don't be intimidated by seasoned users who discourage unusual perspectives. --Tupungato (talk) 22:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Tupungato: "don't be intimidated by seasoned users" who spread unusual perspectives through optical illusions! -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Wow, “seasoned users” – I must remember that cultivated phrase. Very useful, as nobody can say for sure whether this is a respectful description or a refined insult. Well, every FPC regular knows that Basile and me often disagree, but when Basile is called a “seasoned user” I hope I am allowed to share this designation with him. Or am I already a rotten user, having been on Commons for six years longer? Who knows … ;–) But I agree that nobody should be intimidated by any other user, of course. Please take our arguments, check them, compare them, form your own opinion based on reasons, vote. Thank you. – Aristeas (talk) 10:12, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I'm afraid I'm a "seasoned user" too: born in the first half of last century A.D. 1947, with commons for 17 years, 150 FP and 7000 QI hahaha --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 11:19, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Welcome to the club of seasoned users, Wolfgang! ;–) We should request a privileged users group with many “members only” features … – Aristeas (talk) 12:38, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Can I get a membership card please? ;o) Yann (talk) 20:02, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- only if you support my FP candidate ;-) Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:56, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Can I get a membership card please? ;o) Yann (talk) 20:02, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I'm not too keen on the crop, but the photo itself is great Cmao20 (talk) 22:34, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:35, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 11:51:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Ukraine
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 11:51, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 11:51, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Certainly not the most romantic one of the many castles and manors of the Ukraine, but the longer I look at it the more I like the clear geometric construction and how the fortress hides an imposing palazzo in fortezza. One hint: On the roofs of the palace there is some blue/orange/red moiree. In Lightroom or Photoshop/ACR, paint a brush mask over it and set “Moiree removal” e.g. to 60; it may be useful to increase (with the same mask) the saturation a bit, e.g. 20, because moiree removal often decreases saturation. If this is unclear, just drop me a note. – Aristeas (talk) 19:31, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you for review. I didn't notice moiree on the roofs. I fixed this and deployed new version. --Rbrechko (talk) 12:58, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you very much! Now the roofs are perfect. – Aristeas (talk) 15:44, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you for review. I didn't notice moiree on the roofs. I fixed this and deployed new version. --Rbrechko (talk) 12:58, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:11, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Inimese peatäi.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 18:09:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Pediculidae (Lice)
- Info created by Janeklass - uploaded by Janeklass - nominated by Janeklass -- Janeklass (talk) 18:09, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Janeklass (talk) 18:09, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- I modified this file a little. I didn't do anything with the lighting, but I cropped it a little and changed the aspect ratio from 2:3 to 4:5 Janeklass (talk) 17:56, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Perhaps a bit dark? Cmao20 (talk) 01:54, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Underexposed Yes, though the picture looks interesting -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:21, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- It's impossible to agree with the claim that this image is underexposed. This is clearly proven by the excellent visibility of every detail on the head louse's body - its tiny hairs, complex body texture, and even various color shades. The dark, almost black background is not an exposure error, but rather serves to highlight the main subject more clearly. The image's tonality is well balanced - we can clearly see details in both lighter and darker areas, confirming that the exposure is not incorrect. This lighting choice is intentional here, designed to give the image a slightly dramatic effect. If the picture were truly underexposed, we wouldn't be able to see such fine details and color tones that are now clearly visible. Janeklass (talk) 04:19, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Disagree. You will see more details if the photo is better exposed. Currently the contrasts are very hard to distinguish, especially at thumbnail size.
- Note that you can also see a lot of details here, although the photo is underexposed too. And that one was properly fixed.
