Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 05 2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Grey_Heron_in_winterly_setting_01_cropped.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination A adult grey heron in winter. --Etaped 22:42, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:09, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. twigs in foreground --Charlesjsharp 15:20, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
  • weak  Support Overall the photo is a little soft, probably due to the very diffuse lighting. but the blurred branches in the foreground are actually an attractive feature of the composition. --Smial 09:20, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment I acknowledge that the twigs in my other two submission are rather distracting and why Charles rightfully objects. I try to get a better position next time. It was a really overcast morning. Softness could be also due to handheld manual focus and only at 1/200s shutter speed. My Sigma telezoom fails me on Autofocus in LiveView. But I needed to get the camera really low (ca. 15cm over ground) for the perspective and use LV. --Etaped (talk) 14:45, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Perhaps not excellent but QI -- Spurzem 17:57, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg 23:53, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Taj_Lake_Palace_Udaipur_from_City_Palace.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Taj Lake Palace,India --Navneetsharmaiit 20:38, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality, but another time of the day would have been better because main object is shadowed --Michielverbeek 08:16, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose for now - quality is OK, and I will support, but not until you fix the categories. "Hotels" is too general a category and Udaipur is also COM:OVERCAT because the lake is in Udaipur. -- Ikan Kekek 08:37, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment Done.Thanks for the guidance. --Navneetsharmaiit 19:23, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment Don't you need a category for the lake as well, at a minimum, and maybe the boat? -- Ikan Kekek 06:08, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment Pardon me, I am novice at categorization.Have added more categories.Kindly check. --Navneetsharmaiit 10:55, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment That's quite alright. But note that Category:Boating in India is [edited: was when I wrote this] a red link. That means there is no such category on Commons. So please find a relevant category that has a blue link (meaning it exists on Commons). -- Ikan Kekek 12:46, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment Ikan Kekek I have removed the red link. As per Smial I am keeping only the 2 categories. If further categories are required let me know. --Navneetsharmaiit 13:24, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support "Lake Palace" as category is sufficient. Further information can be found in the file description, which can be evaluated by bots and humans. A classification under any subcategory for ships or boats I would consider extremely misleading. The image now contains one category for the lake and one for the structure, which is quite sufficient. Very athmospheric lighting, good sharpness, and colours appear realistic. --Smial 13:14, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment I've respectfully crossed out my opposing vote, but why would a category for the boat be misleading? The boat is quite visible in the photo. -- Ikan Kekek 00:18, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
 Comment Sorry, what I meant was that it is not purposeful to require such detailed categorisation for a QI. The boat in the picture is an incidental accessory, just as people or traffic signs appear by chance in a photo of a market place with a church. One would not demand that such a picture be categorised under "men", "women", "traffic signs" and "fish stall". If the boat in question could be identified, if one knew the name, then that might make sense. But it is not, and that is why I would find such a categorisation misleading. --Smial 09:12, 2 February 2021 (UTC) Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
  • Thanks for the explanation. I still think a category for the boat could be a good thing, but I understand why it probably wouldn't be a very specific category. I'll  Support the photo. -- Ikan Kekek 10:27, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Smial (not signed --Smial 09:12, 2 February 2021 (UTC))
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg 23:52, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Здание Государственного исторического музея на Красной площади в Москве, сентябрь 2020.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Russia, The State Historical Museum building on Red Square, Moscow --Никонико962 15:26, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Commonists 16:33, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but it is noticeably titled CCW. Fixable. --C messier 20:01, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I do not detect too much of a tilt, but sharpness is lacking in this one.--Tobias ToMar Maier 00:16, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Milseburg 23:51, 4 February 2021 (UTC))