Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 30 2020
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Leijepolder pumping station. Wetterskip Fryslân in Súdwest-Fryslân.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:38, 28 September 2020 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:48, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Nomination Leijepolder pumping station. Wetterskip Fryslân in Súdwest-Fryslân.
-
- Nomination Westpolderbrêge. A new bridge over Broeresleat, will be realized in 2020. Detail of the supporting structure.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:38, 28 September 2020 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 04:48, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Nomination Westpolderbrêge. A new bridge over Broeresleat, will be realized in 2020. Detail of the supporting structure.
-
- Nomination Bronze crucifix by Leonardo Bistolfi. --Moroder 03:43, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support GQ.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:36, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Marks Haindorf Foundation (Am Kanonengraben 4) in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:35, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:39, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gargoyles at the St. Lamberti Church in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:35, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:39, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Interior of the Saint Viktor Church, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, GermanyEnglish: Interior of the Saint Viktor Church in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:35, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:39, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Column with Anabaptist sculptures at the historic town hall, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:35, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:37, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Detail of St. Josef Church, Kinderhaus, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:35, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:37, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Frieze and wall anchor at the southern wall of the parish church “Our Lady of Mercy” in Maria Gail, Villach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 03:36, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gothic tracery window at the southern wall of the parish church “Our Lady of Mercy” in Maria Gail, Villach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 03:36, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stonehead of a bearded man at the southern exterior choir wall of the pilgrimage and parish church «Our Lady of Mercy» in Maria Gail, Villach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 03:36, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of Madonna and Child in an alcove at the exterior south wall of the parish and pilgrimage church «Our Lady of Mercy» in Maria Gail, Villach Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 03:38, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grimace head on the exterior south wall of the pilgrimage and parish church «Our Lady of Mercy» in Maria Gail, Villach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 03:38, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Municipal House (Obecní Dum) Ceiling by Alphonse Mucha, Prague. By User:Jorgeroyan --Andrew J.Kurbiko 22:21, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 03:39, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Municipal House (Obecní Dum) Ceiling by Alphonse Mucha, Prague. By User:Jorgeroyan --Andrew J.Kurbiko 22:21, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Waves on rocks at sunset. --Christian Ferrer 22:24, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support GQ.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:34, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Local train arriving at Leipzig-Anger-Crottendorf Halt --Augustgeyler 21:56, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 22:23, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Raamsdonkveer-NL, the water tower --Michielverbeek 21:17, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support GQ.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:30, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Waspik-NL, reformed church --Michielverbeek 21:17, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support GQ --Palauenc05 21:56, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sprang Capelle-NL, reformed church: De Brug --Michielverbeek 21:17, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support GQ --Palauenc05 21:56, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Mühlhausen (Thuringia) (1921). --Palauenc05 20:22, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support GQ--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:32, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mount Andromeda from the Athabasca Glacier By User:Sahagunethan --Sahagunethan 18:39, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 20:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Thunder Lake Panorama (north) By User:Sahagunethan --Sahagunethan 18:36, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Nice but overprocessed, sorry. --Christian Ferrer 22:21, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Engine of Fiat Abarth 695 replica -- Spurzem 18:35, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support GQ --Palauenc05 21:56, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Submerged temple of Telkupi, Purulia. By User:Paramanu Sarkar --Bodhisattwa 17:42, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Decline Focus to main object is not well done --Michielverbeek 18:32, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A room in Tabatabai House, Kashan, Iran --Amirpashaei 17:14, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 