Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 09 2022
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination European goldfinch in a blossoming tree --Alexis Lours 00:11, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:55, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination European robin on a rock --Alexis Lours 00:11, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:55, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Florian Jamnig, player of LASK Linz. --Steindy 00:07, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Alexis Lours 00:12, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Florian Jamnig, player of LASK Linz. --Steindy 00:07, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Alexis Lours 00:12, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ferruginous duck (Aythya nyroca), male --Alexis Lours 21:08, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:33, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grey heron (Ardea cinerea) flying --Alexis Lours 21:08, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 22:50, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ferruginous duck (Aythya nyroca), male --Alexis Lours 21:08, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 22:50, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ferruginous duck (Aythya nyroca), male --Alexis Lours 21:08, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 22:50, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ferruginous duck (Aythya nyroca), male --Alexis Lours 21:08, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:33, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Middelburg-NL, view to churchtower Lange Jan from the station --Michielverbeek 21:00, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:30, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Middelburg-NL, townhall --Michielverbeek 21:00, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 22:53, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Middelburg-NL, churchtower Oostkerk from the bridge (Spijkerbrug) --Michielverbeek 21:00, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:30, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Middelburg-NL, Queen Emma Monument --Michielverbeek 21:00, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:30, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cesena War Cemetery, Main entrance --Terragio67 17:51, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:42, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Novocherkassk. Alexander Nevsky Church --Alexxx1979 17:40, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:46, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Alta Murgia National Park, Italy. By User:Fishmax77 --IamMM 17:26, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:46, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Crete dell'Orcia nature Reserve, Italy. By User:Ciorophotoproject --IamMM 17:26, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:40, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bolshoy Tkhach Nature Park, Russia. By User:Altushkin --IamMM 17:26, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:58, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hell Gate Bridge seen from Queens --Rublov 17:18, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Nice light and good compo but lacks detail, not a QI to me, sorry --Poco a poco 18:40, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eurasian magpie (Pica pica), Almuradiel, Ciudad Real, Spain. --Poco a poco 16:33, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality Lmbuga 16:40, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eurasian magpie (Pica pica), Almuradiel, Ciudad Real, Spain. --Poco a poco 16:33, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality Lmbuga 16:37, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eurasian magpie (Pica pica), Almuradiel, Ciudad Real, Spain. --Poco a poco 16:33, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality Lmbuga 16:41, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eurasian magpie (Pica pica), Almuradiel, Ciudad Real, Spain. --Poco a poco 16:33, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 16:42, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Harris Museum, Art Gallery & Library located in Preson, Lancashire, England --Mdbeckwith 16:02, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 16:42, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination eggs of white-winged lark - Oeufs de Alouette leucoptère --Ercé 15:39, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 16:42, 6 March 2022 (UTC) - Promotion {{{2}}}
- Nomination eggs of white-winged lark - Oeufs de Alouette leucoptère --Ercé 15:39, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The SCHÜTZ Art Museum in Engelhartszell, Upper Austria. --Mosbatho 14:41, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Withdrawn The windows of the upper side have three dust spots. The image needs perspective correction and, IMO, is tilted. The tree gets in the way (disturbing?), but it doesn't seem important to me. Also, the sky seems a little lilac --Lmbuga 15:16, 6 March 2022 (UTC) These ain't dust spots. In this symetric way, you won't find dust spots in images. The tree? This one is there on this location. --~~~~
-
- Nomination Training of the Doubles at the 2021/22 FIL Luge World Cup on Natural Track in Mariazell, Austria: Myroslav Lenko/Ivan Lenk (UKR) --Sandro Halank 14:09, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality Lmbuga 15:13, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Training at the 2021/22 FIL Luge World Cup on Natural Track in Mariazell, Austria: Fabian Achenrainer (AUT) --Sandro Halank 14:09, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:15, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Training at the 2021/22 FIL Luge World Cup on Natural Track in Mariazell, Austria: Greta Pinggera (ITA) --Sandro Halank 14:09, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:42, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Training at the 2021/22 FIL Luge World Cup on Natural Track in Mariazell, Austria: Alex Gruber (ITA) --Sandro Halank 14:09, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:15, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Training at the 2021/22 FIL Luge World Cup on Natural Track in Mariazell, Austria: Florian Markt (AUT) --Sandro Halank 14:09, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality Lmbuga 15:13, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Corbels of the Church of Santa Maria de Leboreiro (Melide, Spain) by User:Lameiro --Lmbuga 12:54, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:42, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Detail of ruined building in Ferrol, Galicia (Spain). F32 --Lmbuga 11:54, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:45, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination xc. Ferrol, Galicia (Spain). F-16 --Lmbuga 11:54, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 12:03, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Production hall and factory shop of Haribo in Solingen --Tuxyso 10:08, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 12:04, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lissabon - Well on Praça de Armas in Castelo de São Jorge --Imehling 09:24, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:45, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lissabon / Chiada - Guard in front of Museu da Guarda Nacional Republicana at Convento do Carmo --Imehling 09:24, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:45, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lisbon - Statue of cat at Doca dos Olivais --Imehling 09:24, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 10:33, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Baptismal font in the Protestant parish church of St. Oswald and Martin in Möhrendorf --Ermell 09:19, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:40, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saints Peter and Paul church in Promilhanes, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 07:55, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Imehling 09:51, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vaulting in the Saint Martin church in Golinhac, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 07:55, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Imehling 09:51, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bell tower of the Saint Eligius Church in Saint-Chély-d'Aubrac, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 07:55, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality Lmbuga 12:16, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Peace rose on the Domplatz in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 06:14, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:55, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of the Johannis choir of St Paul's Cathedral in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 06:14, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:37, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination House “Prinzipalmarkt 48” in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 06:14, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:37, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Prinzipalmarkt in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 06:14, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:37, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue on a gatepost at Erbdrostenhof (Salzstraße) in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 06:14, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:55, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kampen, Sculpture "1965" Artwork by Paul Van Gysegem in Park De la Soblonièrekade.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:38, 6 March 2022 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:40, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Kampen, Sculpture "1965" Artwork by Paul Van Gysegem in Park De la Soblonièrekade.
