Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 16 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Mgła_nad_Wisłą_pod_Tyńcem_w_Krakowie,_20220902_1507.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Morning fog over the Vistula river near Tyniec district of Krakow --Jakubhal 15:56, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment I am not a big fan of this type of picture. But others ? And it seems to have an aliasing. --Sebring12Hrs 06:28, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Aliasing? Sorry, that may not be QI, but I still would like to check other opinions --Jakubhal 15:32, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Interesting. Plants/trees are sharp enough. Artistic composition, but IMO OK. --XRay 05:14, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support per XRay. -- Ikan Kekek 22:15, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:47, 15 October 2022 (UTC))[reply]

File:Baidyapur_Jora_Deul.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Baidyapur Jora Deul, Bardhaman. By User:AmlanTheTramp --Bodhisattwa 15:48, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Support Good quality. --Drow male 16:24, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
     Oppose Noisy, over-staurated colors, over-processed, perspective issues... --Sebring12Hrs 07:01, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Sebring. The perspective issues are the most notable. -- Ikan Kekek 06:40, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:50, 15 October 2022 (UTC))[reply]

File:Orkney_Islands_-_Kirkwall,_St_Magnus_Cathedral,_Graveyard_-_20210816163833.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Orkney Islands, Kirkwall, St Magnus Cathedral, Graveyard --Virtual-Pano 06:57, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment Perspective correction is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 17:42, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
    Could you please guide me to the area in question? I checked but I couldn't spot it --Virtual-Pano 16:20, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
    @Sebring12Hrs: could you please point me towards needed corrction, decline or promote? Virtual-Pano 16:21, 05 October 2022 (UTC)
    The clock tower is good. But the side walls are leaning. I don't think if it's a good perspective, I'm not able to know if the overall perspective is ok. We should have further more opinions to be fair IMO. I am very sorry. --Sebring12Hrs 10:08, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
    May I ask for more opinions? --Virtual-Pano 18:28, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment This should not be here. Please do not set anything to "Discuss" unless there is at least one positive or negative vote. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:57, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment as a comment was left and the suggestion made to ask for more votes by Sebring12Hrs I moved this nomination to discuss. --Virtual-Pano 11:01, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough for QI. --Milseburg 13:43, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:52, 15 October 2022 (UTC)