- Hard to hear that "it's impossible to agree with the claim that this image is underexposed" while the two first reviewers here both find the image too dark :-) Then above you write "This lighting choice is intentional here, designed to give the image a slightly dramatic effect" (by the way, I don't understand this dramatic intention. It's just a close-up of an animal, no special background / context). Sorry, clear light problem for me, in state -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:45, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- I have responded to the criticism and want the evaluators to know that the lighting choice here is clearly intentional. How you choose to evaluate it is up to you. Janeklass (talk) 04:56, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Underexposed Yes, though the picture looks interesting -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:21, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. Please fix the light as you did here -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:00, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- The subjects are different and unfortunately the same approach cannot be applied here. Increasing the light would also amplify surface reflections and this would ruin the image completely Janeklass (talk) 05:17, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think so, but the same was said here. At least one stop could be easily gained in that case IMO -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:26, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- I think this would cause more issues for the image. Unfortunately, I can't make those changes to this photo. This image stays as is. If there's no support... no worries, I'll try with another photo in the future (maybe) :D Janeklass (talk) 05:45, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think so, but the same was said here. At least one stop could be easily gained in that case IMO -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:26, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It is too dark for my eyes. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:58, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support It is a very fascinating image. The darkness is not a problem, as the object is clearly seen, and that seems more like a creative choice on this dark creature. I am thinking that maybe a square format would be better for this image... but I'm not sure. Kruusamägi (talk) 13:24, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 13:40, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry. I agree that there are dark photographs which do not tolerate an increasure of the exposure – reproductions of dark paintings, some gloomy atmospheric landcape photographs, low-key photos etc. However I fail to see why this would apply to this photo, despite of the explanations. I have played a bit with this JPEG file and can confirm that a careful increase of the brightness works very well when at the same time the light parts are dialed down a bit. If you have a raw image or a 16 bit TIFF file, this should work even better. Of course you have all right to keep your photo as you think it should be (so keep it!), but I cannot support it here. Sorry again, – Aristeas (talk) 10:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- As I mentioned before, this solution was intentional. I did try making changes but wasn't satisfied with the result. I can see that opinions are divided on this one - and I suppose not everyone has to like the picture. It's clear that I won't get much support for this image, but that's okay. I'm already looking forward to when this period ends and I can submit my next works 🙂 Janeklass (talk) 13:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support but I agree it should be brightened. if it fails, anyone could just upload a new [separate] version and nominate it. — Rhododendrites talk | 22:17, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 03:10, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Aristeas Poco a poco (talk) 12:10, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Петергоф, Нижний парк, Львиный каскад. Фонтанная статуя «Нимфа, льющая воду из кувшина» 2.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 17:34:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Fountains
- Info Lion Cascade, Peterhof, Saint Petersburg created by Игорь Гордеев - uploaded and nominated by -- FBilula (talk) 17:34, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- FBilula (talk) 17:34, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 18:23, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Interesting place, good composition light Cmao20 (talk) 01:52, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:55, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 20:15, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support —-Llez (talk) 13:32, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support —- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:45, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 01:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:39, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I like it but I think that taking the picture from the back of the scultpure is not the best idea Poco a poco (talk) 19:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Link-Lee House (HDR).jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 15:23:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_States
- Info created by Euthman - uploaded by Euthman - nominated by DragonflySixtyseven. We have other images of the Link-Lee House, but this is the only one that combines high resolution, interesting angle (it would not look anywhere near as interesting seen head-on), and interesting light (File:Link-Lee House at an Angle.jpg was taken on an overcast day). -- DS (talk) 15:23, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- DS (talk) 15:23, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I agree that the angle and composition is great. I do think the shadows have been lifted too much, though, or else the HDR has gone a bit far. The tree branches particularly on the right don't IMO look natural. Cmao20 (talk) 01:51, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Ghost leaves at the right. No metadata but I would doubt this is a long exposure shot. Thus, more a problem of processing or Photoshopping in my opinion. We can see sorts of diffuse clear halos behind the trees. (Probably same impression as Cmao20, evoking "lifted shadows" / "branches don't look natural") -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:05, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not sharp enough and a bit distorted. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:44, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Constancy - Julius Klinger.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 14:05:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Printed#Posters_and_advertisements
- Info created by Julius Klinger - uploaded by Balkanique - nominated by EUPBR -- EUPBR (talk) 14:05, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- EUPBR (talk) 14:05, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 14:44, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent reproduction of an excellent example for a progressive poster of the 1920s. (This reduced style was ultra-modern then, and unlike many advertisings from the 1950s [not even to mention the terrible Nazi kitsch] it still works well.) – Aristeas (talk) 11:21, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:07, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 01:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:39, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 23:13, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Tabella dei periodi di voto per la regola del quinto giorno (5 giorni dopo la candidatura)
[edit]Wed 20 Nov → Mon 25 Nov Thu 21 Nov → Tue 26 Nov Fri 22 Nov → Wed 27 Nov Sat 23 Nov → Thu 28 Nov Sun 24 Nov → Fri 29 Nov Mon 25 Nov → Sat 30 Nov
Tabella dei periodi di voto (9 giorni dopo la candidatura)
[edit]Sat 16 Nov → Mon 25 Nov Sun 17 Nov → Tue 26 Nov Mon 18 Nov → Wed 27 Nov Tue 19 Nov → Thu 28 Nov Wed 20 Nov → Fri 29 Nov Thu 21 Nov → Sat 30 Nov Fri 22 Nov → Sun 01 Dec Sat 23 Nov → Mon 02 Dec Sun 24 Nov → Tue 03 Dec Mon 25 Nov → Wed 04 Dec