17:18, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aminoddole Carvansarai --Amirpashaei 17:14, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 17:18, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ceiling of a room at Borujerdi House, Kashan, Iran --Amirpashaei 17:14, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 17:18, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination World's fastest shed --DeFacto 16:54, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 17:50, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 2020 Land Rover Defender 110 First Edition --DeFacto 16:48, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 17:03, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mehrjährige oder Schönblumige Sonnenblume, Asteraceae, Rheinland-Pfalz, Deutschland. --Fischer.H 16:32, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 16:43, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chiragra spider conch -- George Chernilevsky 15:56, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --ReneeWrites 18:27, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Daytime view of front entrance of Deke House, designed by William Henry Miller and built in 1893.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:. By User:Hlevy2 --Kzirkel 15:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:50, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dashboard and steering wheel of VW Karmann Ghia, Type 34, from 1969 -- Spurzem 15:15, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:35, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Customized Audi TT Roadster at Tuning World Bodensee 2018 --MB-one 13:04, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 13:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Interior of an ODEG Desiro ML --MB-one 13:04, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 20:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Località Il Coppaio, a cultural heritage of Italy. Photograph by User:Montermoli Federica --Mosbatho 10:39, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:06, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Skoda Vision iV at Geneva Motor Show 2019 --Alexander-93 10:38, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Decline Looking at the grill, I don't think this is quite QI level in terms of noise and detail. --Peulle 12:45, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trellises in the gardens of palace of Schönbrunn, Vienna, Austria --Poco a poco 10:32, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Sorry, but it seems to be slightly tilted. --Mosbatho 10:40, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
New version --Poco a poco 12:22, 27 September 2020 (UTC) Support D'accord! Very nice. --Mosbatho 16:23, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Palace of Schönbrunn, Vienna, Austria --Poco a poco 10:32, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --ReneeWrites 18:27, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Palace of Schönbrunn, Vienna, Austria --Poco a poco 10:32, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Halavar 15:11, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Palm House, Schönbrunn, Vienna, Austria --Poco a poco 10:32, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Mosbatho 10:41, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Ploshchad Vosstaniya station of Saint Petersburg Metro --Florstein 09:17, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:04, 27 September 2020 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Halavar 10:06, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Station on Dalhem - Roma museum railway. --ArildV 08:47, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:37, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination A transept view of Herz-Jesu-Kirche, Koblenz --DXR 08:20, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:37, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Palace in Boleścin --Jacek Halicki 07:55, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --DXR 08:21, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kindergarten in Boleścin --Jacek Halicki 07:55, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Florstein 09:17, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Oak and maple alley in Boleścin --Jacek Halicki 07:55, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
The wires are disturbing, I believe that the images would benefit from a crop without them --Poco a poco 10:37, 27 September 2020 (UTC)@Poco a poco: Done--Jacek Halicki 11:52, 27 September 2020 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:07, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Anne church in Grodziszcze 1 --Jacek Halicki 07:55, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Florstein 09:17, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Anne church in Grodziszcze 2 --Jacek Halicki 07:55, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:37, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Shell of a false limpet, Siphonaria serrata --Llez 06:55, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:07, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Houses on the Alexandre Dreuille wharf in Agde, Hérault. --Christian Ferrer 07:11, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --DXR 08:21, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Weinstraße 6-8 in Bad Hersfeld, Hesse, Germany. --Tournasol7 06:38, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:17, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Roch church in Montézic, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 06:38, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:16, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Horto chapel in Póvoa de Lanhoso, Minho, Portugal. --Tournasol7 06:38, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 07:06, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St Genevieve church in