-
- Nomination Juglans regia trees in Mairist, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Farm building in Mairist and snow peaked Saualpe (mountain), Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hemma chapel on Hochosterwitzer Straße in Reipersdorf, Sankt Georgen am Längsee, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 06:16, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castle Hochosterwitz and Saualpe in the background, Sankt Georgen am Längsee, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ulrichsberg (seen from Beiersdorf, Sankt Veit an der Glen), Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 06:16, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Varenna, Lombardy, Italy. --Tsui 00:53, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:36, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Markus Wostry, player of LASK Linz. --Steindy 00:00, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 14:10, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Markus Wostry, player of LASK Linz. --Steindy 00:00, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 14:10, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Philipp Wiesinger, player of LASK Linz. --Steindy 00:00, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 14:10, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eurasian magpie (Pica pica), Almuradiel, Ciudad Real, Spain. --Poco a poco 19:01, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality Lmbuga 11:33, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Single house on the top of the Raggiolo Village, Tuscany, Italy --Terragio67 00:52, 5 March 2022 (UTC) Comment Good but needs perspective correction. --Imehling 07:00, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Done @Imehling: Many thanks for your eval. Perspective corrected. --Terragio67 13:44, 5 March 2022 (UTC) It's ok now. --Imehling 08:54, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Experiment with lens ball and light stick (white light against black background) --XRay 05:16, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:31, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Support Impressive piece. --Aismallard 03:14, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aceredo (submerged town), Lobios, Galiza (Spain). By User:Pementa --Lmbuga 10:14, 3 March 2022 (UTC)--Lmbuga 10:15, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- Withdrawn I withdraw my nomination Good smart phone quality but not enough for QI IMO--Lmbuga 11:31, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Marco Kadlec, player of FC Admira Wacker Mödling. --Steindy 00:02, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Could you erase (or delete) the stain (or head shadow) on the top left? Otherwise the picture is good (Sorry, poor English), but not QI IMO.--Lmbuga 15:06, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Info @Lmbuga: New version uploaded. --Steindy 19:10, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality--Lmbuga 11:25, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue in Ferrol, Galicia (Spain). Holy Week in Ferrol. F-12 --Lmbuga 11:24, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- Withdrawn I withdraw my nomination--Lmbuga 12:19, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Part of the analogue computer that was used to control the positioning of the Lovell Telescope. Jodrell Bank Observatory, University of Manchester, United Kingdom --Mike Peel 18:31, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment It needs a perspective correction--Lmbuga 14:13, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
@Lmbuga: Is it better now? Thanks. Mike Peel 20:46, 5 March 2022 (UTC)I think it's not enough, sorry. Let's see what. others saySupport Problem with cache. Much better--Lmbuga 11:22, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Mujertomandosol-MDP.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Woman sunbathing in Mar del Plata, Argentina --Ezarate 00:07, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
Support Good quality Lmbuga 00:12, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Oppose I disagree. I see a lot of CAs. --Steindy 00:25, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Comment Not a lot. QI--Lmbuga 00:35, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
- Fixed Ezarate 11:23, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
- Question Still worth eliminating, no? -- Ikan Kekek 08:29, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose The photo is crooked, has CA, has completely burnt highlights, but washed out shadow areas without details. Despite the high lighting contrast, it looks low-contrast and muddy. It also doesn't look really sharp, and positioning the subject centrally in the middle of the picture is not comprehensible from a compositional point of view. I don't know what the situation is with regard to the protection of personal rights in the country where the photo was taken, but in any case, a consensus to be photographed cannot be derived from the situation in which the photo was taken. Somehow this looks to me like a technically and creatively unsuccessful holiday snapshot. --Smial 17:30, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
File:2022-01-14_Women's_Sprint_at_2021-22_Oberhof_Luge_World_Cup_by_Sandro_Halank–091.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Women's Sprint test event at the 2021/22 Oberhof Luge World Cup: Julia Taubitz (Germany) --Sandro Halank 21:58, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:02, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Oppose face lacking sharpness, and noisy. --Tomer T 08:58, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Support Good IMO Lmbuga 15:00, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Support OK for me. --Palauenc05 23:06, 4 March 2022 (UTC) - Support True, her face and hair are noisy at full size on my 23.5-inch monitor, but not too much on my 13-inch, and I think the quality is good enough. -- Ikan Kekek 08:31, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support per Ikan. --Smial 17:36, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:55, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --C messier 22:09, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
