Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 07 2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Morning_sun_in_Kemeri.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Ķemeri National park --Papuass 09:20, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Syed07 14:27, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. The composition is partly too unsharp. --Milseburg 16:08, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - Yeah, I think this one is too unsharp, too much of it is pitch black and I'm not sure the posterization is OK. -- Ikan Kekek 07:37, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Milseburg.--Fischer.H 13:30, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 18:48, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

File:2019-04-25_(176)_Natrix_natrix_(grass_snake)_with_length_about_one_meter_at_Haltgraben,_Frankenfels,_Austria.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Natrix natrix (grass snake) with length about one meter at Haltgraben, Frankenfels, Austria.--GT1976 21:42, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Cutting a bit tighter might be better. But good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:05, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. --Croce tingey 19:21, 3 May 2019 (UTC) canceled due to vandalism --Milseburg 10:38, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support - The head might be sharper, but the picture looks OK at 300% of a 13-inch screen, so good enough, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 07:54, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Good picture.--Fischer.H 13:41, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 18:46, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Baku_Railway_Station_panorama.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Panorama of Baku Railway StationI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:. By User:Ymblanter --Power serbs 04:44, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Eatcha 06:21, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Perspective should be corrected, the main subject is too small --Podzemnik 07:36, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Podzemnik - weirdly slanted. If that's fixed, I may reconsider. -- Ikan Kekek 06:47, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I agree with the others. Oh and as a side note, the description is a bit off - this isn't a "panorama", I don't think.--Peulle 10:30, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Podzemnik.--Fischer.H 17:00, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It is Incredible that such a failed picture was presented here as a quality image. -- Spurzem 20:52, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Strong oppose Per others -- Piotr Bart 13:40, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 6 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 18:46, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Royal_Liberty_Morris_'molly'_(Pete)_at_2017_Broadstairs_Folk_Week,_Kent,_England_2.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Portrait of Pete, the 'molly' of Royal Liberty Morris during the 2017 Broadstairs Folk Week, in Kent, England. -- By User:Acabashi --Eatcha 17:23, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment No problem with the OOF background, but the cable, or whatever it is, could easily be cloned out to avoid the unsightly appearance of it going through his head. Rodhullandemu 23:39, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Why is this image at CR? I see only one comment.--Peulle 18:49, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Rod. Puelle - there was no support Seven Pandas 21:57, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support QI for me.--Ermell 06:17, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Yes, it looks OK. The lines could be cloned out but it's not absolutely needed IMO. --Peulle 10:27, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support per Peulle. --Aristeas 08:17, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support My comment was only a suggestion, but I can live with it as it is. Rodhullandemu 00:33, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Yes, that's why I wondered why it came to CR; there was no support and no opposition either... --Peulle 12:12, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 09:07, 6 May 2019 (UTC)