Ste-Genevičve-sur-Argence, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 06:38, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:37, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building at Schlossberg 12-14 in Gotha, Thuringia, Germany. --Tournasol7 06:38, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:58, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination North part of Visby ringmur (city wall). --ArildV 06:24, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 07:18, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Roma Abbey (Swedish: Roma kloster) is a ruined Cistercian abbey. --ArildV 06:24, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:33, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Barrack built 1939 for Gotland Coastal Artillery Regiment. --ArildV 06:24, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:40, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Organ loft in the Trinity Church in Gräfenberg --Ermell 06:09, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --ArildV 06:27, 27 September 2020 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 07:05, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Altar of the Catholic parish church St. Laurentius in Heidenfeld near Schweinfurt --Ermell 06:09, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:40, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Interior of the catholic parish church St. Laurentius in Heidenfeld near Schweinfurt --Ermell 06:09, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:41, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Liberty Statue holding Three Stars at top of Latvian Freedom Monument --Scotch Mist 05:39, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:55, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Liberty Statue, atop Latvian Freedom Monument, overlooking Riga City Centre --Scotch Mist 05:39, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Lacks sharpness. Sorry. --Ermell 05:55, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Guard of the Fatherland statue atop base of Latvian Freedom Monument --Scotch Mist 05:39, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --ArildV 06:28, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mausoleum in the Vittoriale degli Italiani. --Moroder 01:40, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 05:44, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Mausoleum in the Vittoriale degli Italiani. Tomb of D’Annunzio. --Moroder 01:40, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 05:43, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination memorial at cemetery in Leipzig for polish victims of WW2 --Augustgeyler 16:13, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Please remove the green fringes at the branches. --Ermell 20:31, 26 September 2020 (UTC) Done repaired artifacts --Augustgeyler 23:46, 26 September 2020 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination This is a view of 108 Shiva temples, also known as Nava Kailash temple located in Kalna, West Bengal, India. --Dey.sandip 10:16, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
I am unhappy with the crop. Why don't you just pull in the bottom right corner to eliminate the large, dark, empty space at botom right and get a rule of thirds on the main subject. 2/3 building, 1/3 foreground --Rainer Halama 18:11, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
I am withdrawing the nomination. -- Dey.sandip 11:30, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Metropolitan Museum of Art. See the Image and Data Resources Open Access Policy. By User:Pharos --Satdeep Gill 06:33, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Decline Not the work of a commoner --ReneeWrites 11:59, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
@ReneeWrites: I don't understand the reason to decline. -- Spurzem 16:40, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
@Spurzem: I think what she wants to say is, that this is not by a Commons Photographer, but a museum download. Not sure if that is a criteria here. --Rainer Halama 18:17, 26 September 2020
Yeah, it's one of the criteria for QI, see here. This work was uploaded by Pharos, but not created by them. @Spurzem: I hope that clears this up. --ReneeWrites 22:59, 26 September 2020 (UTC) (UTC)
Yes, thank you. -- Spurzem 09:58, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A small mural by Vincent de Boer, showing black text on a white background reading “All Happens Inside" --ReneeWrites 09:11, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 05:53, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Joseph church in Boleścin 4 --Jacek Halicki 07:50, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 05:54, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hejdeby kyrka. --ArildV 10:30, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
2 dust spots that should be removed (see the notes). --Halavar 11:05, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Done, thank you for review. --ArildV 08:30, 27 September 2020 (UTC) Support Good quality now. --Halavar 15:15, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wiki Loves Earth 2020. By User:Gionorossi --Rodrigo.Argenton 20:22, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Mosbatho 10:56, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Our Lady of the Sorrow chapel. Buków, Silesian Voivodeship, Poland. --Halavar 08:44, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 05:58, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Memorial for the victims of euthanasia in Germany from 1933-1945 at Ostfriedhof in Leipzig --Augustgeyler 23:45, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 03:57, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nomination UR-NTP (aircraft). By User:Dmottl --Andrew J.Kurbiko 18:55, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 03:54, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination BMW G21 --Johannes Maximilian 12:22, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