File:2022-01-14_Women's_Sprint_at_2021-22_Oberhof_Luge_World_Cup_by_Sandro_Halank–084.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Women's Sprint test event at the 2021/22 Oberhof Luge World Cup: Madeleine Egle (Austria), Julia Taubitz (Germany), Natalie Geisenberger (Germany) --Sandro Halank 21:58, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Oppose unsharp. --Tomer T 08:58, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Support Good IMO--Lmbuga 15:01, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Support OK for me. --Palauenc05 23:06, 4 March 2022 (UTC) - Support Good enough. -- Ikan Kekek 08:36, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. @Sandro Halank: It would be nice if the photos showing several people were annotated (see example), or at least had an exact description. --Steindy 18:50, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
File:LG_market_square_Ukraine_solidarity_small_planet_265°_shrinked.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Stitched panorama presented as little planet with a focus on the illuminated townhall and candles around a statue --Virtual-Pano 22:25, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Interresting perspective, good quality. --Steindy 10:50, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Not sure about this. Pebbles are sharp, but many of the buildings aren't, and seems overprocessed. I understand this is a high res photo, but better discuss this. --Tomer T 09:07, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Support I have to agree that the pebbles are disproportionately sharper than the buildings, but as a whole I think it is sufficient for quality image status. --aismallard 13:48, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality Lmbuga 19:50, 4 March 2022 (UTC) - Oppose OK, it's a very big file, but the tower of the town hall at the top of it looks unsharp and weird even at 40% of full size. I have to reduce it to 30% for it to look fairly OK, and there's still a lot of noise in the sky at that size. Even at merely full-page size, I see a bunch of lens flares. It could be that I'm concentrating too much on the trees and losing the forest - the artistry - somewhat. If so, I'm sure you all will overrule me. -- Ikan Kekek 08:45, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
- Weak Support I am always a little unclear what to do with photos in this presentation. But you can print it in acceptable sharpness about one metre wide and one metre high. For me, that's good enough. --Smial 17:14, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Done thanks for bringing the noise and lack of focus to my attention. The initial upload was simply a work in progress file and should not have been uploaded. The current version is correct but just quarter size --Virtual-Pano 22:21, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
File:2021-12-07_Fußball,_Männer,_UEFA_Champions_League,_RB_Leipzig_-_Manchester_City_FC_1DX_2828_by_Stepro.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Men's Soccer, UEFA Champions League, RB Leipzig - Manchester City FC: Mohamed Simakan (RB Leipzig, 2), header. By --Stepro 23:14, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose PoV, crop at top --Charlesjsharp 11:47, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
I would accept the decline, but I don't understand the reason. --Stepro 12:52, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
sorry, crop at bottom with floating head, not top --Charlesjsharp 21:04, 4 March 2022 (UTC) - Support If you look at it just as a series of forms, it's unconventional but interesting; however, I expect Charles' viewpoint to carry the day. -- Ikan Kekek 08:47, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks. I didn't understand the supposed problem at the top of the picture, which Charles has then corrected. I can at least understand the problem with the head at the bottom, even if I see it differently. It could easily be removed, but I intentionally left it in the picture to illustrate the jump height. I always think that pictures are allowed to have a message instead of just being "beautiful". ;-) --Stepro 17:52, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Agreed. But outside-the-box photos often have a hard time here. -- Ikan Kekek 19:52, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks. I didn't understand the supposed problem at the top of the picture, which Charles has then corrected. I can at least understand the problem with the head at the bottom, even if I see it differently. It could easily be removed, but I intentionally left it in the picture to illustrate the jump height. I always think that pictures are allowed to have a message instead of just being "beautiful". ;-) --Stepro 17:52, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, the head at the bottom is disturbing. --Sandro Halank 14:14, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Head is disturbing Imo--Lmbuga 17:18, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --C messier 22:08, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
File:Beijing_Dong'anmen_Dajie-20071019-RM-211928.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Donghuamen Night Market --Ermell 09:09, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Imehling 16:09, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Blurred image IMO--Lmbuga 16:43, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose I realize that you can't expect continuous sharpness from front to back in the given lighting situation, but I can't find a really sharp area in the shot at all. In addition, the image description is really poor. On the other hand, I find the image composition quite appealing. Too bad it's not technically convincing. --Smial 10:54, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per others: good photo, but not a QI. -- Ikan Kekek 22:22, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per others, too blurry --aismallard 12:14, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose not sharp enough --Sandro Halank 14:15, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined --C messier 22:07, 8 March 2022 (UTC)