Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 12 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Menzel_jemil_sunset.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination A beautiful sunset in bizerteI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2024. By User:Wejden benabderahmen --Marwenwafi 13:14, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Not very sharp. --Sebring12Hrs 13:31, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment Sorry, but why are you looking for sharpness here? no need for the background to be sharp here and the foreground (the water) is a reflection of the background and could be soft as well , and for the focal point which is the mountain ,is silhouetted and it's clear enough with no details in it ,because it's simply a pure dark element. --Marwenwafi 13:45, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Sebring12Hrs. @Marwenwafi: Please read the guidelines for QIC. There you can easily find out why this image might not meet the criteria. Sharpness and focus are two of them. --Augustgeyler 18:38, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment @Augustgeyler according to your logic, any long exposure effect done on Clouds and water surfaces should be sharp and clear ,which is never the case --Marwenwafi 04:55, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment 1/60 s is not a long exposure. --Augustgeyler 07:45, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Everything is blurry in this picture. --Plozessor 08:35, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 09:49, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Центральный_выставочный_зал.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Moscow Manege --Юрий Д.К. 17:26, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 08:06, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose Well composed image. But the main building is in shadow while many highlights in the foreground are blown out. Additionally the sky looks slightly  Overexposed --Augustgeyler 18:55, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment I disagree. Typical Moscow scene at bright sunny day. Not overexposed. Building in shadow die to sun altitude. Sorry, I don't understand you --Юрий Д.К. 19:46, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
  • @Юрий Д.К.: Bright sunlight at noon or (during summer) in the afternoon can be challenging. Usually it gives very harsh light and makes it harder to get balanced shots with good shadows and remaining highlights. In this case it did not work. --August Geyler (talk) 07:40, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose "Building in shadow due to sun altitude" yes, then you should take the picture at another time of the day with better light conditions. What disturbs me here is the dark building combined with the burned out elements in foreground. --Plozessor 09:07, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
  • I withdraw my nomination. Юрий Д.К. 09:49, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment I changed to discuss. You deleted several images. One nomination process you deleted directly here at CR. Please let this process come to a decision without deleting or withdrawing everything. So many reviewers invested time end effort to review your nominations, finding Pros and Cons. --Augustgeyler 23:00, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 01:05, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Высокогорное_пастбище_на_плато_Ассы-Тургень.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Grazing horses at the lower part of Assy plateau. Almatinsky sanctuary, Yenbekshikazakh District, Almaty Region, Kazakhstan. By User:Exxocette --Красный 04:17, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Marwenwafi 04:30, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I think it is oversaturated, let's discuss --Jakubhal 06:39, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Oversaturated. But the image has potential, can be fixed --ArildV 08:23, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 09:49, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Molenaar,_Molenplein_Made_1.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Sculpture "Miller" in Made --ReneeWrites 10:40, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --El Golli Mohamed 11:26, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The image is rotated ccw and distorted. Level of detail is borderline here. --Augustgeyler 07:48, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose No issue with level of detail, but distortion is weird and should be fixed. --Plozessor 09:08, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 09:50, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Средние_Торговые_Ряды,_фасад,_Москва.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Middle Trade Rows facade, Moscow --Юрий Д.К. 20:21, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:13, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but right side of the image is blurry and there's CA on people there --Екатерина Борисова 02:57, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Weak support CA is there but very minor. Sharpness seems similar everywhere (not perfect but acceptable in that resolution). --Plozessor 14:13, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The image is way to unsharp. Additionally level of detail is borderline here. --Augustgeyler 09:40, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Sorry, but I again don't understand where you find "unsharp" Юрий Д.К. 19:51, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
  • @Юрий Д.К.: I am sorry as well. For me it is hard to imagine that you can not "find unsharp" anywhere. I cheked it again. Comparing this photo with similar architectural images here at this resolution easily reveals its low sharpness. The lowest sharpness inside the DoF can be seen at the outer left part of the building. --August Geyler (talk) 22:07, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support --Georgfotoart 20:55, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Weak support Per Plozessor. --Benjism89 21:25, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 01:08, 12 July 2024 (UTC)