CA should be removed --Poco a poco 13:46, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Compression artefact or chromatic abberation? --Johannes Maximilian 16:58, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Chromatic abberations. Mostly on the right side, e.g. the front wheel. --Zinnmann 07:48, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
acknowledged; will fix this. --Johannes Maximilian 18:21, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
I apologise – the visibility of the CAs depended upon the image resolution; they were not so obvious when zoomed in, which is why I have not seen them earlier. Next time I'll stop down a little… Now the CAs should be gone; I reckon I cannot do better. Best, --Johannes Maximilian 23:08, 26 September 2020 (UTC) Support You removed the purple CA but there is still a bit of red CA, give it a try if you like, the current version is though acceptable to me --Poco a poco 10:49, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Scene of „FAUST“ at Schauspiel Leipzig in 2018 (by Schauspiel Leipzig) --Augustgeyler 11:14, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
- Review
I imagine an image taken during a play would be subject to copyright issues. Did the copyright holder of the play give permission for this image to be distributed? A striking image otherwise, albeit a little noisy in the shadows. --Bobulous 20:28, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
The copyright holder itself published it. --Augustgeyler 11:01, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
_11.jpg)
_09.jpg)
_ceiling,_Prague_-_8901.jpg)
_ceiling,_Prague_-_8906.jpg)
_50_Pfennig_1921_RV_Wallenstein.jpg)
.jpg){kind=small}
.JPG)
.jpg)
.JPG)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_September_2020_05.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}
Consensual review
[edit]File:Eide_Bjugn.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Landscape in Ørland --TommyG 10:58, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Nice composition, but unfortunately too soft. --MB-one 12:24, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- New version I've added some sharpening to the original, though keep in mind this photograph was taken 17 years ago and digital cameras back then simply didn't have the same level of sharpness/resolution you find in modern cameras.TommyG 19:57, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support Little noisy, but IMO worth a discussion --Jakubhal 13:48, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support Pretty and painterly. I'd allow it. -- Ikan Kekek 05:29, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support Per Ikan. Sebring12Hrs (talk) 14:42, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → 
Promoted --Augustgeyler 21:32, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Promoted --Augustgeyler 21:32, 29 September 2020 (UTC)File:Lengurbill_beach_06.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Lengurbill beach, Teknaf, Cox's Bazar. --RockyMasum 06:22, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Kritzolina 15:38, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Good motive. But sorry there is a significant lack of detail. --Augustgeyler 22:14, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose per Augustgeyler. --Fischer.H 17:15, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose good composition with insufficient detail for a QI --Virtual-Pano 22:43, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → 
Declined --Augustgeyler 22:50, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined --Augustgeyler 22:50, 29 September 2020 (UTC)File:Lengurbill_beach_04.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Lengurbill beach, Teknaf, Cox's Bazar. --RockyMasum 06:22, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Kritzolina 15:38, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Good motive. But there is a significant lack of detail. --Augustgeyler 22:14, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose I agree with August in this instance. The boats are the most interesting thing in the picture, so I'd like them to be at least somewhat sharper. -- Ikan Kekek 05:33, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Augustgeyler 09:23, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined --Augustgeyler 09:23, 29 September 2020 (UTC)File:Fischlham_Erinnerungsstätte_Kriegerdenkmal-0375.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Fischlham memorial, Fischlham /Upper Austria --Isiwal 08:42, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:05, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose I disagree. Yes it is a good composition. But this memorial is made to combine the front wall with this one in the back. But the wall in the background is completely in shadow. The lighting condidtions and shadows are unsiutable. --Augustgeyler 23:17, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:12, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. May be that the lighting conditions could be a bit better but they are not bad. -- Spurzem 09:15, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek 09:26, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support per others. --Scotch Mist 07:32, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Augustgeyler 09:17, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Promoted --Augustgeyler 09:17, 29 September 2020 (UTC)File:Riga_Landmarks_57.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Riga Castle with race cyclists passing --Scotch Mist 05:55, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 10:52, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose If it is about the cyclists, there is not enough detail of them. --Augustgeyler 16:24, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Comment Dust spot a bit below and slightly to the left of the upper right corner. -- Ikan Kekek 09:34, 26 September 2020 (UTC)- Done Even better spot - removed and edited caption --Scotch Mist 11:38, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Please clean the solitary branches on the right --Moroder 01:47, 27 September 2020 (UTC) Done --Scotch Mist 06:41, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support I agree with August that the cyclists and the foreground in general is somewhat unsharp; however, that's a legitimate artistic choice, and the castle is sharp enough for me. -- Ikan Kekek 05:41, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Moroder 07:38, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Augustgeyler 09:15, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Promoted --Augustgeyler 09:15, 29 September 2020 (UTC)File:2020_Krzywa_Wieża_w_Ząbkowicach_Śląskich_3.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Tower in Ząbkowice Śląskie 3 --Jacek Halicki 07:22, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
- Only one of the three should be promoted. --Palauenc05 15:10, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose I would rather promote the variant 1 of this series, since it excludes the light pole and the road sign in the foreground which are a little distracting. --Lion-hearted85 13:05, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Variant one is better. Here the composition is distracted by that cropped sign on the right.--Augustgeyler (talk) 12:59, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. I haven't seen or don't remember the other photos in this series, but since everyone admits that they are not identical to this, I don't see on what basis this is being opposed as such. As I recall, there is no guideline for approval that photos must be x-amount different from other photos. -- Ikan Kekek 06:01, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment @Ikan Kekek: Of course you are absolutely right. I'd review in the same way if there would have been no similar shots. --Augustgeyler 09:48, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Augustgeyler 09:51, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined --Augustgeyler 09:51, 29 September 2020 (UTC)File:Wind_Turbine_Enercon_E-82_at_Wind_Park_Mausdorf_01.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination A wind turbine of type Enercon E-82, which is part of the wind park Mausdorf in northern Bavaria --Spike 22:35, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Request
- Comment Sorry, I did not know this guideline existed because it was in the "How to review" section which I did not read thoroughly. Have now done some reviews and I have also moved the guideline to the "For nominators" chapter, so that other nominators don't make the same mistake that I made. Spike 15:25, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment ok, so let's discuss this. --Augustgeyler 21:55, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Weak Support because the upper sky is blotchy, but a good photo, overall. -- Ikan Kekek 09:41, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- weak contra I like that picture but the light is not good enough. The most interesting part, the rotor, is completely in shadow. The upper part of this picture became very dark. --Augustgeyler 10:04, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Full disclosure: I had nominated a very similar image at the same time as this image: File:Wind_Turbine_Enercon_E-82_at_Wind_Park_Mausdorf_02.jpg. That image already successfully slipped through the QI nomination process. Should this image fail, I assume that the other one should probably also lose its QI status. Spike 11:11, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I don't see why it should. Getting an image promoted to QI is at least partially down to luck, and having your image end up in CR sort of by accident (like what happened here) is, I think, an example of bad luck, as people tend to be more strict here. --ReneeWrites 23:04, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support I don’t want to be the cause of bad luck ;-). The photo is good for me --Moroder 01:56, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Augustgeyler 09:13, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Promoted --Augustgeyler 09:13, 29 September 2020 (UTC)File:Steirischer_Ölkürbis_Feld_Allhaming_20200911b.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Field of Cucurbita pepo var. styriaca, Austria. Ready for mechanical harvesting --Tigerente 21:07, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:44, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose I disagree Request I don't see any reviews done by you as requested by QIC guidelines for each nomination --Moroder 09:01, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support looks like a QI to me Poco a poco 22:17, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support Nice photo and good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 09:45, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support good layout and attractive focus --Virtual-Pano 22:59, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Augustgeyler 23:00, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Promoted --Augustgeyler 23:00, 29 September 2020 (UTC)File:GAZ_"Tigr"_(black_colored)_during_the_"Armiya_2020"_exhibition.jpg
[edit]_during_the_%22Armiya_2020%22_exhibition.jpg)
- Nomination Armored SUV "Tigr" during the "Armiya 2020" exhibition --Kirill Borisenko 22:14, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
- Comment Please fix the overexposed area. --SCP-2000 08:14, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose even if overexposure could be fixed (which I doubt), the shot is very average, with disturbing shadows and cluttered composition. Some parts look overprocessed too. --Yerpo 08:57, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- I have removed your vote, you are not eligible to vote for your image Poco a poco 22:21, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Large areas blown. -- Ikan Kekek 07:56, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Look at link - there is edited version (external hosting for saving commons site space :)). How about that view? --Kirill Borisenko 00:45, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Ikan Kekek Poco a poco 22:21, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Look at link - there is edited version (external hosting for saving commons site space :)). How about that view? --Kirill Borisenko 00:45, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- SCP-2000
Yerpo Ikan Kekek Poco a poco Or how about that variant? } --
- Kirill Borisenko: sorry, no big improvement, the areas are blown due to overexposure. Furthermore the processing isn't good, the image doesn't look natural at all, look a the grid in front of the windscreen or at the ligth on the top Poco a poco 10:58, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- SCP-2000
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Augustgeyler 11:07, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Declined --Augustgeyler 11:07, 29 September 2020 (UTC)File:Jelgava_Churches_17.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Framed Icon of Mary and Jesus at Orthodox Cathedral in Jelgava --Scotch Mist 06:14, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose I'm sorry, but the viewing angle isn't well chosen. Uneven sharpness in the relevant areas. Color fringes in the upper left corner. --Zinnmann 07:56, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Zinnmann: Thank you for your review but the angle was dictated by the incense urn hanging in front of the painting (see left side) so I had no choice but to photograph from the side which was certainly not 'ideal' --Scotch Mist 09:13, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Hard circumstances may keep an object from being photographed as a quality one.--Augustgeyler 09:21, 25 September 2020 (UTC) - @Augustgeyler: This goes without saying but I was attempting to make the point that simply because an object cannot be photographed under ideal circumstances should not rule it out for QI providing of course it meets basic QI criteria (as indicated above I am not saying that this image necessarily does!:) --SM1 (talk) 16:32, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose per Zinnmann.--Peulle 12:39, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose unfortunately this angle doesn't do it for me either --Virtual-Pano 23:01, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
File:La_chiesa_di_Santa_Croce_vista_dalla_Torre.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination The church of Santa Croce seen from the Tower of Populonia with the Gulf of Baratti in the background --PROPOLI87 09:32, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support good composition. very interesting lighting situation. --Augustgeyler 09:38, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, not sharp enough, in my opinion, and the land across the gulf looks too blue. -- Ikan Kekek 10:19, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Done I corrected, now okay? -- PROPOLI87 11:16, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment No. -- Ikan Kekek 11:22, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Done I can not do more than that otherwise with each change the photo gets worse -- PROPOLI87 12:34, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment It's probably not fixable, then, although you could always try redeveloping it from the RAW if you have it, but don't ask me for advice on how; I can tell you what I see, but I usually photograph only with my iPhone and don't have very advanced Photoshop skills. -- Ikan Kekek 10:44, 24 September 2020 (UTC)::: CommentI started all over again and re-released a new version on quality. I like this photo and I'm working on it till I drop. Thanks for the help and targeted criticism, which are allowing me to improve my photos more and more.PROPOLI87 07:05, 25 September 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 07:05, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, not sharp enough,look at the entrance of the chapel. --Palauenc05 06:41, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment This version seems a bit overcooked to me. Colours and contrast have become quite harsh. I would say that the original is still the best version, and you could enhance it with smaller tweaks—such as raising the colour temperature to remove the blueish colour cast; if the sea is still too blue, you could consider to selectively de-saturate the blue colours. The original has plenty of contrast already in my opinion. Like Ikan says, I suggest you work on the RAW file if available so that you can freely dial back your processing if necessary (or to start working from scratch from the original version).-- Lion-hearted85 12:35, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks for your effort, but I doubt if you can improve this image. Just look at that tree, or whatever it is, next to the entrance of the church. This part of the picture is still quite blurry. --Palauenc05 14:53, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Couleurs irréalistes et contraste très élevé. Mauvaise numérisation du fichier. Grand manque de détails. Sebring12Hrs (talk) 14:48, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose nice frame, but does not meet the criteria for QI inn terms of sharpness as mentioned above --Virtual-Pano 23:03, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
File:Mercedes-Benz 680 Sport, Techno-Classica 2018, Essen (IMG 9286).jpg
[edit].jpg)
- Nomination Wooden toolbox on a Mercedes-Benz 680 Sport at Techno-Classica 2018, Essen --MB-one 16:09, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Vincent60030 08:54, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose For a static object like this box, there should be more sharpness and detail. And the picture should be cropped a little more. --Augustgeyler 13:24, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Per August --Michielverbeek 06:53, 27 September 2020 (UTC)